AYŞE MELİHA CANPOLAT, Kazak Zişan ÇETİNALP

İlköğretim II. kademe öğrenci-sporcuların başarı algısı ve öz-yeterlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrenci-sporcuların öz-yeterlik ve başarı algısı düzeylerini belirlemek ve başarı algısının öz-yeterlik üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Çalışmada, 237’sı kız ve 194’sı erkek olmak üzere toplam 431 öğrencisporcu yer almaktadır. Öğrencilerin öz-yeterlik ve başarı algısı düzeylerini belirlemek için Genel Öz-yeterlik Ölçeği ve Başarı Algısı Envanteri’nin Çocuk versiyonu kullanılmıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde bağımsız gruplar için t testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi, korelasyon analizi ve çoklu regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, öğrencilerin öz-yeterlik ile başarı algısı alt boyutları arasında orta düzeyde, pozitif ve anlamlı bir ilişkinin olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca, görev yöneliminin özyeterliğin pozitif ve anlamlı belirleyicisi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın bulguları, öğretmenlerin öğrencilerinin öğrenme, performans ve güdülenmelerini nasıl destekleyebileceklerine ilişkin pratik yöntemler ve öneriler sağlamaktadır.

Relationship between perception of success and self-efficacy of secondary school student-athlete

The purpose of this study was to determine perception of success and self-efficacy secondary school student-athletes, and also to examine effect of perception of success on general self-efficacy. A total of 431 student-athletes respondents (237 girls and 194 boys) participated to the study. General Self-Efficacy Scale and The Children's Version of The Perception of Success Questionnaire were used to determine students’ self-efficacy and perception of success levels, respectively. Independent sample t test, one-way ANOVA, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis were used to analyze data. According to analysis, there was a moderate-level, positive and meaningful difference between self-efficacy and perception of success of subscales. In addition, task orientation was positive and significant predictor of self-efficacy.

PDF

___

1. Akkoyunlu B., Orhan F., Umay, A. Bilgisayar Öğretmenleri için Bilgisayar Öğretmenliği Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2005, 29: 1-8.
2. Anderman EM., Midgley C. Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1997, 22, 269– 298.
3. Anshel MH. Sport psychology: from theory to practice. 3rd ed. Scottsdale, Arizona: Gorsuch Scarisbrick. 1997, 115-151.
4. Baker L., Wigfield A. Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 1999, 34, 452–477.
5. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol.4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/BanEncy.html., 1994.
6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman Company, 1997.
7. Bortelli L., Robazza C. Italian version of the Task and Ego Orientation in physical education questionnaire. Perception Motor Skills, 2005, 101(3) : 901-910.
8. Christodoulidis T., Papaioannou A., Digelidis N. Motivational climate and attitudes towards exercise in Greek senior high school: a yearlong intervention. Eur J Sport Sci, 2001, 1:1–12.
9. Cox RH. Sport psychology: Concepts and applications. 4th ed. Boston: The McGraw-Hill; 1998, 236-71.
10. Digelidis, N. & Papaioannou, A. Age-group differences in intrinsic motivation, goal orientations and perceptions of athletic competence, physical appearance and motivational climate in Greek physical education. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 1999, 9: 375-380
11. Duda JL. Goals: A social-cognitive approach to the study of achievement motivation in sport. In: Singer RN, Murphey M, Tennant LK, eds. Handbook on Research on Sport Psychology.New York: Macmillan; 1993, 421-36.
12. Hanrahan, SJ. and Biddle, SJH. Measurement of achievement orientations: Psychometric measures, gender, and sport differences. European Journal of Sport Science, 2002, 2 5: 1-12.
13. Hsieh P., Cho Y., Liu M., Schallert DL. Examining the ınterplay between middle school students’ achievement goals and self-efficacy ın a technology-enhanced learning environment, American Secondary Education, 2008, 36(3) Summer.
14. Hsieh P., Sullivan J.R., Guerra NS. A closer look at college students: self-efficacy and goal orientation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 2007, 18, 454–476.
15. Kavussanu M., Roberts GC. Motivation in physical activity contexts: the relationship of perceived motivational climate to intrinsic motivation and selfefficacy. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 1996, 18:264-280.
16. Kazak Çetinkalp Z. The validity and reliability study of “the children's version of the perception of success questionnaire-POSQ-CH” for Turkish athletes. 9. Uluslararası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 2006, 1325-7.
17. Kazak Z., Moralı S., Doğan B. Sporcuların güdüsel yönelimlerinin öngörücüleri olarak: hedef yönelimi, sportif yeterllik ve yaşam doyumu. Ege Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu, Performans Dergisi, 2004, 10 (3), 27-34.
18. Kim YS. Effects of achievement goal orientation of dental school students on self-motivation, selfregulated learning strategies, and self-efficacy. Korean Journal of Medical Education. Sep; 2008, 20(3):199- 208.
19. Li F, Harmer P, Acock A. The task and ego orientation in sport questionnaire: construct equivalence and mean difference among gender. Res Q Exerc Sport, 1996, 67: 228–39.
20. Luszczynska A., Gibbons FX., Piko B., Tekozel M. Self-regulatory cognitions, social comparisons, perceived peers’ behaviors as predictors of nutrition and physical activity: A comparison among adolescents in Hungary, Poland, Turkey and USA. Psychology and Health, 2004, 19 (5), 577–593.
21. Midgley C., Anderman EM., Hicks L. Differences between elementary and middle school teachers and students: A goal theory approach. Journal of Adolescence, 1995, 15, 90–113.
22. Midgley C., Urdan T. Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2001, 26, 61– 75.
23. Murray HA. Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1938.
24. Netz Y., Raviv S. Age differences in motivational orientation toward physical activity: an application of social- cognitive theory. The Journal of psychology; 2004, 138(1):35-48.
25. Nicholls JG. Conceptions of ability and achievement motivation. In: Ames R, Ames C, eds. Research on Motivation in Education: Student Motivation (1984, Vol. 1, pp. 39–73). New York: Academic Press.
26. Onursal MA., Moralı S. Çocuklarda özyeterlik ve problem çözme becerilerine ilişkin düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. Performans, 2004, 13 (1-2): 21-26.
27. Pintrich PR., De Groot EV. Motivational and selfregulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990, 82 (1), 33-40.
28. Roberts GC, Spink KS, Pemberton CL. Learning experiences in sport psychology. 2nd eds. USA, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1999, 115-118.
29. Roberts GC., Treasure DC., Ballague G. Achievement goals in sport: The development and validation of the Perception of Success Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Sciences, 1998, 16 (4), 337-347.
30. Schwarzer R., Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, (1995, pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
31. Tzetzis G, Goudas M, Kourtessis T, Zisi V. The relation of goal orientations to physical activity in physical education. Eur Phys Educ Rev, 2002, 8:177– 88.
32. Üredi I., Üredi L. Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Cinsiyetlerine, Bulundukları Sınıflara ve Başarı Düzeylerine Göre Fen Öğretimine İlişkin Öz-Yeterlik İnançlarının Karşılaştırılması, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 1 (2), http//www.yeditepe.edu.tr, 2006.
33. Yin Y., Shavelson RJ., Ayala CC., Ruiz-Primo MA., Brandon PR., Furtak EM., Tomitac MK., Young DB. On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 2008, 21: 4, 335-359.