Ektodermal displazili olgularda konjonktiva bası sitolojisi

Ektodermal displazi ektodermal kökenli doku ve organları etkileyen bir belirtiler grubudur. Bu çalışmada ektodermal displazili olgularda konjonktiva etkilenmesini araştırmak amacıyla girişimsel olmayan bir yöntem olan bası sitolojisi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Göz Hastalıkları ve Protetik Diş Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Bilim Dallarında takipte olan ektodermal displazili üç hastanın altı gözü çalışma kapsamına alındı. Üst bulber konjonktivaya uygulanan bası sitoloji yöntemi ile selüloz asetat kağıdı yüzeyine alınan hücre grupları (%70’lik etil alkol, %37’lik formaldehit ve glisiyal asetik asitin 20:1:1 oranındaki) sıvısında sabitlendikten sonra “periodik acid schiff” ve hematoksilen-eozin ile boyandı. Ektodermal displazili olgularda bası sitolojisi ile hücre bütünlüğünde azalma, çekirdekte yer yer piknotik değişimler, epitelyal hücre şeklinde değişimler ve goblet hücre kaybı gözlendi. Ektodermal displazili olgularda göz kuruluğu bulguları bası sitolojisi tekniği ile desteklendi. Bası sitolojisinin, ektodermal displazinin göz izleminde, girişimsel olmayan bir yöntem olarak kullanılabileceği sonucuna varıldı.

Conjunctival impression cytology in patients with ectodermal dysplasia

Ectodermal dysplasia is a group of symptoms affecting tissues and organs of ectodermal origin. In this study, conjunctival impression cytology technique which is a non-invasive method was performed in patients with ectodermal dysplasia to evaluate the affects on conjunctiva. Six eyes of three patients with ectodermal dysplasia who were followed up by the Ophthalmology Clinic of Dicle University Faculty of Medicine and Prosthetic Dentistry Departments were included in the study. Bulbar conjunctiva impression cytology method was applied to the upper surface of the bulbar conjunctiva and the cell groups taken to the surface of cellulose acetate paper were fixed by a solution containing 70% ethyl alcohol, 37% formaldehyde and glicial acetic acid with a ratio of 20:1:1 and later stained by periodic acid-schiff and haematoxylin-eosin. Using impression cytology method a decrease in integrity of the cells, picnotic changes in the nucleus, epithelial cell-like changes and loss of goblet cells were observed in patients with ectodermal dysplasia. The findings of eye dryness in patients with ectodermal dysplasia were supported by the impression cytology technique. Impression cytology can be used as a non-invasive method in ophthalmologic follow-up of patients with ectodermal dysplasia.

___

  • 1. Priolo M, Lagana C. Ectodermal dysplasias a new clinical-genetic classification. J Med Genet 2001; 38: 579-85.[Özet]
  • 2. Ali G, Kumar M, Verma R, Khajuria V, Wadhwa MB. Anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (Christ-Seimens-Touraine syndrome)-case report with a review. Indian J Med Sci 2000; 54: 541-4. [Özet]
  • 3. Hill VA, Nischal KK, Collin Harper JI. An unusual ectodermal dysplasia with unique eye defects. Br J Dermatol 2005; 152: 365-7. [Özet]
  • 4. Moshegov CN. Ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting (EEC) syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114: 1290-1. [Özet]
  • 5. McNab AA, Potts MJ, Welham RA. The EEC syndrome and its ocular manifestations. Br J Ophthalmol 1989; 73: 261-4. [Özet]
  • 6. Mawhorter LG, Ruttum MS, Koenig SB. Keratopathy in a family with the ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting syndrome. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 1427-31.
  • 7. Ota Y, Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, et al. Management of evaporative dry eye in ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting syndrome. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 795-801. [Özet]
  • 8. Saw VP, Dart JK, Sitaru C, Zillikens D. Cicatrising conjunctivitis with anti-basement membrane autoantibodies in ectodermal dysplasia. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 1403-10. [Özet]
  • 9. Käsmann B, Ruprecht KW. Ocular manifestations in a father and son with EEC syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997; 235: 512-6.[Özet]
  • 10. Tseng SCG. Staging of conjonctival squamouse metaplasia by impression cytology. Ophthalmol 1985; 92: 728-33. [Özet]
  • 11. Egbert PR, Lauber S, Maurice DM. A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol 1977; 84: 798-01. [Özet]
  • 12. Nelson JD, Havener VR, Cameron JD. Cellulose asetate impression cytology of the ocular surface-dry eye state. Arch Ophthalmol 1976; 101: 1869-72. [Özet]
  • 13. Wiegmann OA, Walker FA. The syndrome of lobster claw deformity and nasolacrimal obstruction. J Pediatr Ophthalmol 1970; 7: 79-85.
  • 14. Mondino BJ, Bath PE, Foos RY, Apt L, Rajacich GM. Absent meibomian glands in the ectrodactyly, ectodermal dysplasia, cleft lippalate syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 97: 496-500. [Özet]
  • 15. Baum JL, Bull MJ. Ocular manifestations of the ectrodactyly, ectodermal dysplasia, cleft lip-palate syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 78: 211-6. [Özet]
  • 16. Durmuş M, Bardak Y, Aydın G, ve ark. Psöriyazisin oftalmolojik bulguları ve konjonktiva mukoza tutulumunun scraping yöntemiyle sitolojik incelenmesi. Turk j Ophthal 1998; 28: 45-9.
  • 17. Hosseini H, Kumar PV, Geramizadeh B, Nowroozizadeh B, Ramzi M. Conjunctival scrape cytology findings in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Acta Cytol 2010; 54: 272-6. [Özet]
  • 18. Söker S. İmpresyon Sitolojisi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2007; 34: 220-5.
  • 19. Tsubota K, Takamura E, Hasegawa T, et al. Detection by brush cytology of mast cells and eosinophils in allergic and vernal conjunctivitis. Cornea 1991; 10: 525-31.
  • 20. Thatcher RW, Darougar S, Jones BR. Conjunctival impression cytology. Arch Ophthalmol 1977; 95: 678-81.[Özet]