SELF-REGULATEDLEARNING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: AN EFL PERSPECTIVE

Dil öğreniminde bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin kullanımı konusunda yürütülen araştırmalar, şimdiye dek üst bilişsel alandan dil becerileri temelli uygulamalara kadar, teknolojik araçların birçok farklı potansiyelini ortaya koymuştur. Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin potansiyelinin daha fazla araştırılması gereken bir alan da, öğrencilerin kendi öğrenme süreçleriyle ilgili girişimde bulunduğu etkin ve yapıcı bir süreç olan öz-düzenleyici dil öğrenimi alanıdır. Bu çalışma, yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğrenicilerinin okul dışında öz-düzenleyici dil öğrenimi faaliyetlerinde bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri kullanımlarını incelemektedir. Çalışmaya, İngilizce hazırlık programına devam eden 777 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Anket yoluyla toplanan verilerin analizi İngilizce öğrenicilerinin öz-düzenleyici dil öğrenimi faaliyetlerinde aktif bir şekilde bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerini kullandığını, ancak hem öğrenciler arasında hem de öğrenmenin düzenlenen yönleri açısından farklılıklar olduğunu göstermiştir

DİJİTAL ÇAĞDA ÖZ-DÜZENLEYİCİ ÖĞRENME:YABANCI DİL OLARAK İNGİLİZCE BAĞLAM

Research on the role of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in language learning has ascertained heretofore various potentials ranging from metacognitive domain to skill-based practices. One area in which the potentials of ICT tools requires further exploration is self-regulated language learning, an active, constructive process in which learners take the initiative in their learning experiences. This paper reports on a study which aims to examine English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners' use of ICT tools to self-regulate their language learning outside the formal instructional setting. A total of 777 university students attending an intensive English language preparatory program participated in the study. Analysis of the data collected through surveys showed that EFL learners were actively engaged in the use of ICT tools for self-regulated language learning, but there were variations both among the students and in aspects of regulating learning through the use of ICT tools

___

  • Aghaee, N., & Keller, C. (2016). ICT-supported peer interaction among learners in Bachelor's and Master's thesis courses. Computers & Education, 94, 276-297.
  • Ala-mutka, K. (2009). Review of learning in ICT-enabled networks and communities: JRC scientific and technical reports. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Arslan, R. Ş., & Şahin Kızıl, A. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 183-197.
  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where are we today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457.
  • Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.
  • Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 361-379). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Candy, P. C. (2004). Linking thinking: Self directed learning in the digital age. Canberra: Department of Education Science and Training.
  • Chapelle, C. (2010). Evaluating computer technology for language learning. Teachers of English as a Second Language of Ontario, 36(2), 56-67.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Çelik, S., Arkın, E., & Sabriler, D. (2012). EFL learners' use of ICT for self-regulated learning. The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8(2), 98-118.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53(1), 3-32.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ducate, L., & Arnold, N. (2006). Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching. San Marcos: CAL Instruction Consortium.
  • Franco, C. de P. (2008). Using wiki-based peer-correction to develop writing skills of Brazilian EFL learners. Novitas-ROYAL, 2(1), 49-59.
  • Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Towards a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18-43.
  • Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105.
  • Guven, Z. (2016). The relationship between university students' attitudes towards ICT and media tools in learning English and their emotional intelligence. Journal of Selcuk Communication, 9(3), 17-33.
  • Hiemstra, R. (1994). Self-directed learning. In T. Husen, & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 1-11). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Hirata, Y. (2011). Evaluating web content for self-directed language learning. In G. Dettori, & D. Persico (Eds.), fostering self-regulated learning through ICT (pp. 179-193). New York: Information Science Reference.
  • Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Barron, A. E. (2013). Are gender differences in perceived and demonstrated technology literacy significant? It depends on the model. Education Technology, Research and Development, 61(4), 639-663.
  • Hsiao, H. S., Tsai, C. C., Lin, C. Y., & Lin, C. C. (2012). Implementing a self-regulated WebQuest learning system for Chinese elementary schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 315-340.
  • Inozu, J., Sahinkarakas, S., & Yumru, H. (2010). The nature of language learning experiences beyond the classroom and its learning outcomes. US-China Foreing Language, 8(1), 14- 22.
  • Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722- 732.
  • Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students' selfregulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 235-252.
  • Lai, C. (2013). A framework for developing self-directed technology use for language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 17(2), 100-122.
  • Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317-335.
  • Lewis, T., & Vialleton, E. (2011). The notions of control and consciousness in learner autonomy and self-regulated learning: A comparison and critique. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 205-219.
  • McClelland, M. M., & Wanes, S. B. (2012). Growing up with assets and risks: The importance of self-regulation for academic achievement. Research in Human Development, 9(4), 278-297.
  • McDonough, S. K. (2001). Promoting self-regulation in foreign language learners. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 74(6), 323-326.
  • McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43.
  • Motteram, G. (2013). Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching. London: British Council.
  • Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education. London: Sage Publishers.
  • Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity in web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41(2), 31-39.
  • Öz, H. (2014). Big five personality traits and willingness to communicate among foreign language learners in Turkey. Social Behaviour and Personality, 42(9), 1473-1482.
  • Peters, E. (2007). Manipulating L2 learners' online dictionary use and its effect on L2 word retention. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 36-58.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). California: Academic Press.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
  • Proske, A., Narciss, S., & Körndle, H. (2011). Exploring the effects of an optional learning plan tool in technology-enhanced learning. In G. Dettori & D. Persico (Eds.), Fostering self-regulated learning through ICT (pp. 315-333). NY: Information Science Reference.
  • Sanprasert, N. (2010). The application of a course management system to enhance autonomy in learning English as a foreign language. System, 38(1), 109-123.
  • Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native: Myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61(4), 364-379.
  • Song, L. (2005). Adult learners' self-directed learning in online environments: Process, personal attribute, and context (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
  • Spear, G. E., & Mocker, D. W. (1984). The organizing circumstance: Environmental determinants in self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 43(1), 1-10.
  • Steffens, K. (2006). Self-regulated learning in technology-enhanced learning environments: Lessons of a European peer review. European Journal of Education, 41(3), 353-379.
  • Şahin Kızıl, A. (2015). Investigating the impact of Wikis on writing performance of EFL students. In H. Oz (Ed.), Language and communication research around the globe: Exploring untested ideas (pp. 103-126). New York: Untested Ideas Research Center.
  • Thronton, K. (2010). Supporting self-directed learning: A framework for teachers. Language Education in Asia, 1(1), 158-170.
  • Vovides, Y., Sanchezalonso, S., Mitropoulou, V., & Nickmans, G. (2007). The use of e- learning course management systems to support learning strategies and to improve self- regulated learning. Educational Research Review, 2(1), 64-74.
  • Vrugut, A., & Oort, F. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 123- 146.
  • Winke, P., & Goertler, S. (2008). Did we forget someone? Students' computer access and literacy for CALL. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 482-509.
  • Zhang, G. (2011). Technology uses in creating second language learning environments: When learners are creators (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3417670).
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). CA: Academic Press.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. (2001). Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 289-307). Mahwah: Erlbaum.