Multivariate Analysis of Land Use Impact on Soil Water Content and Some Physicochemical Properties of an Alfisol

Multivariate Analysis of Land Use Impact on Soil Water Content and Some Physicochemical Properties of an Alfisol

Land use could impact soil properties and processes in varying degrees. Therefore, the impact of different land use systems on soil water status and its relationship with some physiochemical properties was studied at the Teaching and Research Farm, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria. The land use types included native forest (NF); Paddock (P); Oil palm plantation (OP); Teak (TK); new yam plot (NY) and yam plot under fallow (YF). Structure and disturbed surface soils (0 - 15 cm) samples were taken at three (3) locations in each land use type. Soil water content (SWC) significantly varied among the different land use types, with oil palm plantation storing the highest amount of water. The results also showed significant differences in soil bulk density, organic carbon, porosity, texture and hydraulic conductivity among the land use types. SWC associated positively and significantly with organic matter, silt content and silt + clay. The association between SWC and pH and silt/clay were positive but weak while particle density, bulk density and sand content showed negative and significant association. The principal component regression (PCR) showed a highly significant, positive relationship between SWC and the principal components of other physicochemical properties. Cluster analysis showed that SWC is highly related and linked to OM, Bd, Pd, Pt and silt/clay. The results implied that conversion to paddock and continuous cultivation led to depletion in soil water, physical and chemical properties, whereas cultivation of tree crops conserved these soil properties better. Therefore, establishment of tree crop and conservative soil management practices are suggested to prevent agricultural lands from degradation in areas with soils under similar condition

___

  • Adepetu JA, Adetunji MT, Ige DV. 2014. Soil Fertility and Crop Nutrition. Printed by Jumak Nigeria Limited, Ibadan.
  • Adepetu JA. 1990. Soil-test data interpretation in soil-testing programme. In: Paper Presented at National Workshop on Soil Testing Service for Efficient Fertilizer Use in Nigeria. Moor plantation, Ibadan.
  • Alemayeuhu K, Sheleme B. 2013. Effects of different land use systems on selected soil properties in south Ethiopia. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 4(5): 100- 107. doi: 10.5897/JSSEM2013.0380.
  • Amanze CT, Oguike PC, Eneje RC. 2017. Land use effects on some physico-chemical properties of ultisol at Ndume–Ibeku, Southeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research 7(9): 7-19.
  • Arshad MA, Lowery B, Grossman B. 1996. Physical Tests for Monitoring Soil Quality. In: Doran, JW. and Jones, AJ, Eds., Methods for Assessing Soil Quality, Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 49, SSSA, Madison, WI, 123-142.
  • Ashagrie Y, Zech W, Guggenberger G, Mamo T. 2007. Soil aggregation and total particulate organic matter following conversion of native forests to continuous cultivation in Ethiopia. Soil and Tillage Research 94: 101-108.
  • Ashenafi A, Abayneh E, Sheleme B. 2010. Characterizing soils of Delbo Wegene watershed, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia for planning appropriate land management. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 1: 184-199.
  • Awe GO. 2017. Land use change and crop production: spatial variability of some soil physical and hydraulic properties of an Alfisol grown to cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Journal of Agricultural Environmental Science 17(1): 85-98.
  • Awe GO, Nurudeen OO, Amiola AA, Ojeniyi D, Tutuola T. 2018a. Geostatistical evaluation of spatial variability of selected soil physical properties under different crops in Ado Ekiti, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Soil Science Plant Nutrition 3(1): 1–16. doi: 10.9734/ AJSSPN/2018/41181.
  • Awe GO, Nurudeen OO, Ogunleye KS, Ayodele AA. 2020. Geo- Multivariate analysis of crop yield and soil properties of Students Industrial Training Farm in Ado Ekiti, Southwest Nigeria. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 67(1): 1-16. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2020. 1767773
  • Awe GO, Nurudeen OO, Omotoso SO, Amiola AA, Ojeniyi D, Tutuola T. 2018b. Soilphysico-chemical properties changes under different crops in Ado Ekiti, Nigeria. Asian Soil Research Journal 1(2): 1–15. doi: 10.9734/asrj/2018/v1i2653.
  • Ball JB, Pandey D, Hirai S. 1999. Global overview of teak plantation. In: PaperPresented to the Regional Seminar Site, Technology and Productivity of Teak Plantations. Chiang Mai, Thailand.
  • Bennett LT, Mele PM, Annett S, Kasel S. 2010. Examining links between soil management, soil health, and public benefits in agricultural landscapes: an Australian perspective. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 139: 1-12.
  • Blake A, Hartge JM. 1986. Bulk Density. Methods of soil Analysis; Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods. In: Klute A (editor). Methods of soil analysis. pp. 363-375.
  • Boluwade A, Madramooto CA. 2016. Independent principal component analysis for simulation of soil water and bulk density in a Canadian watershed. International Soil Water Conservation Research 4: 151–158. doi:1016/j.iswcr 2016.09.001.
  • Bossuyt B, Diels J, Deckers J. 1999. Changes following cultivation and reforestation of loess soils in central Belgium: consequences for future land use. Land 3: 151–166.
  • Brady NC, Weil RR. 2002. The nature and properties of soils. 13th edition. The Iowa State, India: PVT Ltd.
  • Bayer C, Neto LM, Mielniczuk J, Ceretta CA. 2000. Effect of no-till cropping systems on soil organic matter in a sandy clay loam Acrisol from southern Brazil monitored by electron spin resonance and nuclear magnetic resonance. Soil and Tillage
  • Research 53(2): 95-104. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00088-4 Celik I. 2005. Land use effects on organic matter physical properties of soil in a southern Mediterranean highland of Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research 83: 270-277. doi: 10.1007/BF00000786.
  • Danielson RE, Sutherland PL. 1986. Porosity. In: Klute A (editor). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition, ASA-SSA, Maddison, Wiscosin, ISBN: 0-89118-088-5. pp. 443-461.
  • De-Geus JG. 1973. Fertilizer guide for the tropic and subtropical farming. Center d’E tude de L’azote Zurich.
  • De Souza CMP, Thomazin A, Schaefer CEGR, Veloso GV, Moreira GM et al. 2018. Multivariate analysis and machine learning in properties of Ultisols (Argissolos) of Brazilian Amazon. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo. doi.10.1590/ 18069657rbcs20170419.
  • EMBRAPA, 2011. Centro National de Pesquisa de Solos (Rio de Janeiro, RJ). Manual de métodos de análise de solo, 2nd Ed. Reviewed. Rio de Janeiro, 230p.
  • Evrendilek F, Celik I, Kilic S. 2004. Changes in soil organic carbon and other physical soil properties along adjacent Mediterranean forest, grassland and croplande cosystems in Turkey. Journal of Arid Environment 59(4): 743-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.03.002
  • Fageria NK. 2012. Role of soil organic matter in maintaining sustainability of cropping system. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 43: 2063-2113.
  • FAO, 2020a. Action against desertification. Overview information. Available at: https://www.fao.org/in- action/action-againstdesertification/overview/desertification- and-land-degradation/en/. Accessed July 2021.
  • FAO, 2020b. GIEWS- global information and early warning system: country briefs, Nigeria. http://www.fao.org/giews/ countrybrief/country.jsp?code¼NGA. Accessed July 2021.
  • Fasina AS, Aruleba JO, Omolayo FO, Omotoso SO, Shittu OS, Okusami TA. 2005. Properties and classification of five soils formed on granitic parent materials of Humid southwest, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science 15(2): 21-29.
  • GLOBE, 2014. Soil particle density Protocol-10. Soil (Pedosphere), 1-10. Available online at: https://www.globe. gov/documents/352961/353769/. Accessed June 2022.
  • Heard JR, Kladivko EJ, Mannering JV, Oumenskou H, Mohamed Baghdadi EL, et al. 1988. Soil macroporosity, hydraulic conductivity and air permeability of silty soils under long- term conservation tillage in Indiana. Soil and Tillage Research 11(1): 1-18.
  • Hudson BD. 1994. Soil organic matter and available water capacity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49: 189-194.
  • Juhos K, Szabo S, Ladanyi M. 2015. Influence of Soil properties on crop yield: a multivariate statistical approach. International Agrophysics 29(4): 433-440. doi: 10.1515/intag-2015-0049.
  • Kiflu A, Beyene S. 2013. Effects of different land use systems on selected soil properties in South Ethiopia. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 4(5): 100-107.
  • Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A et al. 2003. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change 11(4): 261- 269. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
  • Lal R. 2004. Agricultural activities and the global carbon cycle. Nutr. Cycling in Agroecosystem. 70: 103-116.
  • Lal R. 2016. Beyond COP 21: potential and challenges of the “4 per Thousand” initiative. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 71: 20A-25A.
  • Liu M, Han G, Zhang Q. 2020. Effects of soil aggregate stability on soil organic carbon and nitrogen under land use change in an Erodible Region in southwest China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(20: 3809. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203809.
  • Logah V, Ewusi-Mensah N, Tetteh FKM. 2011. Soil organic carbon and crop yield under different soil amendments and cropping in the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana. Journal of Plant Science 6: 165-173.
  • McQueen DJ, Shepherd TG. 2002. Physical changes and compaction sensitivity of a fine-textured poorly drained soil (Typic Endoaquept) under varying durations of cropping, Manawatu Region, New Zealand. Soil and Tillage Research 63: 93-107.
  • Muche M, Kokeb A, Molla E. 2015. Assessing the physicochemical properties of soil under different land use types. Journal of Environ. Anal. Toxicol. 5(5): 1-5. doi: 10.4172/2161-0525.1000309
  • Nawar S, Buddenbaum H, Hill J. 2015. Digital mapping of soil properties using multivariate statistical analysis and ASTER data in an arid region. Remote Sensing 7: 1181–1820. doi: 10.3390/rs70201181.
  • Nwite JN. 2015. Assessment of soil structural stability under different land-uses using some predictive indices in Abakaliki, Southeastern Nigeria. Cur. Agric. Res. 3: 1–3.
  • Offiong RA, Atu JE, Njar GN, Iwara AI. 2009. Effects of Land Use Change on soil physio-chemical properties in South- Southern Nigeria. African Journal of Environment, Pollution and Health 7(2): 47-51.
  • Oguike PC, Mbagwu JSC. 2009. Variation in some physical properties and organic matters content of soils of coastal plain sand under different land uses types. World Journal of Agriculture Science 5: 63-67.
  • Okusami TA, Oyediran GO. 1985. Slope-soil relationship on an aberrant toposequence in Ife area of southwestern Nigeria: variability in soil properties. Ife Journal of Agriculture 7(1- 2): 1–15.
  • Olagunju FI. 2008. Economics of palm oil processing in Southwestern Nigeria. Int. Journal of Agric. Eco and Dev. 1(2): 69-77.
  • Oumenskou H, Baghdadi MEl, Barakat A, Aquit M, Ennaji W, et al. 2018. Multivariate statistical analysis for spatial evaluation of physicochemical properties of agricultural soils from Beni-Amir irrigated perimeter, Tadla plain, Morocco. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes 3(2): 83-94. doi: 10.1080/24749508.2018.1504272.
  • Oyedele DJ, Nurudeen OO, Aina PO. 1992. Geostatistical study of soil physical properties under oil palm plantation, semi- variograms. Ife Journal of Agriculture 14: 1–7.
  • Pandey D. 1998. Report to the FAO Project GCP/INT/628/UK. 1998. Forest plantations areas, p.4. 1995. November 1997, revised July 1998.
  • Pulleman MM, Essen JB, Meijles E. 2000. Soil organic matter content as a function of different land use history. Soil Science Society of American Journal 64(2): 689-693.
  • Ranjar A, Sepaskhah AR, Emadi S. 2015. Relationships between wheat yield, yield components and physico-chemical properties of soil under rain-fed conditions. International Journal of Plant Production 9(3): 433–466. doi:10.22069/IJPP.2015.2225.
  • Reinert DJ, Albuquerque JA, Reichert JM, Aita C, Andrada MMC 2008. Limites críticos de densidade do solo para o crescimento de raízes de plantas de cobertura em Argissolo vermelho. Rev. Bras. Ci. Solo 32: 1805–1816. doi: 10.1590/S0100-06832008000500002. (Abstract in English).
  • Reynolds WD, Drury CF, Yang XM, Tan CS, Yang JY. 2014. Impacts of 48 years of consistent cropping, fertilization and land management on the physical quality of a clay loam soil. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 94: 1-17. doi: 10.4141/cjss2013-097.
  • Salehi N. Ghorbanzadeh N, Kahneh E. 2013. Earthworm biomass and abundance, soil chemical and physical properties under different poplar plantations in the north of Iran. Journal of Forest Science, 59(6): 223-229.
  • Sanjit KD, Shukla MK. 2012. Variability of hydraulic conductivity due to multiple factors. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 8(5): 489–502. doi:10.3844/ajessp.2012.489.502.
  • Sanusi RA, Oluyole KA. 2005. A review of the cocoa sub-sector of the Nigerian economy 1930-2003. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Science Association of Nigeria. 26: 50-65.
  • Soil Survey Staff (SSS) 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 12th Edition, USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service, Washington CD, 372 pp.
  • SPSS 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA.
  • Suzuki LEAS, Reichert JM, Reinert DJ, Lima CLR. 2015. Degree of compactness and mechanical properties of a subtropical Alfisol with eucalyptus, native forest, and grazed pasture, Forest Science 61(4): 716-722. doi: 10.5849/forsci.14-172.
  • Tan HK. 1996. Soil sampling, preparation and analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York. pp. 78-209.
  • Tellen VA, Yerima BPK. 2018. Effects of land use change on soil physicochemical properties in selected areas in the North West region of Cameroon. Environ. Syst. Res. 7(3): 1-29.
  • Thomas GW. 1996. Soil pH and Soil Acidity. In: Sparks DL (editor). Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, Book Series No. 5, SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI. pp. 475-489.
  • Tisdall JM, Oades JM. 1982. Organic matter and water stable aggregates in soils. European Journal of Soil Science 33: 141-163.
  • Topp GC, Reynolds WD, Cook FJ, Kirby JM, Carter MR. 1997. Physical attributes of soil quality. In: Gregorich EG, Carter MR (editors). Soil quality for crop production and ecosystem health. Developments in soil science. Elsevier 25: 21-58.
  • Tsegaye T, Hill RL. 1998. Intensive tillage effects on spatial variability of soil test, plant growth and nutrient uptake measurement. Journal of Soil Science 163: 155-165.
  • USDA-NRCS, 1996. Soil Quality Resource Concerns: Compaction. USDA-NRCS Soil Quality Inst, Ames, IA. http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/survey/SQI/sqihome.shtml.
  • Van Bemmelen JM. 1890. Über die Bestimmung des Wassers, des Humus, des hwefels, der in den colloïdalen Silikaten gebundenen Kieselsäure, des Mangans u.s.w. im Ackerboden. Die Landwirthschaftlichen Versuchs-Stationen 37: 279–290.
  • Van Reewijk LP. 2002. Procedures for Soil Analysis. Wageningen, International Soil Reference and Information Centre. Walkley A, Black IA. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29-38.
  • Yimer F, Ledin S, Abdelkadir A. 2007. Changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents in three adjacent land use types in the Bale Mountains, south eastern highland of Ethiopia. Forest Ecology and Management 242(2-3): 337-342.
  • Yost RS, Uehara G, Fox RL. 1982. Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areas in Semivariograms. Soil Science Society of American Journal 46: 1028-1032.
  • Zhou HZ, Gong ZT, Lamp J. 1996. Study on soil spatial variability. Acta Pedologia Sinica 33: 232-241
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Determination of Climate Change Adaptation Behavior of Wheat Producing Farmers; the Case of Çorum Province in Türkiye

Güngör Karakaş

nvestigation of Changes in Color and Textural Quality Characteristics of Arugula (Eruca vesicaria) by Disinfectant Treatments

Janan Hossein Zadeh, Fikret Pazır

Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant, Antidiabetic and Anticancer Activities of Elaeocarpus variabilis Fruit

Venkatachalam Balamurugan, Manikandan Sridhivya, Ramachandran Dharani, Subramaniam Selvakumar, Krishnan Vasanth

Recent Progress on Melatonin-Induced Salinity Tolerance in Plants: An Overview

İlkay Yavaş, Saddam Hussai

Climate Smart Agriculture for Food Security, Adaptation, and Migration: A Review

Shambhu Katel, Honey Raj Mandal, Dikshya Subedi, Sagar Koirala, Sandipa Timsina, Abichal Poudel

Multivariate Analysis of Land Use Impact on Soil Water Content and Some Physicochemical Properties of an Alfisol

Joy Chiamaka Echebiri, Gabriel Oladele Awe

Empirical Analysis of Productivity among Broiler Farmers

Godfrey C. Onuwa

Evaluation of Photosynthetic Roles of Different Canopy Strata and Capitulum on Seed Yield and its Components of Spring Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)

Shiva Sadighfard, Bahman Pasban Eslam, Reza Amirnia, Esmaeil Zanghani

The Effects of Replacement of Dried Orange Pulp with Ground Corn in Concentrate Feed on Dairy Goats’ Performance, Milk Somatic Cell Counts and Blood Parameters

Harun Kutay, Hasan Rüştü Kutlu

The Effect of Foliar Application of Different Amino Acids (L-Histidine, Methionine) on Cadmium and Zinc Uptake of Wheat

Özlem Ete Aydemir, Kürşat Korkmaz, Faruk Özkutlu