ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALETİN ÖRGÜTSEL SABOTAJA ETKİLERİNİN TESPİTİNE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTıRMAl

Örgütlerde sabotaj davranışları çalışanların örgütlerin amaçlarına ulaşmasına engelolan olumsuzdavranışlardır. Bu davranış örgütün üyelerine ve maddi kaynaklarına zarar vermeyi amaçlamaktadır.Örgütsel adalet ise çalışanların örgütün uygulamalarına ilişkin adalet algılamalarını ifade etmektedir. Buçalışmanın amacı, algılanan örgütsel adaletin örgütsel sabotaj davranışı üzerinde etkisi olup olmadığını tespitetmektir. Bu amaçtan hareketle Niehoff ve Moorman (1993) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan "Algılanan ÖrgütselAdalet Ölçeği" ve "Altintaş (2009) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan "Algılanan Örgütsel Sabotaj Ölçeği"kullanılarak anket formu oluşturulmuştur. Hazırlanan form ile Niğde 'de istihdam edilmiş 432 mavi yakalıçalışandan veri toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler frekans, güvenilirlik, korelasyon ve regresyon analizine tabitutulmuştur. Yapılan regresyon analizi sonucunda algılanan örgütsel adaletin örgütsel sabotaj üzerinde etkisi(R2=,402) olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

ARESEARCH ON THE DETERMINING EFFECTS OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE TO ORGANIZATIONAL SABOTAGE

Sabotage behaviors in organizations are negative behaviors of employees who prevent from achieving organization 's goals. This behavior aims to harm the members and material resources of organization. Organizational justice explains to perceptions of employees about practices of organization. The aim of this study is to determine whether the perceived organization al justice has effect on organization al sabotage behavior. For this purpose, questionnaire was formed using 'Perceived Organization al Justice Scale' developed by Niehoff and Moorman (1993) and the 'Perceived Organizational Sabotage Scale' developed by Altıntaş (2009). With the prepared form, data were collectedfrom 432 blue-collar employees working in Niğde. The collected data were subjected to frequency, reliability, correlation and regression analysis. As a result of regression analysis performed, it was determined that the effect of perceived organizational justice on organizational sabotage (R2=,402)

___

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press. 2, 267-299.
  • Allen, V. L. ve Greenberger, D. B. (1980). Destmction And Perceived Control. In A. Braun, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Advances in Environmental Psychology. New York: Academic Press. 2, 85- 109.
  • Altıntaş, F. Ç. (2009). Kişiliğin algılanan örgütsel sabotaj davranışlan üzerine etkisi. HÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 95-111.
  • Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. A. ve Schırıinke, M. (2002). Sabotage in the Workplace: The Role of Organizational Injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 947- 965.
  • Analoui, F. (1995). Workplace sabotage: its styles, motives, and management. Journal of Management Development, 14,48-65.
  • Bensman, J. ve Gerver, i. (1963). Crime And Punishment in The Factory: The Function Of Deviancy in Maintaining The Social System. American Sociological Review, 28, 588-598.
  • Bies, R. J. ve Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication Criteria of Faimess. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 1,43-55.
  • Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L. ve Cuınınings, L. L. (1988). Causal Accounts and Managing Organizational Conflict: lt is Enough To Say İt's Not My Fault? Communication Research, Brown, R. ve Herrnstein, R. J. (1975). Psychology. Boston: Little, Brown. 762.
  • Byrne, Z.S. ve R. Cropanzano (2001). "The History ofOrganizational Justice: The Founders Speak", R. Cropanzano (eds.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Mahwah, NJ. Erlbaum, 2, 3-26.
  • Chen, P. Y. ve Spector, P. E. (1992). Relationships ofWork Stressors With Aggression, Withdrawal, Theft And Substance Use: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 177-184.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector, P. E. (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86,278-324.
  • Crino, M. D. (1994). Employee Sabotage: A Random or Preventable Phenomenon? Journal of Managerial Issues, 6, 311-330.
  • Crino, M. D. ve Leap, T. L. (1989). What HR Managers Must Know About Employee Sabotage. Personnel, 66(5), 31-38.
  • Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., ve GiUiland: W. (2007), "The Management of Organizational Justice", Academy ofManagement Perspectives, 21,34-48.
  • Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., ve Rupp, D. R. (2001). Moral Virtues, Faimess Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164-209.
  • Dailey, R. C. ve Kirk, D.J. (1992). Distributive and Procedural Justice As Antecedents of Job Dissatisfaction and İntent To Turnover.Human Relations, 45(3), 305-317.
  • DeMore: W., Fisher, J.D., ve Baron, R.M. (1988). The Equity-Control Model As A Predictor of Vandalism Among College Students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18,80-91.
  • Deutsch, M. (1975). "Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used As The Basis of Distributive Justice?", Journal of Social Issues, 31(3),137-149.
  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • DiBattista, R. A. (1991). Creating New Approaches To Recognize and Deter Sabotage. Public Personnel Management, 20, 347-352.
  • DiBattista, R. A. (1996). Forecasting Sabotage Events in The Workplace. Public Personnel Management, 25, 41-52.
  • Dubois, P. (1979). Sabotage In Industry. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UK.: Pelican. 224.
  • Folger, R., ve Skarlicki, D. P. (1998). A Popcom Metaphor For Employee Aggression. In R. W. Griffın, A. O'Leary-Kelly, & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations, Part A: Violent and Deviant Behavior. Stamford, CT: JAI Press. 43-82.
  • Giacalone, R. A. ve Knouse, S.B. (1990). Justifying Wrongful Employee Behavior: The Role of Personality in Organizational Sabotage. Journal of Business Ethics, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 9, 55-61.
  • Giacalone, R. A. ve Rosenfeld, P. (1987). Reasons For Employee Sabotage in The Workplace. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1, 367-378.
  • Greenberg, J. (1982) Approaching Equity and Avoiding İnequity in Groups and Organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (eds), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior. New York: Academic Press. 389-435.
  • Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of Perceived Faimess of Performance Evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342.
  • Greenberg, J. (1990a). "Employee Theft As A Reaction To Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of pay Cuts", Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-68.
  • Greenberg, J. (1993b). "The Social Side of Faimess: Interpersonal and Informational Classes of Organizational Justice", in R. Cropanzano (ed.), Justice in The Workplace: Approaching Faimess in Human Resource Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum, 79-103.
  • Greenberg, J. and Baron, R.A. (2003). Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side ofWork. 18th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River. 691.
  • Greenberg, J., ve Alge, B. J. (1998). Aggressive Reactions To Workplace İnjustice. In R. W. Griffın, A. O'Leary-Kelly, & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations, Part A: Violent and deviant behavior. London: JAI Press. 83-117.
  • Hoad, C.D. (1993). Violence at Work: Perspectives From Research Among 20 British Employers, Security Journal 4(2), 64-86.
  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behaviour and Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 102-11 7.
  • Jawahar, i.M. (2007). The İnfluence ofPerceptions ofFaimess on Performance Appraisal Reactions. Journal of Labor Research, 28, 735-754.
  • Jermier, J. M. (1988). Sabotage At Work: The Rational View. In S. B. Bachrach (Ed.), Research in The Sociology of Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 6, 101-134.
  • Leventhal, G.S. (1976). "The Distribution of Rewards and Resources in Groups and Organizations", L. Berkowitz and E. Walster (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press, 91-131.
  • Lind, E. A. (1995). Justice and Authority Relations in Organizations. In R. Cropanzano & M. K. Kacmar (eds), Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. 83-96.
  • Lind, E. A. ve Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology ofProcedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press. s. 267.
  • McFarlin, D. and P. Sweeney (1992). "Distributive and Procedural Justice As Predictors of Satisfaction With Personal and Organizational Outcomes", Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
  • Moorman, R. (1991). Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviours: Do Faimess Perceptions İnfluence Employee Citizenship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
  • Nakip, M. (2003). Pazarlama Araştırmaları Teknikler ve (SPSS Destekli) Uygulamalar. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Neuman, J. H. ve Baron, R. A. (1998). Workplace Violence and Workplace Aggression: Evidence Conceming Specifıc Forms, Potential Causes, and Preferred Targets. Journal Of Management. 24, 391-419.
  • Neuman, J. H., Baron, R. A. ve Geddes, D. (1996). A Three-Factor Model ofWorkplace Aggression: Predicting Specifıc Forms of Aggression in Organizational Settings. Unpublished Manuscript.
  • Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal, 36(3), 527-556.
  • Rosow, J. M. (1974). The Worker and the Job: Coping with Change. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 218.
  • Sartin, P. (1970). L'homme au travail, forcat du temps'. Gamma, Paris. 267.
  • Sieh, E. W. (1987). Garment workers: perceptions ofinequityand employee theft. British Journal of Criminology,27, 174-191.
  • Skarlicki, D. P., van Jaarsveld, D. D. ve Walker, D. D. (2008). Getting Even for Customer Mistreatment: The Role of Moral Identity in the Relationship Between Customer Interpersonal Injustice and Employee Sabotage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1335-1347. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012704.
  • Spector, P. E. (1978). Organizational Frustration: A Model and Review of The Literature. Personnel Psychology, 31,815-829.
  • Taylor, L. ve Walton, P. (1971). Industrial Sabotage: Motives and Meanings. In S. Cohen (Ed.), Images of Deviance Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. 219-245.
  • Thibaut, J. ve Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Tyler, T. R. (1989). The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of The Group-Value ModeL. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
  • Tyler, T. R. (1994). "Psychological Models of The Justice Motive: Antecedents of Distributive and Procedural Justice", Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 850-863.
  • Tyler, T. R. ve Lind, E. A. (1992). A Relational Model of Authority İn Groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 25, 115-191. https://doi.org/l0.1016/S0065- 2601(08)60283-X
  • Tyler, T. ve Bies, R. (1990). Beyond Formal Procedures: The İnterpersonal Context ofProcedural Justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied Social Psychology And Organizational Settings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 77-98.
  • Van den Bos, K. and Spruijt, N. (2002), "Appropriateness of Decisions As a Moderator of The Psychology ofVoice", European Journal ofPsychologically, 32, 57-72.
  • W. D. (ed.) (1925). The Oxford Translation of Aristotle. Vol. IX: The Nicomachean Ethics. London: Oxford University Press
Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2564-6931
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2008
  • Yayıncı: NİĞDE ÖMER HALİSDEMİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞlNIN ÖRGÜTSEL ETİK İKLİM ÜZERİNE YANsıMALARı: KANTİTATİF BİR ÇALIŞMA

Hüseyin YILMAZ

Elektrik Tüketimi, Karbon Emisyonu ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi (1995-2014)

Serdar ÖZTÜRK, Tuba KÜSMEZ

HEDEF MALİYETLEME VE HEDEF MALİYETLEMENİN BİR ÜRETİM İŞLETMESİNDE UYGULANMASI

Çağrı KÖROGLU, Erkan DENDEŞ, Aslı ERİNCİK DENDEŞ

ÖRGÜTLERDE CAM TAVAN SENDROMUNUN ÖRGÜTSEL GÜVEN ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: LOJİSTİK HİZMET SAĞLAYICILARINA YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Edip ÖRÜCÜ, Görkem AKGÜL

Kurumsallaşma Düzeylerinin İşletme Yapısına Göre İncelenmesi: Oteller Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Engin TENGİLİMOĞLU, Erkan AKGÖZ

BİREYLERİN BAZI KişİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN GİRİşİMCİ KARİYER DEGERİNE OLAN ETKİsİ: ÖNLİsANS ÖGRENCİLERİNİN GİRİşİMCİLİK EGİLİMLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Funda ER ÜLKER, Betül BALKAN AKAN

Algılanan Örgütsel Adaletin Örgütsel Sabotaja Etkilerinin Tespitine Yönelik Bir Araştırma

İbrahim YALÇIN, Ali BAYRAM, Coşkun AKÇA

Örgütlerde Cam Tavan Sendromunun Örgütsel Güven Üzerine Etkisi: Lojistik Hizmet Sağlayıcılarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Edip ÖRÜCÜ, Görkem AKGÜL

Kaldıraç ve Yabancı Sahipliğin Ar-Ge Yatırımları İle Firma Performansı Üzerindeki Moderatör Etkisinin İncelenmesi: Türkiye Örneği

Hasan AYAYDIN, Fahrettin PALA, Abdulkadir BARUT

Bireylerin Bazı Kişilik Özelliklerinin Girişimci Kariyer Değerine Olan Etkisi: Önlisans Öğrencilerinin Girişimcilik Eğilimleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Funda ER ÜLKER, Betül BALKAN AKAN