The canonical works Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad (first published in 1899) and Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë (first published in 1847) had their reflection in literature with their modern counterparts, Chinua Achebe’s (1995) Things Fall Apart and Jean Rhys’ (1997) Wide Sargasso Sea, respectively. Both written in an attempt to offer a re-examination of traditional colonial discourse, Things Fall Apart and Wide Sargasso Sea have major differences in their methodologies. While Achebe offers a pre-colonial insight to underline the impact of colonial forces on African societies, Rhys instead derives a prequel mainly addressing gender issues from Jane Eyre for similar purposes. Comparing Heart of Darkness with Things Fall Apart and Jane Eyre with Wide Sargasso Sea through a postcolonial reading, this paper aims to explore to what extent these works differ from each other in terms of their approach to colonialism, racism, and gender roles. It is concluded that the modern works by Achebe and Rhys succeed in levelling criticism at their canonical counterparts by skilfully surfacing the effects of colonialism, racism and patriarchy as they give voice to voiceless people, who are initially left silenced by Conrad and Brontë.

The canonical works Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad (first published in 1899) and Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë (first published in 1847) had their reflection in literature with their modern counterparts, Chinua Achebe’s (1995) Things Fall Apart and Jean Rhys’ (1997) Wide Sargasso Sea, respectively. Both written in an attempt to offer a re-examination of traditional colonial discourse, Things Fall Apart and Wide Sargasso Sea have major differences in their methodologies. While Achebe offers a pre-colonial insight to underline the impact of colonial forces on African societies, Rhys instead derives a prequel mainly addressing gender issues from Jane Eyre for similar purposes. Comparing Heart of Darkness with Things Fall Apart and Jane Eyre with Wide Sargasso Sea through a postcolonial reading, this paper aims to explore to what extent these works differ from each other in terms of their approach to colonialism, racism, and gender roles. It is concluded that the modern works by Achebe and Rhys succeed in levelling criticism at their canonical counterparts by skilfully surfacing the effects of colonialism, racism and patriarchy as they give voice to voiceless people, who are initially left silenced by Conrad and Brontë.

"> [PDF] The Sound of Silence: Through “Things Fall Apart” by Achebe and “Wide Sargasso Sea” by Rhys | [PDF] The Sound of Silence: Through “Things Fall Apart” by Achebe and “Wide Sargasso Sea” by Rhys The canonical works Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad (first published in 1899) and Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë (first published in 1847) had their reflection in literature with their modern counterparts, Chinua Achebe’s (1995) Things Fall Apart and Jean Rhys’ (1997) Wide Sargasso Sea, respectively. Both written in an attempt to offer a re-examination of traditional colonial discourse, Things Fall Apart and Wide Sargasso Sea have major differences in their methodologies. While Achebe offers a pre-colonial insight to underline the impact of colonial forces on African societies, Rhys instead derives a prequel mainly addressing gender issues from Jane Eyre for similar purposes. Comparing Heart of Darkness with Things Fall Apart and Jane Eyre with Wide Sargasso Sea through a postcolonial reading, this paper aims to explore to what extent these works differ from each other in terms of their approach to colonialism, racism, and gender roles. It is concluded that the modern works by Achebe and Rhys succeed in levelling criticism at their canonical counterparts by skilfully surfacing the effects of colonialism, racism and patriarchy as they give voice to voiceless people, who are initially left silenced by Conrad and Brontë.

"> The canonical works Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad (first published in 1899) and Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë (first published in 1847) had their reflection in literature with their modern counterparts, Chinua Achebe’s (1995) Things Fall Apart and Jean Rhys’ (1997) Wide Sargasso Sea, respectively. Both written in an attempt to offer a re-examination of traditional colonial discourse, Things Fall Apart and Wide Sargasso Sea have major differences in their methodologies. While Achebe offers a pre-colonial insight to underline the impact of colonial forces on African societies, Rhys instead derives a prequel mainly addressing gender issues from Jane Eyre for similar purposes. Comparing Heart of Darkness with Things Fall Apart and Jane Eyre with Wide Sargasso Sea through a postcolonial reading, this paper aims to explore to what extent these works differ from each other in terms of their approach to colonialism, racism, and gender roles. It is concluded that the modern works by Achebe and Rhys succeed in levelling criticism at their canonical counterparts by skilfully surfacing the effects of colonialism, racism and patriarchy as they give voice to voiceless people, who are initially left silenced by Conrad and Brontë.

The canonical works Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad (first published in 1899) and Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë (first published in 1847) had their reflection in literature with their modern counterparts, Chinua Achebe’s (1995) Things Fall Apart and Jean Rhys’ (1997) Wide Sargasso Sea, respectively. Both written in an attempt to offer a re-examination of traditional colonial discourse, Things Fall Apart and Wide Sargasso Sea have major differences in their methodologies. While Achebe offers a pre-colonial insight to underline the impact of colonial forces on African societies, Rhys instead derives a prequel mainly addressing gender issues from Jane Eyre for similar purposes. Comparing Heart of Darkness with Things Fall Apart and Jane Eyre with Wide Sargasso Sea through a postcolonial reading, this paper aims to explore to what extent these works differ from each other in terms of their approach to colonialism, racism, and gender roles. It is concluded that the modern works by Achebe and Rhys succeed in levelling criticism at their canonical counterparts by skilfully surfacing the effects of colonialism, racism and patriarchy as they give voice to voiceless people, who are initially left silenced by Conrad and Brontë.

">

The Sound of Silence: Through “Things Fall Apart” by Achebe and “Wide Sargasso Sea” by Rhys

The canonical works Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad (first published in 1899) and Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë (first published in 1847) had their reflection in literature with their modern counterparts, Chinua Achebe’s (1995) Things Fall Apart and Jean Rhys’ (1997) Wide Sargasso Sea, respectively. Both written in an attempt to offer a re-examination of traditional colonial discourse, Things Fall Apart and Wide Sargasso Sea have major differences in their methodologies. While Achebe offers a pre-colonial insight to underline the impact of colonial forces on African societies, Rhys instead derives a prequel mainly addressing gender issues from Jane Eyre for similar purposes. Comparing Heart of Darkness with Things Fall Apart and Jane Eyre with Wide Sargasso Sea through a postcolonial reading, this paper aims to explore to what extent these works differ from each other in terms of their approach to colonialism, racism, and gender roles. It is concluded that the modern works by Achebe and Rhys succeed in levelling criticism at their canonical counterparts by skilfully surfacing the effects of colonialism, racism and patriarchy as they give voice to voiceless people, who are initially left silenced by Conrad and Brontë.

The Sound of Silence: Through “Things Fall Apart” by Achebe and “Wide Sargasso Sea” by Rhys

The canonical works Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad (first published in 1899) and Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë (first published in 1847) had their reflection in literature with their modern counterparts, Chinua Achebe’s (1995) Things Fall Apart and Jean Rhys’ (1997) Wide Sargasso Sea, respectively. Both written in an attempt to offer a re-examination of traditional colonial discourse, Things Fall Apart and Wide Sargasso Sea have major differences in their methodologies. While Achebe offers a pre-colonial insight to underline the impact of colonial forces on African societies, Rhys instead derives a prequel mainly addressing gender issues from Jane Eyre for similar purposes. Comparing Heart of Darkness with Things Fall Apart and Jane Eyre with Wide Sargasso Sea through a postcolonial reading, this paper aims to explore to what extent these works differ from each other in terms of their approach to colonialism, racism, and gender roles. It is concluded that the modern works by Achebe and Rhys succeed in levelling criticism at their canonical counterparts by skilfully surfacing the effects of colonialism, racism and patriarchy as they give voice to voiceless people, who are initially left silenced by Conrad and Brontë.

___

Achebe, C. (1978). An image of Africa. Research in African Literatures, 9(1), 1-15.

Achebe, C. (1995). Things fall apart. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Bratlinger, P. (1985). Heart of Darkness: Anti-imperialism, racism, or impressionism? Criticism, 27(4), 363-385.

Brogdon, J. M. (2012). Reverential feminism: (Re)considering the status of women in the African novel. The Corinthian, 13(7), 85-95.

Brontë, E. (1994). Jane Eyre. Penguin Popular Classics.

Conrad, J. (2006). Heart of darkness (4th Ed.). WW. Norton & Company.

Guerard, A. J. (1958). Conrad the novelist. Harvard University Press.

Hawkins, H. (1982). The issue of racism in Heart of Darkness. Conradiana, 11(3), 163-171.

McLeod, J. (2010). Beginning postcolonialism. Manchester University Press.

Mellown, E. W. (1972). Character and themes in the novels of Jean Rhys. Contemporary Literature, 13(4), 458-475.

Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Nineteenth-century English: An overview. In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved December 15, 2023, from https://www.oed.com/discover/nineteenth-century-english-an-overview

Rhys, J. (1997). Wide Sargasso Sea. Penguin.

Rhoads, D. A. (1993). Culture in Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart. African Studies Review36(2), 61–72.

Strong-Leek, L. (2001). Reading as a woman: Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart and feminist criticism. African Studies Quarterly, 5(2), 29-35.

Töngür, A. N. (2022). From colonial to postcolonial: Dissemination of the English language. TranSynergy, 1(1), 1-8.