Motivasyon, Deneyime Açıklık ve Örgütsel Bağlılık: Değişime İlişkin Tutumların Aracılık Rolü

Bu çalışmada, değişime ilişkin tutumların öncüllerinin belirlenmesi ve söz konusu öncüller ile duygusal bağlılıkarasındaki mekanizma olarak değişime ilişkin tutumların oynadığı aracılık rolünün incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bukapsamda, 783 çalışanın gönüllü katılımı ile anket çalışması yapılmış ve veriler varyans analizi ve yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (YEM) analizi ile test edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular neticesinde hizmet süresi, eğitim durumu,içsel iş motivasyonu, deneyime açıklık ve gelişme ihtiyacı gücünün değişime ilişkin tutumların öncülü olduğu;katılımcıların yaşının ise değişime ilişkin tutumlara etki etmediği belirlenmiştir. Değişime ilişkin tutumların, içsel işmotivasyonu, deneyime açıklık ve gelişme ihtiyacının gücü ile duygusal bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerde aracılık rolüoynadığı tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular ışığında uygulamaya ve yazına yönelik öneriler ortaya konulmuştur.

Motivation, Openness to Experience, and Affective Commitment: The Mediating Role of Attitudes towards Change

The aim of the current study was to identify the antecedents of attitudes towards change and to investigate the mediator role of attitudes towards change in the relationship between its antecedents and affective commitment. A sample of 783 participants voluntarily took the survey. The data were analyzed via analysis of variance and structural equations modeling. Tenure, education level, intrinsic motivation, openness to experience and growth need strength were found to be antecedents of attitudes towards change, while age was not. Attitudes towards change played a mediator role in the following relationships between openness to experience and affective commitment, intrinsic work motivation and affective commitment, and growth need strength and affective commitment. In light of the findings of the current study, practical and theoretical implications were discussed.

Kaynakça

Allen, N. J. ve Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990. tb00506.x.

Allied Command Transformation (2018). Who we are. (20 Ağustos 2018 tarihinde https://www.act.nato. int/who-we-are adresinden alınmıştır).

Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A. ve Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967. doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.66.5.950.

Antoni, C. H. (2004). Research note: A motivational perspective on change processes and outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(2), 197-216. doi. org/10.1080/13594320444000065.

Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G. ve Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681-703. doi. org/10.1177/001872679304600601.

Baron, M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.51.6.1173

Barrick, M. R. ve Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x

Bayık, M. E. ve Gürbüz, S. (2016). Ölçek uyarlamada metodoloji sorunu: Yönetim ve örgüt alanında uyarlanan ölçekler üzerinden bir araştırma. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 3(1), 1-20. doi.org/10.18394/ iid.15648

Beer, M. ve Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 133- 41.

Benet-Martinez, V. ve John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750. doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729.

Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline of general system theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1, 134-165.

Bouckenooghe, D., Devos, G. ve Van den Broeck, H. (2009). Organizational change questionnaire–climate of change, processes, and readiness: Development of a new instrument. The Journal of Psychology, 143(6), 559-599. doi. org/10.1080/00223980903218216

Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J. ve Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: John Wiley.

Brown, M. ve Cregan, C. (2008). Organizational change cynicism: The role of employee involvement. Human Resource Management, 47(4), 667-686. doi. org/10.1002/hrm.20239

Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M. ve Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980-1009. doi: 10.1037/a0035661.

Chen, J. ve Wang, L. (2007). Locus of control and the three components of commitment to change. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(3), 503–512. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.025

Choi, M. (2011). Employees’ attitudes toward organizational change: A literature review. Human Resource Management, 50(4), 479-500. doi.org/10.1002/ hrm.20434.

Choi, D., Oh, I. S. ve Colbert, A. E. (2015). Understanding organizational commitment: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five-factor model of personality and culture. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100 (5), 1542-1567. doi: 10.1037/ apl0000014

Coleman, D. F., Irving, G. P. ve Cooper, C. L. (1999). Another look at the locus of control-organizational commitment relationship: It depends on the form of commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 995-1001. doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1099-1379(199911)20:6<995::AID-JOB955>3.0.CO;2-3 Cordery, J., Sevastos, P., Mueller, W. ve Parker, S. (1993).

Correlates of employee attitudes toward functional flexibility. Human Relations, 46(6), 705-723. doi. org/10.1177/001872679304600602.

Darlington, R. B. ve Hayes, A. F. (2017). Regression analysis and linear models: Concepts, applications, and implementation. New York: The Guilford Press.

Devos, G., Buelens, M. ve Bouckenooghe, D. (2007). Contribution of content, context, and process to understanding openness to organizational change: Two experimental simulation studies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(6), 607-630. doi. org/10.3200/SOCP.147.6.607-630

Dunham, R. B., Grube, J. A., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L. ve Pierce, J. L. (1989). The development of an attitude toward change instrument. Washington, DC: Academy of Management Annual Meeting.

Eagly, A.H. ve Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske ve G. Lindsey, (Ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology içinde (269- 322). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Eby, L. T., Freeman, D. M., Rush, M. C. ve Lance, C. E. (1999). Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 463-483. doi. org/10.1348/096317999166798

Elias, S. M. (2009). Employee commitment in times of change: Assessing the importance of attitudes toward organizational change. Journal of Management, 35(1), 37-55. doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308910

Ægisdóttir, S., Gerstein, L. H. ve Çınarbaş, D. C. (2008). Methodological issues in cross-cultural counseling research equivalence, bias, and translations. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(2), 188-219. doi. org/10.1177/0011000007305384

Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S. ve Herold, D. M. (2006). The effects of organizational changes on employee commitment: A multilevel investigation. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 1-29.

Fishbein, M. ve Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Fok, L. Y., Hartman, S. J., Patti, A. L. ve Razek, J. R. (2000). The relationships between equity sensitivity, growth need strength, organizational citizenship behavior, and perceived outcomes in the quality environment: A study of accounting professionals Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(1), 99-120. doi.org/10.1177/1046496408326575

George, J. M. ve Jones, G. R. (2001). Towards a process model of individual change in organizations. Human Relations, 54(4), 419–444. doi. org/10.1177/0018726701544002

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42. doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26

Graen, G. B., Scandura, T. A. ve Graen, M. R. (1986). A field experimental test of the moderating effects of growth need strength on productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 484-491. doi. org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.484

Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P. ve Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581- 629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x

Grimm, C. M. ve Smith, K. G. (1991). Research notes and communications management and organizational change: A note on the railroad industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 557-562. doi. org/10.1002/smj.4250120708

Gürbüz, S. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde aracı, düzenleyici ve durumsal etki analizleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Gürbüz, S., Ayhan, Ö. ve Sert, M. (2014). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve örgütsel bağlılık ilişkisi: Türkiye’de yapılan araştırmalar üzerinden bir meta analizi. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 1(1), 3-19. doi. org/10.18394/iid.22845

Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri (5. baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Hackman, J. R. ve Oldham, G. R. (1974). The Job Diagnostic Survey: An instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects (Tech. Rep. No. 4). New Haven, CT: Yale University, Department of Administrative Sciences.

Hackman, J. ve Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hall, G. E. ve Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2. baskı). New York: The Guilford Press.

Hayes, A. F. ve Rockwood, N. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39-57. doi: 10.1016/j. brat.2016.11.001.

Herscovitch, L. ve Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 474. doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474

Houkes, I., Janssen, P. P., de Jonge, J. ve Nijhuis, F. J. (2001). Work and individual determinants of intrinsic work motivation, emotional exhaustion, and turnover intention: A multi-sample analysis. International Journal of Stress Management, 8(4), 257- 283. doi.org/10.1023/A:1017561531748

Hughes, M. (2011). Do 70 per cent of all organizational change initiatives really fail?. Journal of Change Management, 11(4), 451-464. doi: 10.1080/14697017.2011.630506

Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 7-41. doi.org/10.2307/256350

Iverson, R. D. (1996). Employee acceptance of organizational change: the role of organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(1), 122-149. doi. org/10.1080/09585199600000121

Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. K. A. Bollen ve J. S. Long (Ed.), Testing structural equation models içinde (294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V. ve Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 107-122. doi. org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.107

Kartopu, M. ve Gürbüz, S. (2016). Askerî pilotların örgütsel bağlılıklarının, işten ayrılma niyetlerine etkisi: Alternatif iş imkânlarının düzenleyicilik rolü. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(1), 79-112.

KHO, (2016). Askeri organizasyonlarda değişim ve dönüşümün yönetimi sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı. Ankara: Kara Harp Okulu Basımevi.

Kouzes, J. M. ve Posner, B. Z. (2002). The leadership challenge (3. baskı). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kwahk, K. Y. ve Kim, H. W. (2008). Managing readiness in enterprise systems-driven organizational change. Behavior & Information Technology, 27(1), 79- 87. doi.org/10.1080/01449290701398475

Kwahk, K. Y. ve Lee, J. N. (2008). The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Information & Management, 45(7), 474-481. doi.org/10.1016/j. im.2008.07.002

Lau, C. M. ve Woodman, R. W. (1995). Understanding organizational change: A schematic perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 537-554. doi.org/10.5465/256692

Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Theory-based stress measurement. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 3 – 13. doi.org/10.1207/ s15327965pli0101_1

Lazarus, R. S. (2000). Toward better research on stress and coping. American Psychologist, 55(6), 665 – 673. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.6.665

LePine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A. ve Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53, 563−593. doi/pdf/10.1026/2191-9186/ a000392

Lines, R. (2005). The structure and function of attitudes toward organizational change. Human Resource Development Review, 4(1), 8-32. doi. org/10.1177/1534484304273818

Loher, B. T., Noe, R. A., Moeller, N. L. ve Fitzgerald, M. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 280-289. doi. org/10.1177/001872677602901204

Madsen, S. R., Miller, D. ve John, C. R. (2005). Readiness for organizational change: Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference?. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(2), 213-233. doi. org/10.1002/hrdq.1134

Martin, A. J., Jones, E. S. ve Callan, V. J. (2005). The role of psychological climate in facilitating employee adjustment during organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 263-289. doi. org/10.1080/13594320500141228

Mathieu, J. E. ve Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171-194. doi. org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171

McCrae, R. R. ve Costa, P. T. (1986). Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of Personality, 54(2), 385-404. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00401.x

Meyer, J. P. ve Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61- 89. doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. ve Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538. doi. org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538

Miller, J. F. (2002). Motivating people. Executive Excellence, 19(12), 15.

Miller, V. D., Johnson, J. R. ve Grau, J. (1994). Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22(1), 59–80. doi. org/10.1080/00909889409365387

Moon, M. J. (2000). Organizational commitment revisited in new public management: Motivation, organizational culture, sector, and managerial level. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(2), 177-194. doi: 10.2307/3381267

Moskos, C. C., Williams, J.A. ve Segal D. R. (2000). The postmodern military: Armed forces after the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press.

Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680-693. doi:10.1037/0021- 9010.88.4.680

Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73-101. doi.org/10.1080/13594320500451247

Öztürk, D. (2016). TSK 2033 dönüşüm çalışmaları: Temel yaklaşımlar. Askeri organizasyonlarda değişim ve dönüşümün yönetimi sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı (53-70). Ankara: Kara Harp Okulu Basımevi.

Penney, L. M., David, E. ve Witt, L. A. (2011). A review of personality and performance: Identifying boundaries, contingencies, and future research directions. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 297-310. doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.10.005

Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783-794. doi. org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707722

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. doi. org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. ve Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227. doi. org/10.1080/00273170701341316

Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovon, M. ve Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612−624. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.

Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P. ve Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(1), 48-59. doi. org/10.4135/9781483387444.n38

Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L. ve Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359- 371. doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x

Rush, M. C., Schoel, W. A. ve Barnard, S. M. (1995). Psychological resiliency in the public sector:” Hardiness” and pressure for change. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46(1), 17-39. doi.org/10.1006/ jvbe.1995.1002

Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Satana, N. S. (2008). Transformation of the Turkish Military and the path to democracy. Armed Forces & Society, 34(3), 357-388. doi.org/10.1177/0095327X07302679

Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453. doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x Schweiger, D. M. ve DeNisi, A. S. (1991). Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 110-135. doi. org/10.5465/256304

Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. S. Leinhart, (Ed.), Sociological methodology içinde (290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Stanley, D. J., Meyer, J. P. ve Topolnytsky, L. (2005). Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change. Journal of Business & Psychology, 19(4), 429–459. doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005- 4518-2

Sümer, N., Lajunen, T. ve Özkan, T. (2005). Big five personality traits as the distal predictors of road accident involvement. G. Underwood (Ed.) Traffic and transport psychology içinde (215-230). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

Terry, D. J. ve Jimmieson, N. L. (2003). A stress and coping approach to organizational change: Evidence from three field studies. Australian Psychologist, 38(2), 92-101. doi.org/10.1080/000500603100017 07097

Vakola, M. ve Nikolaou, I. (2005). Attitudes towards organizational change: What is the role of employees’ stress and commitment?. Employee Relations, 27(2), 160-174. doi.org/10.1108/01425450510572685

Vakola, M., Tsaousis, I. ve Nikolaou, I. (2004). The role of emotional intelligence and personality variables on attitudes toward organizational change. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(2), 88-110. doi. org/10.1108/02683940410526082

Varoglu, A. K. ve Bicaksiz, A. (2005). Volunteering for risk: The culture of the Turkish armed forces. Armed Forces & Society, 31(4), 583-598. doi.org/10.1177/0095327X0503100407

Wanberg, C. R. ve Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 132. doi: 10.12691/education-3-6-16

Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E. ve Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group & Organization Management, 25(2), 132-153. doi. org/10.1177/1059601100252003

Wasti, S. A. (2002). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Test of an integrated model in the Turkish context. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(5), 525–550. doi. org/10.1016/S0147-1767(02)00032-9

Wasti, S. A. (2003). Organizational commitment, turnover intentions and the influence of cultural values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 303-321. doi. org/10.1348/096317903769647193

Yousef, D. A. (2000). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction as predictors of attitudes toward organizational change in a non-western setting. Personnel Review, 29(5), 567-592. doi. org/10.1108/00483480010296401

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G. ve Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206. doi: 10.1086/651257

Kaynak Göster