TURKISH EFL LEARNERS' PERCEPTIONS OF NATIVE ENGLISH-SPEAKING TEACHERS AND NON-NATIVE ENGLISH-SPEAKING TEACHERS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

İyi bir İngilizce öğretmeni nasıl olur sorusu, eğitim araştırmacılarının uzun yıllardır ilgisini çekmiş ve anadili İngilizce olan ve olmayan öğretmenleri ele alan çalışmalar öğrencilerin bu öğretmenlerle ilgili algılarını araştırmıştır. Bu çalışma, ilk aşamasında, İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen Türk öğrencilerin anadili İngilizce olan ve olmayan öğretmen algıları arasında, bu öğretmenlerle ilk karşılaşmalarında anlamlı bir fark olup olmadığını incelemektedir. İkinci aşama ise öğrencilerin anadili İngilizce olan öğretmenlere yönelik yerleşmiş fikirlerinde zaman içerisinde bir değişim olup olmadığını araştırmaktadır. Katılımcılar, özel bir üniversitede öğrenim gören 120 Türk öğrencidir. Veriler, her iki aşamada Likert ölçeğinden oluşan anketler aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Öğrencilerin algılarını hakkında daha derin anlayışlar kazanılması amacıyla, ikinci aşamaya mülakat seansları eklenmiştir. Sonuçlara göre anadili İngilizce olan ve olmayan öğretmenlere yönelik öğrenci algıları tarafsızdır. Ama ikinci aşamada, nitel içerik analizi ile çözümlenen veriler öğrencilerin algılarının anadili İngilizce olan öğretmenler lehine, özellikle kişisel boyutta olumlu yönde değiştiğini göstermiştir. Her iki aşamada da öğrenciler, anadili İngilizce olan öğretmenleri dilbilimsel ve mesleki boyutlarda ve anadili İngilizce olmayan öğrencileri de eğitimsel boyutta olumlu yönde algılamıştır

İNGİLİZCEYİ YABANCI DİL OLARAK ÖĞRENEN TÜRK ÖĞRENCİLERİN YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE ANADİLİ İNGİLİZCE OLAN VE ANADİLİ İNGİLİZCE OLMAYAN ÖĞRETMEN ALGILARI

The question of what makes a good teacher of English has aroused researchers' interest for many years, and the existing studies comparing NESTs (native English-speaking teachers) and NNESTs (non-native English-speaking teachers) have focused mostly on students' perceptions of these teachers. The current study aims to explore in the first phase if there is a meaningful difference between Turkish EFL learners' perceptions of NESTs and NNESTs on their first encounter with them. The second phase explores whether any changes have occurred in students' preconceptions regarding NESTs within the course of time. The participants are 120 Turkish monolinguals from a private university. Quantitative data was collected through questionnaires consisting of Likert-scale items in both phases. An interview session was added to the second phase to obtain more in-depth insights into students' perceptions. The findings showed that students had neutral perceptions of NESTs and NNESTs. However, in the second phase, the data analysed via qualitative content analysis demonstrated that students' perceptions were found to have positively changed for NESTs, particularly in terms of personality dimension. In both phases, students perceived NESTs in linguistic and professional dimensions, and NNESTs in pedagogical dimension rather positively

___

  • Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Farmer, A. K., & Harnish, R. M. (2010). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication (6th ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Amin, N. (1997). Race and the identity of the nonnative ESL teacher. TESOL quarterly, 31(3), 580-583.
  • Arikan, A., Taşer, D., & Saraç-Süzer, H. S. (2008). The effective English language teacher from the perspectives of Turkish preparatory school students. Education and Science, 33(150), 42-51.
  • Arva, V., & Medgyes, P. (2000). Native and non-native teachers in the classroom. System, 28(3), 355-372.
  • Barkhuizen, G. (1998). Discovering learners' perceptions of ESL classroom teaching/learning activities in a South African context. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 85-108.
  • Benke, E., & Medgyes, P. (2005). Differences in teaching behaviour between native and non- native speaker teachers: As seen by the learners. In E. Llurda (Ed.), Non-native language teachers: Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the profession (pp. 195-215). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Bermudez, J. L. (2008). Nonconceptual mental content. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved July 19, 2014 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/content-nonconceptual/
  • Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3-31.
  • Braine, G. (1999). Nonnative educators in English language teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Brosh, H. (1996). Perceived characteristics of the effective language teacher. Foreign Language Annals, 29(2), 125-138.
  • Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
  • Canagarajah, S. (1999). Interrogating the 'Native speaker fallacy': Non-linguistic roots, non- pedagogical results. In G. Braine (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 77-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 923-939.
  • Cheung, Y. L. (2002). The attitude of university students in Hong Kong towards native and nonnative teachers of English. (Unpublished master's thesis). The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
  • Clouet, R. (2006). Native and non-native teacher: A matter to think over. Revista de Filologia de la Universidad de La Laguna, 24(1), 69-76.
  • Coady, Maria R., Harper, Candace, & de Jong, Ester J. (2015). Aiming for Equity: Preparing Mainstream Teachers for Inclusion or Inclusive Classrooms? TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 340-368.
  • Çelik, S., Arikan, A., & Caner, M. (2013). In the eyes of Turkish EFL learners: What makes an effective foreign language teacher? Porta Linguarum, 20, 287-297.
  • Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: CUP.
  • Davies, A. (2003). The Native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Demir, B. (2011). Undergraduate FL learners' perceptions of native and non-native language instructors. The International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 1(1), 1-29.
  • Earl, D. (2006). The classical theory of concepts. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from http://www.iep.utm.edu/conc-cl/
  • Edley, N., & Litosseliti, L. (2010). Contemplating interviews and focus groups. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics. New York: Continuum.
  • Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gallego, F. M. D. (2012, February 12). Experiences of a teacher of English. [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://fernandoexperiences.blogspot.com.tr/2012/02/792-english-as- bridge-of-communication.html
  • Garrett, P., & Shortall, T. (2002). Learners' evaluations of teacher-fronted and student- centered classroom activities. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 25-57.
  • Gökmen, S., & Önal, Ö. (2012). Ön-tür kuramı çerçevesinde Türkçede anlamsal ulamların incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 52(2), 1-19
  • Graddol, D. (1997). The future of English?: A guide to forecasting the popularity of the English language in the 21st century. London, England: British Council.
  • Graham, A. S., Namy, L. L., Gentner, D., & Meagher, K. (2010). The role of comparison in preschoolers' novel object categorization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(3), 280-290.
  • Gültekin, M. (2015). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin ideal öğretmen algısı. Turkish Studies, 10(11), 726-756.
  • Hadla, Z. (2013). Student and teacher perceptions of native and non-native English speaking teachers in the Lebanese context. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Exeter, Exeter, England.
  • İnceçay, G., & Atay, D. (2009, May). EFL learners' interaction with native and nonnative teachers. Paper presented at The 1st International Congress of Educational Research. Çanakkale, Turkey.
  • Johnson, R. K. (1985). Prototype theory, cognitive linguistics and pedagogical grammar. Working Papers in Linguistics and Language Training, 8(3), 12-24.
  • Kachru, B. B., & Nelson, C. L. (1996). World Englishes. In S. L. McKay & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp.71-102). Cambridge: CUP.
  • Karakaş, A. (2013). Intercultural attitudes of Turkish students studying in a UK university. Journal http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr31/karakas.html
  • Karakaş, A. (2016). Turkish lecturers' and students' perceptions of English in English- medium universities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Southampton University, Southampton, England.
  • Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2002) University students' perceptions of native and non- native speaker teachers of English. Language Awareness, 11(2), 132-142.
  • Lee, J. J. (2010). The uniqueness of EFL teachers: Perceptions of Japanese learners. TESOL Journal, 1(1), 23-48.
  • Lee, Y. -J., & Cho, H. -S. (2015). Promoting collaborative teaching between NESTs and NNESTs in English slassrooms. Studies in English Education, 20(1), 87-112.
  • Liang, K. (2002). English as a Second Language (ESL) students' attitudes towards nonnative English-speaking teachers' accentedness. (Unpublished master's thesis). California State University, LA.
  • Ling, C. Y., & Braine, G. (2007). The attitudes of university students towards non-native speakers English teachers in Hong Kong. RELC journal, 38(3), 257-277.
  • Llurda, E. (2005). Non-Native Language Teachers: Perceptions, Challenges, and Contributions to the Profession. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Mahboob, A. (2004). Native or nonnative: What do students enrolled in an intensive English program think? In L. Kamhi-Stein (Ed.), Learning and teaching from experience: Perspectives on nonnative English speaking professionals (pp. 121-147). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2002). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. In A. Huberman & M. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher's companion (pp. 37-64). London: Sage.
  • McBer, H. (2000). A model of teacher effectiveness. Report to the Department for Education and Emloyment, UK. Retrieved from http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/teachinginengland/detail.cfm?id=521
  • Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: who's worth more? ELT journal, 46(4), 340-349.
  • Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native teacher. London, England: Macmillan.
  • Merino, I. G. (1997). Native English-speaking teachers versus non-native English-speaking teachers. Revista alicantina de estudios ingleses, 10, 67-79.
  • Mermelstein, A. D. (2015). Perceptions of native and non-native English teachers by Taiwanese university EFL students. Mextesol Journal, 39(3), 1-18.
  • Miller, P. (2012). Ten characteristics of a good teacher. English Teaching Forum, 50(1), 36- 38.
  • Moussu, L., & Braine, G. (2006). The attitudes of ESL students towards nonnative English language teachers. TESL Reporter, 39(1), 33-47.
  • Murtiana, R. (2011, November). Student's perceptions of native speaker and non-native speaker teachers: Implication for teacher education. Paper presented at the 5th International Seminar: Teacher Education in the Era of World Englishes, Salatiga, Indonesia.
  • Native speaker [Def. 1]. (n.d.). Cambridge Dictionaries Online. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/citation.
  • Native speaker [Def. 2]. (n.d.). Macmillan Dictionary Online. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/citation.
  • Newell, F. N., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2002). Categorical perception of familiar objects. Cognition, 85(2), 113-143.
  • Non-native [Def. 3]. (n.d.). The Free Dictionary Online. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dictionary/citation.
  • Prodromou, L. (1991). The good language teacher. English Teaching Forum, 29(2), 2-7.
  • Quirk, R. (1985). The English language in a global context. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 1-6). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rao, Z. (2010). Chinese students' perceptions of native English speaking teachers in EFL teaching. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31(1), 55-68.
  • Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350.
  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27-48.) New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382-439.
  • Şahin, İ. (2005). The effect of native speaker teachers of English on the attitudes and achievements of learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 30-42.
  • Samimy, K., & Brutt-Griffler, J. (1999). To be a native or non-native speaker: Perceptions of 'non-native' students in a graduate TESOL program. In G. Braine (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 127-144). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Seferoğlu, G. (1999). Prototip kuramı çerçevesinde bir araştırma. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1999, 79-88.
  • Selvi, A. F. (2010). All teachers are equal, but some teachers are more equal than others: Trend analysis of job advertisements in English language teaching. WATESOL NNEST Caucus Annual Review, 1, 156-181.
  • Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
  • Silverman, D. (2007). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about qualitative research. London, England: Sage.
  • Tye, M. (2006). Nonconceptual content, richness, and fineness of grain. In T. Szabo-Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual Experience (pp. 504-530). Oxford: OUP.
  • Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. (2006). An introduction to cognitive linguistics (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Longman.
  • Uysal, H. (2015). Çocuk dilinde deyimlerin anlamlandırılması ve öntürlük etkisi (Master's thesis). Retrieved from Turkish Council of Higher Education's National Thesis Center Database. (Accession No. 393411)
  • Uysal, H., Bulut, T., & Al Hosein, Y. (2013). Using concordances as supplementary materials in teaching grammar. Studies about Languages, 22, 113-118.
  • Ürkmez, S. (2015). Turkish EFL learner perceptions of native and non-native English language teachers. Third 21st CAF Conference at Harvard in Boston, 6(1), 328-334.
  • Üstünlüoğlu, E. (2007). University students' perceptions of native and non-native teachers. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 13(1), 63-79.
  • Walkinshaw, I. S., & Oanh, D. H. (2014). Native and non-native English language teachers: Student perceptions in Vietnam and Japan. SAGE Open, 4(2), 1-9.
  • Walkinshaw, I., & Duong, O. T. H. (2012). Native and non-native English speaking teachers in Vietnam: Weighing the benefits. TESL-EJ, 16(3), 1-17.
  • Walls, R. T., Nardi, A. H., von Minden, A. M., & Hoffman, N. (2002). The characteristics of effective and ineffective teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(1), 39-48.
  • Wu, K., & Ke, C. (2009). Haunting native speakerism? Students' perceptions towards native English speaking teachers in Taiwan. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 44-52.