___

Bovo, R. Ciorba, A., Prosser, S. ve Martini, A. (2009). The Mc-Gurk phenomenon in Italian listeners. Acta Otorhinolar-yngol Italica, 29, 203-208.

Burnham, D., Lau, S., Tam, H. ve Schoknecht, C. (2001). Vi-sual discrimination of cantonese tone by tonal but non-cantonese speakers, and by non-tonal language speakers. D. Massaro, J. Light ve K. Geraci, (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory-Visual Speech Processing (AVSP2001) içinde (155-160). Aalborg, Den-mark: ISCA.

Burnham, D., Ciocca, V., Lauw, C. Lau, S. ve Stokes, S. (2000). Perception of visual information for Cantonese tones. M. Barlow, (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth Australian In-ternational Conference on Speech Science and Technoogy içinde (86-91). Canberra: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association, Inc.

Burnham, D. ve Dodd, B. (2004) Auditory-visual speech inte-gration by prelinguistic infants: Perception of an emer-gent consonant in the McGurk effect. Developmental Psychobiology, 45, 1-17.

Chen, Y. ve Hazan, V. (2009). Developmental factor and the nonnative speaker effect in auditory-visual speech per-ception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 858-865.

Davis, C. ve Kim, J. (2001). Repeating and remembering for-eign language words: Implications for language teaching systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 16, 37-47.

Desjardins, R. N. ve Werker, J. F. (2004). Is the integration of heard and seen speech mandatory for infants? Develop-mental Psychobiology, 45, 187-203.

Desjardins, R. N., Rogers, J. ve Werker, J. F. (1997). An explo-ration of why preschoolers perform differently than do adults in audiovisual speech perception tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 85-110.

Erdener, V. D. ve Burnham, D. K. (2005). The role of audio-visual speech and orthographic information in nonnative speech production. Language Learning, 55, 191-228.

Erdener, D. ve Burnham, D. (2013). The relationship between auditory-visual speech perception and language-specific speech perception at the onset of reading instruction in english-speaking children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 120-138.

Erdener, D. (2012). Basic to applied research: the benefits of audio-visual speech perception research in teaching for-eign languages. The Language Learning Journal, iFirst,1-9. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2012.724080

Erdener, D. ve Pehlivan, E. B. (hazırlama aşamasında). The awareness of visual speech information in L2 acquisition context: A Turkish sample. Grassegger, H. (1995). McGurk effect in German and Hungar-ian listeners. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetics Sciences, Stockholm, 4, 210-213.

Hardison, D. M. (2003). Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker vari-ability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 495-522.

Hazan, V., Sennema, A, Faulkner, A. ve Ortega-Llebaria, M. (2006). The use of visual cues in the perception of non-native consonant contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical So-ciety of America, 119, 1740-1751.

Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M. ve Faulkner, A. (2005). Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of Eng-lish. Speech Communication, 47, 360-378.

Kuhl, P. K. ve Meltzoff, A. N. (1982). The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. Science, 218, 1138-1144. Learn NC Editions (2013). Mandarin Chinese I: Tones. 4 Ocak 2013, http://www.learnnc.org/lp/editions/manda-rin1/4480Mc

Gurk, H. ve MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.

Nath, A. ve Beauchamp, M. (2012). A neural basis for inter-individual differences in McGurk effect, a multisensory speech illusion. Neuroimage, 59, 781-787.

Ortega-Llebaria, M., Faulkner, A. ve Hazan, V. (2001). Audito-ry-visual L2 speech perception: effects of visual cues and acoustic-phonetic context for Spanish learners of English. Speech, Hearing and Language: Work in Progress, 13, 39-51.

Plant, G., Gnosspelius, J. ve Levitt, H. (2000). The use of tactile supplements in lipreading Swedish and English: A single-subject study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 43, 172-183.

Reisberg, D., McLean, J. ve Goldfield, A. (1987). Easy to hear but hard to understand: a lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. B. Dodd ve R. Campbell, (Ed.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading içinde (97-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Rosenblum, L. D., Schmuckler, M. A. ve Johnson, J. A. (1997). The McGurk effect in infants. Perception ve Psychophys-ics, 59(3), 347-357.

Sams, M., Manninen, P., Surakka, V., Helin, P. ve Kättö, R. (1998). McGurk effect in Finnish syllables, isolated words, and words in sentences: Effects of word mean-ing and sentence context. Speech Communication, 26, 75-8-7.

Sekiyama, K. ve Burnham, D. (2008) Impact of language on development of auditory-visual speech perception. De-velopmental Science, 11(2), 306-320.

Sekiyama, K. ve Tohkura, Y. I. (1993). Inter-language differ-ences in the influence of visual cues in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 21(4), 427-444.

Sekiyama, K. (1997). Audiovisual speech perception and its inter-language differences. Japanese Journal of Psycho-nomic Science, 15(2), 122-127.

Sumby, W. H. ve Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.

Wang, Y., Behne, D. ve Jiang, H. (2009). Influence of native language phonetic system on audio-visual speech percep-tion. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 344-356.