Use of Natural and Synthetic Materials in Denim Washing Process as an Alternative to Pumice Stone

Use of Natural and Synthetic Materials in Denim Washing Process as an Alternative to Pumice Stone

In this study, the use of synthetic stones and peach kernels in the denim stone washing process instead of pumice stone was investigated. The performance of each alternative was identified with different washing methods, i.e. conventional, low liquor, and spraying methods. The stone washing effects of each alternative were compared. Moreover, energy and water consumption and equivalent carbon dioxide emission of each method were analyzed. The results indicated that although pumice stone led to the best aging affect in the conventional method, synthetic Stones and peach kernels showed better performance when the low liquor method was used. Additionally, the energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission of the low liquor method were shown to be lower. Therefore, it was concluded that synthetic stones or peach kernels could be a sustainable alternative to pumice stone and the selection of a low liquor method for this application would be advantageous.

___

  • 1. Pekin M. 2006. Greenhouse gas emissions produced by transportation sector (Master’s thesis, in Turkish), Istanbul Technical University, Turkey.
  • 2. Periyasamy AP. 2020. Environmental hazards of denim processing – I. Asian Dyer February-March 2020, 56-60.
  • 3. Garcia B. 2015. Reduced water washing of denim garments, in Denim, Manufacture, Finishing and Applications, Paul R. (Ed.), UK: Woodhead Publishing, 405-423.
  • 4. Shamsuzzaman M, Kashem MA, Sayem ASM, Khan AM, Shamsuddin SM, Islam MM. 2021. Quantifying environmental sustainability of denim garments washing factories through effluent analysis: A case study in Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production 290, 125740.
  • 5. Luo Y, Wu X, Ding X. 2022. Carbon and water footprints assessment of cotton jeans using the method based on modularity: A full life cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 332, 130042.
  • 6. Arjun D, Hiranmayee J, Farheen MN. 2013. Technology of industrial denim washing. International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Technology 3(4), 25-34.
  • 7. Alam R, Islam T, Rahman M, Antor AANA, Rahman R, Tamanna TA. 2021. Sustainable denim fabric washing with post-used rubber shoe sole: An eco-friendly alternative of Pumice stone. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 13(48), 4723-4731.
  • 8. Chattopadhyay DP, Pachauri RD. 2012. Preparation of synthetic stones for denim washing and analysis of wash effects. Textiles and Light Industrial Science and Technology 1(2), 24-28.
  • 9. Hoque S, Hossain J, Imtiaz A, Das S, Rashid MA. 2018. Scope of dry wood & wood composite alternate to stone in case of acid wash on denim fabric. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology 8(2), 382-388.
  • 10. Maryan AS, Montazer M. 2015. One pot denim washing and finishing using organo-montmorillonite: introducing nano mineral washing and finishing. Textile Research Journal. 85(1), 91-100.
  • 11. EİE, Elektrik İşleri Etüt İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü. 1997. Sanayide Enerji Yönetim Esasları, Cilt II.
  • 12. GHG Protocol. The GHG Emissions Calculation Tool. Retrieved from https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools
Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-3356
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Ege Üniversitesi Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon Araştırma & Uygulama Merkezi