Uğur YEGÜL, Maksut Barış EMİNOĞLU, Ufuk TÜRKER

Buğdayın Verimi ve Kalite Parametrelerinin Toprağın Elektriksel İletkenliği ile İlişkisinin Belirlenmesi

Bu çalışmanın amacı, toprağın elektriksel iletkenliğini kullanarak buğday bitkisinde ürün verimi ve protein içeriği değişimini belirlemektir. Çalışma sonucunda bu parametreler arasında önemli ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmada kullanılan bütün çeşitler için toprağın elektriksel iletkenlik değerli ile buğday bitkisine ait verim veprotein içeriği değerleri arasında doğrusal ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre elektriksel iletkenlik değerlerinin artması ile birlikte verim değerleri düşmekte protein içeri ise artmaktadır. Araştırma sonucu arazinin elektriksel iletkenlik değerleri ile verim değerleri arasındaki ilişkiler (R2) sırasıyla Bezostaja-1 çeşidi için 0,81, Gün-91 çeşidi için 0,81, Sagittario çeşidi için 0,77, Altıntaş-95 çeşidi için 0,73 ve Gönen-98 çeşidi için 0,88 olarak bulunmuştur. Arazinin elektriksel iletkenlik değerleri ile protein içerikleri arasındaki ilişkiler (R2) ise sırasıyla Bezostaja-1 çeşidi için 0,83, Gün-91 çeşidi için 0,86, Sagittario çeşidi için 0,85, Altıntaş-95 çeşidi için 0,85 ve Gönen-98 çeşidi için 0,88 olarak bulunmuştur.

Determination of Yield and Quality Parameters of Wheat Related with Electrical Conductivity of Soil

The aim of this study was to determine the spatial variation in yield and protein content of wheat plant by utilizing the electrical conductivity of the soil. As a result of this study, significant relationships were determined. For all of the varieties used in the research, a linear relationship were found between electrical conductivity values of the soil with the yield values as well as the protein contents. According to the results, with the increase of electrical conductivity values, yield values decreases and the protein content increases. As a result of the research, the relations between the electrical conductivity values of the soil and the yield values were determined as R2 = 0,81 for bezostaja-1, R2 = 0,81 for Gün-91 variety, R2 = 0,77 for Sagittario and R2 = 0,73 for Altıntaş-95 as well as R2 = 0,88 for Gönen-98 varieties respectively. The relationships between the electrical conductivity values of the soil and the protein contents were determined as R2 = 0,83 for Bezostaja-1 variety, R2 = 0,86 for the Gün-91 variety, R2 = 0,85 for the Sagittario variety, R2 = 0,85 for the Altıntaş-95 variety and it was found as R2 = 0,88 for Gönen- 98 variety respectively.

PDF

___

Anonymous, 2019a. Geonics Limited (http://www.geonics.com/). Erişim tarihi: 29.03.2019
Anonymous, 2019b. Juniper Systems Inc. (http://www.junipersys.com/). Erişim tarihi: 29.03.2019
Anonymous, 2019c. Geomaticsgroup (http://www.geomaticsgroup.com/). Erişim tarihi: 29.03.2019
Anonymous, 2019d. Perten Instruments (https://www.perten.com/tr/). Erişim tarihi: 29.03.2019
Amor FM, Martinez V, Cerda A, 2001. Salt tolerance of tomato plants as affected by stage of plant development. Hortscience, 36(7): 1260-1263.
Ashraf M, 1994. Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 13(1): 17-42.
Bilgin N, Yıldız, N, 2008. Besin kültüründe yetiştirilen (Kaya F1) domates çeşidinin (Lycopersicon esculentum) artan NaCl uygulamalarına toleransı ve tuzluluk stresinin kuru madde miktarı ile bitki mineral madde içeriğine etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1): 15-21.
Corwin D, & Lesch S, 2005. Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity: I. Survey protocols. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 46: 103-133.
Eraslan F, Güneş A, İnal A, Çiçek N, Alpaslan M, 2008. Gübrelerden kaynaklanan tuzluluğun domates ve biber bitkisinde bazı fizyolojik özellikler ve mineral beslenme üzerine etkisi. 4. Ulusal Bitki Besleme ve Gübre Kongresi, 8-10 Ekim, Konya, 641-649.
Eraslan F, Elkarim AKH, Güneş A, İnal A, 2012. Effect of nutrient inducted salinity on growth, membrane permeability, nitrate reductase activity, proline content and, macronutrient concentrations of tomato grown in greenhouse. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 71: 1915-1919.
Fernandez-Garcia N, Martinez V, Carvajal M, 2004. Effect of Salinity on growth, mineral composition and water relations of grafted tomato plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 167: 616-622.
Geboloğlu N, Yılmaz E, Çakmak P, Aydın M, Kasap Y, 2011. Determining of the yield, quality and nutrient content of tomatoes grafted on different rootstocks in soilless culture. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(10): 2147-2153.
Giuffrida F, Martonara M, Leonardi C, 2009. How sodium chloride concentration in the nutrient solution influences the mineral composition of tomato leaves and fruits. HortScience, 44(3): 707-711.
Gui-Guerrero JL, Rebolloso-Fuentes MM, 2009. Nutrient composition and antioxidant activity of eight tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) varieties. Journal of Food Composition and analysis, 22: 123-129.
Gunderson V, McCall D, Bechmann IE, 2001. Comparison of major and trace element concentrations in Danish greenhouse tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Cv. Aromata F1) cultivated in different sustrates. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49: 3808-3815.
Huang Y, Bie Z, He S, Hua B, Zhen A, Liu Z, 2010. Imoroving cucumber tolerance to major nutrient induced salinity by grafting onto Cucurbita ficifolia. Enviromental and Experimental Botany, 69: 32-38.
Mohammed SMT, Humidan M, Boras M, Abdalla OA, 2009. Effect of grafting tomato on different rootstocks on growth and productivity under glasshouse conditions. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(2): 47-54.
Premuzic Z, Bargiela M, Garcia A, Rendina A, Loria A, 1998. Calcium, iron, potassium, and vitamin C content of organic and hyroponic tomatoes. Hort.Science 33(2): 255-257.
Rhoades JD, Chanduvi F, Lesch S, 1999. Soil salinity assessment. Methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 57, Rome.
Shannon MC, 1978. Testing Salt Tolerance Variability Among Tall Wheatgrass Lines. Agronomy Journal, 70(5): 719-722.
Setter TL, Waters I, Stefanova K, Munns R, Barrett-Lennard EG, 2016. Salt tolerance, date of flowering and rain affect the productivity of wheat and barley on rainfed saline land, Field Crops Research, (194): 31-42.
Tuna AL, Kaya C, Ashraf M, Altunlu H, Yokas I, Yagmur B. 2007. The effects of calcium sulphate on growth, membrane stability and nutrient uptake of tomato plants grown under salt stres. Enviromental and Experimental Botany, 59: 173-178.
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF, 1974. A decimal code for the growth stage of cereals. Weed Res. 14: 415–421.
Zhu J, Bie Z, Huang Y, Han X, 2008. Effects of grafting on the growth and ion concentrations of cucumber seedlings under NaCl stres. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 54: 895-902.
Zhu Q, Lin HS, Doolittle JA, 2013. Functional soil mapping for site-specific soil moisture and crop yield management, Geoderma, (200–201): 45-54.