___

• Arrighi, G. (1993), "The Three Hegemonies of Historical Capitalism/' In Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, Ed. S. Gill, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 148-185.
• Ashley, R. K. (1981), "Political Realism and Human Interests", International Studies Quarterly, 25-2, 204-236.
• Augelli E. and Murphy, C. N. (1993), "Gramsci and International Relations: A General Perspective and Example from Recent US Policy toward the Third World," In Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, Ed. S. Gill, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 127-147.
• Blaikbe, N. (1993), Approaches to Social Enquiry, Polity, Cambridge.
• Blaikbe, N.(2000), Designing Social Research, Polity Press, Maiden and Cambridge.
• Bobbio, N. (1979), "Gramsci and the Conception of Civil Society," In Gramsci and Marxist Theory, Ed. C. Mouffe, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 21-47.
• Bohman, L (2005), "Critical Theory", In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2005 Edition), Ed. E. N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2005/entries/critical-theory/.
• Bryman, A. (2001), Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Buchanan, P. (2000), "Note Sulla 'Escuola Italiana': Using Gramsci in the Current International Moment", Contemporary Politics, 6-2, 103-124.
• Burnham, P. (1991), "Neo-Gramscian Hegemony and the International Order", Capital & Class, 45,73-91.
• Cafruny, A. W. (1990), "A Gramscian Concept of Declining Hegemony: Stages of U.S. Power and the Evolution of International Economic Relations," World Leadership and Hegemony, Ed. D. Rapkin, Lynne Rienner Publishers, London, pp. 97-118.
• Clarke, S. (2001), "Mixing Methods for Organisational Intervention: Background and Current Status", http://www.sociotechnical.org/archive/Clarke.pdf.
• Comstock, D. E. (1982), "A Method for Critical Research," In Knowledge and Values in Social and Educational Research, Eds. E. Bredo and W. Feinberg, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, pp. 370-390.
• Cox, R. W. (1981), "Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory", Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10-2,126-155.
• Cox, R. W.(1987), Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History,Columbia University Press, New York.
• Cox, R. W.(1993), Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method. In Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, Ed. S. Gill, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 49-66.
• Cox, W. and Sjolander, C.T. (1994), "Critical Reflections on International Relations," In Beyond Positivism: Critical Reflections on International Relations, Eds. C. T. Sjolander and W. Cox, Lynne Rienner, Boulder and London, pp. 1-10.
• Devetak, R. (1996), "Critical Theory," In Theories of International Relations, Ed. S. Burchill et al., Macmillan, London, pp. 145-178.
• Dickens, D. (1983), "The Critical Project of Jurgen Habermas," In Changing Social Science: Critical Theory and Other Perspectives, Eds. D. R. Sabia & J. Wallulis, State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 131-155.
• Diez, T. and Steans, J. (2005), "A Useful Dialogue? Habermas and International Relations", Review of International Studies, 31-1,127-140.
• Fals-Borda, O. (2006), "Participatory (Action) Research in Social Theory: Origins and Challenges," In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Ed. P. Reason and H. Bradbury, Sage, London, pp. 27-37.
• Germain, R. D. and Kenny, M. (1998), "Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians", Review of International Studies, 24-1, 3-21.
• Gill, S. (1990), American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Gill, S.(2003), Power and Resistance in the New World Order, Palgrave, New York.
• Gill, S. and Law, D. (1993), "Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital," In Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, Ed. S. Gill, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 93-124.
• Gomm, R. (2004), Social Research Methodology: A Critical Introduction, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire and New Yörk.
• Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, International Publishers, New York.
• Greene, J. C. (1990), "Three Views on the Nature and Role of Knowledge in Social Science," In The Paradigm Dialogue, Ed. E. G. Guba, Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 227-245.
• Grundy, S. (1982), "Three Modes of Action Research," In The Action Research Reader (3rd ed.), Eds. S. Kemmis and R. McTaggert, Deakin University Press, Geelong, pp. 353-364.
• Guba, E. G. (1990), "The Alternative Paradigm Dialogue," In The Paradigm Dialogue, Ed. E. G. Guba, Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 17-27.
• Habermas, J. (1972), Knowledge and Human Interests (J. Shapiro, Trans.), Heinemann, London.
• Habermas, J.(1974), Theory and Practice (J. Viertel, Trans.), Heinemann, London.
• Held, D. (1990), Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas, Hutchinson, London.
• Hoffman, M. (1987), "Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate", Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16-2,231-249.
• Horkheimer, M. (1972), Critical Theory (M. J. O'Connell et al., Trans.), Herder & Herder, New York.
• Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. (2002), Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (E. Jephcott, Trans.), Stanford University Press, Stanford.
• Hoy, D. and Mccharty, T. (1994), Critical Theory, Blackwell, Cornwall.
• Hughes, I. (1995), "Introduction", in Action Research Electronic Reader, Ed. I. Hughes, The University of Sydney, on-line,
• http://www.behs.cchs.usyd.edu.au/arow/Reader/rmasters.htm
• Huspek, M. (1997), "Toward Normative Theories of Communication with Reference to the Frankfurt School: An Introduction", Communication Theory, 7-4,265-276.
• Ives, P. (2005), "Language, Agency and Hegemony: A Gramscian Response to Post-Marxism", Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 8-4,455-468.
• Jahn, B. (1998), "One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism", Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 27-3, 613-641.
• Johnson, S. (1999), "Doing Critical Organizational Research: An Examination of Methodology", http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/eirot/cmsconference/documents/Metliods/CMSconfpubme thods.pdf
• Kandlbinder, P. (2003), "Critical Reconstruction as a Methodology for Higher Education Research", A Paper Presented at Learning for an Unknown Future: 2003 Annual International Conference of HERDSA, (July 6-9), New Zealand, Christchurch, http://surveys.canterbury.ac.nz/herdsa03/pdfsnon/N1220.pdf.
• Keyman, E. F. (1997), Globalization, State, Identity/Difference: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Relations, Humanities Press, New Jersey.
• Kincheloe, J. (1995), "Meet Me Behind the Curtain: The Struggle for a Critical Postmodern Action Research," In Critical Theory and Educational Research, Eds. P. McLaren and J. Giarelli, Suny, New York, pp. 71-89.
• Kirby, S. and Mckenna, K. (1989), Experience, Research, Social Change: Methods from the Margins, Garamond Press, Toronto.
• Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Verso, London.
• Lapid, Y. (1989), "The Third Debate: On the Perspectives of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era", International Studies Quarterly, 33-3, 235-254.
• Lincoln, Y. (2001), "Engaging Sympathies: Relationships between Action Research and Social Constructivism," In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Ed. P. Reason, Sage, London, pp. 124-132.
• Linklater, A. (1990), Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations, Macmillan, London.
• Linklater, A.(1992), "The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical Theoretical Point of View", Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21-1, 77-98.
• Linklater, A.(1996), "The Achievements of Critical Theory," In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Eds. S. Smith, K. Booth, M. Zalewski, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 279-298.
• Linklater, A. and Macmillan, J. (1995), "Introduction: Boundaries in Question," In Boundaries in Question: New Directions in International Relations, Eds. J. MacMillan and A. Linklater, Pinter, London, pp. 1-16.
• Maier, C. (1978), "The Politics of Productivity: Foundations of American International Economic Policy after World War II," In Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Poliçies of Advanced Industrial States, Ed. P. Katzenstein, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 23-49.
• Masters, J. (1995), '"The History of Action Research", In Action Research Electronic Reader, Ed. I. Hughes, The University of Sydney, on-line. http://www.behs.cchs.usvd.edu.au/arow/Reader/rmasters.htm.
• May, T. (2001), Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process (3rd ed.), Open University Press, Buckingham and Philadelphia.
• Mccharty, T. (1976), "A Theory of Communicative Competence," In Critical Sociology, Ed. P. Connerton, Penguin Books, Middlesex, pp. 478-496.
• Mccharty, T.(1978), The Critical Theory of Jwrgen Habermas, Polity Press, Cambridge.
• Mckernan, J. (1991), Curriculum Action Research. A Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner, Kogan Page, London.
• Miller, E. (1999), "Why and How Has 'Habermas' Become a Household Word in the Social Sciences?", Submitted in December 1999 for the course, Public Space, at the University of Pennsylvania,
• http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~emiller/Habermasj3aper.html.
• MJOSET, L. (1990), "The Turn of Two Centuries: A Comparison of British and U.S. Hegemonies," In World Leadership and Hegemony, Ed. D. Rapkin, Lynne Rienner, London, pp. 21-48.
• Morera, E. (1990), Gramsci's Historicism: a Realist Interpretation, Routledge, London.
• Morrow, R. A. (1994), Critical Theory and Methodology, Sage, London.
• Morton, A. D. (2003), "Social Forces in the Struggle over Hegemony: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Political Economy", Rethinking Marxism, 15-2,153-179.
• Mouffe, C. (1979), "Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci," In Gramsci and Marxist Theory, Ed. C. Mouffe, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 177-204.
• Murphy, C. N. (2001), "Critical Theory and the Democratic Impulse: Understanding a Century-Old Tradition," In Critical Theory and World Politics, Ed. R. W. Jones, Lynne Rienner, London, pp. 61-75.
• Neufeld, M. (1995), The Restructuring of International Relations Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Neufeld, M.(2001), "What's Critical About Critical International Relations Theory?," In Critical Theory and World Politics, Ed. R. W. Jones, Lynne Rienner, London, 127-145.
• Persaud, R. B. (2001), Counter-Hegemony and Foreign Policy: The Dialectics of Marginalized and Global Forces in Jamaika, Suny, Albany.
• Rengger, N. J. (2001), "Negative Dialectic? The Two Modes of Critical Theory in World Politics," In Critical Theory and World Politics, Ed. R. W. Jones, Lynne Rienner, London, pp. 91-107.
• Robson, C. (2005), Real World Research (2nd Ed.), Blackwell, Maiden and Oxford.
• Rupert, M. (1995), Producing Hegemony: the Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.