İlhan SUBAŞI, YUSUF ARSLAN, Safure GÜLER, Halil HATİPOĞLU, Servet ABRAK, Arzu KÖSE

Oil and Protein Stability in Some Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) Genotypes

Camelina sativa L. Crantz., which draws attention with its non-food use (biodiesel, animal feed etc.) against the increasing demand for oilseeds worldwide, is a good alternative plant. It is important to identify suitable and stable genotypes for regions along with high protein and oil content. The purpose of this study, camelina genotypes of Turkey in 3 different locations (Ankara, Ankara, Eskisehir) to investigate the quality characteristics in terms of genotype environment interactions in unirrigated and unfertilized conditions. 36 different genotypes, purified lines by negative selection, were analysed with 3 standard genotypes with augmented trial design. Environmental (E), genotype (G) and G × E interactions, which are sources of variation for protein and oil content, have been shown to be important. Oil and protein content were found ranged from 34.35%-37.88% and 25.76%-27.64% respectively. We have obtained important findings in our study to see the performance of Camelina sativa, and the possibility of alternative oil plants for these regions. İn terms of correlation of protein ratio and oil ratio, genotypes with high value that were least affected by each other were determined. The results showed that genotype selection by regions is important in terms of protein and oil ratio.

PDF

___

Ayerza R. 2009. The Seed’s protein and oil content, fatty acid composition, and growing cycle length of a single genotype of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) as affected by environmental factors. J. Oleo Sci. 58: 347–554. https://doi.org/10.5650/ jos.58.347

Berhow MA, Polat U, Glinski JA, Glensk M, Vaughn SF, Isbell T, Ayala-Diaz I, Marek L, Gardner C. 2013. Optimized analysis and quantification of glucosinolates from Camelina sativa seeds by reverse-phase liquid chromatography. Ind. Crops Prod. 43: 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop. 2012.07.018

Bertrand M, Brühl L. 2001. Comparison of Different Methods for the Determination of the Oil Content in Oilseeds. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 78: 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-001- 0226-y

Canvin DT. 1965. The Effect of Temperature on the Oil Content and Fatty Acid Composition of the Oils From Several Oil Seed Crops. Can. J. Bot. 43: 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1139/b65-008

Crowley JG, Fröhlich A. 1998. Factors Affecting the Composition and Use of Camelina 1–23.

Downey RK. 1971. Agricultural and genetic potentials of cruciferous oilseed crops. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 48: 718–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02638528

Fröhlich A, Rice B. 2005. Evaluation of Camelina sativa oil as a feedstock for biodiesel production. Ind. Crops Prod. 21: 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.12.004

Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim, T, Vural M, Babaç MT. 2012. Türkiye bitkileri listesi (damarlı bitkiler), Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını. İstanbul.

Gurmu F, Mohammed H, Alemaw G. 2010. Genotype X environment interactions and stability of soybean for grain yield and nutrition quality. African Crop Sci. J. 17. https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v17i2.54202

Ilker E, Kocaturk M, Kadiroglu A, Altinbas M, Yildirim A, Ozturk G, Yildiz H. 2018. Stability Analyses For Double Cropping In Soybean [(Glycine max L.) Merrill]. Turkish J. F. Crop. 80–84. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.467434

Karvonen HM, Aro A, Tapola NS, Salminen I, Uusitupa MIJ, Sarkkinen ES. 2002. Effect of α-linolenic acid-rich Camelina sativa oil on serum fatty acid composition and serum lipids in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Metabolism. 51: 1253–1260. https://doi.org/10.1053/meta.2002.35183

Kaya Y, Akçura M, Taner S. 2006. GGE-Biplot Analysis of MultiEnvironment Yield Trials in Bread Wheat 30: 325–337.

Korsrud GO, Keith MO, Bell JM. 1978. a Comparison of the Nutritional Value of Crambe and Camelina Seed Meals With Egg and Casein. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 58: 493–499. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas78-063

Kurt O, Seyis F. 2008. Alternatif yağ bitkisi: Ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]. J. Fac. Agric. 23: 116–120.

Mcvay KA, Lamb PF. 2008. Camelina Production in Montana (Report) [WWW Document]. Bull. MT200701AG. URL http://www.msuextension.org

Montesinos-lópez OA, Baenziger PS, Eskridge KM, Little RS. 2018. Analysis of genotype-by-environment interaction in winter wheat growth in organic production system 30: 212– 223. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i3.1643

Pilgeram AL, Sands DC, Boss D, Dale N, Wichman D, Lamb P, Lu C, Kirkpatrick M, Thompson B, Johnson DL. 2007. Camelina sativa, A Montana Omega-3 and Fuel Crop. Proc. sixth Natl. Symp. Creat. Mark. Econ. Dev. New Crop. New Uses. 129–131.

Popovic V, Vidic M, Miladinovic J, Ikanovic J, Drazic G, Djukic V, Mihailovic B, Filipovic V, Dozet G, Jovanovic L, Stevanovic P. 2016. Variability of yield and chemical composition in soybean genotypes grown under different agroecological conditions of Serbia. Rom. Agric. Res. 2016.

Putnam DH, Budin JT, Field LA, Breene WM. 1993. Camelina: A promising low-input oilseed. New Crop. John Wiley Sons, New York, NY 314–322.

Robinson RG. 1987. Camelina: a useful research crop and a potential oilseed crop. Minnesota Ag. Expt. Stn. Bull. 579 2– 12.

Rokka T, Alén K, Valaja J, Ryhänen EL. 2002. The effect of a Camelina sativa enriched diet on the composition and sensory quality of hen eggs. Food Res. Int. 35: 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(01)00193-4

Ryhänen EL, Perttilä S, Tupasela T, Valaja J, Eriksson C, Larkka K. 2007. Effect of Camelina sativa expeller cake on performance and meat quality of broilers. J. Sci. Food Agric. 87: 1489–1494. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2864

Schuster A, Friedt W. 1998. Glucosinolate content and composition as parameters of quality of Camelina seed. Ind. Crops Prod. 7: 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926- 6690(97)00061-7

Silveira DA, Pricinotto LF, Nardino M, Bahry CA, Prete CEC, Cruz L. 2016. Determination of the adaptability and stability of soybean cultivars in different locations and at different sowing times in Paraná state using the AMMI and Eberhart and Russel methods. Semin. Agrar. 37: 3973–3982. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p3973

Tyagi AK. 2002. Influence of water soaking of mustard cake on glucosinolate hydrolysis. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 99: 215– 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00142-6

Vollmann J, Moritz T, Kargl C, Baumgartner S, Wagentristl H. 2007. Agronomic evaluation of camelina genotypes selected for seed quality characteristics. Ind. Crops Prod. 26: 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.03.017

Yan W, Hunt LA. 2001. Interpretation of Genotype 1109–1113.

Yan W, Rajcan I. 2002. Biplot Analysis of Test Sites and Trait Relations of Soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42: 11. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0011