İngilizceyi Yabancı Bir Dil Olarak Öğrenen Öğrencilerin Sınıf İçi İngilizce İletişim Kurma İstekliliğini Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Nitel Bir İnceleme

Bu çalışma yabancı bir dil olarak İngilizce öğrenen öğrencilerin sınıf içi İngilizce iletişim kurma istekliliğini etkileyen faktörlere ilişkin algılarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ölçüt örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen katılımcılar, Balıkesir Üniversitesi’nde İngilizce dersini almış 32 öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Nitel araştırma deseninin kullanıldığı bu çalışmada, veri toplama işlemi yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşmeler aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler nitel içerik analizi tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, öğrencilerin sınıf içi İngilizce iletişim kurma istekliliğinin sınıf arkadaşları, öğretim yöntemleri, öğretmen, sınıf atmosferi, kullanılan materyaller, sınıf mevcudu, yabancı dil motivasyonu, dalga geçilme korkusu, yabancı dil kaygısı, hata yapma korkusu, konuya olan ilgi, konu aşinalığı, çekingenlik, içe dönüklük, kelime bilgisi, telaffuz, konuşma pratiği, algılanan iletişim yetkinliği ve geçmiş iletişim deneyimleri gibi çeşitli faktörler tarafından etkilendiğini göstermiştir. Sonuçlar ışığında, bazı pedagojik çıkarımlarda bulunulmuş ve gelecek çalışmalar için öneriler sunulmuştur.

A Qualitative Inquiry into the Factors Influencing EFL Learners’ in-class Willingness to Communicate in English

This study aims to examine English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’perceptions of the factors influencing their in-class willingness to communicate (WTC)in English. Having been selected through criterion sampling method, the participantsconsisted of 32 undergraduate EFL learners who took the English course at BalıkesirUniversity in Balıkesir, Turkey. In this study, which employed qualitative researchdesign, the data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The data generatedfrom the interviews were analyzed through qualitative content analysis. The results ofthe study showed that learners’ in-class WTC in English is affected by a variety offactors including classmates, instructional methods, teacher, classroom atmosphere,materials, class size, L2 motivation, fear of being ridiculed, L2 anxiety, fear of makingmistakes, topic interest, topic familiarity, shyness, introversion, vocabulary knowledge,pronunciation, practice, self-perceived communication competence and pastcommunication experience. In light of the results, some pedagogical implications wereprovided and suggestions for further research were given.

___

  • Atay, D., & Kurt, G. (2009). The predictors of EFL learners' willingness to communicate. Paper presented at American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference, Costa Mesa, California.
  • Aubrey, S. C. (2010). Influences on Japanese students’ willingness to communicate across three different sized EFL classes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Bahadori, M., & Hashemizadeh, S. M. (2018). Relationship among self-perceived oral competence, communication apprehension, and Iranian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate: Cooperative teaching in focus. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 6(21), 75-96.
  • Baran-Lucarz, M. (2014). The link between pronunciation anxiety and willingness to communicate in the foreign-language classroom: The Polish EFL context. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 445-473.
  • Başöz, T., & Erten, I. H. (2018). Investigating tertiary level EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in English. English Language Teaching, 11(3), 78.
  • Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493.
  • Cao, Y.-Q. (2005). Willingness to communicate in a second language classroom. (Unpublished master’s thesis). The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Crozier, W. R. (2001). Understanding shyness. New York: Palgrave.
  • Çetinkaya, Y. B. (2005). Turkish college students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Colombus.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ellis, R. (2008). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 140-147.
  • House, A. (2004). Learner perceptions of willingness to communicate. (Unpublished master’s thesis). The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Joe, H. K., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 133-144.
  • Jung, M. (2011). Korean EFL university students’ willingness to communicate in English. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, USA.
  • Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.
  • Khajavy, G. H., MacIntyre, P.D., & Barabadi, E. (2017). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: Applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1-20.
  • Khazaei, Z. M., Zadeh, A. M., & Ketabi, S. (2012). Willingness to communicate in Iranian EFL learners: The Effect of Class Size. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 181-187.
  • Khodarahmi, E., & Nia, Z. M. (2014). EFL teachers’ classroom discipline strategies and learners’ willingness to communicate in English inside the classroom. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 976-981.
  • MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564-576.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Babin, P. A., & Clément, R. (1999). Willingness to communicate: Antecedents & consequences. Communication Quarterly, 47(2), 215-229.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369-388.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3-26.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in an L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1989). Anxiety and second-language learning: Toward a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 39(2), 251-275.
  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • McCroskey, J.C., & Baer, J. E. (November, 1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(2), 19.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Miller, A., & Pearson, J. (2013). Can I talk to you? The effects of instructor position, nationality, and teaching style on students' perceived willingness to communicate and on teacher evaluations. Communication Quarterly, 61(1), 18-34.
  • Nagy, B. C. (2007). To will or not to will: Exploring advanced EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in English. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pécs, Hungary.
  • Öz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Willingness to communicate of EFL learners in Turkish context. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 269-275.
  • Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2015). Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1-9.
  • Peng, J. E. (2015). L2 motivational self system, attitudes, and affect as predictors of L2 WTC: An imagined community perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 433-443.
  • Peng, J. E. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the Chinese EFL classroom: A cultural perspective. In J. Liu (Ed.), English language teaching in China: New approaches, perspectives and standards (pp. 250-269). London: Continuum.
  • Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876.
  • Rastegar, M., & Karami, M. (2015). On the relationship between foreign language Classroom anxiety, willingness to communicate and scholastic success among Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(11), 2387-2394.
  • Riasati, M. J. (2012). EFL learners’ perception of factors influencing willingness to speak English in language classrooms: A qualitative study. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(10), 1287-1297.
  • Riasati, M. J., & Rahimi, F. (2018). Situational and individual factors engendering willingness to speak English in foreign language classrooms. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-15.
  • Savignon, S. J. (2005). Communicative language teaching: Strategies and goals. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 653- 561). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Svensson, J. (2016). The influence of classmates on students' willingness to communicate in English: A study based on teacher and student views and experiences at a Swedish upper secondary school. (Unpublished degree project). Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
  • Wells, G., Chang-Wells, G.L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: classrooms as centers of inquiry and literacy. Heinemenn, Portsmouth, NH.
  • Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119-152.
  • Yu, M. (2015). An examination of the dynamic feature of WTC through dyadic group interaction. System, 55, 11-20.
  • Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the effect of teacher on learners' willingness to communicate. System, 42, 288-295.