Yolculuk Talep Yönetimi Stratejilerinin Kentsel Trafik Yüküne Etkisi Üzerine Bir Uygulama

In recent years, experts and managers in both industrialized and developing countries have begun a quest to create new policies for urban transportation, environmental problems, energy saving and equity between different groups in society with increasing sensitivity. In urban transportation sector, instead of traditional transportation policies which are irreversible and require large investments, the transportation policies which are developed with lesser investment and more reasonable and efficient use of available resources are adopted. These policies which are developed to manage the increasing demand rather than to create supply for the increasing transportation demand, are called "travel demand management strategies." In this study, with the help of travel demand management strategies, which have very successful applications in the world, reduction of traffic load is calculated through a sample case and things that need to be done in this direction are introduced.

An Application on The Effect of Travel Demand Management Strategies on Urban Traffic Load

-

___

  • OECD, “Environmental Outlook”, OECD Statistics, Garlin, T., “Travel Demand Management Targeting Reduced Private Car Use: Effectiveness, Public Acceptability and Political Feasibility”, Journal of Social Issues, Vol:63, No:1, 139-153, 2007.
  • Annual energy review, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington D.C.: Energy Information Administration, Beroldo, S., “Casual Carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area”, Transportation Quarterly, 133-150, 1990.
  • Çelik, F., Yolculuk talep yöntemi ve bu yaklaşımların Ankara Çayyolu koridorundaki uygulama önerileri, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Hanks, J., Lomax, T., “Roadway Congestion in Major Urban Areas: 1982 to 1988”, 70th Annual Meeting,
  • Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 1991.
  • Çelik F., “Geçmişte Ülkemizde Uygulanan Yolculuk Talep Yönetimi Yaklaşımları ve Bu yaklaşımların Kalıcılığına İlişkin Alınması Gereken Önlemler”, 2. Ulaşım ve Trafik Kongresi, Ankara, 1999.
  • Developing an Effective Travel Plan, Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, London, 2000.
  • Comsis, “Implementing Effective Travel Demand Management Measures”, A Series on TDM, Institute of Transport Engineers, Washington, 1993.
  • Souza, P. A., “New approach to finance metropolitan transportation and ensure system performance”. Public Works Management and Policy, 13(1), 75-84, 2008.
  • Litman, T., “Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs”, VTPI., http://www.vtpi.org. 2001.
  • Regional Municipality of Peel, Transportation Demand Management Study. Report, No:1235, Canada, 2004.
  • Hatipoğlu S., “Ulaşım Problemlerinin Çözümüne Yönelik Bir Strateji: Taşıt Paylaşma Programları”, 2. Ulaşım ve Trafik Kongresi, Ankara, 1999.
  • Elker, C., Ulaşımda Politika ve Pratik, Gölge Ofset Matbaacılık, Ankara, 2002.
  • Zupan, M., “Transportation Demand Management: A Cautious Look” Transportation Research Record, No. 1346,
  • Dewan, K.K., Ahmad I., “A step to reduce congestion - A case study,of Delhi”, Conference Information: International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, 2006.
  • Huwer, U., “Public transport and car-sharing, benefits and effects of combined services”, Transport Policy, 11, 77- , 2004.
  • Fellows, N.T., Pitfield, D.E., “An economic and operational evaluation of urban car-sharing” Transport. Research Part D, 5, 1–10, 2000.
  • Baldassare, M., Ryan, S., Katz, C., “Suburban attitudes toward policies aimed at reducing solo driving” Transportation, 25, 99–117, 1998.
  • Collura, J., “Evaluating ride-sharing programs: Massachusetts’ experience” J. Urban Planning Devel, 120 (1), 28–47, 1994.
  • ILO, “Conditions of Work Digest on Telework” ILO, Vol.9, 1, Geneva 1990.
  • INAC, “New Ways of Living and Working: Teleworking in Ireland”, Report of Ireland National Advisory Council,1999.
  • Martino, V.D., Wirth, L., “Telework: A New Way of Working and Living”, International Labour Review, Vol.129, No.5, 1990.
  • Nilles, J.M., “Making Telecommuting Happen: A Guide for Telemanagers and Telecommuters, Van Nostrand Reinbold, New York, 1994.
  • Alkan H.F., “Geleceğin Çalışma Biçimi Tele Çalışmaya İlişkin Yaklaşımlar”, IX. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Kütahya, 265-272, 31 Ocak - 2 Şubat 2007.
  • Matthews, H.S., Williams, E., “Telework Adoption and Energy Use in Building and Transport Sectors in the United States and Japan”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol: , No: 1, 21-30, 2005.
  • Soysal, T., “Tele Çalışma”, Legal İş Hukuku ve Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku Dergisi, Sayı: 9, 133-165, 2006.
  • Ulaştırma Ana Planı Stratejisi Sonuç Raporu, T.C. Ulaştırma Bakanlığı, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, 2005.
  • EPA, “Commuter Model V.2.0 User Manual (Steps in TDM Program Evaluation Methodology)”, Environmental Protection Agency, 2005.
  • Lovejoy, K., “Results of the 2009-10 Campus Travel
  • Survey, University of California, 2011.
  • Çubuk, M.K., Türkmen, M., “Ankara’da Raylı Ulaşım”, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18, No: 1, 125-144, 2003.
  • Comsis Corporation, “A Guidance Manual for Implementing Effective Employer-based Travel Demand Management Programs Final Reports”, US Department of Transportaion, 1993.
  • Hatipoğlu, S., Servis Araçlarının Atıl Zamanlarının Başka Bir Ulaşım Sistemi Olarak Değerlendirilmesi, Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erel A., Yüksel H., “Ulaştırmada Talep Yönetimi ve Ülkemizde Uygulanabilirliği”, 4. Ulaştırma Kongresi, Denizli, 13-24, 1998.
  • Erel, A., Yüksel, H., “Kentiçi Ulaşım Sorunlarının Çözümünde Talep Yönetimi”, Ulaşım ve Trafik Kongresi, Ankara, 53-60, 1997.