Leishmaniasis şüpheli örneklerin kültür ve PCR sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi
Amaç: Bu çalışmada leishmaniasis şüphesi ile laboratuvarımıza gönderilen kan, kemik iliği ve/veya doku biyopsisi ve yara aspiratı örneklerinin NovyMacNeal-Nicolle NNN besiyerine ekimi ve moleküler yöntemlerle inceleme sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Ülkemizde yerli olguların görülme sıklığı düşük olmasına rağmen son yıllarda artan göçmen sayısı nedeniyle leishmaniasis tüm dünyada olduğu gibi ülkemizde de yeniden önem kazanmıştır. Visseral leishmaniasis tanısında özellikle kemik iliği ve buffy coat örnekleri; kütanöz leishmaniasis tanısında ise yara aspiratı veya doku biyopsi örneklerinden yararlanılmaktadır. Kemik iliği ve doku biyopsi örneklerinin alınması hasta açısından oldukça zahmetli olmakta, ayrıca doğru şekilde alınmadığında yanlış tanıya yol açabilmektedir. Bu nedenle mümkün olduğunca birden fazla yöntemin bir arada kullanılması ile tanı koyma şansının artırılması önerilmektedir.Yöntem: Ocak 2015 ile Temmuz 2018 tarihleri arasında leishmaniasis şüphesiyle Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü Ulusal Parazitoloji Referans Laboratuvarı’na gönderilen 271 adet kan, kemik iliği, doku ve/veya yara aspiratı örneğinin NNN besiyerine ekimi yapılmış ve ticari kit kullanılarak Genesig, Primer Design, UK realDesign, UK for real-time PCR method. Results: While 45 16.60% of the samples were evaluated as positive by any method, 226 83.40% were evaluated as negative. Of the 174 64.20% samples evaluated by PCR alone, 22 12.64% were positive and 152 87.36% were negative. Of the 52 19.20% samples evaluated by culture method only, 7 13.46% were positive and 45 86.54% were negative. And finally, of the 45 16.60% samples evaluated by both methods, 29 64.45% were negative by both PCR and culture, 10 22.22% were positive by PCR and culture, 6 13.33% were positive by PCR and negative by culture. There were no samples detected negative by PCR and positive by culture. There were no samples detected negative by PCR and positive by culture. A moderate concordance was found between the two methods studied κ= 0.545 . Conclusion: Since the sensitivity and specificity of the two diagnostic methods are different, it is concluded that the use of a combination of culture and PCR methods that allow the growth of the parasite by culture, especially in the case of low parasitemia and amplification of DNA by PCR, will increase the chance of diagnosis of the disease
Evaluation of culture and PCR results of leishmaniasis suspected samples
Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the results of blood, bone marrow and / or tissue biopsy and wound aspirate samples sent to our laboratory with suspicion of leishmaniasis on Novy-MacNeal-Nicolle NNN medium and the results of molecular examination. Although incidence of indigenous cases in our country is low, due to increasing number of migrants in recent years, leishmaniasis has regained importance in our country as in the whole world. Especially bone marrow and buffy coat samples for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis and wound aspirate or tissue biopsy specimens for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis are used. Obtaining bone marrow and tissue biopsy specimens is very painful for the patient and may lead to misdiagnosis if not obtained correctly. Therefore, it is recommended to increase the chance of diagnosis by using more than one method together.Methods: Two hundred seventy one blood, bone marrow, tissue and / or wound aspirate specimens between January 2015 and July 2018 were sent to the National Parasitology Reference Laboratory of the General Directorate of Public Health on suspicion of leishmaniasis and cultured in NNN medium were then processed by using a commercial kit Genesig, Primer Design, UK for real-time PCR method. Results: While 45 16.60% of the samples were evaluated as positive by any method, 226 83.40% were evaluated as negative. Of the 174 64.20% samples evaluated by PCR alone, 22 12.64% were positive and 152 87.36% were negative. Of the 52 19.20% samples evaluated by culture method only, 7 13.46% were positive and 45 86.54% were negative. And finally, of the 45 16.60% samples evaluated by both methods, 29 64.45% were negative by both PCR and culture, 10 22.22% were positive by PCR and culture, 6 13.33% were positive by PCR and negative by culture. There were no samples detected negative by PCR and positive by culture. There were no samples detected negative by PCR and positive by culture. A moderate concordance was found between the two methods studied κ= 0.545 . Conclusion: Since the sensitivity and specificity of the two diagnostic methods are different, it is concluded that the use of a combination of culture and PCR methods that allow the growth of the parasite by culture, especially in the case of low parasitemia and amplification of DNA by PCR, will increase the chance of diagnosis of the disease
___
- 1. Singh S, New developments in diagnosis of
leishmaniasis, Indian J Med Res 2006; 123:311-30.
- 2. Öztoprak N, Aydemir H, Pişkin N, Seremet Keskin
A, Araslı M, Gökmen A, Çelebi G, Külekçi Uğur
A, Taylan Özkan A, Zonguldak’ta Erişkin Viseral
Leyşmaniyaz Olgusu, Mikrobiyol Bul 2010; 44: 671-
7.
- 3. Sayili A, Taylan Ozkan A, Schallig HDFH, Case
Report: Pediatric Visceral Leishmaniasis Caused by
Leishmania infantum in Northern Cyprus, Am J Trop
Med Hyg 2016; 95(6): 1386–8.
- 4. Dinçer D, Arca E, Koç E, Topal Y, Taylan Özkan A,
Çelebi B, Ülkemizin Endemik Olmayan Bir İlinde
(Ankara) Saptanan Leishmania infantum’a Bağlı Bir
Kütanöz Leyşmanyazis Olgusu, Mikrobiyol Bul 2012;
46(3): 499-506.
- 5. Malatyalı E, Özçelik S, Gürsoy N, Kekik (Thymus
vulgaris), kimyon (Cuminum cyminum) ve mersin
(Myrtus communis) bitkilerinden elde edilen
yağların invitro antileishmanial etkileri, Turk
Hij Den Biyol Derg 2009; 66 (1): 7-13.
- 6. Çulha G, Doğramacı ÇA, Gülkan B, Savaş N, Kutanöz
leishmaniasis ve Hatay İlindeki durumu, Turk Hij Den
Biyol Derg 2014; 71(4): 171-8.
- 7. Fraga TL, Brustoloni YM, Lima RB, Cavalheiros
Dorval ME, Teruya Oshiro E, Oliveira J, Lyrio de
Oliveira AL, Pirmez C, Polymerase Chain Reaction
of Peripheral Blood as a Tool for the Diagnosis
of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Children, Mem Inst
Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 2010;105(3):310-3.
- 8. Rahi AA, Nsaif S, Hassoni JJ, Ali MA, Hamza HA,
Comparison of Diagnostic Methods in Cutaneous
Leishmaniasis in Iraq, Am J BioSci 2013;1(1):1-5.
- 9. Ertabaklar H, Çalışkan SÖ, Boduç E, Ertuğ S, Kutanöz
Leyşmanyazis Tanısında Direkt Mikroskopi, Kültür
ve Polimeraz Zincir Reaksiyonu Yöntemlerinin
Karşılaştırılması, Mikrobiyol Bul 2015;49(1):77-84.
- 10. Nsaif AL-Hucheimi S, Sultan BA, Al-Dhalimi MA,
Abdullah Mahmood T, Tracking of Ceotaneous
Leishmaniasis by Parasitological, Molecular
and Biochemical Analysis, Kufa J Nursing Sci
2015;5(1):1-10.
- 11. ILemrani M, Hamdi S, Laamrani A, Hassar M, PCR
Detection of Leishmania in Skin Biopsies, J Infect
Developing Countries 2009; 3(2):115-22.
- 12. Zakai HA, Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) in
Saudi Arabia: Current Status, J Adv Lab Res Biol
2014;5(2):29-34
- 13. El Hassan AM, Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Al-Ahsa
Oasis in Saudi Arabia and in Sudan: A Comparative
Study, Saudi J Med Med Sci 2013;1(2):64-71
- 14. Georgiadou SP, Makaritsis KP, Dalekos GN,
Leishmaniasis Revisited: Current Aspects on
Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment, J Translat
Intern Med 2015;3(2):43-50
- 15. Imran AL-Mosa MA, The best method for Diagnosis
of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Identification
of the Causative Leishmania Species in Al-Najaf
Governorate by Using PCR Assay, Int J Adv Res
2015;3(5):226-33
- 16. Pourmohammadi B, Motazedian MH, Hatam GR,
Kalantari M, Habibi P, Sarkari B, Comparison
of Three Methods for Diagnosis of Cutaneous
Leishmaniasis, Iranian J Parasitol 2010;5(4):1-8
- 17. Abda IB, de Monbrison F, Bousslimi N, Aoun K,
Bouratbine A, Picot S, Advantages and Limits of
Real-time PCR Assay and PCR-Restriction Fragment
Length Polymorphism for the Identification of
Cutaneous Leishmania Species in Tunisia, Trans R
Soc Trop Med Hyg 2011;105(1):17-22
- 18. Daldal N, Taylan Özkan A, Etkene Yönelik
Tanı Yöntemleri, Korkmaz M, Ok ÜZ (eds) In:
Parazitolojide Laboratuvar Yöntem, Yorum,
Akreditasyon, Meta Basım, İzmir, 2011:87-117
- 19. Profeta Luz ZM, da Silva AR, de Oliveira Silva
F, Caligiorne RB, Oliveira E, Rabello A, Lesion
aspirate culture for the diagnosis and isolation
of Leishmania spp. from patients with cutaneous
leishmaniasis, Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de
Janeiro 2009;104(1):62-6
- 20. Thomaz-Soccol A, Mocellin M, Mulinari F, de
Castro EA, de Queiroz-Telles F, de Souza Alcântara
F, Bavaresco MT, Hennig L, Andraus A, Luz E,
Thomaz-Soccol V, Clinical Aspects and Relevance
of Molecular Diagnosis in Late Mucocutaneous
Leishmaniasis Patients in Paraná, Brazil, Braz Arch
Biol Technol 2011, 54(3): 487-94
- 21. Qader AM, Abood MK, Bakir TY, Identification of
Leishmania Parasites in Clinical Samples Obtained
from Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Patients Using PCR
Technique in Iraq, Iraqi J Sci 2009;50(1):32-6