ORGANİZASYONEL BÜYÜMENİN AÇIKLANMASINDA TEKNOLOJİK VE PAZARLAMA İNOVASYONU

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, teknolojik ve pazarlama inovasyonun örgütsel büyüme üzerindeki etkisini kontrol etmek ve her ikisinin etkisini karşılaştırmaktır. Tasarım: Ankete dayalı teknik bu çalışma için benimsenmiştir. Teknolojik ve pazarlama inovasyonu, teknoloji ve pazarlama olarak inovasyon unsurları ve örgütsel büyüme gibi kabul edilmiş bir ölçüyle ölçülür. Çalışmanın verileri Pakistan'ın Peshawar kentindeki cam endüstrisinden 89 katılımcıdan alınmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmanın bulguları teknolojik inovasyonun ve pazarlama inovasyonunun örgütsel büyüme üzerinde önemli bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir.

TECHNOLOGICAL AND MARKETING INNOVATION FOR EXPLAINING ORGANIZATIONAL GROWTH

Purpose– Purpose of this research paper is to check the impact of technological and marketing innovation on organization growth and which one role is better in the glass industry, as innovation strategy influence the strategic planning of the organization and their growth in glass industry of Pakistani market.                                                                                                          Design– Technological and marketing innovation are measured by an adopted scale, having elements of innovation, technology, marketing and organizational growth. The study included 89 respondents from glass industry in Peshawar, Pakistan.Findings– The role of technological innovation was seen more as compared to the marketing innovation of glass industry in Peshawar, Pakistan. Overall the result was positive with a good significance level.                                                                                                                      Keywords- Marketing innovation, Organizational growth, Technological innovation

___

  • Abdi, A. M., & Ali, A. Y. S. (2013). Innovation and business performance in telecommunication industry in sub-saharan african context: Case of somalia. INNOVATION, 2(4).
  • Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., & Lay, G. (2008). Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation, 28 (10), 644-657.
  • Audretsch, D. B., & Stephan, P. E. (1996). Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review, 641-652.
  • Autant-Bernard, C., & Massard, N. (2000). Scientific interactions, geographic spillovers and innovation. An empirical study on the French case. In40th European Regional Science Association Congress.
  • Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), pp. 662- 676.
  • Howard Smith (2005), “What Innovation Is”. A CSC White Paper, European Office of Technology and Innovation.
  • Johne, A., & Davies, R. (2000). Innovation in medium-sized insurance companies: how marketing adds value. International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 6-14.
  • Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Liu, C. T. (2008). Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation. Technovation, 28(4), pp.183-195.
  • Li, L. X. (2000). An analysis of sources of competitiveness and performance of Chinese manufacturers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20 (3), pp. 299- 315.
  • Manual, O. (2005). “The measurement of scientific and technological activities”, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. European Commission and Eurostat.
  • Miller, W. L. (2001). Innovation for business growth. Research-Technology Management, 44 (5), pp. 26-41.
  • Powell, W. W., & Brantley, P. (1992). Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: Learning through networks. Networks and organizations, 366-394.
  • Saftig, B. (2012, January 1). Sustainability and Energy Effi ciency. Focus on Glass and Solar Industry, pp. 16-20.
  • Walker, R. M. (2008). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591-615.
  • Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. (1998). Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets?. Economic Inquiry, 36(1), 65-86.