TÜLAY SAĞKAL MİDİLLİ, ASLI KALKIM, Esma Sülü UĞURLU, Necla KIRMIZILAR ERSOY

Gebelerin Eşi Tarafından Şiddete Maruz Kalma Durumları ve Şiddetle İlişkili Faktörlerin İncelenmesi

AMAÇ: Bu çalışma, kırsal alanda yaşayan gebelerin eşi tarafından şiddete maruz kalma durumları ve şiddetle ilişkili faktörleri belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. YÖNTEM: Tanımlayıcı kesitsel tipteki bu araştırma, İzmir ili Ödemiş ilçesinin merkezinde bulunan beş Aile Sağlığı Merkezinin (ASM) tamamında yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın örneğini Aralık 2011- Şubat 2012 tarihleri arasında araştırmanın yapıldığı ASMlere başvuran, çalışmaya katılmaya istekli olan 230 gebe oluşturmuştur. Veriler literatür incelenerek hazırlanan soru formu aracılığı ile toplanmıştır. Soru formu gebelerin sosyodemografik özelliklerini içeren (8 soru), gebelikte fiziksel, duygusal, ekonomik ve cinsel şiddeti belirlemeye yönelik (12 soru) olmak üzere toplam 20 sorudan oluşmuştur. Veriler, araştırmacılar tarafından yüz yüze görüşme tekniği ile toplanmış, sayı, yüzde dağılımları ve ki-kare testleri ile değerlendirilmiştir. BULGULAR: Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması 25,75±4.63 (15-40 arası)dır. Gebelerin %83ünün isteyerek gebe kaldığı, %43ünün ilk gebeliği olduğu, %79,6sının gebelik süresince eşinin, %67sinin ailesinin destek olduğu, %32,6sının eşinin alkol kullandığı ancak hiç madde kullanmadığı saptanmıştır. Gebelerin %10,9unun fiziksel, %52,6sının duygusal, %31,7sinin ekonomik ve %8,3ünün cinsel şiddete maruz kalmıştır. SONUÇ: Araştırmada gebenin ve eşinin ilkokul mezunu olması, ekonomik durumun orta düzeyde olması, gebeliğin istenmemesi ve ailenin destek olmaması şiddetle en çok ilişkili faktörler olarak belirlenmiştir. Sağlık kurumları ve sağlık personeli tarafından gebelikte şiddetin belirlenmesine yönelik rutin taramaların yapılması önerilmektedir.

The Situation of Pregnant Women Exposure to Violence by Husband and the Factors Associated With Violence

AIM: This study was planned to determine the pregnant women living in rural areas exposure the situation to violence by husband and the factors associated with violence. METHODS: This descriptive cross-section research was conducted all of 5 Family Health Center located in the center of Odemis in İzmir. The study sample consisted of 230 pregnant women who are willing to participate in the study, which surveyed admitted to Family Health Center between December 2011 - February 2012. Data are collected through a questionnaire prepared by examining the literature. The questionnaire consists of a total of 20 questions which including socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women (8 questions), pregnancy, physical, emotional, economic and sexual violence, to determine (12 questions). Data were collected by face to face interviews by the researchers, were evaluated with number, percentage and chi-square tests. RESULTS: The average age of pregnant women was 25.75 ± 4.63 (min:15-max:40), who was 83% of willingly got pregnant, 43% of first pregnancy, 79.6% of during pregnancy support of husband, 67% of the support of the family, % 32.6 of her husband doesnt use substance but use alcohol, 10.9% of pregnant women reported physical, 52.6% of emotional, 31.7% of economic and 8.3% were exposed to sexual violence. CONCLUSİON: In this study, having pregnant woman and her husband to have graduated from primary school, moderate of the economic situation, unwilling pregnancy, lack of family support were the factors most strongly associated with violence. It is suggested that by health care institutions and health care providers must be routine screenings to determine violence during pregnancy.

PDF

___

1. Bailey BA. Partner Violence During Pregnancy: Prevalence, Effects, Screening, And Management. Int J Womens Health. 2010; 2:183-97.
2. Giray H, Keskinoğlu P, Sönmez Y, Meseri R, Karakuş NE, Yücetin N ve ark. Aile İçi Fiziksel Şiddet Ve Etkileyen Etmenler. STED. 2005; 14(10): 217-20.
3. Bohn DK, Tebben JG, Campbell JC. Influences Of Income, Education, Age, And Ethnicity On Physical Abuse Before And During Pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatal Nursing. 2004; 33(5):561571.
4. Johnson JK, Haider F, Ellis K, Hay DM, Lindow SW. The Prevalance Of Domestic Violence In Pregnant Women. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynacology. 2003;110:272275.
5. Valladares E, Ellsberg M, Pena R, et al. Physical Partner Abuse During Pregnancy: A Risk Factor For Low Birth Weight In Nicaragua. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002; 100(4):70005.
6. Naved RT, Persson LA. Factors Associated With Physical Spousal Abuse Of Women During Pregnancy ın Bangladesh. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2008; 34(2):7178.
7. Taft AJ, Watson LF. Termination Of Pregnancy: Associations With Partner Violence And Other Factors In A National Cohort Of Young Australian Women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2007; 31(2):13542.
8. Rodrigues T, Rocha L, Barros H. Physical Abuse During Pregnancy And Preterm Delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008; 198(2): 171-176.
9. Coker AL, Sanderson M, Dong B. Partner Violence During Pregnancy And Risk Of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2004; 18, 260- 269.
10. World Health Organization (2012). Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy. Geneva: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2011/WHO_RHR_11.3 5_eng.pdf
11. Martin SL, Li Y, Casanueva C, Harris-Britt A, et al. Intimate Partner Violence And Women's Depression Before And During Pregnancy. Violence Against Women 2006; 12(3):221239.
12. Lau Y, Chan KS. Influence Of Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy And Early Postpartum Depressive Symptoms On Breastfeeding Among Chinese Women In Hong Kong. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health. 2007; 52(2): 1520.
13. García-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, et al. WHO Multi-Country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence Against Women: Initial Results On Prevalence, Health Outcomes And Women's Responses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
14. Kishor S, Johnson K. Profiling Domestic Violence: A Multi-Country Study. Calverton MD: ORC Macro; 2004.
15. Jewkes R. Intimate Partner Violence: Causes And Prevention. Lancet 2002; 359(9315):14231429.
16. Johnson H, Ollus N, Nevala S. Violence Against Women: An International Perspective. New York: Springer; 2007.
17. World Health Organization (2002). World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/viol ence/world_report/wrvh1/en/
18. Kharboush IF, Roudi-Fahimi F, İsmail HM, Mamdouh HM, Muhammad YY, Tawfik MM et al. (2010). Spousal Violence In Egypt. http://www.prb.org/pdf10/spousalviolence- egypt.pdf
19. Peedicayil A, Sadowski LS, Jeyaseelan L, Shankar V, Jain D, Suresh S et al. Spousal Physical Violence Against Women During Pregnancy. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2004; 111:682687.
20. Karaoğlu L, Celbis O, Ercan C, Ilgar M, Pehlivan E, Güneş G, et al. Physical, Emotional And Sexual Violence During Pregnancy In Malatya, Turkey. Europ Journal Public Health. 2006; 16(2):14956.
21. Su-fang G et al., Domestic Abuse On Women In China Before, During, And After Pregnancy. Chinese Medical Journal. 2004; 117(3):331336.
22. Eryılmaz G. Aile İçi Şiddet, Kadın Sağlığı Ve Hemşirelik. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi. 2001; 5(2):19-24.
23. Devries KM, Kishor S, Johnson H, Stöckl H, Bacchus LJ, Garcia-Moreno C, et al. Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy: Analysis Of Prevalence Data From 19 Countries. Reproductive Health Matters. 2010;18(36):158170.
24. Ayrancı U, Günay Y, Ünlüoğlu I. Hamilelikte Aile İçi Şiddet: Birinci Basamak Sağlık Kurumlarına Başvuran Kadınlar Arasında Bir Araştırma. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2002; 3:75-87.
25. Deveci SE, Açık Y, Gülbayrak C, Tokdemir M, Ayar A. Prevalence Of Domestic Violence During Pregnancy In A Turkish Community. Southeast Asian Journal Tropic Medicine Public Health. 2007; 38:754-760.
26. Güler N. Gebelikte Eşi Tarafından Kadına Uygulanan Fiziksel, Duygusal, Cinsel ve Ekonomik Şiddet Ve İlişkili Faktörler. DEUHYO ED. 2010; 3(2):72-77.
27. KSGM (T.C. Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü). Türkiyede Kadına Yönelik Aile İçi Şiddet Araştırması. Ankara, 2009.
28. Campbell J, Garcia-Moreno C, Sharps P. Abuse During Pregnancy In Industrialized And Developing Countries. Violence Against Women. 2004; 10(7):770-789.
29. Babu VB, Kar SK. Abuse Against Women In Pregnancy: A Population-Based Study From Eastern India. WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health. 2012; 1(2):133-143.
30. Farid M, Saleem S, Karim MS, Hatcher J. Spousal Abuse During Pregnancy In Karachi, Pakistan. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2008; 101:141-145.
31. Gao W, Paterson J, Carter S, Lusitini L. Intimate Partner Violence And Unplanned Pregnancy In The Pacific Islands Families Study. International American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008; 100:109115.
32. Moraes CL, Reichenheim M E. Domestic Violence During Pregnancy In Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2002; 79(3):269-77.
33. Valladares E, Pena R, Persson LA, Hogberg U. Violence Against Pregnant Women: Prevalence And Characteristics. A population- based study in Nicaragua. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2005; 112:12438.
34. Arat Y, Altınay AG. Türkiyede Kadına Yönelik Şiddet. Punto Baskı Çözümleri, İstanbul, 2007.
35. Güler N, Tel H, Özkan Tuncay F. Kadının Aile İçinde Yaşanan Şiddete Bakışı. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2005; 27(2):51-56.
36. Cubbins LA, Vannoy D. Sosyoeconomic Resources, Gender Traditionalism And Wife Abuse In Urban Russian Couples. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2005; 67:3752.
37. Krıshnan S. Gender, Caste And Economic Inequalities And Marital Violence In Rural South India. Health Care for Women International. 2005; 26:87-99.
38. Humphreys CA. Health Inequalities Perspective On Violence Aganist Women. Health and Social Care in the Community. 2007; 15:120127.
39. Hindin MJ, Adair LS. Who at risk? Factor Associated With Intimate Partner Violence In The Philippines. Social Science&Medicine. 2002; 55:13851399.
40. Bassuk E, Dawson R, Hungtington N. Intimate Partner Violence In Extremely Poor Women: Longitudinal Patterns And Risk Markers. J. Fam. Viol. 2006; 21:387399.
41. Deveci SE, Açık Y, Gülbayrak C, Tokdemir M. Elazığ İl Merkezinde 1549 Yaş Evli Kadınların Aile İçi Şiddete Maruz Kalma Durumları. Toplum ve Hekim. 2005; 20:229234.
42. Kemerli N. Aile İçinde Kadına Yönelik Şiddet. Kadına Yönelik Şiddet ve Hekimlik Sempozyum Kitabı,4158, 1617 Kasım 2002, Ankara.