Abdullah TURK

8091

EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT AND IMPORTANCE OF INFORMATION SHARING IN THE AVIATION SECTOR WITH TWO DIFFERENT QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

Purpose- Aviation has an important place in the world economy. The correct management of operations in this sector is equivalent to the correct management of financial resources. Operations in aviation are a combination of very complex relationships. Effective information sharing and communication cohesion play a vital role in these relationships. This study focuses on the impact and importance of information sharing in aviation on team communication. Methodology- The study is handled from the perspective of knowledge-based theory and learning organization. The study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 15 senior operations managers in aviation. The data obtained from these interviews were analyzed in two different qualitative data programs, NVivo 12 and Maxqda 20. Findings- As a result of the study, an intense relationship was found between criteria such as coordination, organizational success, operational success and effective decision making. Conclusion- As a result of the study, a cycle was determined. It has been concluded that the impact of information sharing in aviation on team communication and the continuity of operational success supports the organizational success with coordination efficiency in the long term.
Keywords:

Information sharing, team communication, organizational learning aviation sector,

PDF

___

  • Abidi, S.S.R. (2006). Healthcare Knowledge Sharing: Purpose, Practices and Prospects. In R.K. Bali, Dwivedi, A. (Ed.), Healthcare Knowledge Management: Issues, Advances and Successes, İçinde (65–86). Springer, Heidelberg.
  • Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001), “Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conception, foundations and research issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107-136.
  • Bolarinwa, J.A.; Olorunfemi, D. Y. (2009), “Organizational Communication for Organizational Climate and Quality Service in Academic Librarian”, Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-5
  • Brakensiek, F.C., (2002), “Knowledge Management for EHS Professionals”, Occupational Health-Safety, January, pp. 72-74.
  • Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Prentice-Hall.
  • Chang Lee, K., S. Lee and I. W. Kang. “KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance”, Information & Management, Vol. 42, Issue 3, 2005, pp. 469-482.
  • Cummings, J.N. (2004), “Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization”, Management Science, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 352-364.
  • Dandridge, T.C., I. Mitroff, W.F. Joyce (1980) “Organizational Symbolism: A Topic to Expand Organizational Analysis”, Academy of Management Review, 5, 77- 82.
  • De Vries, R. E. ve Hooff B. (2006). ‘Explaining knowledge sharing’. Sage Publications. 33, 115-135.
  • FAA (1999) Strategic Program Plan, Aircraft Maintenance Division & Office of Aviation Medicine. Electronic version retrieved March 16, 2009 from http://library.erau.edu/guest /find/online-full-text/hfami.htm#strategic
  • Federal Aviation Administration (2004) Crew Resource Management, Advisory Circular 120- 51E, Washington, D.C.
  • Fleming, J.L. ve Monda-Amaya, L.E. (2001). Process Variables Critical for Team Effectiveness. Remedial and Special Education. 22, 158-171.
  • Garnett, James L; Justin Marlowe ve Sanjay K Pandey, Mar/Apr 2008, “Penetrating the Performance Predicament: Communication as a Mediator or Moderator of Organizational Culture’s Impact on Public Organizational Performance”, Public Administration Review, 68, 2; ABI/INFORM Global, pp. 266-281
  • Garvin, A. D. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, JulyAugust, 78-89.
  • Galunic, C., Sengupta, K. and Petriglieri, J.L. (2014), “Deus ex machina? Career progress and the contingent benefits of knowledge management systems”, European Management Journal, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 13-23.
  • Gibbs, Graham R. (2002) Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with NVivo. Open University, Buckingham. ISBN 9780335200849
  • Gold, A., H. A., Malhotra and A. H. Segars. “Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective”, Journal of management information systems, Vol. 18, Issue 1, 2001, pp. 185-214.
  • Gupta, S., Sharma, S.L., Dutta, K., (2007). Using Knowledge Mapping to Support Knowledge Management İn Health Organizations. (24.8.2009). Http://Library.İgcar.Gov.İn/Readit2007/Conpro/Htmls/S2.Html.
  • Grant,R. M. (1996). 'Prospering in dynamically-com-petitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration',Organization Science, 7(4),pp.375-387
  • Hamel, G. (1999). The quest for value. Executive Excellence. 16(3): 2-13.
  • Hayashi, A.M. (2004).’’Building beter teams’’. Intelligence. Knowledge Management. 45(2), 5.
  • Hidalgo, C.A. (2011), “The value in the links: networks and the evolution of organizations”, in Allen, P., Maguire, S. and McKelvey, B. (Eds), Sage Handbook on Management and Complexity, Sage, London, pp. 257-569.
  • Husted, K. and Michailova, S. (2002). Knowledge Sharing in Russian Companies with Western Participation. Management International. Vol. 6 (2), pp. 17-28.
  • Hutchison A J, Johnston L H, Breckon J D. Using QSR-NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2010, 13(4): 283-302.
  • Jensen, M. T. (2003). Organizational Communication a Review: Research and Development Report. http://www.agderforskning.no/rapporter/82002046.pdf. Kaynaktan 11/01/2006 tarihinde alınmıştır
  • Kelly, Dawn, 2000, “Using vision to improve organisational communication”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal; 21, 1/2; Abı/Inform Global, pp. 92- 101.
  • Keskin, H., Akgün, AE, Koçoğlu, İ. (2016). Örgüt Teorisi (1. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Kitzinger, J., (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. Bmj, 311(7000), 299-302.
  • Kogut, B. and U. Zander (1992). 'Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology', Organization Science, 3(3), pp.383-397.
  • Kuckartz, U., R¨adiker, S., 2019. Analyzing Focus Group Data, in: Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA: Text, Audio, and Video. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8_15.
  • Linn Hsiu-F. and Lee Gwo-G., (2005), “Perceptions Of Senior Managers Toward KnowledgeSharing Behavior”, Management Decision, Emerald Publishing Limited 0025-1747, Vol. 42(1), 74-78.
  • Marton, F. (1994). In the International Encyclopedia of Education. Second edition, Volume 8. Eds. Torsten Husén & T. Neville Postlethwaite. Pergamon, 4424 – 4429.
  • MAXQDA,2020. MAXQDA. ........................................................................
  • Miller, R. (2002). Motivating and managing knowledge workers: blending strategy and culture in knowledge organizations, Knowledge Management Review, 5 (1), 6-19.
  • Miles, I. (2012). KIBS and knowledge dynamics in client–supplier interactions. In E. Di Maria, R. Grandinetti, & B. Di Bernardo (Eds.), Exploring knowledge intensive business services (pp. 13–34). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Nevile M (2006) Communication in Context: a Conversational Analysis Tool for Examining Recorded Data in Investigations of Aviation Occurences, ATSB Research and Analysis Report.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
  • Potter, L. R. (2003). The Communicator as Gardener. Communication World, 20(2), 5-14.
  • Polanyi, M. (1997). The tacit dimension. In L. Prusak (Ed.), Knowledge in organizations (pp. 135–146). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Riege, Andreas (2005) Three-Dozen Knowledge-Sharing Barriers Managers Must Consider. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 9 No. 3. pp. 18-35.
  • Saillard, E.K., 2011. Systematic versus interpretive analysis with two CAQDAS packages: NVivo and MAXQDA. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum. Qualitative Social Research.
  • Senge, M. P. (2000). Beşinci disiplin, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları. Çevirenler: Ayşegül İldeniz, Ahmet Doğukan.
  • Senge, P.M. (1990a). The fifth discipline: the arts and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
  • Senge, M. P. (1990). The Leader’s New Work: Building Learning Organizations. Sloan Management Review, (Fall), 9-18.
  • Sexton J B ve Helmreich R L (2000) Analyzing cockpit communication: The links between language, performance, error and workload, Human Performance in Extrem Environments, 5 (1): pp 63-68.
  • Simon H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 125–134.
  • Steinheider, B., Al-Hawamdeh, S., (2004). Team Coordination, Communication and Knowledge Sharing İn Smss and Large Organizations. J. Inf Knowl Manage, 3(3). 223-232.
  • Taylor, James R. ve Franqois Cooren, (1997). “What makes communication organizational? How the many voices of a collectivity become the one voice of an organization”, Journal of Pragmatics, 27, pp. 409-438.
  • Welsh, E. 2002. “Dealing with Data: Using NVivo in the Qualitative Data Analysis Process [12 paragraphs].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 3 (2)
Research Journal of Business and Management-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: PressAcademia
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ENTELEKTÜEL SERMAYENİN İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNE ETKİSİNDE YÖNETİM BİLİŞİM SİSTEMLERİ MEMNUNİYET DÜZEYİNİN ROLÜ

Osman KUNT, Mustafa SUNDU

Abdullah TURK

Bayram Z. ERDOGAN, Bulent AYDIN, Deniz KIRMIZI

Wichakorn SEKARAWİSUT, E. Serra YURTKORU