Determinants of Tomato Farmers Participation in Agricultural Services and Training Centre (ASTC) Activities

Determinants of Tomato Farmers Participation in Agricultural Services and Training Centre (ASTC) Activities

Agricultural production have remained rudimentary despite many years’ of technology development and transfer; to reverse this declining trend, several agricultural policies and programmes aimed at ensuring sustainable production, improved income and farm expansion with added value output have become very germane. This study therefore analyzed tomato farmers’ participation in ASTC activities in Jos-south local Government Area of Plateau state, Nigeria. This study adopted multi stage sampling techniques. Primary was data collected from 80 respondents, during the 2017/2018 farming season and were analyzed using descriptive statistics, participation index, weighted average index analysis and Binary Logit regression. The result of the study revealed that 73.8% were male; 88.75% had access to extension contact. The estimated mean for educational training, household size, farm income and farming experience were 6 years; 8 people; ₦108,500/ha and 12 years respectively. Also, most (68.7%) of the farmers have low participation index of ≤0.45; this trend is responsible for the existing low farm productivity of this crop in the area. Furthermore, the benefits derived from participating in ASTC activities among the respondents were significant as indicated by their weighted average index. In addition, the estimated coefficient of multiple determination (R2) was 0.7602. Also, the coefficients of household size (0.421), education (0.559), experience (0.808), income (0.485) and extension contact (0.376) were statistically significant; implying that these factors in the regression model affected the likelihood of farmer’s decision to participate in ASTC activities. Adequate labour supply; establishment of pilot farms; capacity training; access to agricultural credit, extension services, agro service centres, agricultural information, input supply and cooperative formation are strongly recommended.

___

  • Adesope OM, Mathews-Njoku EC, Oguzor NS, Ugwuja VC. 2012. Effect of Socio-Economic Characteristic of Farmers on Their Adoption of Organic Farming Practices, Crop Production Technologies. In: Peeyush Sharma (Ed), Intech, Pp. 211 - 220. Available At: Http://Www.Intechopen.Com/ Books/Crop-Production-Technologies/Effect-Assessed 26/11/2012.
  • Agwu AE, Agbada MO. 2010. Level of Farmer's Participation in the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Improved Spear Grass (Imperata cylindrica) Control Activity in Benue State. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 14 (2): 1- 13
  • Agricultural Services and Training Centres (ASTC) Bulletin. 2012. Agricultural Revolution in Nigeria.
  • Bismark AY, Agbeti S. 2012. Farm and Farmer Characteristics that Influence Tomato Farmers' Awareness and Willingness to Adopt Mobile Phone based MIS in Ghana.
  • Bongiwe GX, Micah BM. 2013. Factors Affecting the Productivity and Profitability of Vegetables Production in Swaziland. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 1(2): 37-52
  • Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). 2011. Integrating Nigeria‘s Agricultural and Financial Value Chains: The Role of NISAL. November 16, 2011. Retrieved from www.efina.org.ng.
  • Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). 2012. Harnessing Nigeria‘s Potential in Tomato Production-Nigeria. Retrieved from www.nigeriabestforum.com. Business and Economy
  • Devkota RP, Cockfield G, Maraseni TN. 2014. Perceived community-based flood adaptation strategies under climate change in Nepal. International Journal of Global Warming, 6:113-124.
  • Edi D, Paola G, Ford R, Samuel T. 2007. Factors Affecting Farmer's Participation in Agric-environmental measures: A Northern Italian Perspectives. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(1):114-131.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2010. Global and National Tomato Production (Trade for Fresh Tomato-Code 0702000), Tomato News. Tomato Products Consumption.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAOSTAT). 2012. Food and Agriculture Organization, online statistical database. Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org/.
  • Green WH. 2003. Econometric Analysis. Fifth edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  • Haruna U, Sani MH, Danwanka HA, Adejo E. 2012. Economic Analysis of Fresh Tomato Marketers in Bauchi Metropolis of Bauchi State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment, 8(3):1-8.
  • Kerlinger NF. 1973. Foundations of Behavioural Research. New York, Holt Rinehart and Winston Inc. Mustapha SB, Gwary MM, Nuhu HS, Samaila PA. 2010. Assessment of the Effectiveness Lake Chad Research
  • Institute-Adopted Villages Scheme in the Dissemination of Improved Farm Technologies in Borno State, Nigeria.
  • International Journal of science and Technology, 23(1): 89- 96. Montshwe BD. 2006. Factors Affecting Participation in Mainstream Cattle Markets by Small-Scale Cattle Farmers in South Africa. Master Dissertation: Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Free State, Bloemfontein.
  • National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). 2012. Socio-economic Survey on Nigeria. First Quarter Report, NBS, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Oruche EN, Atala TK, Akpoko JG, Chikaire J. 2012. Impact of the National Special Programme for Food on livestock farmers in Ideato South Local Government Area, Imo State, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Agricultural Science, 2(6): 251- 258.
  • Osuala EC. 2005. Introduction to Research Methodology (3rd Edition). African First Publishers Ltd., Onitsha, Nigeria, 307pp.
  • Philips DM, Masangwa M, Philip B. 2000. Adoption of maize and related technologies in the north-west Zone of Nigeria. Moor J. Agric. Res., 1: 98-105.
  • ologbonse EB, Jibrin MM, Auta SJ, Damisa MA. 2013. Factors Influencing Women Participation in Women in Agriculture (WIA) Programme of Kaduna State Agricultural Development Activity, Nigeria. International journal for Agricultural Economics and Extension, 1(7): 47-54.
  • Ugwu DS, Kanu IO. 2012. Effects of Agricultural Reforms on the Agricultural Sector in Nigeria. Journal of African Studies and Development, 4 (2):51-59.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2002. Human Development Report 2002. Available at www.undp.org/hdr [Accessed 15th October, 2001].
  • Wooldridge JM. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Empirical Analysis of Productivity among Broiler Farmers

Godfrey C. Onuwa

Climate Smart Agriculture for Food Security, Adaptation, and Migration: A Review

Shambhu Katel, Honey Raj Mandal, Dikshya Subedi, Sagar Koirala, Sandipa Timsina, Abichal Poudel

Effects of Pre-Starter Feeds Prepared Using Different Sugar Sources on Performance, Carcass Parameters, Internal Organ Development, Intestinal Development and Microbial Load in Broilers

Harun Kutay, Hasan Rüştü Kutlu

Multivariate Analysis of Land Use Impact on Soil Water Content and Some Physicochemical Properties of an Alfisol

Joy Chiamaka Echebiri, Gabriel Oladele Awe

Determinants of Market Outlet Choices of Tef Producers in Western Ethiopia: Evidence of Multivariate Probit Model

Kifle Degefa, Getachew Biru, Galmessa Abebe

Biochar Amendments for Reducing Nitrate Leaching from Soils of Different Textural Classes in the Nigerian Savanna

Rejoice Ibrahim Solom

Combined Effect of Milk Source and Acidification Method of Cheese Milk on Properties of Mozzarella Cheese

Nayana Kumari Narayana, Oshada Gihan Palliyaguru

Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant, Antidiabetic and Anticancer Activities of Elaeocarpus variabilis Fruit

Venkatachalam Balamurugan, Manikandan Sridhivya, Ramachandran Dharani, Subramaniam Selvakumar, Krishnan Vasanth

How to Affect the Number of Images on the Success Rate for Detection of Weeds with Deep Learning

Guzel Mustafa, Turan Bulent, Kadioglu İzzet, Sin Bahadir, Basturk Alper, Khaled R. Ahmed

Effects of Different Salt Applications on Ion and Physiological Analysis in Lettuce

Turgay Kabay