___

• Allison, D. B., Gorman, B. S. (1993). Calculating effect sizes for meta-analysis: The case of the single case. Behavioral Research, 31, 621-631.
• Campbell, J. (2004). Statistical comparison of four effect sizes for single-subject design. Behavior Modification, 28, 234-246.
• Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, New York: Academic Press.
• Crosbie, J. (1993). Interrupted time-series analysis with brief single-subject data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 966-974.
• Crosbie, J. (1995). Interrupted time-series analysis with short series: Why it is problematic; how it can be improved. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change, (pp. 361-395). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Dunst, C.J., Hamby, D.W., Trivette, C.M. (2004). Guidelines for calculating effect sizes for practice-based research synthesis. Centerscope: Evidence-Based Approaches to Early Childhood Development, 3,1-10.
• Faith, M.S., Allison, D.B., Gorman, B.S. (1996). Meta-analysis of single-case research. In R.D. Franklin, D.B.Allison, B.S. Gorman (Eds.), Design and analysis of single-case research (pp. 245- 277). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S.L., Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to Identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-180.
• Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Karasu, N. Promoting social and communication skills of children with developmental disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Subject Design Studies. (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi). Indiana University, Bloomington.
• Karasu, N., Odom, S.L. (Değerlendirmede). Comparison of three methods for comparing effect sizes in single-subject design. Submitted to Journal of Special Education.
• Kavale, K. A. (1984). Potential advantages of the meta-analysis technique for research in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 18, 61-72.
• Kavale, K.A., Glass, G. V. (1981). Meta-analysis and the integration of research in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 531-538.
• Kavale, K. A., Nye, C. (1985/86). Parameters of learning disabilities in achievement, linguistic, neuropsychological and social/behavioral domains. Journal of Special Education, 19, 443-458.
• Lloyd, L.L. (2001, March). Evidence-based practice. Why and what with an emphasis on research issues. Paper presented at the Early Childhood intervention Research Seminar, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
• Mastropieri, M., Scruggs, T. E. (1985-86). Early intervention for socially withdrawn children. Journal of Special Education, 19, 429-441.
• Maughan, D.R. (2004). Behavioral parent training as an intervention for parents of children with externalizing behaviors and disruptive behavior disorders: A meta-analysis. Dissertation International Abstracts, 65(01), 425.
• Nelson, J. R., Epstein, M.H. (2002). Report on evidence-based interventions: Recommended next steps. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 493-499.
• Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., Harris, K., R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidencebased practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137-149.
• Olive, M.L., Smith, B.W. (2005). Effect-size calculations and single-subject design.Educational Psychology, 25, 313-325.
• Parker, R. I., Brossart, D. F., Callicott, K. J., Long, J. R., Garcia de Alba, R., Baugh, F. G., Sullivan, J. R. (2005). Effect sizes in single case research: How large is large? School Psychology Review, 34(1), 116–132.
• Robey, R.R., Schultz, M. C., Crawford, A. B., Sinner, C. A. (1999). Single-subject clinical-outcome research: Designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses. Aphasiology,13, 445-473.
• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24–33.
• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Forness, S. R., Kavale, K. A. (1988). Early language intervention: Aquantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Journal of Special Education, 22, 259–283.
• Schlosser, R.W. (2003). The ethicacy of augmentative and alternative communication toward evidence based practice, Sons Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Scotti, J. R., Evans, I. M., Meyer, L. H., Walker, P. (1991). A meta-analysis of intervention research with problem behavior: Treatment validity and standards of practice. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 233-256.
• Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.
• Stoiber, K.C (2002). Revisiting efforts on constructing a knowledge base of evidence based intervention within school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 533-546.
• Waas. G. A. (2002). Identifying evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Building a bridge pr jousting with windmills? School Psychology Quarterly. 17, 508-517.
• Ek 1: Meta-Analizde İncelenen Çalışmalar Listesi
• Baker, M. J. (2000). Incorporating the thematic ritualistic behaviors of children with autism into games: Increasing social play interactions with siblings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 66–84.
• Carter, C. (2001). Using choice with game play to increase language skills and interactive behaviors in children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3(3), 131- 151.
• Charlop-Christy, M., Carpenter, M. (2000). Modified incidental teaching sessions: A procedure for parents to increase spontaneous speech in their children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(2), 98-112.
• Hancock, T., Kaiser, A. (2002). The effects of trainer-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22(1), 39-54.
• Hemmeter, M., Kaiser, A. (1994). Enhanced milieu teaching: Effects of parent implemented language intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 18(3), 269-289.
• Ingersoll, B., Dvortcsak, A., Whalen, C., Sikora, D. (2005). The Effects of a developmental, social-pragmatic language intervention on rate of expressive language production in young children with autistic spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(4), 213-222.
• Kaiser, A., Hancock, T., Nietfeld, J. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Early Education and Development, 11(4), 423-446.
• Pierce, K., Schreibman, L. (1995). Increasing complex social behaviors in children with autism: Effects of peer-implemented pivotal response training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(3), 285-296.
• Thorp, D., Stahmer, A. (1995). Effects of sociodramatic play training on children with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 25(3), 265-282.
• Whalen, C., Schreibman, L. (2003). Joint attention training for children with autism using behavior modification procedures. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 44(3), 456-468.