Amaç: Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de enfektif endokardit tanısıyla cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri ve ekokardiyografik ve mikrobiyolojik bulguları, yanı sıra ameliyat sonuçları araştırıldı.Çalışmaplanı:Bu çok merkezli çalışmaya Ocak 2005 - Ağustos 2012 tarihleri arasında 13 üçüncü basamak Üniversite/Eğitim ve Araştırma hastanesinde enfektif endokardit tanısıyla ameliyat edilen 116 hasta (65 erkek, 51 kadın; ort yaş 43±16 yıl; dağılım 14-80 yıl) alındı. Hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri, ekokardiyografik ve mikrobiyolojik bulguları, cerrahi tedavi endikasyonları ve ameliyat sonuçları retrospektif olarak incelendi.Bul gu lar: Hastaların en sık başvuru semptomu ve fizik muayene bulgusu ateş idi. Kan kültürü 35 hastada (%30) negatif idi. Stafilokoklar en sık saptanan mikrobiyolojik patojenlerdi (%22). Konjestif kalp yetmezliği 56 hastada (%48) en sık cerrahi endikasyon nedeni idi. On iki hastaya (%10) kapak tamir ameliyatı yapılırken, 104 hastada (%90) kapak replasmanı tercih edilen işlem oldu. Cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastaların 33'ü ameliyat sonrası dönemde kaybedildi. Mortalite oranı (%28) idi. Cerrahi mortalitenin bağımsız öngördürücüleri Sınıf 3-4 fonksiyonel kapasite, C-reaktif protein yüksekliği ve böbrek fonksiyon bozukluğu olarak bulundu.So nuç: Enfektif endokardit komplike olgularda cerrahi olarak tedavi edilebilmesine rağmen, cerrahi tedavinin mortalite ve morbiditesi halen yüksektir
Background: This study aims to investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics and echocardiographic and microbiological findings of the patients as well as the outcomes of surgery undergoing surgical treatment with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in Turkey. Methods: Between January 2005 and August 2012 116 patients (65 males, 51 females; mean age 43±16 years; range 14 to 80 years) with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis who underwent surgery in 13 tertiary university/research and education hospitals were included in this multi-center study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, and echocardiographic and microbiological findings, surgical indications and outcomes of surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The most common symptom on admission and physical finding was fever. Blood cultures were negative in 35 patients (30%). Staphylococci were the most common microbiological pathogens (22%). Congestive heart failure was the most common indication for surgery in 56 patients (48%). Valve repair was performed in 12 patients (10%), valve replacement was the procedure of choice in 104 patients (90%). Thirty-three patients undergoing surgical treatment died in the postoperative period. The mortality rate was 28%. Independent predictors of surgical mortality were Class 3-4 functional capacity, elevated C-reactive protein, and renal dysfunction. Conclusion: Although complicated cases of infective endocarditis can be treated through surgery, surgical morbidity and mortality is still high ">
[PDF] Enfektif endokardit tanısıyla ameliyat edilen hastaların demografik verileri ve sonuçları: Çok merkezli retrospektif çalışma | [PDF] Demographical data and outcomes of surgically treated patients with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis: a multi-center retrospective study
Amaç: Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de enfektif endokardit tanısıyla cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri ve ekokardiyografik ve mikrobiyolojik bulguları, yanı sıra ameliyat sonuçları araştırıldı.Çalışmaplanı:Bu çok merkezli çalışmaya Ocak 2005 - Ağustos 2012 tarihleri arasında 13 üçüncü basamak Üniversite/Eğitim ve Araştırma hastanesinde enfektif endokardit tanısıyla ameliyat edilen 116 hasta (65 erkek, 51 kadın; ort yaş 43±16 yıl; dağılım 14-80 yıl) alındı. Hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri, ekokardiyografik ve mikrobiyolojik bulguları, cerrahi tedavi endikasyonları ve ameliyat sonuçları retrospektif olarak incelendi.Bul gu lar: Hastaların en sık başvuru semptomu ve fizik muayene bulgusu ateş idi. Kan kültürü 35 hastada (%30) negatif idi. Stafilokoklar en sık saptanan mikrobiyolojik patojenlerdi (%22). Konjestif kalp yetmezliği 56 hastada (%48) en sık cerrahi endikasyon nedeni idi. On iki hastaya (%10) kapak tamir ameliyatı yapılırken, 104 hastada (%90) kapak replasmanı tercih edilen işlem oldu. Cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastaların 33'ü ameliyat sonrası dönemde kaybedildi. Mortalite oranı (%28) idi. Cerrahi mortalitenin bağımsız öngördürücüleri Sınıf 3-4 fonksiyonel kapasite, C-reaktif protein yüksekliği ve böbrek fonksiyon bozukluğu olarak bulundu.So nuç: Enfektif endokardit komplike olgularda cerrahi olarak tedavi edilebilmesine rağmen, cerrahi tedavinin mortalite ve morbiditesi halen yüksektir ">
Amaç: Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de enfektif endokardit tanısıyla cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri ve ekokardiyografik ve mikrobiyolojik bulguları, yanı sıra ameliyat sonuçları araştırıldı.Çalışmaplanı:Bu çok merkezli çalışmaya Ocak 2005 - Ağustos 2012 tarihleri arasında 13 üçüncü basamak Üniversite/Eğitim ve Araştırma hastanesinde enfektif endokardit tanısıyla ameliyat edilen 116 hasta (65 erkek, 51 kadın; ort yaş 43±16 yıl; dağılım 14-80 yıl) alındı. Hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri, ekokardiyografik ve mikrobiyolojik bulguları, cerrahi tedavi endikasyonları ve ameliyat sonuçları retrospektif olarak incelendi.Bul gu lar: Hastaların en sık başvuru semptomu ve fizik muayene bulgusu ateş idi. Kan kültürü 35 hastada (%30) negatif idi. Stafilokoklar en sık saptanan mikrobiyolojik patojenlerdi (%22). Konjestif kalp yetmezliği 56 hastada (%48) en sık cerrahi endikasyon nedeni idi. On iki hastaya (%10) kapak tamir ameliyatı yapılırken, 104 hastada (%90) kapak replasmanı tercih edilen işlem oldu. Cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastaların 33'ü ameliyat sonrası dönemde kaybedildi. Mortalite oranı (%28) idi. Cerrahi mortalitenin bağımsız öngördürücüleri Sınıf 3-4 fonksiyonel kapasite, C-reaktif protein yüksekliği ve böbrek fonksiyon bozukluğu olarak bulundu.So nuç: Enfektif endokardit komplike olgularda cerrahi olarak tedavi edilebilmesine rağmen, cerrahi tedavinin mortalite ve morbiditesi halen yüksektir
Background: This study aims to investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics and echocardiographic and microbiological findings of the patients as well as the outcomes of surgery undergoing surgical treatment with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in Turkey. Methods: Between January 2005 and August 2012 116 patients (65 males, 51 females; mean age 43±16 years; range 14 to 80 years) with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis who underwent surgery in 13 tertiary university/research and education hospitals were included in this multi-center study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, and echocardiographic and microbiological findings, surgical indications and outcomes of surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The most common symptom on admission and physical finding was fever. Blood cultures were negative in 35 patients (30%). Staphylococci were the most common microbiological pathogens (22%). Congestive heart failure was the most common indication for surgery in 56 patients (48%). Valve repair was performed in 12 patients (10%), valve replacement was the procedure of choice in 104 patients (90%). Thirty-three patients undergoing surgical treatment died in the postoperative period. The mortality rate was 28%. Independent predictors of surgical mortality were Class 3-4 functional capacity, elevated C-reactive protein, and renal dysfunction. Conclusion: Although complicated cases of infective endocarditis can be treated through surgery, surgical morbidity and mortality is still high ">
Enfektif endokardit tanısıyla ameliyat edilen hastaların demografik verileri ve sonuçları: Çok merkezli retrospektif çalışma
Amaç: Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de enfektif endokardit tanısıyla cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri ve ekokardiyografik ve mikrobiyolojik bulguları, yanı sıra ameliyat sonuçları araştırıldı.Çalışmaplanı:Bu çok merkezli çalışmaya Ocak 2005 - Ağustos 2012 tarihleri arasında 13 üçüncü basamak Üniversite/Eğitim ve Araştırma hastanesinde enfektif endokardit tanısıyla ameliyat edilen 116 hasta (65 erkek, 51 kadın; ort yaş 43±16 yıl; dağılım 14-80 yıl) alındı. Hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri, ekokardiyografik ve mikrobiyolojik bulguları, cerrahi tedavi endikasyonları ve ameliyat sonuçları retrospektif olarak incelendi.Bul gu lar: Hastaların en sık başvuru semptomu ve fizik muayene bulgusu ateş idi. Kan kültürü 35 hastada (%30) negatif idi. Stafilokoklar en sık saptanan mikrobiyolojik patojenlerdi (%22). Konjestif kalp yetmezliği 56 hastada (%48) en sık cerrahi endikasyon nedeni idi. On iki hastaya (%10) kapak tamir ameliyatı yapılırken, 104 hastada (%90) kapak replasmanı tercih edilen işlem oldu. Cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastaların 33'ü ameliyat sonrası dönemde kaybedildi. Mortalite oranı (%28) idi. Cerrahi mortalitenin bağımsız öngördürücüleri Sınıf 3-4 fonksiyonel kapasite, C-reaktif protein yüksekliği ve böbrek fonksiyon bozukluğu olarak bulundu.So nuç: Enfektif endokardit komplike olgularda cerrahi olarak tedavi edilebilmesine rağmen, cerrahi tedavinin mortalite ve morbiditesi halen yüksektir
Demographical data and outcomes of surgically treated patients with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis: a multi-center retrospective study
Background: This study aims to investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics and echocardiographic and microbiological findings of the patients as well as the outcomes of surgery undergoing surgical treatment with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in Turkey. Methods: Between January 2005 and August 2012 116 patients (65 males, 51 females; mean age 43±16 years; range 14 to 80 years) with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis who underwent surgery in 13 tertiary university/research and education hospitals were included in this multi-center study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, and echocardiographic and microbiological findings, surgical indications and outcomes of surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The most common symptom on admission and physical finding was fever. Blood cultures were negative in 35 patients (30%). Staphylococci were the most common microbiological pathogens (22%). Congestive heart failure was the most common indication for surgery in 56 patients (48%). Valve repair was performed in 12 patients (10%), valve replacement was the procedure of choice in 104 patients (90%). Thirty-three patients undergoing surgical treatment died in the postoperative period. The mortality rate was 28%. Independent predictors of surgical mortality were Class 3-4 functional capacity, elevated C-reactive protein, and renal dysfunction. Conclusion: Although complicated cases of infective endocarditis can be treated through surgery, surgical morbidity and mortality is still high
1. Cabell CH, Jollis JG, Peterson GE, Corey GR, Anderson DJ, Sexton DJ, et al. Changing patient characteristics and the effect on mortality in endocarditis. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:90-4.
2. Prendergast BD. The changing face of infective endocarditis. Heart 2006;92:879-85.
3. Tornos P, Iung B, Permanyer-Miralda G, Baron G, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Bärwolf Ch, et al. Infective endocarditis in Europe: lessons from the Euro heart survey. Heart 2005;91:571-5.
4. Habib G, Hoen B, Tornos P, Thuny F, Prendergast B, Vilacosta I, et al. Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): the Task Force on the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for Infection and Cancer. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2369-413.
5. Wang A, Athan E, Pappas PA, Fowler VG Jr, Olaison L, Paré C, et al. Contemporary clinical profile and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA 2007;297:1354-61.
6. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler VG Jr, Bayer AS, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:463-73.
7. Horstkotte D, Follath F, Gutschik E, Lengyel M, Oto A, Pavie A, et al. Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis executive summary; the task force on infective endocarditis of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 2004;25:267-76.
8. American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease); Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:e1-148.
9. Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler VG Jr, Ryan T, et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:633-8.
10. Cates JE, Christie RV. Subacute bacterial endocarditis: a review of 442 patients treated in 14 centres appointed by the Penicillin Trials Committee of the Medical Research Council. QJM 1951;78:93-130.
11. Wallace AG, Young WG Jr, Osterhout S. Treatment of acute bacterial endocarditis by valve excision and replacement. Circulation 1965;31:450-3.
12. Griffin FM Jr, Jones G, Cobbs CC. Aortic insufficiency in bacterial endocarditis. Ann Intern Med 1972;76:23-8.
13. Hoen B, Alla F, Selton-Suty C, Béguinot I, Bouvet A, Briançon S, et al. Changing profile of infective endocarditis: results of a 1-year survey in France. JAMA 2002;288:75-81.
14. Aksoy O, Meyer LT, Cabell CH, Kourany WM, Pappas PA, Sexton DJ. Gender differences in infective endocarditis: pre- and co-morbid conditions lead to different management and outcomes in female patients. Scand J Infect Dis 2007;39:101-7.
15. Cabell CH, Abrutyn E, Fowler VG Jr, Hoen B, Miro JM, Corey GR, et al. Use of surgery in patients with native valve infective endocarditis: results from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database. Am Heart J 2005;150:1092-8.
17. Vikram HR, Buenconsejo J, Hasbun R, Quagliarello VJ. Impact of valve surgery on 6-month mortality in adults with complicated, left-sided native valve endocarditis: a propensity analysis. JAMA 2003;290:3207-14.
18. Cecchi E, Forno D, Imazio M, Migliardi A, Gnavi R, Dal Conte I, et al. New trends in the epidemiological and clinical features of infective endocarditis: results of a multicenter prospective study. Ital Heart J 2004;5:249-56.
19. Leblebicioglu H, Yilmaz H, Tasova Y, Alp E, Saba R, Caylan R, et al. Characteristics and analysis of risk factors for mortality in infective endocarditis. Eur J Epidemiol 2006;21:25-31.
21. Loupa C, Mavroidi N, Boutsikakis I, Paniara O, Deligarou O, Manoli H, et al. Infective endocarditis in Greece: a changing profile. Epidemiological, microbiological and therapeutic data. Clin Microbiol Infect 2004;10:556-61.
22. Benn M, Hagelskjaer LH, Tvede M. Infective endocarditis, 1984 through 1993: a clinical and microbiological survey. J Intern Med 1997;242:15-22.
23. Letaief A, Boughzala E, Kaabia N, Ernez S, Abid F, Ben Chaabane T, et al. Epidemiology of infective endocarditis in Tunisia: a 10-year multicenter retrospective study. Int J Infect Dis 2007;11:430-3.
24. Krcmery V, Hricak V, Babelova O. Culture negative endocarditis: analysis of 201 cases. Scand J Infect Dis 2007;39:384.
25. Thuny F, Di Salvo G, Belliard O, Avierinos JF, Pergola V, Rosenberg V, et al. Risk of embolism and death in infective endocarditis: prognostic value of echocardiography: a prospective multicenter study. Circulation 2005;112:69-75.
6. Anguera I, Miro JM, Evangelista A, Cabell CH, San Roman JA, Vilacosta I, et al. Periannular complications in infective endocarditis involving native aortic valves. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:1254-60.
27. Habib G. Management of infective endocarditis. Heart 2006;92:124-30.
28. Revilla A, López J, Vilacosta I, Villacorta E, Rollán MJ, Echevarría JR, et al. Clinical and prognostic profile of patients with infective endocarditis who need urgent surgery. Eur Heart J 2007;28:65-71.
29. Majumdar A, Chowdhary S, Ferreira MA, Hammond LA, Howie AJ, Lipkin GW, et al. Renal pathological findings in infective endocarditis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000;15:1782-7.
30. Chu VH, Cabell CH, Benjamin DK Jr, Kuniholm EF, Fowler VG Jr, Engemann J, et al. Early predictors of in-hospital death in infective endocarditis. Circulation 2004;109:1745-9.
31. Geerlings SE, Hoepelman AI. Immune dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1999;26:259-65.
32. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359-67.