___

• Abanomey, A. A. (2002). The effect of texts’ authenticity on reading-comprehension test-taking strategies used by adult Saudi learners of English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.
• Alderson J. C. & Banerjee J. (2002). Language testing and assessment (Part 2). Language Teaching, 35, 79–113.
• Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bachman, L. F. (1991).What does language testing have to offer? TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 671–704.
• Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Baker, L. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.) Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.
• Bernhardt, E. B. (2000). Second language reading as a case study of reading scholarship in the 20th century. In M.
• Kamil & P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr, editors, Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 791–811).
• Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L. F. Bachman & A. D. Cohen, editors, Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 32–70).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chemers, M., Hu, L., & Garcia, B. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 55–64.
• Cohen, A. D. (2006). The coming of age of research on test-taking strategies. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(4), 307–331.
• Cohen, A. D., & Aphek, E. (1979). Easifying second language learning. Jerusalem: Jacob Hiatt Institute. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED163753).
• Cohen, A. D., & Upton, T. A. (2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
• Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Forster, D. E., & Karn, R. (1998). Teaching TOEIC/TOEFL test-taking strategies. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Seattle, WA, March 17–21, 1998. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427543)
• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255–274.
• Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55– 75.
• Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39, 188–213.
• Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60, 222–232.
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Liu, N. F. (2003). Processing problems in L2 listening comprehension of university students in Hong Kong. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
• Mackey, A. & Gass S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London and New York: Longman.
• Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (Eds). (1994). Metacognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.
• Nisbet, J., & Shucksmith, J. (1986). Learning strategies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Osada, N. (2001). What strategy do less-proficient learners employ in listening comprehension? A reappraisal of bottom-up and top-down processing. Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 5, 73–90.
• Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20 (1), 26–56.
• Phakiti, A. (2008). Construct validation of Bachman and Palmer's (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Language Testing, 25 (2) 237–272.
• Purpura, J. E. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test-takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47(2), 289–325.
• Purpura, J. E. (1998). Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with highand low-ability test-takers: A structural equation modelling approach. Language Testing, 15(3), 333–379.
• Robinson, M. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57.
• Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. London: Longman. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt, (Ed.) Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63).
• Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (2001). Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 90–112.
• Song, X. (2004). Language learning strategy use and language performance for Chinese learners of English. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ontario: Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada.
• Song, X. (2005). Language learner strategy use and English proficiency on the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment, 3, 1–26.
• Storey, P. (1997). Examining the test-taking process: A cognitive perspective on the discourse cloze test. Language Testing, 14(2), 214–231.
• Taguchi, N. (2001). L2 learners’ strategic mental processes during a listening test. JALT Journal, 23(2), 176–201.
• Tian, S. (2000). TOEFL reading comprehension: Strategies used by Taiwanese students with coaching-school training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
• Tsagari, C. (1994). Method effect on testing reading comprehension: How far can we go? M.A. Thesis, University of Lancaster, 96 pp. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED424768)
• Van Patten, B. (1994). Evaluating the role of consciousness in second language acquisition: Terms, linguistic features and research methodology. AILA Review, 11, 27–36.
• Vandergrift, L. (2002). “It was nice to see that our predictions were right”: Developing metacognition in L2 listening comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 555–75.
• Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Towards a model of the skilled L2 listener. Language Learning, 53, 461–494.
• Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26, 70–89.
• Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ): Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431–462.
• Yoshida-Morise, Y. (1998). The use of communication strategies in language proficiency interviews. In R. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 205–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Yoshizawa, K. (2002). Relationships among strategy use, foreign language aptitude, and second language proficiency: A structural equation modeling approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
• Zhang, S., & Goh, C. (2006). Strategy knowledge and perceived strategy use: Singaporean learners’ awareness of listening and speaking strategies. Language Awareness, 15, 119–219.
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Mahwah, NJ: E