Süleyman Çalışlar, Rahmi Kanat

A Research on the Comparative Effect of Active Dry Yeast and Inactivated- Stabilized Probiotic Yeast (Thepax) Added at Different Levels to Diets on Broiler Performanc

This experiment was conducted to determine the effect of active yeast (AY) and inactive-stabilized yeast (Thepax) supplementation to the rations in different levels on broiler performance. In the experiment carried out according to the randomized plot design, there were 5 different treatment groups as control group (Group 1), 0.1% Thepax (Group 2), 0.2% Thepax (Group 3), 0.1% AY (Group 4) and 0.2% AY (Group 5). In the experiment, the effects of active and inactive yeasts on body weight gain (BWG), feed consumption, feed conversion rate, carcass weight (CW), carcass yield (CY), abdominal fat amount and mortality were investigated. In the present experiment, the final live weight, the cumulative feed consumption and feed conversion were insignificant. The statistical difference between the groups in the experiment was significant in carcass weight, but insignificant in the amount of abdominal fat and mortality rate. Inactive-stabilized yeast (Thepax 0.1%) was more effective than 0.2% AY on BWG. Only 0.1% Thepax increased the CW besides CY was high in 0.1%, 0.2% Thepax and 0.1% AY groups. It has been observed that active and inactive yeasts are used in broiler chickens without any problem

PDF

___

Afsharmanesh M, Barani M, Silversides FG. 2010. Evaluation of wet-feeding wheat-based diets containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae to broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 51(6): 776-783.
Anonymous. 1983. Based on the amino acid, mineral and vitamin content of Cerevisiae a typical analysis for Thepax, Dox-al Italia SpA, Via Mascagni, Sulbiate Superiore. Monza E Brianza, Italy.
Boostani A, Mahmoodian Fard HR, Ashayerizadeh A, Aminafshar M. 2013. Growth performance, carcass yield and intestinal microflora populations of broilers fed diets containing thepax and yogurt. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 15(1): 1-6.
Brock TD, Smith DW, Madigan MT. 1984. Biology of Microorganisms, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 112 pp.
Elgün A, Ertugay Z. 1990. Tahıl İşleme Teknolojisi. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No:718. s: 273-283.
Fathi MM, Al-Mansour S, Al-Homidan A, Al-Khalaf A, Al- Damegh M. 2012. Effect of yeast culture supplementation on carcass yield and humoral immune response of broiler chicks. Veterinary World, 5(11): 651-657.
Gao J, Zhang HJ, Yu SH, Wu AG, Yoon I, Quigley J, Gao YP, Qi GH. 2008. Effects of yeast culture in broiler diets on performance and immunomodulatory functions. Poultry Science, 87(7): 1377-1384.
Gong J, Forster RJ, James HY, Chambers R, Wheatcroft R, Sabour PM, Chen S. 2002. Molecular analysis of bacterial populations in the ileum of broiler chickens and comparison with bacteria in the cecum. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 41(3): 171-179.
Hassanein MS, Soliman, NK. 2010. Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) adding to diets on intestinal microflora and performance of hy-line layers hens. Journal of American Science, 6(11): 159-169. ISSN: 1545-1003.
Köşker Ö. Çakmakçı L. 1985. Genel Mikrobiyoloji. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, 955, pp:94-95.
Kubena LF, Chen TC, Deaton JW, Reece FN. 1974. Factors influencing the quantity of abdominal fat in broilers. Poultry Science, 53(1): 974-978.
Martinez MJ, Roy S, Archuletta AB, Wentzell PD, Anna-Arriola SS, Rodriguez A L, Aragon AD, Quiñones GA, Allen C, Werner-Washburne M. 2004. Genomic analysis of stationary- phase and exit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: gene expression and identification of novel essential genes. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 15(12): 5295-5305.
Mohamed EA, Talha EA, Mojahid AA, Dafaalla EM. 2015. Effect of dietary yeast (saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics and some metabolic responses of broilers. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 3(5-1): 5-10.
NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry: Ninth Revised Edition, 1994. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nabila,M., Yaakub, H., Alimon, AR. and Samsudin, AA.2017. Mal. J. Anim. Sci. 20(2): 83-93.
Ogbuewu I, Okoro VM, Mbajiorgu EF, Mbajiorgu CA. 2019. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and its effect on production indices of livestock and poultry- a review. Com Clinic Path., 28(3): 669-677.
Reed G, Tilak W Nagodawithana. 1991. Yeast Technology. Second Edition. Library of Congress Catalog Card. No:90, 33144. ISBN 978-94-011-9771-7 (eBook).
Reed G. 2012. Yeast technology. Van Nostrand Reinhold: Springer Netherlands, 2end; 2012. 454 p.
Rezaeipour V, Fononi H, Irani M. 2012. Effects of dietary L- threonine and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on performance, intestinal morphology and immune response of broiler chickens. South African Journal Of Animal Science, 42(3): 266-273.
Rose HJ, Harrison S. 1971. "The yeasts". Vol. 2. Physiology and Biochemistry of Yeasts. XIV + 571 S., 73 Abb., 39 Tab. London‐New York Academic Press, N.Y. USA.
Salim H, Huque K, Kamaruddin K, Beg AH. 2018. Global restriction of using antibiotic growth promoters and alternative strategies in poultry production. Science Progress, 101 (1): 52-75.
Santin E, Mariorka A, Macari M, Grecco M, Sanchez JC. 2001. Performance and intestinal mucosa development in broiler chickens fed ration containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cellwall. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 10 (3): 236-244.
Silva VK, Da Silva JDT, Gravena RA, Gravena RA, Marques RH, Hada FH, De Moraes VMB. 2010. Yeast extract and prebiotic in pre-initial phase diet for broiler chickens raised under different temperatures. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39(1): 165-174.
Stanley VG, Ojo R, Woldesenbet S, Hutchinson DH, Kubena LF. 1993. The use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to suppress the effects of aflatoxicosis in broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 72(10) :1867-1872.
Sun Z, Wang T, Demelash N, Zheng S, Zhao W, Chen X, Zhen Y, Qin G. 2019. Effect of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on Broilers: A preliminary study on the effective components of yeast culture. Animals (Basel), 10(1): 68.
Suzer B, Altinbas B, Seyidoglu N, Arican I, Orman A, Yildiz H, Yalcin M. 2015. The effects of supplemental saccharomyces cerevisiae and phytase on growth performances and plasma biochemical parameters of broiler chickens. Journal of The Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 34(1,2): 15-23.
Thongsong B, Kalandakanond-Thongsong S, Chavananikul V. 2008. Effects of the additionof probiotic containing both bacteria and yeast or an antibiotic on performance parameters, mortality rate and antibiotic residue in broilers. The Thai Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 38(1): 17-26.
Vohra A, Syal, P, Madan A. 2016. Probiotic yeasts in livestock sector. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 219, 31-47.
Wang WW, Ren WL, Li Z, Yue YS, Guo YM. 2017. Effects of live yeast on immune responses and intestinal morphological structure in lipopolysaccharide-challenged broilers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 97(1): 136-144.
Yalçın S, Önol AG, Koçak D, Özcan İ. 1993. Ekmek mayasının broyler rasyonlarında protein kaynağı olarak kullanılması. Doğa- Tr. J. of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 17(4): 305- 309.
Zhang AW, Lee BD, Lee KW, Song KB, An GH, Lee CH. 2005. Effect of graded levels of dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance and meat quality in broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 18(5): 699- 703