Globalisation and trade unions in Turkey: Two class strategies in countering neo-liberal restructuring

Bu çalışmada ekonomik kriz ve artan muhalif politikalar içinde küreselleşmenin ve neoliberal yeniden yapılanmanın alternatifleri tartışılmaktadır. Küreselleşme işçi hareketi için ne gibi sonuçlar doğurmuştur? Türkiye’deki işçi hareketi ne gibi stratejiler öne sürmektedir? Çalışma tekstil, otomotiv ve tarım sektörlerinde örgütlenmiş sendikacılar ile kamu emekçileri ve konfederasyonlardan seçilmiş sendikacılar ile yirmi iki mülakatı esas alır. Bu mülakatlar Nisan-Mayıs 2010 ve Aralık 2010-Ocak 2011 tarihleri arasında İstanbul ve Ankara’da yapılmıştır. Çalışmada işçi hareketi her ne kadar küreselleşme karşısında ortak eleştirel bir tutum geliştirse de, hareket içinde bir sınıf içi çatışma gözlemlemenin olası olduğu tartışılacaktır. Uluslararası alana yönelik işçiler ‘işçilerin lehine başka bir küreselleşme mümkün’ sloganının yansıttığı gibi uluslararası alanda bir mücadele öne sürerken, ulusal alana yönelik işçiler Keynesci refah devletini çağrıştıran mekanizmalarla daha koruyucu bir strateji geliştirmişlerdir.

Küreselleşme ve Türkiye’deki sendikalar: Neoliberal yeniden yapılanmaya karşı iki sınıf stratejisi

The paper reviews alternatives to globalization and neoliberal restructuring within the context of economic crisis and rising politics of dissent. What are the challenges posed by globalisation to labour movements? What kind of strategies does the labour movement in Turkey develop as a way forward? The study is based upon interviews conducted with twenty two trade unionists who took various responsibilities in the recent past in unions that are organised in textile, automotive and agriculture sectors, public services and in their confederations. They were conducted in İstanbul and Ankara in April-May 2010 and December 2010-January 2011. It is argued that although labour is united in their criticisms to globalisation, it is probable to observe an intra-class struggle. Whilst the internationally oriented labour has articulated a struggle at the international level under the motto that ‘another globalisation in the interests of labour is possible’, nationally oriented labour has developed a relatively defensive strategy echoing a form of Keynesian welfare state.

___

  • ADAMAN, F., BUĞRA, A. and İNSEL, A. (2009), “Societal Context of Labour Union Strategy, The Case of Turkey”, Labour Studies Journal, 34(2), 168-88.
  • ALBO, G., GINDIN, S. and PANITCH, L. (2010), In and Out of Crisis, The Global Financial Meltdown and Left Alternatives, Oakland: Spectre.
  • AMIN, S. (1997), Capitalism in the Age of Globalization, London: Zed Books.
  • AMOORE, L., DODGSON, R., GILLS, B., LANGLEY, P., MARSHALL, D. and WATSON, I. (2000), “Overturning ‘Globalization’: Resisting Teleology, Reclaiming Politics”, in B. K. Gills (ed.), Globalization and the Politics of Resistance, Houndmills: Palgrave, 12-28.
  • BELLO, W. (2004), Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World Economy, London: Zed Books.
  • BIELER, A. (2000), Globalisation and Enlargement of the European Union, Austrian and Swedish Social Forces in the Struggle over Membership, London: Routledge.
  • BIELER, A. (2005), “European Integration and the Transnational Restructuring of Social Relations: The Emergence of Labour as a Regional Actor?”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(3), 461-84.
  • BIELER, A. (2006), The Struggle for a Social Europe: Trade Unions and EMU in Times of Global Restructuring, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
  • BIELER, A. and LINDBERG, I. (2011a), “Globalisation and the new Challenges for Transnational Solidarity, An Introduction”, in A. Bieler and I. Lindberg (eds.), Global Restructuring, Labour and the Challenges for Transnational Solidarity, London: Routledge, 3-15.
  • BIELER, A. and LINDBERG, I. (2011b), “Conclusions, A Variable Landscape of Emerging Transnational Solidarities” in A. Bieler and I. Lindberg (eds.), Global Restructuring, Labour and the Challenges for Transnational Solidarity, London: Routledge, 220-31.
  • BIELER, A., LINDBERG, I. and PILLAY, D. (2008a), “The Future of the Global Working Class: An Introduction”, in A. Bieler, I. Lindberg and D. Pillay (eds.), Labour and the Challenges of Globalization: What Prospects for Transnational Solidarity? London: Pluto, 1-22.
  • BIELER, A., LINDBERG, I. and PILLAY, D. (2008b), “What future strategy for the global working class? The need for a new Historical Subject”, in A. Bieler, I. Lindberg and D. Pillay (eds.), Labour and the Challenges of Globalization: What Prospects for Transnational Solidarity? London: Pluto, 264-85.
  • BIELER, A. and MORTON, A. D. (2004), “‘Another Europe is Possible’? Labour and Social Movements at European Social Forum”, Globalizations, 1-2, 305-27.
  • BLANPAIN, R. (2013), Emerging Patterns of Work and Turkish Labour Market Challenges under Globalization, Kluwer Law International.
  • BORATAV, K., YELDAN, A. E., and KOSE, A.H. (2000), Globalization, Distribution and Social Policy: Turkey, 1980-1998, Centre for Economic Policy Analysis.
  • CAM, S. (1999), “Job Security, Unionisation, Wages and Privatisation: A Case Study in the Turkish Cement Industry”, Sociological Review, 47, 695–714.
  • CAM, S. (2002), “Neo-liberalism and Labour within the Context of an ‘Emerging Market’ Economy – Turkey”, Capital and Class, 26, 89-114.
  • COX, R. W. (1981), “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-55.
  • COX, R. W. (1987), Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History, New York: Columbia University Press.
  • DİSK (1996), Olağanüstü Genel Kurul Çalışma Raporu 1994-1996 [Working Report for Extraordinary General Assembly], DİSK Yayınları 20, İstanbul: Egemen Matbaacılık.
  • DİSK (2000), Çalışma Raporu 1997-2000 Küresel Saldırıya Karşı Küresel Direniş [Working Report 1997-2000 Global Struggle Against Global Attack], İstanbul: DİSK Basın Yayın.
  • DİSK (2012), 14. Genel Kurulu Yönlendirici Belge ve Kararlar [14 th General Assembly Guide of Documents and Decisions].
  • DRAINVILLE, A. C. (1994), “International Political Economy in the Age of Open Marxism”, Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 105-32.
  • EUROSTAT, “FDI stocks as of GDP” available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table. do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00047&plugin=1.
  • FOUGNER, T. and KURTOĞLU, A. (2011), “Transnational Labour Solidarity and Social Movement Unionism: Insights from and beyond a Women Workers’ Strike in Turkey”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(2), 353-75.
  • GIDDENS, A. (1998), The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge: Polity.
  • GILL, S. (2000), “Toward a Postmodern Prince? The Battle in Seattle as a Moment in the New Politics of Globalisation”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29(1), 131-40.
  • GILL, S. (2012), “Towards a Radical Concept of Praxis: Imperial ‘Common Sense’ Versus the Post-modern Prince”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(3), 505-24.
  • HAK-İŞ (1996), İkibine Doğru Yeni Bir Sendikacılık ve Yeni Bir Türkiye Düşünmek, 21 Yaşında 21. Yüzyıla Doğru Çağdaş Sendikal Anlayış [Thinking New Trade Unionism and Turkey towards the 2000s, Contemporary Trade Unionism towards the 21th century], Ankara, Hak-İş Yayınları.
  • HAK-İŞ (2009), Hak-İş Konfederasyonu Tanıtım Kitabı [A Book to Introduce Hak-İş Confederation], Ankara, Hak-İş Yayınları.
  • HAK-İŞ (2011), 12. Olağan Genel Kurul Kararları [12nd General Assembly Resolutions], http://www.hakis.org.tr/12.genelkurul_alinan_kararlar.pdf
  • HARROD, J. and O’BRIEN, R. (eds.) (2002), Global Unions? Theory and Strategies of Organized Labour in the Global Political Economy, London: Routledge.
  • HIRST, P. and THOMPSON, G. (1996), Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance, London: Polity.
  • İZMEN, Ü. and YILMAZ, K. (2009), “Turkey’s Recent Trade and Foreign Direct Investment Performance”, in Z. Öniş and F. Şenses (eds.), Turkey and the Global Economy, Neo-liberal Restructuring and Integration in the Post-crisis Era, London: Routledge, 173-203.
  • KOÇ, Y. (2001), Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği İlişkileri [Turkey-European Union Relations], Ankara: Türk-İş Eğitim Yayınları 66.
  • MUNCK, R. (2002), Globalisation and Labour: The New “Great Transformation”, London: Zed Books.
  • NICHOLS, T. and SUNGUR, N. (2004), Global Management and Local Labour: Turkish Workers and Modern Industry, London: Palgrave.
  • O’BRIEN, R. (2000), “Labour and IPE: Rediscovering Human Agency”, in R. Palan (ed.), Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories, London: Routledge, 89-99.
  • ONARAN, O. (2009), “Crises and Post-crisis Adjustment in Turkey: Implications for Labor”, in Z. Öniş and F. Şenses (eds.), Turkey and the Global Economy: Neo-liberal Restructuring and Integration in the Post-crisis Era, London: Routledge.
  • RADICE, H. (2000), “Responses to Globalisation: A Critique of Progressive Nationalism”, New Political Economy, 5(1), 5-19.
  • ROBINSON, W. I. (2004), A Theory of Global Capitalism, Production, Class and State in a Transnational World, Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.
  • RODRIK, D. (1997), Has Globalisation Gone too Far?, Washington: Institute for International Economics.
  • RODRIK, D. (1999), Making Openness Work: The New Global Economy and the Developing Countries, Washington: Overseas Development Council.
  • SCHOLTE, J. A. (2005), Globalization: A Critical Introduction, Houndmills: Palgrave and Macmillan.
  • STRANGE, G. (2002), “Globalisation, Regionalism and Labour Interests in the New International Political Economy”, New Political Economy, 7(3), 343-65.
  • TOGAN, S., NEBİOĞLU H. and DOĞAN, S. (2005), ‘Integration and the Manufacturing Industry’, in B. Hoekman and S. Togan (eds.), Turkey: Economic Reform and Accession to the EU, Washington: World Bank, 87-121.
  • TÜRK-İŞ (2007), Türk-İş and the Central Organization of Finnish Trade Unions, International Symposium on European Social Model and Trade Union Rights Within the EU Negotiations, 3-4 October 2006, Ankara: Gurup Matbaacılık.
  • TÜRK-İŞ (2011), 21. Olağan Genel Kuruluna Sunulan Çalışma Raporu [Working Report for 21th General Assembly]. UNCTAD (2012), Investment Country Profiles: Turkey, http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ webdiaeia2012d6_en.pdf.
  • VAN APELDOORN, B. (2002), Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle over European Integration, London: Routledge.
  • VAN DER PIJL, K. (1998), Transnational Classes and International Relations, London: Routledge.
  • WOOD, E. M. (2002), “Global Capital, National States”, in M. Rupert and H. Smith (eds.), Historical Materialism and Globalization, London: Routledge, 17-39.
  • YÜCESAN-ÖZDEMİR, G. (2003), “Hidden Forms of Resistance among Turkish Workers: Hegemonic Incorporation or Building Blocks for Working Class Struggle”, Capital and Class, 27, 31-59.
  • WORLD BANK, ”Imports of goods and services % of GDP”, available at http://data.worldbank. org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS.ZS.
  • WORLD BANK, ”Exports of goods and services”available athttp://data.worldbank.org/ indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS/countries?display=default.