2013

Arıtmada Doğal Bitkilerin Kullanımı, Modeller ve Pilot Çalışma Örneği: Kozan İlçesi

Günümüzde çeşitli yollarla kirletilmiş suyu arıtmak için birçok alternatif bulunmaktadır. Bu alternatifler en basit teknolojiden en ilerisine kadar değişmektedir. Arıtma sistemini seçerken maliyet ve diğer şartlar açısından en uygun teknolojiyi kullanmak ve doğal ortama en az kirletici vermektir. Sulak alan arıtma sistemlerinin tasarımı genel hidrolik parametrelerinden hidrolik yükleme ve kütlesel yükleme hızı gibi parametrelerle yapılır. Ancak madde çevrimleri ve kirletici giderme mekanizmaları tasarımı için arıtılmış su kalitesini artırmaya yönelik farklı kinetik modeller de geliştirilmekte ve daha sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Birçok faktörün etkin olduğu ve özellikle biyolojik ayrışabilirliği olan maddelerin temel izlemsel işlem maddesi olması modellemelerde önemli rol oynar. Ayrıca, sulak alan arıtma sistemindeki biyolojik aktivitenin derecesi, aktif ekosistemlerde farklı faktörleri etkileyebilmektedir. Yüzey altı akışlı sulak alanlar ve yüzey akışlı sulak alanlar temel işleyişi farklı, işlevsel fonksiyonu ise aynı olan sistemsel metotlardır. Burada özellikle bazı parametreler (sıcaklık v.b.) değişime karşı fazla duyarlı değildir. Buda işletmede dikkat edilmesi gereken unsurlardandır. Çalışmada hidrolik yük ve buna bağlı olarak değişik kütlesel yüklerdeki değerler (öncelikle BOİ5,Azot, Fosfor ve diğer organik maddeler) ile sistemin temel işleyişini oluşturan nitrifikasyon, denitrifikasyon incelemiştir. Çevresel ve işletme faktörleri de değerlendirilerek su kalitesi ve tasarım kriterlerinin uygulama sonuçlarının ülkemizin sıcak bölgelerindeki durumu ve uygulanabilirliği test edilmiştir.

Use of Plants in Water Treatment: Models and Pilot Study Case in Kozan District

Today, there are many alternatives to treating polluted water. These alternatives range from the most basic to the most advanced technology. When selecting the most appropriate technology for the treatment system, the aim is to use the most convenient technology in terms of cost and other conditions, and to release the least possible pollutants to the natural environment. Wetlands treatment system designs are done by general hydraulic parameters such as hydraulic and mass loading speed. However, different kinetic models are being developed and are frequently used to improve the water quality of the matter cycles and pollutant removal mechanisms design. Many factors are influential in modelling and particularly the fact that biodegradable substances are the main formative process ingredient plays an important role in modelling. In addition, the degree of biological activity in the wetland treatment system may influence various factors in active ecosystems. Subsurface runoff wetlands and surface runoff wetlands are systematic methods which are different in terms of basic functioning, but are the same in terms of operational functioning. Here, especially some parameters (temperature, etc.) are not very sensitive to change. This is one of the factors to be taken into consideration during the operation. In this research, hydraulic load and values of different loads (primarily BOD5, nitrogen, phosphorus and other organic materials) and nitrification, denitrification which are the main constituents of the system are examined. The application results of water quality and design criteria in the hot regions of Turkey are tested and also environmental and operational factors are evaluated.

PDF

___

Adiloğlu, S., Adiloğlu, A., Acikgoz, F.E. Yeniaras T., Solmaz.Y., 2016. Phytoremediation of Cadmium (Cd) from Agricultural Soils Using Dock (Rumex patientia L.) Plant. Analytical Letters. 49 (4) : 601-606.
Adiloğlu, S., 2016. Using Phytoremediation with Canola to Remove Cobalt from Agricultural Soils. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 25 (6): 2251-2254.
Ayaz, S., Akça, L., Yinanç, A., 2001. Treatment of Waste Water by Constructed Wetland in Small Settlements. Water Sci. Tech. pp. 40-51.
Brix, H., 1994. Use of Wetlands in Water Pollution Control: Historical Development. Present Status and Future Perspectives. Journal of Water Science and Technology 30 (8): 209-220.
Burgoon, P.S. 1993. Oxidation of Carbon and Nitrogen in the Root Zone of Emergent Macrophytes Grown in Wetland Microcosms. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Constructed Wetlands Guidance Manual-Ontario Rural App., 1999. Guidance Manual forthe Design, Construction and Operations of Constructed Wetlands forrural Applications ın Ontario, Funded by the Canadapt Program of the Agricultural Adaptation Council, Author: Eric Tousignant, Ontario.
Fisher, M.M. and K.R. Reddy. 1987. Water Hyacinth for Improving Eutrophic Lake Water: Water Quality and Mass Balance. pp. 969-976.
Hamilton, H.,P.G.Nixand A.Sobolewski. 1993. An Overview of Constructed Wetlands as Alternetives to Conventional Wastewater Treatment Systems. Water Pollution Research Journal of Canada 28 (3): 529-548.
Jenssen, P.D., T. Maehlum and T.Krogstad. 1994. Potential of Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment in Northern Environments. Journal of Water Science and Technology 28 (10): 149- 157
Kadlec. H.R. ve Knight. R.L., 1996. Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publisher. FL. USA.
Karaman, M. R., A. Adiloğlu, A. R. Brohi, A. Güneş, A. İnal, M. Kaplan & M. Zengin. 2012. Plant Nutrition. Ankara, Turkey: Dumat Ofset, 1080.
Lemna Corporation. 1994. Innovations in Lagoon-Based Treatment. Retention Times, Spring/Summer, (Promotional Literature).
Magmedov, V.G. and L.I. Yakovleva. 1994. The Experience of the GIS on Using Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. European Water Pollution Control, 4 (2): 22-25.
Mitchell, C., 1996. Pollutant Removal Mechanisms in Artificial wetlands. Course notes for the IWES 96 International Winter Environmental School. Gold Coast. July.
Mitsch, W.J. and J.G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands. New York: v-Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Müftüoğlu, N.M. and T. Demirer. 1998. Toprakta Azot Bilançosu. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak.Derg. 29 (1): 175- 185.
Qasım, S.R., 1999. Wastewater Treatment Plants, Planning, Design and Operation, Second Edition, The University of Texas at Arlington.
Reddy. K.R. and Patrick. W.H., 1984. Nitrogen transformations and Loss in Flooded Soils and Sediments. CRC Crit. Rev. Envir. Control 13: 273-309.
Reddy, K.R. and D.A.Graetz.1988. Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Wetland Soils. The Ecology and Management of Wetlands. London: Croom Helm. pp. 307-318.
Reddy, K.R. and E.M. D'Angelo . 1994. Soil Processes Regulating Water Quality in Wetlands. pp. 309-324. Global Wetlands: Old World and New. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Tırıs, M., Görgün, E. Ayaz, S., 2003. İçme Suyu Barajlarına Gelen Sularda Sulak alan Sistemleriyle Organik, İnorganik ve Mikrobiyolojik Kirliliğin Giderilmesi . Proje Kodu: 5022410, Gebze, Kocaeli.
WEF (Water Environment Federation), 2000. Natural Systems for Wastewater Treatment, MOP FD-16, WEF, Alexandria, VA.