Non-Refoulement İlkesinin Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Çerçevesinde Uygulanması

Mülteci hukuku ile sağlanan korumanın temelini oluşturan non-refoulement ilkesi, insan hakları sözleşmeleri çerçevesinde önemli bir uygulama alanına sahiptir. İnsan hakları sözleşmelerinin bir kısmında non-refoulement ilkesine açık bir biçimde yer verilirken önemli bir kısmında ilke, sözleşmelerin diğer hükümleri ile ilişkilendirilerek değerlendirilmektedir. İlkenin sözleşmeler kapsamında ortaya çıkan uygulaması ise öğretide ağırlıklı olarak kişinin gönderildiği ülkede maruz kalacağı muamele ile çerçevesinde yaşam hakkı, işkence yasağı ve sınırlı da olsa kişi özgürlüğü ve güvenliği hakkı, adil yargılanma hakkı, özel yaşama ve aile yaşamına saygı hakkı ve düşünce, vicdan, din özgürlüğü ve sınır dışı etme işlemi ile bağlantılı olarak etkili başvuru hakkı ve uygulanan idari gözetim tedbirine bağlı olarak kişi özgürlüğü ve güvenliği hakkı ile birlikte ele alınmaktadır. Ancak ilkenin sözleşmeler çerçevesindeki görünümü, sınır dışı etme işlemi ile bağlantılı olarak ortaya çıkan uygulamalardan, tedbirlerden ya da hukuki başvuru yollarından bağımsız, kişinin gönderileceği devlet ülkesinde maruz kalacağı muamele sebebiyle muhatap kaldığı duruma ilişkindir. Sınır dışı etme veya geri gönderme sonucunu doğuran eylem veya işleme muhatap kişinin tabi tutulduğu idari gözetim koşulları veya söz konusu eylem ve işleme karşı sahip olduğu adli ve idari başvuru hakkı çerçevesinde değerlendirilen hak ve özgürlükler ise temel olarak devletin ulusal hukuk düzeninde var olan eksiklikleri veya hukuka aykırılıkları konu almaktadır. Bu sebeple ilkenin Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi bağlamında uygulanması çalışmada, kişinin gönderildiği devlet ülkesinde maruz kalacağı muamelenin Sözleşme ile koruma altına alınan hak ve özgürlükler bakımından değerlendirilmesi çerçevesinde incelenecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Non-refoulement İlkesi, Mülteci Hukuku, İnsan Hakları Hukuku, Avrupa İnsanları Hakları Sözleşmesi, Ülke Dışı Uygulama

Application of the Principle of Non-Refoulement Within the Context of the European Convention on Human Rights

The principle of non-refoulement constitutes the foundation of the protection provided by refugee law and has an important scope of application within the framework of human rights treaties. While some human rights treaties clearly include provisions on the principle of non-refoulement, most treaties handle the principle in relation to other provisions. Application of the principle of non-refoulement is mainly handle alongside the right to administrative detention or the right to an effective remedy in connection with the deportation process in doctrine. However, the rights and freedoms evaluated within the scope of this principle are related to deficiencies or illegalities in the national legal order of the state in connection with a deportation, extradition, or refoulement decision. Application the principle of non-refoulement within the scope treaties is independent of these elements. It instead concerns the treatment to which the person being addressed will be subjected to in the territory of the state to which that person will be deported, extradited or refouled. Within the framework of this limitation, this study will examine the application of the principle of non-refoulement in the context of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Keywords:

Non-refoulement, Refugee law, Human Rights Law, European Convention On Human Rights, Extraterritorial application,

PDF

___

Battjes H, ‘The Soering Threshold: Why Only Fundamental Values Prohibit Refoulement in ECHR Case Law’ (2009) 11 European Journal of Migration and Law 205-219. google scholar
Blöndal EK, Amardöttir OM, ‘Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances’ (2018) 5(3) Oslo Law Review 147-174. google scholar
Çiçekli B, Yabancılar ve Mülteci Hukuku (6th edn, Seçkin 2016). google scholar
Den Heijer M, Europe and Extraterritorial Asylum (Hart Publishing, 2012). google scholar
Den Heijer M, ‘Whose Rights and Which Rights? The Continuing Story of Non-Refoulement under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2008) 10(3) European Journal of Migration and Law 277-314. google scholar
Ekşi N, ‘İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi’nin 6. Maddesinin Yabancıların Sınırdışı Edilmesine Uygulanıp Uygulanamayacağı Sorunu’ (2009) 29 (1-2) Milletlerarası Hukuk Bülteni 119-139. google scholar
Ekşi N, Mahkeme Kararları Işığında Suçluların İltica Sistemi Dışında Bırakılması (Beta 2017). google scholar
Ekşi N, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Abdolkhani ve Karimnia- Türkiye Davası Mülteci ve Sığınmacı Hukuku Açısından Değerlendirme (Beta 2010). google scholar
Frenzen N, ‘Extraterritorial Refugee Protection’, The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law, Andre Nollkaemper (Ed.) (Cambridge University Press 2017). google scholar
Gemalmaz MS, Ulusalüstü İnsan Hakları Hukuku Belgeleri I. Cilt- Bölgesel Sistemler (Legal Kitabevi 2011). google scholar
Goodwin-Gill GS, ‘The Haitian Refoulement Case: A Comment’ (1994) 6(1) International Journal of Refugee Law 103-9. google scholar
Hathaway JC, The Rights of Refugees Under International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005). google scholar
‘Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR): Pertinent Parts of October 28, 2005 Reiteration and further Amplification of Precautionary Measures (Detainees in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba)’ (2006) 45(3) International Legal Materials 673-681 google scholar
Kalin W, Das Prinzip des non-refoulement: das Verbot der Zurückweisung, Ausweisung und Auslieferung von Flüchtlingen in den Verfolgerstaat im Völkerrecht und im schweizerischen Landesrecht (Peter Lang International Academic Publishers 1982). google scholar
Karagözoğlu C, İnsan Hakları Sözleşmelerinin Ülke Dışına Uygulanabilirliği Çerçevesinde Devletin Yetkisi ve Sorumluluğu (On İki Levha 2023). google scholar
Konyalı G, Uluslararası Hukukta Sığınma Hakkı (Seçkin 2021). google scholar
Lambert H, ‘The European Convention On Human Rights And The Protection of Refugees: Limits And Opportunities’ (2005) 24(2) Refugee Survey Quarterly 39-55. google scholar
Lauterpacht E, Bethlehem D, ‘The scope and content of the principle of non-refoulement: Opinion’, Refugee Protection in International Law- UNHCR ’s Global Consultations on International Protection, Erika Feller,
Volker Türk, Frances Nicholson (Eds.) (Cambridge University Press 2003). google scholar
Noll G, ‘Delimiting and Justifying Protection under the ECHR’, Negotiating Asylum- The EUAcquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection (The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2000). google scholar
Nowak M, ‘Obligations of States to Prevent and Prohibit Torture in an Extratemtorial Perspective’ Universal Human Rights and Extraterritorial Obligations, Mark Gibney, Sigrun Skogly (Eds.) (University of Pennsylvania Press 2010). google scholar
Odman MT, Tarihsel Gelişim Sürecinde Güncelleştirilmiş Mülteci Hukuku (Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de İlticanın Gelişim Süreci (Yetkin 2020). google scholar
Robinson N, Convention relating to the status of refugees: Its History, Contents and Interpretation, A Commentary (Institut of Jewish Affaires, 1953). google scholar
Solomon S, ‘Migrant boats on the high seas and their interception through psychologically coercive measures: Is there a case to extraterritorially apply human rights law?’ (2019) 37(1) Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 36-49. google scholar
The Refugee Convention 1951 The Travaux Preparatoires Analysed With A Commentary, By Dr. Paul Weis (1990) . google scholar
Toluner S, Milletlerarası Hukuk Dersleri: Devletin Yetkisi (5th edn, Beta 1996). google scholar
Topal AH, Mülteci Hukuku ve Silahlı Çatışma Kaynaklı Sığınmacılar (On İki Levha 2019). google scholar
Uzun E, ‘Geri Göndermeme İlkesinin Uluslararası Hukuktaki Konumu Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme’ (2012) 8 (30) Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika 25-58. google scholar
Yüksel S, ‘Procedural aspects of the European Court of Human Right’s Assessment under Article google scholar
3 of the European Convention on Human Rights in Removal Cases’ (2022) 42 (2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin 777-790. google scholar
Uluslararası Belgeler ve Yargı Kararları /International Documents and Judgments google scholar
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 189, p 137. google scholar
Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 606, p 267. google scholar
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols No. 11 and No. 14, European Treaty Series - No. 5. google scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, p 171 and vol. 1057, p 407. google scholar
American Convention on Human Rights “Pact of San Jose, Da Costa Rica”, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 1144, p 123. google scholar
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 1465, p 85. google scholar
European Convention on Extradition, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 359, p 273. google scholar
Convention on the Rights of the Child, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 1577, p 3. google scholar
Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 2241, p 480. google scholar
UNHRC, (A/AC.96/898) Note on International Protection, 3 July 1998 12 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
UNHCR, Interception of Asylum-seekers and Refugees: The International Framework and Recommendations for a Comprehensive Approach, UN Doc. EC/50/SC/CRP.17 (9 June 2000). google scholar
Cartagena Declaration on Refugees, Colloquium on the International Protection of Refugees in Central America, Mexico and Panama 11 Eki 2022. google scholar
Committee Against Torture, J.H.A. v Spain (Marine I), CAT/C/41/D/323/2007, 21.11.2008 www.refworld.org/cases,CAT,4a939d542.html> 12 Nisan 2021. google scholar
Committee Against Torture, Comments by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the conclusions and recommendations (CAT/C/CR/33/3), (CAT/C/GBR/ CO/4/Add.1), (CAT/C/SR.627), (CAT/C/SR.624). google scholar
CCPR, General Comment No. 20, Prohibition of Torture or Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Article 7), 10 March 1992, (HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9 (Vol. I)). google scholar
CCPR, General Comment No. 31 [80] The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, Adopted on 29 March 2004 (2187th meeting), (CCPR/C/21/ Rev.1/Add. 13)). google scholar
CCPR, General Comment No. 36, Article 6 Right of life, CCPR/C/GC/36, 3 September 2019. google scholar
ECtHR, 22414/93, 15.11.1996, Chahal v The United Kingdom 3 Temmuz 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 2947/06, 24.04.2008, Ismoilov and Others v Russia 3 Temmuz 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 27765/09, 23.02.2012, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy 20 Haziran 2020. google scholar
ECtHR, 45653/99, 23.06.2008, Andreou v Turkey (As to The Admissibility) 23 Ağustos 2020). google scholar
ECtHR, 8675/15, 8697/15, 03.10.2017, N.D., N.T v Spain 13 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 8675/15, 8697/15, 13.02.2020, N.D., N.T. v Spain 13 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 3599/18, 05.03.2020, M.N. and Others v Belgium 6 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 59793/17, 11.12.2018, M.A. and Others v Lithuania 26 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 40503/17; 42902/17; 43643/17, 23.07.2020, M.K. and Others v Poland 10 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 18603/12, 15.09.2022, O.M. and D.S. v Ukraine 3 Ocak 2023. google scholar
ECtHR, 51246/17, 08.07.2021, D.A. and Others v Poland 3 Kasım 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 13284/04, 08.11.2005, Bader and Kanbor v Sweden 30 Ocak 2021. google scholar
ECtHR, 28761/1, 24.01.2014, Al-Nashiri v Poland 4 Temmuz 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 14038/88, 07.07.1989, Soering v The United Kingdom 29 Nisan 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 16643/09, 21.10.2014, Sharifi and Others v Italy and Greece, para 212 3 Ekim 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 40035/98,11.07.2000 Jabari v Turkey 20 Şubat2021. google scholar
ECtHR, 59166/12, 23.08.2016, J.K. and Others v Sweden 2 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 5560/19, 15.04.2021, K.I. v France 14 Aralık 2022. google scholar
F.G. v Sweden, para 115; ECtHR, 59166/12, 23.08.2016, J.K. and Others v Sweden https://hudoc. echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-161829. google scholar
ECtHR, 28492/15; 49975/15, Khasanov And Rakhmanov v Russia 12 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 30696/09, 20.01.2011, M.S.S. v Belgium and Greece 13 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, The European Court grants urgent interim measure in case concerning asylum- seeker’s imminent removal from the UK to Rwanda, 14.06.2022 14 Temmuz 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 41326/17, 8098/18, 8147/18, 8384/18, 10.03.2022, Shenturk and Others v Azerbaijan 11 Eylül 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 42367/98, 19.01.1999, Ould Barar v Sweden (As to The Admissibility) 22.05. 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 46605/07, 13.04.2010, Charahili v Turkey 15 Nisan 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 36370/08, 13.04.2010, Keshmiri v Turkey 15 Nisan 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 58182/14, 07.11.2017, K.I. v Russia 15 Nisan 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 21896/08, 19.01.2010, Z.N.S. v Turkey 14 Nisan 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 36009/08, 15.06.2010, M.B. and Others v Turkey 14 Nisan 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 15916/09, 13.07.2010, Dbouba v Turkey 14 Nisan 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 28127/09, 03.12.2013, Ghorbanov and Others v Turkey 27 Ocak 2021. google scholar
ECtHR, 29217/12, 04.11.2014, Tarakhel v Switzerland 27 Ocak 2021. google scholar
ECtHR, 37201/06, 28.02.2008, Saadi v Italy 7 Ağustos2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 25904/07, 17.07.2008, NA. v The United Kingdom 15 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 71555/01, 16.10.2001, Einhorn v France (As to The Admissibility) 22 Şubat 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 17341/03, 22.06.2004, F. v The United Kingdom (As to The Admissibility) 20 Şubat 2021. google scholar
ECtHR, 46827/99, 46951/99, 04.02.2005, Mamatkulov and Askarov v Turkey 26 Şubat 2021. google scholar
ECtHR, 8139/09, 17.01.2012, Othman (Abu Qatada) v The United Kingdom 3 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 71537/14, 15.06.2017, Harkins v The United Kingdom 3 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 44599/98, 06.02.2001, Bensaid v The United Kingdom 9 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 26565/05, 27.052008, N. v The United Kingdom 12 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 41738/10, 13.12.2016, Paposhvili v Belgium 12 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
ECtHR, 27034/05, 28.02.2006, Z. and T. v The United Kingdom 6 Ocak 2021. google scholar
ECtHR, 29836/20, 26.04.2022, M.A.M. v Switzerland 10 Eylül 2022. google scholar
HRC, Communication No. 470/1991, 30.07.1993, Kindler v Canada 11 Şubat 2021. google scholar
HRC, Communication No. 1539/2006, 21.09.2009, Mohammad Munaf v Romania 22 Eylül 2021). google scholar
Inter-Am.C.H.R, 20.03.2012, Djamel Ameziane v United States, Admissibility Report No. 17/12 25 Ocak 2021. google scholar
Inter-Am.C.H.R., 13.03.1997, The Haitian Centre for Human Rights et al. v United States, Report No. 51/96, Case 10.675, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.95 Doc. 7 rev at 550 (1997). google scholar
Inter-Am.Ct.H.R, 25.11.2013, Pacheco Tineo Family v Plurinational State of Bolivia 25 Ocak 2021. google scholar