Farmakomekanik tromboaspirasyon ile tedavi edilen akut derin ven trombozlu hastalarda trombolitik tedavi ilavesinin uzun dönem sonuçları: Karşılaştırmalı çalışma

Amaç: Bu çalışmada akut ve subakut alt ekstremite derin ven trombozlu hastalarda trombolitik tedavinin farmakomekanik tromboaspirasyona ilavesinin klinik ve ultrasonografik uzun dönem sonuçları değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Ocak 2013 - Ocak 2015 tarihleri arasında hiperakut veya akut derin ven trombozu tanısı ile kliniğimize başvuran toplam 68 hastanın (41 erkek, 27 kadın; ort. yaş 38 yıl; dağılım 25-56 yıl) tıbbi verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastalar iki gruba ayrıldı: trombolitik tedavi olmaksızın trombektomi (Grup 1, n=33) ve trombolitik tedavi ile trombektomi (Grup 2, n=35). Hastaların tümüne bir, altı ve 12. ayda Klinik Semptom Skorlaması ve Doppler ultrasonografisi yapıldı. Bulgular: Grup 1'de birinci ayda klinik semptom skoru daha yüksek iken (p

Long-term results of additional thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis treated with pharmacomechanical thromboaspiration: A comparative study

Background: This study aims to evaluate the clinical andultrasonographic long-term results of additional thrombolytictherapy to pharmacomechanical thromboaspiration in patients withacute and subacute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.Methods: Medical data of a total of 68 patients (41 males,27 females; mean age 38 years; range, 25 to 56 years) who wereadmitted to our department with the diagnosis of hyperacute or acutedeep vein thrombosis between January 2013 and January 2015 wereretrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups:thrombectomy without thrombolytic therapy (Group 1, n=33) andthrombectomy with thrombolytic therapy (Group 2, n=35). Allpatients were administered Clinical Symptom Scoring and Dopplerultrasonography at one, six, and 12 months.Results: Clinical symptom scores were higher in Group 1 at onemonth (p

PDF

___

Fowkes FJ, Price JF, Fowkes FG. Incidence of diagnosed deep vein thrombosis in the general population: systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003;25:1-5.
Watz R, Savidge GF. Rapid thrombolysis and preservation of valvular venous function in high deep vein thrombosis. A comparative study between streptokinase and heparin therapy. Acta Med Scand 1979;205:293-8.
Coon WW. Venous thromboembolism. Prevalence, risk factors, and prevention. Clin Chest Med 1984;5:391-401.
Watson LI, Armon MP. Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;4:CD002783.
Alesh I, Kayali F, Stein PD. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (intrathrombus injection) in treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:143-8.
Meissner MH, Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, Gillespie DL, et al. Early thrombus removal strategies for acute deep venous thrombosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg 2012;55:1449-62.
Ho WK, Hankey GJ, Lee CH, Eikelboom JW. Venous thromboembolism: diagnosis and management of deep venous thrombosis. Med J Aust. 2005;182:476-81.
Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, Ducruet T, Arsenault L, Miron MJ, et al. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:698-707.
Vedantham S, Thorpe PE, Cardella JF, Grassi CJ, Patel NH, Ferral H, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis with use of endovascular thrombus removal. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;17:435-47.
Park SI, Lee M, Lee MS, Kim MD, Won JY, Lee DY. Single-session aspiration thrombectomy of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis using large-size catheter without pharmacologic thrombolysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37:412-9.
Garcia MJ, Lookstein R, Malhotra R, Amin A, Blitz LR, Leung DA, et al. Endovascular Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis with Rheolytic Thrombectomy: Final Report of the Prospective Multicenter PEARL (Peripheral Use of AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy with a Variety of Catheter Lengths) Registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015;26:777-85.
Lin PH, Zhou W, Dardik A, Mussa F, Kougias P, Hedayati N, et al. Catheter-direct thrombolysis versus pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Am J Surg 2006;192:782-8.
Huang CY, Hsu HL, Kuo TT, Lee CY, Hsu CP. Percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombectomy offers lower risk of postthrombotic syndrome than catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb. Ann Vasc Surg 2015;29:995-1002.
Cakir V, Gulcu A, Akay E, Capar AE, Gencpinar T, Kucuk B, et al. Use of percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy vs. anticoagulation therapy to treat acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis: 1-year follow-up results of a randomised, clinical trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37:969-76.
Rao AS, Konig G, Leers SA, Cho J, Rhee RY, Makaroun MS, et al. Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: an alternative in patients with contraindications to thrombolysis. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:1092-8.
Baran Ç, Çakıcı M, Özçınar E, Hasde Aİ, Gümüş F, Soykan C, et al. Comparison of different venous accesses through catheter-directed thrombolysis procedures in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis. Damar Cer Derg 2017;26:80-4.
Tayfur K, Bademci MŞ, Yalçın M, Ürkmez M, Gödekmerdan E, Yazman S. Short term results of endovenous treatment with pharmacomechanic thrombectomy in acute ıliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: a single center experience. Damar Cer Derg 2015;24:41-6.