Tıp Fakültesine Başvurudan Meslek Hayatına: Tıp Öğrencisinin Ülkelere Göre Eğitim ve Kariyer Serüveni

Amaç: Türkiye’deki tıp fakülteleri, mezuniyet öncesi dönemde 6 yıllık eğitim vermektedir. Fakülteler bu 6 yıllık sürenin ilk 3 yılını klinik öncesi dönem, sonraki 2 yılını klinik dönem, son yılını uygulamaya yönelik intörnlük dönemi şeklinde yapılandırmıştır. Aile hekimliği uzmanlığı eğitiminin süresi 3 yıldır. Bu çalışmanın amacı; AB (Avrupa Birliği), ABD (Amerika Birleşik Devletleri), Avustralya, Birleşik Krallık, Çin, Japonya, Kanada, Rusya, Singapur ülkelerinde tıp fakültesine başvuru şartları ve süreçlerini, mezuniyet öncesi tıp eğitimi sürecinin zamansal yapısını, uzmanlık eğitimine başlayabilmek için gereken şartları, uzmanlık eğitimlerinin ve aile hekimliği uzmanlık eğitiminin süresini sunmaktır. Yöntem: Çeşitli ülkelerdeki tıp eğitimi süreçlerine erişmek için yapılan kaynak taramaları 03.10.2019- 06.01.2020 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Pubmed, Scopus, Google Scholar arama motorlarında ve veritabanlarında aramalar yapılmıştır. Anahtar kelimelerle erişilen çalışmaların yanında, ülkelerin tıp eğitimi ve sağlık sistemi ile ilgili bazı düzenleyici kuruluş ve tıp fakülteleri internet sitelerine erişilmiştir. Bulgular: Mezuniyet öncesi tıp eğitimi genel olarak 3-6 yıl sürmektedir. Eğitim süreci çoğu ülkede, klinik öncesi dönem ve klinik dönem olarak ayrılmaktadır. ABD ve Kanada’da, tıp fakültesine başvurabilmek için lisans mezunu olma şartı vardır. Bazı ülkeler, mezuniyet sonrasında 1-3 yıl intörnlük yapılmasını zorunlu kılmaktadır. Kanada’da uzmanlık eğitimi veren bazı bölümler, öğrencilerinin “mecburi hizmet” sözleşmesini imzalamasını zorunlu kılar. Aile hekimliği uzmanlık eğitimi genelde 3 yıldır. Sonuç: Her ülkede, öğrencilerin tıp fakültesine başvurusundan aile hekimliğine yaşadıkları süreç farklılık göstermektedir. Bu çeşitliliklere rağmen ortak noktalar da mevcuttur. Yabancı ülkelerdeki eğitim ve birinci basamaktaki kariyer süreçlerinin incelenmesi ve bu ülkelerde yer alan işlevsel yaklaşımların ülkemize uyarlanması, birinci basamakta çalışacak hekimlerimizin topluma daha faydalı olabilecek niteliklerle mezun olmasını sağlayabilir.

From Medical School Application to Professional Life: Education and Career Journey of Medical Students

Aim: Medical schools in Turkey offer six-year-long undergraduate medical education. Most of them divide these six years into three periods: The pre-clinical period is the first three years, the clinical period is the next two years, and the last year is the practiceoriented internship. The education of family medicine specialty lasts three years. This study aims to present; terms and processes of medical school applications, the time structure of undergraduate medical education, terms of application to specialty education, and duration of family medicine specialty education in European Union (EU), United States of America (USA), Australia, United Kingdom, China, Japan, Canada, Russia, Singapore. Method: To access the information about processes of medical education in foreign countries, a literature search was conducted between 03.10.2019-06.01.2020. Pubmed, Scopus, and Google Scholar have been screened by using keywords. In addition to this, websites of some decision-maker institutions on medical education and healthcare as well as websites of some medical schools have been accessed. Results: In general, undergraduate medical education lasts 3-6 years. These years are divided into two parts; pre-clinical and clinical periods. To make an application to medical school in USA and Canada, students have to get a bachelor’s degree. Some countries require students 1-3 years of internship after graduation. Students have to sign “return of service” agreement in some specialty areas in Canada. Commonly, family medicine specialty education lasts 3 years. Conclusion: The phases of which students should pass from medical school application to being family physician are different in every country. In spite of the differences, there are similar parts. Educational features and primary care career pathways in foreign countries should be investigated to adopt their positive sides for our country. Thus, our primary care physicians in the future would provide better service to the community. at all levels from preschool education to higher education started to be carried out remotely. Higher education institutions and medical faculties are trying to manage this process in line with their own facilities. It is seen that the studies or projects that initiated before the epidemic in primary, secondary and higher education regarding digital transformation in teaching and experiences in this direction lead the decisions taken in the process. Filtering the accumulation of knowledge and experience for elearning, which is widely included in the literature, on the philosophy of education and theories will contribute to the healthy decision-making process.

___

  • 1. Kurdak H, Altıntaş D, Doran F. Medical education in Turkey: past to future. Med Teach. 2008;30(8):768-773.
  • 2. Uğurlu M, Üstü Y. Türkiye’de Aile Hekimliği Uzmanlık Eğitimi Süreci ve Geliştirilmesi Gereken Noktalar. Ankara Med J. 2018;18(1):123-128.
  • 3. Wijnen-Meijer M, Burdick W, Alofs L, Burgers C, ten Cate O. Stages and transitions in medical education around the world: clarifying structures and terminology. Med Teach. 2013;35(4):301-307.
  • 4. Chenot JF. Undergraduate medical education in Germany. GMS Ger Med Sci. 2009;7.
  • 5. Nikendei C, Weyrich P, Jünger J, Schrauth M. Medical education in Germany. Med Teach. 2009;31:7,591-600.
  • 6. Segouin C, Jouquan J, Hodges B, Bréchat PH, David S, Maillard D, et al. Country report: medical education in France. Med Educ. 2007;41(3):295-301.
  • 7. Ten Cate O. Medical education in the Netherlands. Med Teach. 2007;29(8),752-757.
  • 8. Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Noé JG, Gansbacher B. A comparison of medical education in Germany and the United States: from applying to medical school to the beginnings of residency. GMS Ger Med Sci. 2017;15.
  • 9. Weggemans MM, Van Dijk B, Van Dooijeweert B, Veenendaal AG, Ten Cate O. The postgraduate medical education pathway: an international comparison. GMS J Med Educ. 2017;34(5).
  • 10. Foreign Doctors in Germany (İnternet). Erişim adresi: https://www.howtogermany. com/pages/international-doctors.html
  • 11. Admission requirements & About MCAT Exam (İnternet). Erişim adresi: https://studentsresidents.aamc.org
  • 12. Functions and Structure & Canadian Schools (İnternet). (4 Ekim 2019 tarihinde erişildi) Erişim adresi: https://lcme.org
  • 13. MD Degree (İnternet). (3 Ekim 2019 tarihinde erişildi) Erişim adresi: https://med.nyu.edu/education/md-degree/
  • 14. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine Has Offered Free Tuition Since 2008 (İnternet). Erişim adresi: https://newsroom. clevelandclinic.org/2018/08/20/clevelandclinic-lerner-college-of-medicine-has-offeredfree-tuition-since-2008/
  • 15. DeZee KJ, Artino AR, Elnicki DM, Hemmer PA, Durning SJ. Medical education in the USA. Med Teach. 2012;34(7):521-525.
  • 16. Navigating state medical licensure (İnternet). Erişim adresi: https://www.ama-assn.org/ residents-students/career-planningresource/navigating-state-medical-licensure
  • 17. Accreditation Criteria (İnternet). Erişim adresi: http://www.accme.org/accreditationrules/accreditation-criteria
  • 18. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Educationin the Transitional Year. Erişim adresi: https://www.acgme.org/ Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/999_ TransitionalYear_2019.pdf?ver=2019-08-26- 134505-047
  • 19. Buchman S. It’s about time: 3-year FM residency training. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(9):1045.
  • 20. Levy S. Medscape Residents Salary & Debt Report 2018. Erişim adresi: https://www. medscape.com/slideshow/2018-residentssalary-debt-report-6010044#2
  • 21. Prideaux D. Medical education in Australia: Much has changed but what remains?, Med Teach. 2009;31(2):96-100.
  • 22. Standards for Assessment and Accreditation of Primary Medical Programs by the Australian Medical Council 2012. Erişim adresi: https://www.amc.org.au/wp-content/uploads /2019/10/Standards-for-Assessment-andAccreditation-of-Primary-Medical-Programsby-the-Australian-Medical-Council-2012.pdf
  • 23. Granting general registration as a medical practitioner to Australian and New Zealand medical graduates on completion of intern training. Erişim adresi: https://www. medicalboard.gov.au/documents/default.aspx?r ecord=WD12%2f9504&dbid=AP&chksum=wb PeZldtyqPMGvIkbt0Qgg%3d%3d
  • 24. General Practice Training in Australia - The guide. Erişim adresi: http://www.agpt.com.au/ ArticleDocuments/12/General%20Practice%20 Training%20in%20Australia%20-%20The%20 guide.pdf.aspx
  • 25. Health Professional and Medical Salaries. Erişim adresi: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/ careers/conditions/Awards/he-profmedsalaries.pdf
  • 26. Entry requirements for UK medical schools & After Medical School. Erişim adresi: https://www.medschools.ac.uk
  • 27. UCAT Test Format. Erişim adresi: https://www.ucat.ac.uk/ucat/test-format/
  • 28. Locum Work Doctors & Applying Foundation Training & Pay Doctors. Erişim adresi: https://www.healthcareers.nhs.uk
  • 29. FAQS (İnternet). Erişim adresi: https://www.foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/cont ent/faqs
  • 30. Du N, Zhang H, Adashi EY. Medical education in China: painting on a large canvas. Am J Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2016;3(2):22- 31.
  • 31. Xu D, Sun B, Wan X, Ke Y. Reformation of medical education in China. Lancet. 2010;375(9725):1502-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(10)60241-3
  • 32. Ren X, Yin J, Wang B, Schwarz MR. A descriptive analysis of medical education in China. Med Teach. 2008;30(7):667-672.
  • 33. Wang Z, Yin Z, Wei YB, Liu LF, Yang JR. The expansion of 8-year medical training programs in China: a status report. Med Educ Online. 2015;20(1):25890.
  • 34. Lee JY. Residency training for general practice in China. Educ Prim Care. 2014;25(3):163-163.
  • 35. Kozu T. Medical Education in Japan. Acad Med. 2006;81(12):1069-1075.
  • 36. Teo A. The current state of medical education in Japan: a system under reform. Med Educ. 2007;41(3):302-308.
  • 37. Murai M, Kitamura K, Fetters MD. Lessons learned in developing family medicine residency training programs in Japan. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5(1):33.
  • 38. Future MD Canada. Erişim adresi: https://afmc.ca/learners/future-md-canada
  • 39. MD Curriculum Structure & Family Medicine Curriculum Overview. Erişim adresi: https://mcgill.ca
  • 40. Our Curriculum. Erişim adresi: https://mdprogram.mcmaster.ca/md-program/ our-curriculum
  • 41. About LMCC. Erişim adresi: https://mcc.ca/about/lmcc/
  • 42. Program Descriptions. Erişim adresi: https://www.carms.ca/match/r-1-mainresidency-match/program-descriptions/
  • 43. What is a return of service (ROS) agreement? Erişim adresi: https://carms.zendesk.com/hc/enus/articles/360002892092-What-is-a-return-ofservice-ROS-agreement44. Organek AJ, Tannenbaum D, Kerr J, Konkin J, Parsons E, Saucier D, et al. Redesigning Family Medicine Residency in Canada: The Triple C Curriculum. Fam Med. 2012;44(2):90-7.
  • 45. Jargin SV. Some aspects of medical education in Russia. Am J Med Stud. 2013;1(2):4-7.
  • 46. Samarasekera DD, Ooi S, Yeo SP, Hooi SC. Medical education in Singapore, Medical Teacher. 2015;37(8):707-713.
  • 47. Full Registration & General Information on Training Programmes & Point Requirements for . Erişim adresi: https://www.healthprofessionals.gov.sg
  • 48. Akredite Eğitim Programları. Erişim adresi: http://tepdad.org.tr/akredite-egitim-programlari
  • 49. Yeniçeri N, Mevsim V, Özçakar N, Özan S, Güldal D, Başak O. Tıp Eğitimi Son Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Gelecek Meslek Yaşamları İle İlgili Yaşadıkları Anksiyete İle Sürekli Anksiyetelerinin Karşılaştırılması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2007;24-19.
  • 50. Ergin A, Uzun SU, Topaloğlu S. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi 5. ve 6. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Sürekli Kaygı ve Mesleki Kaygı Düzeyleri ve Bunları Etkileyen Etkenler. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi. 2017;3(3):16-21