Performance Evaluation of Exotic and Local Landraces of Tomatoes for the Mid-Hill Conditions of Nepal

The productivity of tomato in Nepal is very low due to lack of high yielding, disease and pests resistant varieties. An experiment was carried out to evaluate horticultural traits of 50 genotypes obtained from World Vegetable Centre (WorldVeg), Taiwan and SAARC region, and local collections during March to August 2020 in open field conditions at National Horticulture Research Centre, Khumaltar, Lalitpur. The objectives were to identify promising open-pollinated tomato cultivars for high yield, appropriate fruit size, and disease resistant. The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed significant differences in yield and yield attributing characters including virus infection. The highest yield (39.6 mt ha-1 ) was produced by HRA43 and it was followed by HRA33 (26.4 mt ha-1 ). Among the WorldVeg OP lines, AVTO1429 produced the highest yield (16.21 mt ha-1 ) and it was followed by AVTO1717 (12.95 mt ha-1 ), AVTO0922 (11.83 mt ha-1 ) and AVTO1219 (11.7 mt ha-1 ) respectively. Most of the WorldVeg lines performed better than the check variety ‘Pusa Ruby’. Genotype HRA43, Red Local and Sindhupalchock Local were not affected by virus while Yellow Local showed 3.3% infection. Among the WorldVeg lines, AVTO1712 (20%), AVTO1717 (20%) and AVTO1718 (13%) and AVTO1219 (15%) showed less than 20% virus infection in the open field conditions. Cluster analysis using the unweighted paired group method with arithmetic mean showed that cluster-1 was the largest cluster comprised of 40 genotypes followed by cluster-2 and cluster-4. Genotypes from cluster-4 showed the higher fruit yield (25.1 mt ha-1 ) and resistant to the virus and the highest number of fruits per plot (1978 in 4.5 m2 area). The yield was low in cluster1 which could be due to the heavy rainfall during the vegetative and reproductive stages. Genotypes Red Local and Sindhupalchock Local could be used in future tomato breeding program due to their resistant to TYLCV, higher potential yield and highest plant vigour in open field conditions at the mid-hill of Nepal. Considering the overall performance, genotype HRA43, HRA33 and AVTO1429 were promising lines with performance for yield and other horticultural traits.

___

Balcha K, Belew D, Nego J. 2015. Evaluation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) varieties for seed yield and yield components under Jimma Condition, South Western Ethiopia. Journal of Agronomy, 14(4): 292-297. doi: 10.3923/ja.2015.292.297

Bhattarai SP, Subedi PP. 1996. Assessment of tomato varieties for heat and bacterial wilt tolerant in low hills during 1992- 93. LARC working paper No. 96/36. Lumle Agriculture Research Center, Kaski, Nepal.

Bhurtyal PR, Shakya SM, Dhakal DD, Upreti G. 2007. Evaluation of heat-tolerant tomato (Solanum lycopersicon) genotypes during summer in Chitwan, Nepal. IAAS Res. Advances, 2: 47-51.

Bojarian M, Asadi-Gharneh HA, Golabadi, M. 2019. Factor analysis, stepwise regression and path coefficient analyses of yield, yield-associated traits, and fruit quality in tomato. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 25: 542-553. doi:10.1080/19315260.2018.1551260

Budhathoki K, Pradan NG, Regmi HN, Bhurtayal PR. 2004. Evaluation of tomato cultivar for off-season production under the polyhouse and open field condition. Proceeding of the Fourth National Workshop on Horticulture, March 2-4, 2004. Nepal Agricultural Research Council, National Agriculture Research Institute and Horticulture Research Division, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, pp: 413-418.

Chapagain TR, Shrestha AK, Sharma MD, Tripathi KM, Srivastva A. 2020a. Evaluation and characterization of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes using path coefficient, GGE biplot and cluster analyses under natural heat stress. International Journal of Horticulture, 10(6): 1-10. doi: 10.5376/ijh.2020.10.0006)

Chapagain T, Shrestha AK, Sharma MD, Mishra Tripathi K, Srivastva A. 2020b. Growth, yield and biochemical characteristics of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes under seasonal heat stress. Asian J. Agric. Hortic. Res., 6(2): 22-29. doi: 10.9734/AJAHR/2020/v6i230069.

Chapagain TR, Tiwari DN, Adhikari RC, Shrestha MB. 2014. Physicochemical properties and yield of tomato varieties under plastic house condition. Nepal J. Sci. Tech., 15(2): 17- 22. doi.org/10.3126/njst.v15i2.12106.

Devkota S, Shrestha SL, Dhakal DD, Shakya SM, Pandey J. 2018. Evaluation of tomato hybrids for yield attributes under Khumaltar condition. J. Inst. Agric. Ani. Sci., 35: 191-196.

FAO, 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/No. of data/QC. [Retrieved on December 25, 2020].

Gotame TP, Gautam IP, Shrestha SL, Pradhan NG. 2019. A field guide for vegetable germplasm testing and variety registration/release. Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC), National Agriculture Research Institute (NARI), Horticulture Research Division (HRD) Khumaltar, Lalitpur. NARC publication serial No. 00669-683 (2019/20).

Gotame TP, Shrestha SL, Poudel S, Shrestha J. 2021. Growth and yield performance of different open-pollinated tomato genotypes in the Terai region of Nepal. J. Agric. Nat. Res., 4(1): 256-264. doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v4i1.33280.

Gurung S, Adhikari P, Giri K, Gotame TP, Shrestha SL. 2020. Growth and yield performance of hybrid tomato (Solanum lycopercicum L.) lines at Parwanipur, Bara, Nepal. J. Agric. Natu. Res., 3(1): 180-189. doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/ janr.v3i1.27166.

Hanson P, Lin L, Luther GC, Tsai W, Srinivasan R, Chen C, Lin C, Sheu Z, Lu S. 2013. Procedures for tomato variety field trials. AVRDC Publication No. 11-751. http://203.64. 245.61/fulltext_pdf/FLYER/2011-2015/f0194.pdf and http:// avrdc.org/?page_id=227 [Retrieved on August 20, 2019].

IPGRI, 1996. Descriptors for tomato (Lycopersicon spp.). International Plant Genetic Resource Institute (IPGRI), Rome (Italy). ISBN 10: 92-9043-294-2. https://www. bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/_migrated/uploads/tx_ news/Descriptors_for_tomato__Lycopersicon_spp.__286.pd f. [Retrieved on January 2020].

MoALD, 2019. Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development, AgriBusiness Promotion and Statistics Division, Singh Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Panthee D, Gotame TP. 2020. Improving heat stress tolerance in tomato. CAB Reviews, 15(060): 1-14. doi: 10.1079/PAVSN NR202015060.

Paudel KB, Gautam IP, Regmi HN, Chaudhary JN, Upadhaya KP, Dauwadi P, Pokharel D, Khatri B. 2004. Evaluation of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L.) genotypes in the farmer’s field for the rainy season in the western hills of Nepal. Proceeding of the Fourth National Workshop on Horticulture, March 2-4, 2004. Nepal Agricultural Research Council, National Agriculture Research Institute and Horticulture Research Division, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Pp: 422-426.

Rawal R, Gautam DM, Gautam IP, Khadka RB, Tripathi KM, Hanson P, Acedo AL, Easdown W, Hughes JA, Keatinge JDH. 2017. Evaluation of AVRDC advanced lines of long shelf life tomato in the Terai region of Nepal. Acta Hortic., 1179: 305-310. doi: org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1179. 47.

Regmi HN, Budathoki K, Pradhan NG. 2004. Evaluation of tomato inbred lines for the production of F1 hybrids. Proceeding of the Fourth National Workshop on Horticulture, March 2-4, 2004. Nepal Agricultural Research Council, National Agriculture Research Institute and Horticulture Research Division, Khumaltar, Lalitpur. pp: 401-404.

Reddy BR, Reddy MP, Reddy DS, Begum H. 2013. Correlation and path analysis studies for yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 4(4): 56-59. doi.org/10.9790/2380- 0445659.

Sato S, Peet MM, Thomas JF. 2000. Physiological factors limit fruit set of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under chronic, mild heat stress. Plant, Cell and Environ., 23(7): 719- 726.

Shrestha SL, Sah RL. 2014. Evaluation of tomato cultivars for central Terai of Nepal. Nepal J. Sci. and Tech., 15(2): 11-16.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effects of Cold and Hot Infusions on Antioxidant Activities of Rosehip Tea Bag

Zeynep AKAR, Erza ORHAN, Seçil DURMUŞ

Growth Hormone Gene Polymorphism and its Relation to Quail Growth and Carcass

Fatma İLHAN

Prevalence of Tea Consumption among University Students of South-Eastern Region of Bangladesh and Associated Factors

Jakia Sultana JOTHI, Nahidur RAHMAN, Anindya CHAKRABORTY, Shireen AKTHER

A Comparative Study on the Effects of Use Hemp Seed Oil Substitute to Soybean Oil in Growing Quail Diets

Gülşah KANBUR, Rabia GÖÇMEN

Farklı Sulama Programlama Yaklaşımlarının Pamukta Verim ve Su Kullanım Randımanları Üzerine Etkileri

Safiye Pınar TUNALI, Necdet DAĞDELEN, Talih GÜRBÜZ, Selin AKÇAY

Proximate Composition, Antioxidant Capacity and Functional Properties of Breadnut Seed Flour (Artocarpus camansi)

Cherry Lyn M ALCON, Aimee Sheree A BARRION, Marie Faye NGUYEN ORCA

Development and Validation of a Simple RP-HPLC-PDA Method for Determination of 18 Polyphenols in Grape Juice and Red Wine

Ni̇lüfer VURAL, Özlem YALÇINÇIRAY

Major Sorghum Production Constraints and Coping Mechanisms: The Case of Anthracnose (Colletotrichum sublineolum)

Kebede DESSALEGN, Peter OGBONNA, Christian AGBO, Dagnachew LULE

Arı Sütü Üretim Kolonilerinin Anasız ve Ana Arılı Olması Arı Sütündeki 10- HDA ve Çözünür Protein Miktarını Etkiler mi?

Aytül UÇAK KOÇ, Mete KARACAOĞLU, Zehra Burcu BAKIR, Burcu KESER

Influence of Different Irrigation Strategies on Yield and Water Use of Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Semi-Arid Zone

Nurcan YAVUZ