Çevirmen: Abdulsamet ŞENTÜRK, Çevirmen: Osman Nuri DUMAN

Felsefî Terminolojinin Arapça Tercümesinde Çerçeve Semantiği

Bu çalışmanın amacı felsefî kavramların Arapçaya nasıl çevrildiğini tetkik etmektir. Bu inceleme, Batı menşeli felsefî terimler ile Arapça karşılıkları arasındaki epistemik farklılıktan kaynaklanan sorunları, bilişsel çerçevelere (cognitive frame) dayanan bir düzlemde ele almayı amaçlamakla birlikte gizli semantik ilişkiler ağına sahip olan terminolojik bilgi yapısının temellerine odaklanır. Çalışmadaki örnekler Abdurrahman Bedevi’nin felsefe alanına tahsis edilmiş ansiklopedisinden alınmıştır. Bu makale, ansiklopedideki felsefi terimlerin tercümelerini analiz etmek için Çerçeve Tabanlı Terminoloji Kuramı’na başvurmaktadır. Ayrıca, felsefî terimleri tercüme ederken karşılaşılan zorlukların epistemik engelleri temsil ettiğini iddia etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Dil Bilim, Terminoloji, Tercüme, Arapça, Çerçeve Semantiği

Frame Semantics in the Arabic Translation of Philosophical Terminology

The purpose of this study is to examine how philosophical terms are translated into Arabic. It aims at discussing the problems arising from the epistemological difference between Western philosophical terms and their counterparts in Arabic in the degreeof reliance on cognitive frames. It focuses on the structure of terminological knowledge bases, which have a hidden network of semantic relations. Examples of the study are taken from the specialized encyclopedia of Abdel Rahman Badawi (1996). Thestudy utilizes Frame-Based Terminology Theory to analyze the translation of the philosophical terms in the encyclopedia. The study argues that difficulties in translating philosophical terms represent epistemological barriers.

PDF

___

Arberry, A. J. “Some Plato in an Arabic Epitome”. The Islamic Quarterly 2 (ts.), 86-99.
Bedevî, Abdurrahman. Aflutin ‘inda l-‘arab. Plotinus Apud Arabes. Theologia Aristotelis et Fragmenta Quae Supersunt. Kahire: Maktabat al-Nahda al-Misriyya, 1955.
Bedevî, Abdurrahman. Al-Aflatuniyya al-muhdatha ‘ind al-‘Arab. Kahire: Maktabat al-Nahda al-Misriyya, 1955.
Bedevî, Abdurrahman. Mevsûʿatü’l-felsefe. Beyrut: el-Müessetü’l-Arabiyye li’d-dirâse ve’n-neşr, I., 1984.
Bekir, Savaş. “Film Çevirilerinde Altyazı Uygulamaları Çeviribilim Kapsamında Bir Çeviri midir?” Journal of International Social Research 12 (2019), 136-149.
Black, D.L. Logic and Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics in Medieval Arabic Philosophy. Leiden: Brill, 1990.
Brague, R. Thémistius. Paraphrase de la Métaphysique d’Aristote (livre Lambda). ed. R. Brague. Vrin, 1999.
Cabré, C. “Theories of terminology: Their Description, Prescription and Explanation”. Terminology. 163-199. John Benjamins, 2003.
Daiber, H. “Salient trends of the Arabic Aristotle”. The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism (Studies on the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Sciences dedicated to H.J. Drossaart Lulofs on his ninetieth birthday). ed. Kruk G. Endressand R. 29-41. Leiden, ts.
Darbelnet, J. - Vinay, J. P. Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais.. In: Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire. Geschiedenis (sedert de Oudheid), 38. Basım, 1960.
Faber, P. vd. “Framing Terminology: A Process-Oriented Approach”. Meta 50 4 (2005).
Faber, P. vd. “Linking images and words: the description of specialized concepts”. Interna-tional Journal of Lexicography 20 (2007), 39-65.
Faber, P. “Process-oriented terminology management in the domain of Coastal Engineer-ing”. Terminology. 12/189-213., 2006.
Faber, P. The Cognitive Shift in Terminology and Specialized Translation. MonTI, 2009.
Fillmore, C. J. “Frame semantics”. The Linguistic Society of Korea. ed. Linguistics in the Morning Calm. 111-137. Seoul: Hanshin, ts.
Fillmore, C. J. “Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language”. Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech. ed. J. Lancaster vd. 280. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, 1976.
Fillmore, C. J. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding”. Quaderni di Semantica 6/2 (1985), 222-254.
Fillmore, C. J. - Atkins, S. “Towards a frame-based organization of the lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors”. Frames, Fields, and Contrast: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization. ed. A. Lehrer - E. Kittay. 75-102. Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992.
Gaudin, F. Pour une socioterminologie: Des problèmes pratiques aux pratiques institutionnelles. Rouen: Publications de l’Université de Rouen, 1993.
Ghazala, H. Translation as problems and solutions: A course-book for university students and trainee translators. Valetta Malta: Elga Publication, 1995.
Gürbüz, Faruk. “Kelime Kelimes Çeviri Anlamı Anlamına Bir Çeviridir”. Erzincan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2/10 (2017), 285-290.
Hart, Roger. Problem of Translation in Global Circulations. ed. Lydia H. Liu. Durham: Duke University Press, 1. Basım, ts. Hassan, Bahaa-eddin A. Frame Semantics in the Arabic Translation of Philosophical Terminology. 1 Cilt. Rome-Italy: Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences , MCSER Publishing, 2017.
Korkmaz. “Çeviri Stratejilerinin Yazın Çevirisinde Uygulanması: Yaşar Kemal’in Ölmez Otu Eserinin İngilizceye Çevirisinden Örnekler”. Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 6/12 (ts.), 35-46.
Langacker, R. W. Cognitive Grammar: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Manerko, L. “Cognitive Aspect of Terminology Description as a Means to Understanding Specialised Discourse”. The XVIth European Symposium on Language for Special Purposes (LSP) “Specialised Language in Global Communication”: Book of Abstracts. 118-119. Ham-burg, 2007.
Manerko, L. “Concept understanding in cognitive linguistics and cognitive terminology science”. Languages for Special Purposes in a Multilingual, Transcultural World, Proceed-ings of the 19th European Symposium on Languages for Special Purposes. ed. G. Budin - V. Lušicky. 471-483. Vienna, Austria: Vienna: University of Vienna, 2013.
Odacıoğlu, C - Barut, E. “Çeviri Usul, Strateji ve Yöntemleri Üzerine Bir Derleme”. Tarih Okulu Dergisi 11 (2018), 1363-1392. Oleksy, W. - Piotr S. (ed.). Cognitive Approaches to Language and Linguistic Data: Studies in honor of Barbara LewandowskaTomaszczyk Series: Polish Studies in English Language and Literature. Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien: Frankfurt am Main, 27. Basım, 2009.
Parks, G. “The Translation of Philosophical Texts”. Rivista Internazionale di Tecnica Della traduzione 8 (2004), 1-10. Petruck, M. “Frame Semantics”. Handbook of Pragmatics. ed. Ostman O. - J. Verschueren. 1-13, 1996. Polat, Y - Köse, B. “Fransızcadan Türkçeye Çeviride İlgi Eyleminin Dolaylı Yollarla Çevirisi.” Litera: Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi 1/31 (ts.), 395-422.
Rosch, E. “Principles of Categorization”. Cognition and Categorization. 27-48. Hillsdale: N.J: Erlbaum, 1978. Süren, M.S. “Çeviriden Beklentiler ve Çeviri Gerçekleri: Çeviri Eleştirisinde Yapıcı Bir Yaklaşım Mümkün Mü?” İstanbul Üniversitesi Çeviribilim Dergisi 0/15 (2021).
Temmerman, R. Towards New Ways of Terminology Description. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2000. Vinay, J. P. - Darbelnet, J. Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A methodology for trans-lation. London: Geschiedenis, 1995.
Weissenhofer, P. Conceptology in terminology theory, semantics and word-formation: a morpho-conceptually based approach to classification as exemplified by the English baseball terminolo-gy. London: Technical Press, 1995.
Wüster, E. The Machine Tool. An interlingual dictionary of basic concepts. London: Technical Press, 1968.
Encyclopedia Britannica. “Abdel Rahman Badawi”, ts. https://global.britannica.com/biography/Abdel-Rahman-Badawi