Raziye ÖZDEMİR, İbrahim GÜLHAN, Gökhan TOSUN, İbrahim UYAR, Aşkın DOĞAN, Yüksel KURBAN, Suna YILDIRIM KARACA, Bülent KILIÇ

Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Uzmanlarının Klinik Karar Destek Sistemlerine Yaklaşımı

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de üç büyükşehirde görev yapan kadın hastalıkları ve doğum uzmanlarının klinik karar destek sistemi (KKDS) kullanım düzeyinin belirlenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kesitsel tipteki araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, İzmir, Ankara ve İstanbul illerinde görev yapan 872 KHDU’nun 178’i (%20,4) oluşturdu. KHDU’ları ile yüz yüze görüşme yoluyla toplanan veriler, yüzde dağılım biçiminde özetlendi. KKDS kullanımı ile bağımsız değişkenler arasındaki ilişki ki-kare testi ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Uzman hekimlerin %71,9’u çalışma saatlerinde en az bir KKDS kullanmaktaydı. Her gün KKDS kullanan hekimlerin yüzdesi 14,8 idi. KKDS kullanma yüzdesi genç hekimlerde (p

Approaches of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians to Clinical Decision Support Systems

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the level of use of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) by obstetricians and gynaecologists (OB/GYNs), who work in three metropolises of Turkey. Methods: The population of this cross-sectional study consisted of 178 (20,4%) of 872 OB/GYNs working in İzmir, Ankara and İstanbul. The data collected through face-to-face the interviews with OB/GYNs were summarized in percentage distribution. Chi-square test was used to evaluate the relationship between the use of CDSS and independent variables. Findings: 71,9% of the OB/GYNs used at least one CDSS during the working hours. The percentage of those using CDSS every day was 14,8. The percentage of using CDSS was higher among the young physicians (p

___

1. van Gemert-Pijnen J, Wynchank S, Covvey H, Ossebaard H. Improving the credibility of electronic health technologies. Bull World Health Organ 2012 May 1;90(5):323-323A.
2. Al-Hhorbaji N. The World Health Assembly resolutions on eHealth: eHealth in support of universal health coverage. Methods Inf Med 2013;52(6):463-6.
3. Lee Ventola C. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. Pharmacy and Therapeutics 2014 May; 39(5):356-64.
4. Özata M, Aslan Ş. Klinik karar destek sistemleri ve örnek uygulamalar. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 2004 Ocak;5:11-7.
5. Walton R, Dovey S, Harvey E, Freemantle N. Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 1999 Apr 10;318(7189):984-90.
6. Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001 JulyAug;8(4):299-308.
7. Teich JM, Wrinn MM. Clinical decision support systems come of age. MD Comput 2000 JanFeb;17(1):43-6.
8. Mitchell J, Probst J, Brock-Martin A, Bennett K, Glover S, Hardin J. Association between clinical decision support system use and rural quality disparities in the treatment of pneumonia. J Rural Health 2014 Spring;30(2):186-95.
9. Bellodi E, Vagnoni E, Bonvento B, Lamma E. Economic and organizational impact of a clinical decision support system on laboratory test ordering. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017 Dec 22;17(1):179.
10. Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, Bastian L, Coeytaux RR, Samsa G, Hasselblad V, Williams JW, Musty MD, Wing L, Kendrick AS, Sanders GD, Lobach D. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2012 Jul 3;157(1):29-43.
11. Aydın N. Klinik karar destek sistemleri ve hemşirelikte kullanımı. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi 2011;8(3):59-63.
12. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, RosasArellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38.
13. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1339-46.
14. Lewis TL, Wyatt JC. mHealth and mobile medical apps: a framework to assess risk and promote safer use. J Med Internet Res 2014 Sep 15;16(9):e210.
15. Bierbrier R, Lo V, Wu RC. Evaluation of the accuracy of smartphone medical calculation apps. J Med Internet Res 2014 Feb 3;16(2):e32.
16. Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Akilov O, Patton T, English JC, Ho J, Ferris LK. Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection. JAMA Dermatol 2013 Apr;149(4):422-6.
17. Haffey F, Brady RR, Maxwell S. A comparison of the reliability of smartphone apps for opioid conversion. Drug Saf 2013 Feb;36(2):111-7.
18. Franko OI, Tirrell TF. Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst 2012 Oct;36(5):3135-9.
19. Payne KB, Wharrad H, Watts K. Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012 Oct 30;12:121.
20. Mosa ASM, Yoo I, Sheets L. A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012;12:67.
21. Yaman H, Yavuz E, Er A, Vural R, Albayrak Y, Yardimci A, Asilkan O. The use of mobile smart devices and medical apps in the family practice setting. J Eval Clin Pract 2016;22(2):290-6.
22. Patel RK, Sayers AE, Patrick NL, Hughes K, Armitage J, Hunter AI. A UK perspective on smartphone use amongst doctors within the surgical profession. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2015 Jun;4(2):107-12.
23. Alshuaibia A, Almutairia O, Baghaffara M, Jameelb T, Baig M. Utilization of smart phones relatedmedical applications among medical students at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah: A cross-sectional study. J Infect Public Health 2016 Nov-Dec;9(6):691-7.
24. Carroll AE, Christakis DA. Pediatricians' use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants. Pediatrics 2004 Feb;113(2):238-42.
25. AL-Malaise AL-Gamdi A, Albeladi KS, AlCattan RF. Clinical decision support system in healthcare ındustry success and risk factors. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology 2014 May:11(4):188-92.