Hangi Lider, Kurumda Kalmayı Nasıl Sağlıyor? Çok Boyutlu İş Motivasyonunun Aracı Rolü
Yöneticilerin liderlik tipleri çalışanların iş motivasyonlarını en fazla etkileyen faktörler arasında yer almaktadır ancak, Türkiye’de hem bu etkileri hem de liderlik stillerinin çalışan motivasyonları aracılığı ile işle ilgili diğer sonuçdeğişkenleri üzerindeki etkilerini inceleyen araştırmalar az sayıdadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, yöneticilerin babacan vedönüşümcü liderlik stilleri ile çalışanların çok boyutlu iş motivasyonları arasındaki ilişkileri geçerliği ve güvenirliğitest edilmiş bir ölçek kullanarak Türkiye örnekleminde incelemek (Çalışma 1); ayrıca, liderlik tipleri ile işten ayrılmaniyetleri arasındaki ilişkilerde çok boyutlu iş motivasyonunun kısmi aracı rolünü test etmektir (Çalışma 2). Bu amaçla,Çalışma 1’de 456 çalışandan veri toplanmış ve Gagné ve arkadaşları (2014) tarafından Öz Belirleme Kuramı (Decive Ryan, 1985) temel alınarak geliştirilen Çok Boyutlu İş Motivasyonu Ölçeği’nin (ÇBİMÖ) Türkçeye adaptasyonçalışması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma 2’de 388 çalışandan veri toplanmış ve önerilen model yapısal eşitlik modellemesi yöntemiyle test edilmiştir. Çalışma 1’in bulguları, ÇBİMÖ’nün diğer ülkelerde yapılan çalışmaların gösterdiği faktöryapılarına uyumlu bir yapı gösterdiğini ve yordayıcı geçerliği olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Çalışma 2’nin bulguları,genel olarak iki liderlik stilinin de motivasyon tipleriyle önerilen ilişkileri gösterdiğini ancak, iş motivasyonlarınınyalnızca dönüşümcü liderlik ile işten ayrılma niyetleri arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracılık ettiğini göstermiştir. Bulgular,kuramsal ve uygulamaya yönelik çıkarımlar ile gelecekteki çalışmalara yönelik önerilerle birlikte tartışılmıştır.
Which Leader Makes Us Stay and How? The Mediating Role of Multidimensional Work Motivation
Supervisors’ leadership styles are among the most important variables that influence employees’ work motivation. However, in Turkey, only a limited number of studies examined the effects of leadership styles on employee motivations and on distal work-related outcomes via their influences on these motivations. The present study aimed to examine the links of paternalistic and transformational leadership with employees’ work motivations by using a valid and reliable work motivation measure and to test the mediating roles of motivations in the relationships between leadership styles and employees’ turnover intentions. In Study 1, data were collected from 456 employees and the Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale (MWMS; Gagné et al., 2014), which was developed within the framework of Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985), was adapted to Turkish. In Study 2, data were collected from 388 employees and the proposed model was tested using structural equation modeling. Study 1 revealed that the factor structure and the predictive validity results of the adapted MWMS were consistent with those of its versions in other languages. Study 2 showed that both leadership styles were associated with motivation dimensions in the proposed directions; however, motivations partially mediated only the link between transformational leadership and turnover intentions.
___
Abassi, S. M. ve Hollman, K. W. (2000). Turnover: The real bottom line. Public Personnel Management, 29(3), 333-342. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/009102600002900303Alatawi, M.A. (2017). Can transformational managers control turnover intention? SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1), 1-6. https://doi. org/10.4102/sajhrm.v15i0.873
Allen, N. J. ve Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). Amos (Version 22.0). Computer Program. Chicago: SPSS/IBM.
Armstrong, M. (1998). A handbook of personnel management practice, (6th ed). London: Kogan Page Limited.
Avolio, B. J. ve Bass, B. M. (2001). Developing potential across a full range of Leadership TM: Cases on transactional and transformational leadership. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M. ve Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441-462. http://dx.doi. org/10.1348/096317999166789
Aycan, Z. (2000). Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology: Contributions, past developments, and future directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(1), 110-128. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0022022100031001009
Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism. Indigenous and cultural psychology içinde (445-466). Springer, Boston, MA.
Aycan, Z., Schyns, B., Sun, J. M., Felfe, J. ve Saher, N. (2013). Convergence and divergence of paternalistic leadership: A cross-cultural investigation of prototypes. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(9), 962-969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ jibs.2013.48
Bakoğlu Deliorman, R., Taştan Boz, İ., Yiğit, İ. ve Yıldız, S. (2009). Tükenmişliği ölçmede alternatif bir araç: Kopenhag tükenmişlik envanterinin Marmara Üniversitesi akademik personeli üzerine uyarlaması, İstanbul Üniversitesi Yönetim Dergisi, 63, 77-98.
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410
Blau, G. ve Boal, K. (1989). Using job involvement and organizational commitment interactively to predict turnover. Journal of Management, 15(1), 115-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500110
Caillier, J. G. (2016a). Do transformational leaders affect turnover intentions and extra-role behaviors through mission valence?. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 226-242. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/0275074014551751
Caillier, J. G. (2016b). Linking transformational leadership to self-efficacy, extra-role behaviors, and turnover intentions in public agencies: The mediating role of goal clarity. Administration & Society, 48(7), 883-906. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0095399713519093
Cem Ersoy, N., Born, M. P., Derous, E. ve van der Molen, H. T. (2012). The effect of cultural orientation and leadership style on self-versus other-oriented organizational citizenship behaviour in Turkey and the Netherlands. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15(4), 249-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-839X.2012.01380.x
Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C. ve House, R. J. (Eds.). (2008). LEA’s organization and management series. Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Clark, J., Quast, L. N., Jang, S., Wohkittel, J., Center, B., Edwards, K. ve Bovornusvakool, W. (2016). GLOBE Study culture clusters: Can they be found in Importance ratings of managerial competencies?. European Journal of Training and Development, 40(7), 534-553. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-03- 2016-0016
Çivilidağ A. ve Şekercioğlu G. (2017). Çok boyutlu iş motivasyonu ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 7(1), 143-156.
Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P. ve Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H. ve Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
Deci, E. ve Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Boston, MA: Springer Science ve Business Media. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/ S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/a0012801
Deci, E. L. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., ve Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461 520.1991.9653137
Eyal, O. ve Roth, G. (2011). Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation: Self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256- 275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578231111129055
Fernet, C., Trépanier, S. G., Austin, S., Gagné, M. ve Forest, J. (2015). Transformational leadership and optimal functioning at work: On the mediating role of employees’ perceived job characteristics and motivation. Work & Stress, 29(1), 11-31. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/02678373.2014.1003998
Friedman, L. ve Wall, M. (2005). Graphical views of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple linear regression. The American Statistician, 59(2), 127- 136. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313005X41337
Fu, P. P., Tsui, A. S., Liu, J. ve Li, L. (2010). Pursuit of whose happiness? Executive leaders’ transformational behaviors and personal values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 222-254. http://dx.doi. org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.222
Gagné, M. (2003). Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15(4), 372- 390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/714044203
Gagné, M., Chemolli, E., Forest, J. ve Koestner, R. (2008). A temporal analysis of the relation between organisational commitment and work motivation. Psychologica Belgica, 48(2-3). http://dx.doi. org/10.5334/pb-48-2-3-219
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., ... ve Halvari, H. (2014). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178-196. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
Gillet, N., Gagné, M., Sauvagère, S. ve Fouquereau, E. (2013). The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees’ satisfaction and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 450-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.665228
Green A. E., Miller E .A. ve Aarons, G. A. (2013). Transformational leadership moderates the relationship between emotional exhaustion and turnover intention among community mental health providers. Community Mental Health Journal, 49(4), 373- 379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10597-011-9463-0
Göncü, A. (2013). Farklı olan değil ayn(a) olan kazanır: Bir yönetici olarak grup protipi lider olmak. ODTÜ Yayıncılık, Ankara, Türkiye.
Göncü, A., Aycan, Z. ve Johnson, R. E. (2014). Effects of paternalistic and transformational leadership on follower outcomes. International Journal of Management and Business, 5(1), 36-58.
Göncü Köse, A. ve Metin, U. B. (2018). Linking leadership style and workplace procrastination: The role of organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 46(3), 245-262. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10852352.2018.1470369
Hayes, A. F. ve Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451-470. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hughes, L. W., Avey, J. B. ve Nixon, D. R. (2010). Relationships between leadership and followers’ quitting intentions and job search behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(4), 351- 362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809358698
Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C. ve Djurdjevic, E. (2011). Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher-order multidimensional constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 744-761. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021504
Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. ve Gümüşlüoğlu, L. (2013). Dönüştürücü liderliğin Türkiye bağlamında yeniden kavramsallaştırılması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 28(72), 105-124.
Kuvaas, B. (2006a). Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: The roles of pay administration and pay level. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(3), 365-385. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.377
Kuvaas, B. (2006b). Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: Mediating and moderating roles of work motivation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(3), 504-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190500521581
Liao, S. H., Widowati, R., Hu, D. C. ve Tasman, L. (2017). The mediating effect of psychological contract in the relationships between paternalistic leadership and turnover intention for foreign workers in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(2), 80- 87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.08.003
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L. ve Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173- 181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371
Markus, H. R. ve Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
Metin, U. B., Taris, T. W. ve Peeters, M .C. W. (2016). Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 254 – 263. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.006
Mowday R. T., Steers, R. M. ve Porter, W. L. (1997). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
Moynihan, D. P. ve Landuyt, N. (2008). Explaining turnover intention in state government: Examining the roles of gender, life cycle, and loyalty. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(2), 120-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734371X08315771
Nunnally, J.C. (1977), Psychometric Theory, (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Olafsen, A. H., Halvari, H., Forest, J. ve Deci, E. L. (2015). Show them the money? The role of pay, managerial need support, and justice in a self-determination theory model of intrinsic work motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(4), 447-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12211
Parker, S. L., Jimmieson, N. L. ve Amiot, C. E. (2017). The motivational mechanisms underlying active and high-strain work: Consequences for mastery and performance. Work & Stress, 31(3), 233-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1303551
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Riggio, R. E. (2013). Introduction to industrial/organizational psychology (6th ed.) (L. W. Porter, Ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978- 94-007-0753-5_2630
Shim, M. (2010). Factors influencing child welfare employee’s turnover: Focusing on organisational culture and climate. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(6), 847-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. childyouth.2010.02.004
Shuck, B., Peyton Roberts, T. ve Zigarmi, D. (2018). Employee perceptions of the work environment, motivational outlooks, and employee work intentions: An HR practitioner’s dream or nightmare?. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(2), 197- 213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1523422318757209
Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. ve Shapiro, D. L. (2004). The future of work motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379-387. http://dx.doi. org/10.5465/amr.2004.13670978
Steers, R. M. ve Porter, L. W. (Eds.) (1991). Motivation and work behavior (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Trépanier, S. G., Forest, J., Fernet, C. ve Austin, S. (2015). On the psychological and motivational processes linking job characteristics to employee functioning: Insights from self-determination theory. Work & Stress, 29(3), 286-305. http://dx.doi.org /10.1080/02678373.2015.1074957
Uğurluoğlu Ö., Uğurluoğlu Aldoğan E., Turgut M. ve Özatkan Y. (2018). The effect of paternalistic leadership on job performance and intention to leave the job. Journal of Health Management, 20(1), 46- 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0972063417747700
Wasti, S. A. (1999). Organizational commitment and collectivism: The case of Turkey, Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, University of Illinois, Chicago.
- ISSN: 1300-4433
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
- Başlangıç: 1978
- Yayıncı: Türk Psikologlar Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
Üç Boyutlu Vatandaşlık Performansı Modelinin Türkiye’de Yapı Geçerliği ve Öncülleri
Yönetici ile Çalışan Duygusal Tükenmişliği Arasındaki İlişki: İşlemsel Adaletin Rolü
Engin Bağış ÖZTÜRK, Gökhan KARAGONLAR
Mehmet PEKER, Nevra Cem ERSOY, Muazzez GİRAY DENİZ
Hangi Lider, Kurumda Kalmayı Nasıl Sağlıyor? Çok Boyutlu İş Motivasyonunun Aracı Rolü
Aslı GÖNCÜ KÖSE, U. Baran METİN
Motivasyon, Deneyime Açıklık ve Örgütsel Bağlılık: Değişime İlişkin Tutumların Aracılık Rolü