Comparison of IPARD I and IPARD II Programmes as a Source of Rural Development Financing in Turkey

European Union (EU) uses The Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA) to prepare candidate and potential candidate countries for EU membership. One of the five components of IPA is rural development (IPARD). IPARD funds provide financing to develop production standards of agricultural establishments for competing with other establishments in EU member states. For this purpose, in Turkey IPARD I programme was applied between 2007 and 2013 and IPARD II programme was prepared to apply from 2014 to 2020. The purpose of this study is comparing structural differences of IPARD I and IPARD II programme which are important tools to increase competitiveness of agricultural establishments in Turkey. The main material of the study was IPARD I and IPARD II programs. In the study, firstly, the support given within the scope of IPARD programs were presented as tables and graphs. Structural differences between the two programmes were examined under three headings; targets of programmes, budgets of programmes and eligibility criteria. In the result of this study, changes and the actual statue of this important financial tool was revealed. Most important changes were public aid rates and new supporting sectors. Regarding to the public aid rates, while the highest rate was 65% in IPARD I, it is 70% in IPARD II. Also an additional 10% can be given for investments in effluent storage and waste management for benefit of the environment in IPARD II. In IPARD II; egg production, mushroom cultivation, machinery parks and renewable energy plants sectors are added to supporting sectors.

___

Akın S. 2008 “Avrupa Birliğinde Kırsal Kalkınmaya Yönelik Mali Yardımlar, Değişimler ve Türkiye’nin Uyum Çalışmaları”, European Union and International Economic Relations, Ankara, Turkey.

Anonymous. 2008, “The Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance in Rural Development (2007-2013)”, Republic Of Turkey Ministry Of Food, Agriculture And Livestock, Ankara, Turkey.

Anonymous. 2015a, “The Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance in Rural Development (2014-2020)”, Republic Of Turkey Ministry Of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Ankara, Turkey.

Anonymous. 2015b, “Tarım ve Kırsal Kalkınmayı Destekleme Kurumu Projeleri Etki Değerlendirme Raporu”, The Agriculture and Rural Development Support Institution, Ankara, Turkey.

Anonymous. 2017, “IPARD I’den IPARD II’ye”, (Access date: 13.11.2017; available at: https:// www.tkdk.gov.tr).

Anonymous. 2018, “The IPARD Programme statistics”, (Access date: 13.11.2018; available at: https://ipard.tarim.gov.tr/ Statiks-en).

Soylu A. 2011, “‘AB 2020’ ve ‘Vizyon 2023’ Stratejilerinde Inovasyon Hedeflerinin Karşilaştirilmasi” Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, v. 2011/2/14, pp. 105-122, Isparta.

Yılmaz HB. 2010, “Lizbon Sonrası AB 2020 Stratejisi”, Türkiye Odalar ve Borsalar Birliği, Ekonomik Forum Dergisi, pp. 30- 40 , Ankara.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

An Investigation of Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activity of Nettle (Urtica dioica L.), Mint (Mentha piperita), Thyme (Thyme serpyllum) and Chenopodium album L. Plants from Yaylacık Plateau, Giresun, Turkey

Duygu KÜLCÜ, Cavidan GÖKIŞIK, Sinem AYDIN

Türkiye’de Üretilen Mısırlarda Mikotoksin Düzeylerinin ve GDO Varlığının Araştırılması

Sanem ARGIN, Sibel Şimşek YAZICI

Etlik Piliçlerin Beslenmesinde Antimikrobiyal Peptidlerin Kullanımı

Mehmet ÖZCAN, Levent GÜLÜM, Mustafa MİDİLLİ, Muhammet GÖREN

Research on Nutrition and Dietetic Undergraduates in Terms of Their Information Level and Views About Genetically Modified Organisms

Seydi YIKMIŞ, Başak ÇÖL

Determinants of Farm Mechanization in Nepal

Arun GC, Jun Ho YEO, Kiran GHİMİRE

Assessment of Hygienic Quality of Beverage Cans Surfaces with and without Protective Cover

Gülten GÜNDÜZ, Ayça KORKMAZ, İlkim EMENLİ, Zeynep ÖZTÜRK

Buğdaygil ve Baklagil -Buğdaygil Karışımı Meraların Süt İneklerinin Verim Performansı ve Sütün Bileşimine Etkileri

Numan KILIÇALP, Mustafa AVCI, Hatice HIZLI, RÜŞTÜ HATİPOĞLU

Katı Kültür Fermantasyonun Zeytin Yaprağı Temel Besin Madde, Bazı Mineral Madde, Kondanse Tanen ve Fenolik Bileşenlerine Etkisi

Aydın Altop

Fertigasyon ve Mikoriza Uygulamalarının Tarla Koşullarında Biber Bitkisinin (Capsicum annum L.) Verimine ve Besin Elementleri Alımına Etkileri#

Ahmet DEMİRBAŞ, Zülküf KAYA, ÇAĞDAŞ AKPINAR, İBRAHİM ORTAŞ

Sivas İlindeki Bazı Süt İşletmelerine Gelen Sütlerin Ağır Metal İçeriklerinin Belirlenmesi

Mehmet BEYKAYA, Zeliha YILDIRIM, Ayşe ÖZBEY, METİN YILDIRIM