Mehmet KABAK, Yiğit KAZANÇOĞLU, Kaan KURTEL

Determining logistics center's ISO/IEC 9126 software product quality criteria based on analytic hierarchy process

ISO/IEC 9126 yazılım kalite modeli iki önemli özelliğini işaret eder. Birincisi; kullanıcı, geliştiren ve yöneticinin ürün kalitesine ait görüşü; ikincisi kullanım kılavuzlarında yer alan kalite karakteristikleri ile ilgilidir. Bu iki özellik, bizi lojistik merkezi yazılım kalite karakteristiklerinin daha iyi anlaşılması konusunda çalışmak için cesaret veren unsurlardı. Biz bu çalışmada, lojistik merkezi yazılım kalite gereksinimlerini karşılamada yeterince güçlü olan yazılım ürün kalite karakteristiklerini seçtik. Lojistik merkezinin zorunlu ve kullanışlı yazılım ürün kalite kriterlerini belirlemek için ISO/IEC 9126 ile çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemini kullandık. Sonuç olarak, geliştirilmiş alt standartları içeren bir başka bir model önerdik.

Lojistik merkezine ait ISO/IEC 9126 yazılım ürünü kalite kriterlerinin analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi ile belirlenmesi

ISO/IEC 9126 software product quality model points out two significant properties; first related to the user, the developer and the manager’s view for product quality and second the quality characteristics are accompanied by guidelines for their use. These two properties are encouragement to us as we continue to strive for better understanding of the logistics centers software product quality characteristics. In this paper, we selected software product quality characteristics that were powerful enough to capture logistics center’s software quality requirements. We have used multicriteria decision making method called Analytic Hierarchy Process with ISO/IEC 9126 for determining logistics center’s essential and useful software product quality criteria. Eventually, we proposed an equivalent model which includes modified base standards.

PDF

___

Arbel, A., Orgler, Y.E., 1990. "An Application of the AHP to Bank Strategic Planning: The Mergers and Acquisitions Process", European Journal of 13 Operational Research, Amsterdam: Sep 5,Vol. 48, Iss. 1; p. 27.
Ayyıldız, G., 2003,CIM Yatırımlarının Bulanık AHP Yöntemi ile ıs Değerlendirilmesi, İTU Endüstri Müh. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
Büyüközkan, G., Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., 2004. "A fuzzy multi-criteria 13, decision approach for software development strategy selection." International Journal of General Systems, Apr-Jun.2004, Vol. 33 Issue 2/3, p.259-280.
Chan, A.H.S., Kwok, W. Y, Duffy, V.G. 2004. "Using AHP for determining priority in a safety management system", Industrial Management + Data Systems, Wembley: Vol. 104, Iss. 5/6; p. 430.
Cheng, Ching-Hsue, Yang, Kuo-Lung, Hwang, Chia-Lung, 1999. "Evaluating Attack Helicopters By AHP Based On Linguistic Variable Weight" European Journal of Operational Research, Amsterdam: Jul 16 I999. Vol. 116, Iss. 2; p.423.
Cook, D.R., Staschak, S., Green, W.T., 1990. "Equitable Allocation of Livers for Orthotopic Transplantation: An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research, Amsterdam: Sep 5, 1990. Vol. 48, Iss. 1; p. 49.
Dağdeviren, M., Eren, T. 2001. "Tedarikçi Firma Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ve 0-1 Hedef Programlama Yöntemlerinin Kullanılması" Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der., (16), 2, p.41-52.
Dyer, R.F., Forman, E.H., Mustafa, M.A., 1992. "Decision Support for Media Selection Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process", Journal of Advertising, Armonk: Mar 1992. Vol. 21, Iss. 1; p.59.
Ebert C., Dumke R., Bundschuh M., Schmietendorf, A., 2005. Best Practices in Software Measurement, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Fenton N.E., and Pfleeger S.L., 1997. Software metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2nd edition, PWS Publishing Company.
Frazelle E.H., 2002. Supply Chain Strategy, McGraw-Hill.
Hull E., Jackson K., and Dick J., 2005. Requirements Engineering, 2nd edition, Springer.
IEEE, 1990. IEEE Std. 610.12-1990-IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, Approved edition, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York.
IEEE, 1998. IEEE Std. 830-1998-IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications, Approved edition, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York.
IEEE, 2004. IEEE Std. , 1012-2004-IEEE Standard for Software Verification and Validation, Approved edition, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York.
ISO/I EC 1061, 1998. Software Quality Metrics Methodology, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/I EC 9126-1, 2001. Software engineering - Product quality - Part 1: Quality model, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/I EC TR 9126-2, 2003. Software engineering - Product quality - Part 2: External metrics, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization
ISO/I EC TR 9126-3, 2003. Software engineering - Product quality - Part 3: Internal metrics, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/I EC 14598-1, 1999. Information Technology - Evaluation of software product; Part 1: General Overview, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/I EC 14598-2, 2000. Information Technology - Evaluation of software product; Part 2: Planning and management, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/I EC 14598-3, 2000. Information Technology - Evaluation of software product; Part 3: Process for developers, Geneva. International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/I EC 14598-4, 1999. Information Technology - Evaluation of software product; Part 4: Process for buyers, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/I EC 14598-5, 1998. Information Technology - Evaluation of software product; Part 5: Process for evaluators, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/I EC 14598-6, 2001. Information Technology - Evaluation of software product; Part 6: Evaluation modules, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
Jung H., Kim S., Chung C., 2004. Measuring Software Product Quality: A Survey of ISO/IEC 9126, IEEE Software, Vol. 21, issue 5, pp.88 - 92.
Juran J.M., and Godfrey A.B., 1999. Juran's Quality Handbook, 5th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kan S.H., 2002. Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering, 2nd edition, Addison Wesley.
Kaner C., Bond W.P., 2004. Software Engineering Metrics: What Do They Measure and How Do We Know? 10th International Software Metrics Symposium.
Kodali, R., Chandra, S., 2001. "Analytical hierarchy process for justification of total productive maintenance." Production Planning & Control, Oct/Nov2001, Vol. 12 Issue 7, p.695-705.
Koscianski, A., Candido, B.C.J., 1999. Combining Analytical Hierarchical Analysis with ISO/IEC 9126 for a Complete Quality Evaluation Framework, Software Engineering Standards, Fourth IEEE International Symposium and Forum, pp.218-226.
Kurtel K., Atay S., Tuncay A., 2006. Information Technologies for Contemporary Logistics Centers. Proceedings of 4th International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress, pp. 616-622.
Lai, V.S., Wong, B.K., Cheung, W., 2002. "Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software seJection", European Journal of Operational Research, Amsterdam: Feb 16, 2002. Vol. 137, Iss. 1; p.134.
Li H., Lu M., and Li Q., 2006. Software Reliability Metrics Selecting Method Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC'06), pp. 337-346.
Liang, W:Y., 2003. "The analytic hierarchy process in project evaluation: An R&D case study in Taiwan", Benchmarking, Bradford, Vol. 10, Iss. 5; p. 445.
Liberatore, M.J., El-Najdawi, M.K, "Matrix management effectiveness: An update for research and engineering organizations" Project Management Journal, Sylva: Mar 1997. Vol. 28, Iss. 1; p. 25.
Mohanty, R.P., Venkataraman, S., 1993. "Use Of The Analytic Hierarchy Process For Selecting Automated Manufacturing Systems" International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Bradford, Vol. 13, Iss. 8; p. 45.
Murphy P.R., Wood D.F., 2004. Contemporary Logistics, 8th edition, Prentice Hall.
Ossadnik, W., Lange, 0..1999. "AHP-Based Evaluation of A HP-software", European Journal of Operational Research, Amsterdam: Nov 1, Vol. 118, Iss. 3; p. 578.
Partovi, F.Y. and Hopton, W.E., 1994. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process as Applied to Two Types of Inventory Problems", Production and Inventory Management Journal, p. 13.
Partovi, F. 1994. "Determining What to Benchmark: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach" International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 14 Issue: 6, s.25 - 39.
Saaty T. L. , 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L., 1968. "Axiomatic Foundation of The Analytic Hierarchy Process", Management Science, Linthicum: Jul 1986. Vol. 32, Iss. 7; p. 741.
Schniederjans, M. J., 2004. Information Technology Investment: Decision-Making Methodology, Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Company.
Soyuer, H., Kocamaz, M., 2003. "İşletmelerde Bilgisayar Destekli İnsan Kaynağı Değerlendirme ve Seçme Süreci", II. Ulusal Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi, Bildiriler, Kocaeli Üniversitesi, 17-18.Mayıs.2003, Derbent, İzmit, p.673-684.
Tam, M.C.Y; Tummala, V.M.R.,2001. "An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system". Omega, Oxford: Apr 2001. Vol. 29, Iss. 2; p.171.
Tavana, M., Mohebbi, B., Kennedy, D.T., 2003. "Total quality index: a benchmarking tool for total quality management", Benchmarking, Bradford, Vol. 10, Iss. 6; p. 507.
Van de Water., H., De Vries J., 2006. "Choosing a quality improvement project using the analytic hierarchy process", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol 23, Issue 4, p.409 - 425.
Weber, C.A., Ellram, L.M.,1993. "Supplier selection using multi-objective programming: A decision support system approach", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Bradford, Vol. 23, Iss. 2; p. 3.
Winston W.L., (2004). Operations Research Application and Algorithms, 4th edition, Canada, Thomson Learning, pp: 785-791.
Wu, J.A., Wu, N., 1991. "A Strategic Planning Model: Structuring and Analysing Via the Analytic Hierarchy Process", Industrial Management + Data Systems, Wembley: Vol. 91, Iss. 6; p. 5.
Yahya, S., Kingsman, S. 1999. "Vendor Rating for an Enterpreneur Development Programme: A Case Study Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method." The Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol 50, No 9., p.916-930.
Yurdakul, M., 2002. "Measuring a Manufacturing System's Performance Using Saaty's System With Feedback Approach," Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 13, Iss. 1; p. 25.

ISSN: 1303-6831
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2002
Yayıncı: Milli Savunma Üniversitesi Alparslan Savunma Bilimleri ve Millî Güvenlik Enstitüsü