___

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T Johnson, & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitude (pp.173–221). Mahwah, Erlbaum NJ.
• Akturan, U., & Tezcan, N. (2012). Mobile banking adoption of the youth market: Perceptions and intentions. Marketing Intelligence & Planning,30(4), 444–459.
• Alalwan, AA., Dwivedi, YK., & Rana, N.P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37 (3), 99–110.
• Alalwan, AA., Dwivedi, Y.K.,Rana, N.P., & Williams, M.D. (2016). Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan: Examining the role of usefulness, ease of use, perceived risk and self-efficacy. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(1),118–139.
• Alalwan, AA., Dwivedi, YK., Rana, NP., Lal, B. &Williams, MD. (2015). “Consumer adoption of Internet banking in Jordan: examining the role of hedonic motivation, habit, self-efficacy and trust. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 20(2),145–157.
• Albashrawi,MA. (2017). Understanding mobile banking usage behavior: a multi model perspective. University of Massachusetts Lowell, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10614303.
• Alnawas, I., & Aburub, F. (2016). The effect of benefits generated from interacting with branded mobile apps onconsumer satisfaction and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, (31), 313–322.
• Bakırtaş, T., & Ustaömer, K. (2019). Türkiye’nin bankacılık sektöründe dijitalleşme olgusu. Ekonomi, İşletme ve Yönetim Dergisi, 3(1),1–24. Erişim adresi:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jebm/issue/46705/559934.
• Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2015). Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 418–430.
• Baptista G., & Oliveira, T. (2017). Why so serious? Gamification impact in the acceptance of mobile banking services. Internet Research, 27 (1),118 –139.
• Bhatiasevi, V. (2015). An extended UTAUT model to explain the adoption of mobile banking. InformationDevelopment, 32(4), 799–814.
• Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming(2nded.) New York London: Taylor & Francis Group.
• Chiu, CM.., Hsu, M.H., & Wang, E.T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3),1872–1888.
• Chung, N., & Kwon, S.J. (2009). Effect of trust level on mobile banking satisfaction: a multi-group analysis of information system success instruments.Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(69), 549–562.
• Criteo, (2015). State of mobile commerce. Cross-device shopping starts and ends on mobil, Q3.Retrieved from: http://www.criteo.com/media/3099/criteo-state-of-mobile-commerce-q3-2015-es.pdf.
• Crosby, L.A., Evans, K.R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. The Journal of Marketing, 54(3),68–81.,
• Davis, FD. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319–340.
• DeLone, W., & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLoneand McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19 (4), 9–30.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme, (T. Totan, Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Dineshwar, R., & Steven, M. (2013). An investigation on mobile banking adoption and usage: a case study of Mauritius. In Proceedings of 3rd Asia-Pacific Business Research Conference, February,pp. 25–39.
• Doğan, H., & Burucuoğlu, M. (2018). Tüketicilerin mobil bankacılık hizmet kalitesi algıları ve tekrar kullanma niyetleri: ampirik bir araştırma. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 14 (4), 1183–1198.
• Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., Chen, H., & Williams, M.D. (2011). A meta-analysis of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). In IFIP International Working Conference on Governance and Sustainability in Information Systems-Managing the Transfer and Diffusion of it Springer,Berlin, Heidelberg, September, pp. 155–170.
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity (free press paperbacks. New York: Free Press.
• Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D.W. (2003). TrustandTAMinonlineshopping:anintegratedmodel. MISQuarterly,27(1), 51–90.
• Gerrard, P., Barton Cunningham, J., & Devlin, J.F. (2006). Why consumers are not using internet banking: a qualitative study. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(3), 160–168.
• Gu, J.C., Lee, S.C., & Suh, Y.H. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9),11605–11616.
• Gürses, F. (2016). Türkiye’de yerel yönetimlerde yöneticiler ve vatandaşlar perspektifinden e-devlet’in benimsenmesi: Bursa Büyükşehir Belediyesi Örneği (Doktora tezi), Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Hall, D., & Mansfield, R. (1975). Relationships of age and seniority with career variables of engineers and scientists.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 201–210.
• Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Koshksaray, AA., & Tabar, M.J.S. (2014). Mobile-bankingadoptionbyIranianbankclients. TelematicsandInformatics,31(1),31–56.
• Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 356–388.
• Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal,6 (1), 1–55.
• Jaruwachirathanakul, B., & Fink,D. (2005). Internet banking adoption strategies for a developing country: the case of Thailand. Internet research, 15(3), 295–311.
• Jennings, J.M., &Jacoby, L.L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control. Psychologyand Aging, 8(2), 283–293.
• Kaplan, H.E. (2019). Üniversite öğrencilerinin online bankacılık ile ilgili tutum ve davranışların incelenmesi: Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi öğrencileri üzerinde bir araştırma. AL FARABI 6thInternational Conference on Social Sciences, 15-17 November, Adana, pp. 125–139.
• Kesari, B., Atulkar, S. (2016). Satisfaction of mall shoppers: A study on perceived utilitarian and hedonic shopping values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, (31), 22–31.
• Kim, G., Shin, B., & Lee, H.G. (2009). Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 283–311.
• Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(4thed.). New York Guilford Publications, Inc.
• Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., & Moll, A. (2010). Predicting young consumers’ take up of mobile banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 410–432.
• Köksal, M.H. (2016). The intentions of lebanese consumers to adopt mobile banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(3), 327–346.
• Kurt, K., & Turan, A.H. (2017). Mobil bankacılık uygulamalarının benimsenmesine yönelik davranışsal niyetleri etkileyen faktörler üzerine bir araştırma. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, l5(3), 25–58.
• Lee, T., & Jun, J. (2005). Contextual perceived usefulness? Toward an understanding of mobile commerce acceptance, in Mobile Business, ICMB, International Conference on IEEE, July,pp. 255–261.
• Limayem, M., Hirt, S.G., & Cheung, C.M. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31 (4), 705–737.
• Lin, F., Fofanah, S.S., & Liang, D. (2011). Assessing citizen adoption of e-Governmentinitiatives in Gambia: a validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 28 (2), 271–279.
• Luarn, P., & Lin, H.H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21 (6), 873–891.
• Luo, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., & Shim, J.P. (2010). Examiningmulti-dimensionaltrustandmultifacetedriskininitialacceptanceofemergingtechnologies:anempiricalstudyof mobilebankingservices. Decision Support Systems,49 (2), 222–234.
• Lustig, C., Konkel, A., & Jacoby, L.L. (2004). Which route to recovery?. Psychological Science, 15 (11), 729–735.
• Malaquias, R.F., & Hwang, Y. (2016). An empirical study on trust in mobile banking: a developing country perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 453–461.
• Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. InternationalJournal of Information Management, 34(1), 1–13.
• Morris, M.G., Venkatesh, V., & Ackerman, P.L. (2005). Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52 (1), 69–84.
• Muñoz-Leiva, F., Climent-Climent, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: an extension of the classic TAM model. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 21(1), 25–38.
• Negahban, A., & Chung, C.H. (2014). Discovering determinants of users’ perception of mobile device functionality fit. Computers in Human Behavior, 35,75–84.
• Özcan, H. P., Çelik, Ş. S., & Özer, A. (2019). Bireysel müşterilerin mobil bankacılık kullanım niyetini etkileyen faktörler.Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,9(2), 149–180. DOI: 10.18074/ckuiibfd.590493.
• Özecan, M. (2018). Factors affectıng mobile banking usage intention, user satisfaction and word-of-mouth intention (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Plude, D.J., & Hoyer, W.J. (1985). Attention and performance: identifying and localizing age deficits. In N. Charnessi (Ed.), Aging and human performance(pp. 47–99). London: Wiley.
• Posner, R.A. (1996). Aging and old age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Puschel, J., Mazzon, J.A., & Hernandez, J.M.C. (2010). Mobile banking: proposition of an integrated adoption intention framework. International Journal ofBank Marketing, 28(5), 389–409.
• Riffai, M.M.M.A., Grant, K., & Edgar, D. (2012). Big TAM in Oman: exploring the promise of on-line banking, its adoption by customers and the challenges of banking in Oman. International Journal of Information Management, 32 (3), 239–250.
• Riquelme, H.E., & Rios, R.E. (2010). The moderating effect of gender in the adoption of mobile banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28 (5), 328–341.
• Sathye, M. (1999). Adoption of Internet banking by Australian consumers: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Bank Marketing17 (7), 324–334.
• Seyrek, İ., & Akşahı̇n, A. (2016). Mobil bankacılık uygulamaları kalite faktörlerinin analitik hiyerarşiprosesi ile karşılaştırılması. International Review of Economics and Management, 4 (3), 47–61. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/ pub/iremjournal/issue/15725/285226.
• Söylemez, C., & Taşkın, E. (2020). Tüketicilerin mobil bankacılık uygulamalarını kullanma niyetini etkileyen faktörler: Uluslararası bir karşılaştırma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(2), 411–436. DOI: 10.17153/oguiibf.549422.
• Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinox.
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics.Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 233–244.
• Tezbaşaran, A.A. (2008). Likert tipi ölçek hazırlama kılavuzu (Üçüncü sürüm), (e-Kitap), Mersin.
• Tseng, S.M. (2015). Exploring the intention to continue using web-based self-service. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,24, 85–93.
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39 (2), 273–315.
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptanceofinformationtechnology:Towardaunifiedview. MISQuarterly,27(3),425–478.
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumeracceptanceanduseofinformationtechnology:Extendingtheunifiedtheoryof acceptanceanduseoftechnology. MISQuarterly,36 (1), 157–178.
• Yang, A. S. (2009). Exploring adoption difficulties in mobile banking services. Canadian. Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 26 (2), 136–49.
• Yu, C. S. (2012). Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model.Journal of Electronic Commerce Research,13(2), 104–117.
• Zhou, T. (2011). AnempiricalexaminationofinitialtrustinMobilebanking. InternetResearch,21 (5), 527–540.
• Zhou, T. (2012). Understandingusers’initialtrustinmobilebanking:anelaborationlikelihoodperspective. ComputersinHumanBehavior,28 (4), 1518–1525.
• Zhou, T. (2012a). Examining mobile banking user adoption from the perspectives of trust and flow experience.Information Technology and Management, 13 (1), 27–37.
• Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). IntegratingTTFandUTAUTtoexplainMobilebankinguseradoption. ComputersinHumanBehavior,26 (4), 760–767.