Mansur Seymen SEĞMENOĞLU, Hilal KUŞCU KARATEPE

Akademisyenlerin Aşı Karşıtı ve Akılcı İlaç Kullanım Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi: Kesitsel Bir Çalışma

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, akademisyenlerin COVID-19 pandemisi sürecinde sosyodemografik özelliklerine göre aşı karşıtı ve akılcı ilaç kullanım davranışlarındaki farkı ortaya koymaktır. Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel tipteki bu araştırma, Türkiye'de farklı alanlarda çalışan 468 akademisyen ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çevrimiçi veri toplamak için Sosyodemografik Bilgi Formu, Aşı Tereddüt Ölçeği ve Akılcı İlaç Kullanım Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Veriler bağımsız örneklem t testi, ANOVA ve Tukey testi ile analiz edildi. Bulgular: Erkeklerde, 31-40 yaşları arasında ve fen bilimleri alanında çalışan kişilerde aşı tereddüt düzeyi anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti. Kadın akademisyenler, profesörler ve sağlık bilimleri alanında görev yapanlar daha akılcı ilaç kullanım davranışı sergilediler (p

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Akademisyenler, aşı karşıtlığı, davranış, COVID-19, akılcı ilaç kullanımı

Evaluation of Academics' Anti-vaccination and Rational Drug Use Behaviors

Aim: The aim of this study is to reveal the difference in academics' anti-vaccine and rational drug use behaviors according to their sociodemographic characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out with 468 academics working in different fields in Turkey. A Sociodemographic Information Form, the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, and Rational Drug Use Scale were used to collect data online. The data were analyzed via the independent sample t-test, ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results: The level of vaccine hesitancy was significantly higher in male, and between the ages of 31-40, and who were working in the field of physical sciences. Female academics, and professors, and who working in the field of health sciences exhibited more rational drug use behaviors (p

Keywords:

Academics anti-vaccine, behavior, COVID-19, rational drug use, rational drug use,

PDF

___

1.Hussain A, Ali S, Ahmed M, Hussein S. (2018). The anti-vaccination movement: a regression in modern medicine . Cureus; 10(7): e2919. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2919
2.Shen S, Dubey V. (2019). Addressing vaccine hesitancy. Canadian Family Physician; 65 (3):175-181.
3.Herrera-Peco I, Jiménez-Gómez B, Romero Magdalena CS, Deudero JJ, García-Puente M, Benítez De Gracia E, Ruiz Núñez C. (2021). Antivaccine Movement and COVID-19 Negationism: A Content Analysis of Spanish-Written Messages on Twitter. Vaccines; 9, 656. https:// doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060656
4.Germani F, Biller-Andorno N. (2021). The anti-vaccination infodemic on social media: A behavioral analysis. PLoS ONE; 16(3): e0247642.
5.Kader Ç. (2019). Anti-vaccination: vaccine hesitancy and refusal. ESTÜDAM Halk Sağlığı Dergisi; 4(3): 377-88. https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.590304
6.Dubé È, Ward JK, Verger P, MacDonald NE. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy, acceptance, and anti-vaccination: trends and future prospects for public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health; 42:175–91.
7.Shi J, Ghasiya P, Sasahara K. (2021). Psycho-linguistic differences among competing vaccination communities on social mediaarXiv:2111.05237v1.
8.Akyüz SS. (2021). The role of communication practices and political affiliations in anti-vaccine attitude and transparency perception, e-Journal of New Media; 5 (2): 172-185.
9.Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. (2007). YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA; 298: 2482-84.
10.Motta M, Callaghan T, Sylvester S, Lunz-Trujillo, K. (2021). Identifying the prevalence, correlates, and policy consequences of anti-vaccine social identity. Politics, Groups, and Identities; DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2021.1932528.
11.Sema FD, Asres ED, Wubeshet BD. (2021). Evaluation of rational use of medicine using WHO/INRUD core drug use indicators at Teda and Azezo Health Centers, Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice; 10: 51–63.
12.Yang H, Chen Y. (2021). Analysis on the problems of rational drug use carrying out by hospital pharmacists in China. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine; 11: 251-258.
13.Özdamar EN, Mutlu HH. (2021). Evaluation of the rational drug use by using the World Health Organization core prescribing indicators at the obesity outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital. Ege Journal of Medicine; 60 (1): 13-19.
14.WHO. (2002). Promoting rational use of medicines: core components. WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines.
15.Khan Z, Karatas Y. (2021). Irrational drug usage in Turkey: The need for more active educational intervention among health care professionals and patients. Anatol J Family Med; 4(2):199–200.
16.Anonymous. (2021). Türk üniversitelerindeki kadın profesör oranı, Avrupa ortalamasını geride bıraktı. Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK), Ankara.
17.Kılınçarslan MG, Sarigül B, Toraman C, Sahin EM. (2020). Development of valid and reliable scale of Vaccine Hesitancy in Turkish language. Konuralp Medical Journal; 12(3): 420-29.
18.Demirtaş Z, Dağtekin G, Sağlan R, Alaiye M, Önsüz MF, Işıklı B, Kılıç FS, Metintaş S. (2018). Akılcı ilaç kullanımı ölçeği geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği. ESTÜDAM Halk Sağlığı Dergisi; 3(3): 37-46.
19.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
20.Karakurt P, Hacıhasanoğlu R, Yıldırım A, Sağlam R. (2010). Medication use among university students. TAF Prev Med Bull; 9(5): 505-512.
21.Akıcı A, Uğurlu MÜ, Gönüllü N, Oktay Ş, Kalaça, S. (2002). Pratisyen hekimlerin akılcı ilaç kullanımı konusunda bilgi ve tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi (STED); 11: 253-7.
22.Kıroğlu O, Berktaş F, Şahan E, Karataş Y. (2018). Knowledge and attitudes of research assistants about rational drug use. Cukurova Medical Journal; 43(1): 164-171.
23.Dutta A, Chakraborty S. (2010). Practice of rational drug uses in a rural area of 24 pgs(s) in West Bengal. J. Adv. Pharm. Tech. Res; 1(3): 358-364.