SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR GELİŞME VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK ARASI BAĞLANTILARI DEĞERLENDİRMEK İÇİN BİR MODEL ÖNERİSİ-A MODEL PROPOSAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Bu araştırma, sürdürülebilir gelişim ile girişimcilik arasındaki bağları kavramsallaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma sürdürülebilirlik ile girişimcilik, gelişim ile girişimcilik ve son olarak sürdürülebilir gelişim ile girişimcilik arasındaki ilişkiyi sistematik bir yaklaşımla irdelemektedir. Bu yazıda önerilen Sürdürülebilirlik Gelişim ve Girişimcilik (SDE) Modeli, sürdürülebilirlik, gelişim ve girişimcilik kavramlarının nasıl ilişkilendiklerini açıklayacak bir altyapı oluşturmaktadır. Önceki çalışmalar sadece sürdürülebilirlik ve gelişim arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanmış ve Sürdürülebilir Gelişim kavramının ortaya çıkmasını sağlamıştır. Önerilen SDE modeli; herhangi bir girişimciyi kriterler çerçevesinde konumlandırabilecek ve durumu özet olarak sunabilecek üç boyutlu bir Kartezyen koordinat sistemi sunmaktadır. Model girişimcilik faaliyetlerinin, hem sürdürülebilir gelişim hem de girişimcinin kendine has motivasyonları açısından değerlendirilmesine imkân sağlayan faydalı bir araçtır.-This study aims to conceptualize the linkages between sustainable development and entrepreneurship. It assesses the relationship between sustainment and entrepreneurship, between development and entrepreneurship and finally between sustainable development and entrepreneurship with a systematic approach. The Sustainment, Development and Entrepreneurship (SDE) Model proposed in this article lays the foundations for explaining how sustainment, development and entrepreneurship are related. Predate studies focused on the relationship between sustainment and development, which presented the notion of sustainable development. The proposed SDE Model introduces a 3 dimensional Cartesian coordinate system to localize or express any particular enterprise with respect to certain criteria and summarize its status. The model is a useful tool for the assessment of entrepreneurial activities both from the perspectives of sustainable development and motivations of entrepreneurship.

___

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1997). What Is Sustainable Development? Land Economics, 73(4), 467-491.
  • Kates, R.W.; Parris, T.M. & Leiserowitz, A.A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8-21. [21] Papanek, G.F. (1962). The Development of Entrepreneurship. The American Economic Review, 52(2), 46-58.
  • Evans, G.H.Jr. (1942). A Theory of Entrepreneurship. The Journal of Economic History, 2, Supplement: The Tasks of Economic History, 142-146.
  • Hoselitz, B.F. (1952). Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 12(1), 97-110. [24] Wahren, C. (1991). Population, Environment, Development: an Inseparable Troika. Populi, 18(1), 4-23.
  • Wilbanks, T.J. (1994). "Sustainable Development" in Geographic Perspective. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(4), 541-556.
  • Stoddart, D.R. (1986). On Geography and Its History. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Guimaraes, L.T. & Magrini, A. (2008). A Proposal of Indicators Management of River Basins. Water Resource Manage, 22, 1191–1202 Development in the [28] Tolba, M.K. (1987). Sustainable Development: Constraints and Opportunities. London: Butterworth.
  • Simon, D. (1997). Development Reconsidered; New Directions in Development Thinking. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 79(4), 183-201.
  • Dean, T.J. & McMullen, J.S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50-76.
  • Ma, H. & Tan, J. (2006). Key components and implications of entrepreneurship: A 4-P framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 704– 725.
  • Brouthers, D.K.; Brouthers, E.L. & Werner, S. (2008). Real Options, International Entry Mode Choice and Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 936- 960.
  • Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  • Harper, D.A. (2008). Towards a theory of entrepreneurial teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 613-626.
  • Sobel, R.S. (2008). Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 641-655.
  • Sarason,Y.; Dean, T. & Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(3), 286-305 Dillard, J.F. (2006).
  • Bluedorn, A.C. & Martin, G. (2008). The time frames of entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(1), 1-20.
  • Baumol, W.J. (1968). Entrepreneurship in Economic Theory. The American Economic Review, 58(2), Papers and Proceedings of the Eightieth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, 64-71.
  • Leff, N.H. (1979). Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: The Problem Revisited. Journal of Economic Literature, 17(1), 46-64.
  • Minniti, M. & Levesque, M. (2008). Recent developments in the economics of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 603-612.
  • Miner, J.B. (1997). A Psychological Typology of Successful Entrepreneurs. Quorum Books, Westport, CT.
  • Winslow, D. (1991). Sustainable Development in New Caledonia. Pacific Affairs, 64(4), 489-505.
  • Weiss, E.B. (1992). Environment and Trade as Partners in Sustainable Development: A Commentary. The American Journal of International Law, 86(4), 728-735.
  • Daly, H.E. (1990). Sustainable Development: From Concept and Theory to Operational Principles. Population and Development Review, 16, Supplement: Resources, Environment, and Population: Present Knowledge, Future Options, 25-43.
  • National Research Council, Policy Division, Board on Sustainable Development. (1999). Our Common Journey: A Transition toward Sustainability. Washington: National Academy Press.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.
  • Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: Harper Business.
  • McGrath, RG. & MacMillan, I.C. (2000). The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Strategies for Continuously Creating Opportunity in the Age of Uncertainty. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Bendell, J. & Kearins, K. (2005). The Political Bottom Line: Responsibility for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and Environment, 14(6), 372-383. Corporate
  • Blaikie, P. & Jeanrenaud, S. (1997). Biodiversity and human welfare (Eds.: Ghimire, K & Pimbert, M.P.). Social change and conservation. London: Earthscan, 46-70.
  • Ömer LİVVARÇİN (livvarcin@gmail.com) earned his
  • Ph.D. in Strategic Management from Yeditepe University.
  • His research interest includes sustainable develeopment
  • and entrepreneurship as well as the study of strategic management, countries. change and developing
  • Mesud ÜNAL (bugraunal94@hotmail.com) earned his
  • Ph.D. in Business Economics and Industrial Relationships
  • from 9 Eylul University. Areas of interest and specialty include
  • international business and issues related to brain drain. develeopment, economics,
Öneri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0845
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1994
  • Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

DUYGUSALLIK VE BİLİŞSELLİĞİN PLANSIZ SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞINA ETKİSİ-THE INFLUENCE OF AFFECT AND COGNITION ON IMPULSE BUYING BEHAVIOR

Caner DİNCER

SATIŞ LİDERİ’NİN DURUMSAL YAKLAŞIM TEMELİNDE KENDİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME ÖLÇEĞİ-SALES LEADER’S SELF-ASSESSMENT MEASUREMENT BASED ON SITUATIONAL APPROACH

Mehmet ALİKİŞİOĞLU

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE TYPES AND OCCUPATIONAL PRESSURE VARIABLES: A RESEARCH ON FEMALE EMPLOYEES IN THE TURKISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY

Seyhan GÜLER, Özlem ÖZKANLI, Ayşe AKYOL

MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE MUHASEBE EĞİTİMİ ALAN ÖĞRENCİLERİN MUHASEBE ALANINA BAKIŞ AÇILARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA-A RESEARCH FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE STANDPOINT OF THE ACCOUNTING STUDENTS IN RESPECT OF THE FIELD OF ACCOUNTING AT MA

Hakan ÇELENK, Metin ATMACA, Emre HORASAN

ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARI: ALGISAL BOŞLUKLARIN ANALİZİ-LEARNING OUTCOMES: THE ANALYSIS OF PERCEPTUAL GAPS

Tuğba GÜRÇAYLILAR YENİDOĞAN

MEVSİMSEL DÜZELTMEDE KULLANILAN İSTATİSTİKİ YÖNTEMLER ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME-AN ANALYSE ON STATISTICAL METHODS WHICH ARE USED FOR SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT

Handan YOLSAL

HIZLI DÖNÜŞÜMLER ÇAĞINDA, MİLLİYETÇİ DÜŞÜNCENİN KÖKENLERİNİN YENİDEN GÖZDEN GEÇİRİLMESİ

Haldun ÇANCI

ULUSLARARASI MUHASEBE HARMONİZASYONU VE ÇEVRESEL FAKTÖRLER-INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING HARMONIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

Banu DİNCER

PAZARLAMA İLETİŞİMİ ARAÇLARININ TÜRK ŞARAP SEKTÖRÜ AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ-ANALYSING MARKETING COMMUNICATION MEANS ACCORDING TO THE TURKISH WINE SECTOR

Gülnur İÇLİ

FİNANSAL RAPORLAMADA YENİ YAKLAŞIMLAR-NEW APPROACHES IN FINANCIAL REPORTING

Barış SİPAHİ, Aylin Poroy ARSOY