Stres Üriner İnkontinans Nedeniyle Burch ve Transobturator tape Uygulanan Olgularda Seksüel Fonksiyon ve İnkontinans Skorun Karşılaştırılması

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı stres üriner inkontinansın cerrahi tedavisinde uygulanan trans obturatuar tape (TOT) ve Burch operasyonlarını postoperatif rezidüel volüm, seksüel fonksiyon ve inkontinans skorları açısından karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma prospektif gözlemsel olarak dizayn edildi. Eylül 2014- Ocak 2018 tarihleri arasında üriner inkontinans cerrahisi uygulanan olgular dahil edildi. Trans obturatuar tape ve Burch uygulanan hastalar postoperatif rezidü miktarı, Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) ve International Incontinence Questionnaire-Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF) açısından karşılaştırıldı. İstatistiksel analiz için student t, mann-whitney u, wilcoxon testleri uygulandı. P<0,05 anlamlı kabul edildi. Bulgular: 29'u TOT, 23'ü de BURCH olmak üzere toplam 52 stress üriner inkontinans cerrahisi uygulanan olgu çalışmaya dahil edildi. Yaş ortalaması 55,50±9,71, ortalama izlem süresi 14,63±9,33 ay ve ortalama postoperatif rezidü miktarı 30,40±16,75 cc idi. Gruplar arasında post operatif rezidüel volüm idrar miktarı açısından istatistiki olarak anlamlı farklılık vardır (p<0,05). BURCH ve TOT grupları arasında yaş (53,60–57,00) ve vücut kitle indeksi (VKI) (27,60-30,45) ortalamaları yönünden anlamlı farlılık vardı (p<0,05). ICIQ-SF skorlarında ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası arasında istatistiki olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur (BURCH preop:11,09/postop:1,30 - TOT preop:16,59/postop:0,79) (p<0,05). BURCH grubunda operasyon sonrası ASEX skor ortalamalarındaki azalma (Preop 16,96 / postop 13,04) istatistiki olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p=0,03), TOT grubunda operasyon sonrası ASEX skorunda (preop 19 / postop 18,24) azalma görülmüştür. Sonuç: BURCH uygulanan olgularda seksüel fonksiyonlarda anlamlı olarak düzelme tespit edilmişken TOT uygulanan olgularda ise inkontinans skorlarında anlamlı düzelme tespit edilmiştir.

Comparison of Sexual Function and Incontinence Scores in Cases of Burch and Transobturator Tape For Stress Urinary Incontinence

Aim: Aim: This study aims to compare trans obturator tape (TOT) and Burch operations performed for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in terms of postoperative residual volume, sexual function and incontinence scores. Material and Method: The study was designed as prospective observational. Cases who underwent urinary incontinence surgery between September 2014 and January 2018 were included. Patients who underwent trans obturatory tape and Burch were compared in terms of postoperative residue, Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) and International Incontinence Questionnaire-Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF). Student t, Mann-Whitney u, Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: The records of 52 patients who underwent stress urinary incontinence surgery, 29 of whom were TOT and 23 were Burch, were retrieved. The mean age was 55.50±9.71 years, the mean follow-up time was 14.63±9.33 months, and the mean postoperative urine residue was 30.40±16.75 cc. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the postoperative residual volume of urine (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between the Burch and TOT groups in terms of mean age (53.60–57.00) and body mass index (BMI) (27.60-30.45) (p<0.05). A statistically significant difference was found between preoperative and postoperative ICIQ-SF scores in groups (Burch preop:11.09/ postop:1.30 - TOT preop:16.59/postop:0.79) (p<0.05). (p<0.05). Subjective clinical improvement was recorded in more ICIQ-SF scores in the TOT group. The decrease in the postoperative ASEX score averages in the Burch (Preop 16.96/ postop 13.04) group was statistically significant (p<0.05), while this score decreased in the TOT (preop 19 / postop 18.24) group after the operation. Conclusion: While there was a significant improvement in sexual functions in the cases whom Burch was applied, a significant improvement was also found in the incontinence scores of the issues in which TOT was used.

___

  • D'Ancona C, Haylen B, Oelke M, et al. Standardisation Steering Committee ICS and the ICS Working Group on Terminology for Male Lower Urinary Tract & Pelvic Floor Symptoms and Dysfunction. The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38:433-477.
  • Kelleher C. Epidemiology and classification of urinary incontinence. In: Urogynecology Cordozo L (ed.) Churchill Livingstone, Newyork. 1997; 3-26.
  • Abrams P, Blavias JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT. The standardization of terminology for lower urinary tract function. Neurol Urodyn 1998; 7:403-409.
  • Biri A, Durukan E, Maral I, et al. Incidence of stress urinary incontinence among women in Turkey. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006; 17:604-610.
  • Bergman A, Elia G. Three surgical procedure for genuine stress incontinence. Five year follow up of a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173:66-71.
  • Dainer M, Hall CD, Choe J, Bhatia NN. The Burch procedure: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999;54:49-60.125
  • Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol 2000; 163:888-893.
  • Ulmsten U, Falconer C, Johnson P, et al. A multicenter study of tensionfree vaginal tape (TVT) for surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1998;9:210-3.
  • Basson R, Berman J, Burnett A, et al. Report of the international consensus development on female sexual dysfunction: Definitions and classifications. J Urol Int 2004; 72:52-57.
  • Çayan S, Akbay E, Bozlu M, et al. The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction and potential risk factors that may impaire sexual function in Turkish women. Urol Int. 2004; 72:52-57.
  • Gousse A. The impact of lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence on female sexual dysfunction using a validated instrument. J Sex Med. 2008; 5:1418-23.
  • Çetinel B, Ozkan B, Can G. Geçerlilik Güvenilirlik Çalısması. Turk Uroloji Dergisi 2000; 30:332-338.
  • Hartnell GG, Kiely EA, Williams G, et al: Real time ultrasound meaasurement of bladder volüme: A comparative study of three methods. Br J Radiol 1987; 60:1063-1065.
  • Heiman JR, Guess MK, Connell K. Standards for clinical trials in sexual dysfunctions of women: research designs and outcomes assessment. In: Lue TF, Basson R, Rossen R, eds. Sexual Medicine-Sexual Dysfunction İn Men and Women. 2nd International Consultations on Sexual Dysfunctions, 1st ed. Paris: Health Publications; 2004. p.633-82.
  • Guner H, Ahmet S, Nas T, Yıldırım M. Surgical treatment alternatives in stress incontinence. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1996; 52:255-258.
  • Ekmez M, Göksedef BPÇ, Ateş U. Stress Üriner İnkontinans Tedavisinde TVT, TOT, ve Burch Operasyonlarının Uzun Dönem Sonuçları. Med Bull Haseki 2012; 50:122-126.
  • Bandarian M, Ghanbari Z, Asgari A. Comparison of transobturator tape (TOT) vs Burch method in treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;31(6):518-20.
  • Lazarou G, Minis E, Grigorescu B. Outcomes of stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing TOT versus Burch colposuspension with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30:245-250.
  • Çayan F, Dilek S, Akbay E, Çayan S. Sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: vaginal sling versus Burch colposuspension. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008; 277:31-36.
  • Drahoradova P, Martan A, Svabik K, et al. Longitudinal trends with improvement in quality of life after TVT, TVT O and Burch colposuspension procedures. Med Sci Monit. 2011; 17:CR67-72.
  • Lapitan MC, Cody JD. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 13:6.
  • Tuncer M, Tarhan F, Kafkasli A, Demir K, Yucetas U, Faydaci G, Eryildirim B, Sarica K. The effects of stress incontinence surgery on sexual function and life quality of women. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2016; 88:106-110.