EN İYİ TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ UYGULAMALARI VE BİR SAHA ÇALIŞMASI

Tedarik zinciri yönetimi (TZY) günümüz işletmelerinin gündemini oluşturan önemli konulardan birisidir. Tedarik zincirinin etkili bir şekilde yönetilmesi uygulamacı ve akademik çevrelerde tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışma Sivas ilinde faaliyet gösteren sanayi işletmelerinin en iyi tedarik zinciri uygulamalarını ne denli takip ettiklerini, tedarikçi seçim kriterlerini ve tedarikçi performansını belirleme amacıyla kaleme alınmıştır. 41 firma üzerinde anket çalışması yapılarak elde edilen veriler istatistikî açıdan değerlendirmeye tabi tutulmuştur. Sonuçlar işletmelerin en iyi tedarik zinciri uygulamaları konusunda eksikleri olduğunu, tedarikçi seçim kriterlerine riayet ettikleri ve tedarikçi performansını yeterli bulduklarını göstermiştir

En İyi Tedarik Zinciri Uygulamaları ve Bir Saha Çalışması

Keywords:

-,

___

  • 1. ARTER, D. R. (2001), “Supplier Selection and Maintenance”, Quality Progress, Vol.34, No. 11, s.104.
  • 2. AZZONE G. ve A., Rangone. (1996), “Measuring Manufacturing Competence: A Fuzzy Approach”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 34, No. 9, s.2517-32.
  • 3. BASNET, C., J. Corner, J. Wisner ve K.C. Tan (2003), “Benchmarking Supply Chain Management Practice in New Zealand", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, s.57-64.
  • 4. BOVET, D., and Y. Sheffi (1998), “The Brave New World of Supply Chain Management”, Supply Chain Management Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, s.14-22.
  • 5. BURT D.N. ve W.R. Soukup (1985), “Purchasing's Role in New Product Development”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63, No. 5, s.90-97.
  • 6. ÇEBİ, F. ve D. Bayraktar (2003), “An İntegrated Approach for Supplier Selection ”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 16, No 6, s.395-400.
  • 7. CHAN F.T.S. (2003), “Interactive Selection Model for Supplier Selection Process: An Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 41, No. 15, s.3549–3579.
  • 8. CHAN I.J. ve A. Paulraj (2004), “Understanding Supply Chain Management: Critical Research and a Theoretical Framework”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 42, No. 1, s.131–163.
  • 9. DEGRAEVE Z. ve F. Roodhooft (1999), "Effectively Selecting Suppliers Using Total Cost of Ownership", Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1999, s.5-10.
  • 10. GHODSYPOUR S.H. ve C. O’Brien (1998), “A Decision Support System for Supplier Selection Using an Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Linear Programming”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 56–57, s.199-122.
  • 11. GILMORE, J.H. ve Pine II (1997), "The Four Faces of Mass Customization", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75, No. 1, s.91-101.
  • 12. GOFFIN, K., M. Szwejczewski ve C. New (1997), “Managing Suppliers: When Fewer can Mean More”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 27, No. 7, s.422-436.
  • 13. GÜLEŞ, H.K. V. Çağlıyan (2010), “Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Bağlamında Ürün Yeniliğine Tedarikçi Katılımı”, Niğde Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt:3, Sayı:1, s.30-40
  • 14. GUNASEKARAN A., C. Patel, ve E. McGaughey (2004), “A framework for supply chain performance measurement”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 87, s.333-347.
  • 15. KANNAN, V.J. ve K C. Tan (2006), “Buyer-Supplier Relationships: The Impact of Supplier Selection and Buyer-Supplier Engagement on Relationship and Firm Performance” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 36 No. 10, s.755-775.
  • 16. KEMPAINEN, K ve Vepsalainen, A.P.J. (2003), “Trends in industrial supply chains and networks”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol.33, Iss. 8; s. 701-720.
  • 17. KRAUSE D. ve L. Ellram (1997), "Critical Elements of Supplier Development", European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 3, 1997, s.21-31.
  • 18. LEE, H.L. ve C. Billington (1992), “Managing Supply Chain Inventory: Pitfalls and Opportunities”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 33, No 3, s.65-73.
  • 19. MCGINNIS M.A. ve R.M. Vallopra (1999), “Purchasing and Supplier Involvement in Process Improvement: A Source of Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol 35, No 4, s.42-50
  • 20. MIN S. and J.T. Mentzer (2004), “Developing and Measuring Supply Chain Concepts”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 25, No 1, s.63-99.
  • 21. NEW ve S.J. P. Payne (1995), “Research Frameworks in Logistics: Three Models, Seven Dinners and a Survey”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol 25, No 10, s.60–77.
  • 22. PARK D. ve H.A. Krishnan, (2001), “Understanding Supplier Selection Practices: Differences between U.S. and Korean Executives”, Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, March–April 2001, s.243-255.
  • 23. PIDDUCK, A. B.(2006), “Issues İn Supplier Partner Selection”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2006 s.262-276
  • 24. SAHAY B.S., V. Cavale ve R. Mohan (2003), “The Indian Supply Chain Architecture", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, s.93-106.
  • 25. SIMCHI-LEVI, D., P. Kaminsky ve E. Simchi-Levi (2000), Designing and Managing the Supply Chain, New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
  • 26. SIMPSON, P.M., A. Siguawand, S.C. White, (2002), “Measuring The Performance of Suppliers: An Analysis of Evaluation Processes”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 38 No. 1, s.29-41.
  • 27. SPEKMAN, R.E., J.W. Kamauff ve N. Myhr (1998), “An Empirical Investigation into Supply Chain Management: A Perspective on Partnerships”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol.28, Iss.8, s.630-650.
  • 28. TAN, K.C.A., V.R. Kannan ve R.B. Handfield, (1998), “Supply Chain Management: Supplier Performance and Firm Performance”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,Vol.34, Iss.3, s.2-9.
  • 29. TAN K.C.A., V.R. Kannan, R.B. Handfield ve S. Ghosh, (1999), “Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Study of its Impact on Performance”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19, No.10, s.1034-1052.
  • 30. TAN K.C.A. and J. Wisner, (2000), “ Supply Chain Management Practices in the United States and Europe”, Research Paper Series of the APICS Educational and Research Foundation and The Supply-Chain Council, Stock No. 07029, s.43.
  • 31. TAN, K.C.A. (2001), “Framework of Supply Chain Management Literature”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol 7, No. 1, s. 39-48.
  • 32. TAN, K.C.A. (2002), “Supply Chain Management: Practices, Concerns, and Performance Issues”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 38, No.1, s. 53.
  • 33. TAN, K.C.A., S.B. Lyman ve J.D. Wisner, (2002), “Supply Chain Management: A Strategic Perspective”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management”, Vol. 22, No.5/6, s.614- 631.
  • 34. TAYLOR, D. H. ve S. Probert, (1993), “European logistics systems employed by UK manufacturing companies“, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 23, Iss. 2, s.37-48.
  • 35. TING S.C. ve D.I. Cho (2008), “An Integrated Approach for Supplier Selection and Purchasing Decisions” “ Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol 13, No 2, s.116-127.
  • 36. TRACEY M. ve C. L. TAN, (2001), “Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance”, Supply Chain Management, Vol.6, Iss. ¾, s.174-188.
  • 37. ULUSOY, G. (2003), “An Assessment of Supply Chain And Innovation Management Practices in The Manufacturing Industries in Turkey”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 86, s.251–270.
  • 38. WISNER, Joel D., G. Keong Leong, and Keah-Choon Tan (2004), Supply Chain Management: A Balanced Approach, Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-0603
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1996
  • Yayıncı: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ KULLANIMININ HİZMET SUNUMUNA ETKİLERİ: KONYA İL ÖZEL İDARESİ ÖRNEĞİ

  Yrd.Doç.Dr.Filiz Tufan Emini, Filiz TUFAN EMİNİ, Arş.Gör.Mustafa KOCAOĞLU

TARİHİ ALAN YÖNETİMİNİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN SORUNLAR VE YENİDEN YAPILANDIRMA İHTİYACI: DAĞLIK FRİGYA ÖRNEĞİ

  Ahmet KURT, Doç.Dr.Sıtkı ÇORBACIOĞLU

TÜMLEŞİK HİYERARŞİK KONJOİNT ANALİZİ KULLANARAK ŞEHİRLERARASI YOLCU TAŞIMACILIĞINDA MÜŞTERİ DEĞER ANALİZİ: UŞAK ÖRNEĞİ

  Öğr.Gör.Dr.Hasan Hüseyin CEYLAN, Yrd.Doç.Dr.Serdar AYDIN

EN İYİ TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ UYGULAMALARI VE BİR SAHA ÇALIŞMASI

  Yrd.Doç.Dr.Mustafa Cahit UNGAN

MALİYET HACİM KAR ANALİZİNİN BİR HASTANE İŞLETMESİ MR ÜNİTESİNDE UYGULANMASI

  Yrd.Doç.Dr.M.Mustafa KISAKÜREK, Öğr.Gör.Enis Baha BİÇER

SOSYAL YARDIM VE SOSYAL HİZMET FAALİYETLERİ AÇISINDAN ISPARTA BELEDİYESİ: FARKINDALIK, YARARLANMA VE DEĞERLENİRME AÇISINDAN BİR ARAŞTIRMA

  Yrd.Doç.Dr. Nilüfer NEGİZ

LİKİDİTE TUZAĞI ALTINDA PARA VE MALİYE POLİTİKASI: AB VE TÜRKİYE DENEYİMİ

  Prof.Dr.C.Mehmet BAYDUR, Doç.Dr.Bora SÜSLÜ

TARIM ÜRÜNLERİ İHRACATINI OLUMSUZ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖR OLARAK FİYAT İSTİKRARSIZLIĞI: KAYISI ÖRNEĞİ

  Yrd.Doç.Dr.Yavuz CÖMERT, Öğr.Gör.İbrahim ARISAL

DEMOKRASİ, EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN MEKÂNSAL ANALİZİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

  Assist. Prof.Dr.Hüseyin ALTAY, Assist.Prof.Dr.Fatih ÇELEBİOĞLU

TÜRKİYE’DE KRİZLER VE KRİZLERİN TURİZM SEKTÖRÜNE ETKİLERİ

  Öğr.Gör.Sedat GÖÇEN, Şevket YİRİK, Yrd.Doç.Dr.Yusuf YILMAZ