Hatay'da iki dillilik ve iki dillilikten kaynaklanan dil karışması

Hatay ilinde Türkçe ve Arapça, günlük konusma dilinde iki dilli bireyler tarafından etkin bir sekilde kullanılmaktadır. Ana dili Arapça olan iki dilli bireyler günlük iletisimlerinde konustukları bireylerin dilsel altyapısını da dikkate alarak iki dile ait ögeleri bir arada kullanarak farklı dil örüntüleri olusturmaktadırlar. Bu çalısma, Hatay ilinin farklı bölgelerinden seçilen iki dilli bireylerin konusmaları esnasında ortaya çıkan kelime ödünç alma (word-borrowing) ve dil karısması (interference) durumlarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalısma esnasında yerli ve yabancı literatürden yararlanılmıs, katılımlı gözlem ve mülakat teknikleri kullanılmıs, daha önce yapılan benzer çalısmalar incelenmistir. Çalısma sonucunda, iki dilli bireylerin her iki dile ait konusmalarında karsı dilden yani Arapça ve Türkçeden kelimeleri ödünç almada ve kullanmada bir sakınca görmedikleri gözlenmistir. (ki dilli bireyler, dil bilgisel kurallara uygun olmamasına ragmen dilsel faydacılıgı tercih etmektedirler.

Bilingualism in Hatay and interference due to bilingualism

In daily life Arabic and Turkish are actively spoken by the bilingual people in Hatay city. Bilingual people whose mother tongue are Arabic construct mixed language patterns depending on the person they talk in their daily conversation. This essay aims to research the conversation of bilingual people from different parts of Hatay in the means of word-borrowing and interference. In the frame of this study, all the literature and sources related to the study in Turkish and foreign languages are searched and the previous studies are analyzed and participant observation and interviews are used. As a result of the study, it is observed that the bilingual people easily could transfer words and language patterns into another language during their conversations. Bilinguals use a pragmatic approach while expressing themselves even though these language patterns are not considered to be grammatically correct in both languages.

PDF

___

Akarsu, B. (1998), Dil - Kültür Baglantısı, İstanbul: İnkılâp Kitabevi
Anderson, R. (1976), The Cultural Context, An Introduction To Cultural Anthropology, Minnesota: Burgess Publishing Company
Benveniste, E. (1995), Genel Dilbilim Sorunları, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul: Altan Matbaacılık.
Berlin, B. & Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms, Berkeley: University of California Press 2003.
Bloomfield, L. (1933) Language, New York: HOLT.
Clyne, M. (1967), Transference and Triggering, The Hague: Nijhoff.
Cummins, J. (1976), “The Influence of Bilingualism on Cognitive Growth: A Synthesis of Research Findings and Explanatory Hypotheses”. Working Papers on Bilingualism 9.
Diebold, A. R. (1961), Incipient Bilingualism. Language 37, 97-112.
Fishman, J. A. (1971-2), Advances in the Sociology of Language, The Hague: Mouton.
Fox, R. (1973), Encounter With Anthropology, New York
Grosjean, F. (1982), Life With Two Languages, U.S.A.: Harvard College.
Güvenç, Bozkurt. (1999), (nsan ve Kültür, (8. Baskı), İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi
Hamers, J. F. ve Blanc, M. H.A. (1989), Bilinguality and Bilingualism, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Hamers J.F. ve Blanc, M.H.A. (1982), Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 29-49
Haugen, E. (1953) Bilingualism in the Americas, Montgomery AL: University of Alabama Press.
Hickerson, N. P. (1980), Linguistic Anthropology, Texas Tech University.
Hockett, C. F., (1958), A Course In Modern Linguistics, New York: Macmillan.
Hockett, C. F. ve Robert, A. (1964), “The Human Revolution”, Current Anthropology June, 1964 Vol.5 (3):135-166.
Hoijer, H. (1967), Phonology and Morphology of Navaho Language, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hoebel, E.A. (1972), Anthropology the Study of Man, New York, McGraw-Hill.
Hoijer, Harry. (1971). “Patterns of Meaning in Navaho.” In Themes in Culture. (eds. Zamora, Mario; Mahar, J.M.; and Orenstein, Henry.). Quezon City: Kayumanggi Publishers. 227-237.
Holloway, R. L. (1969), “Culture: A Human Domain”, Current Anthropology, 10, s. 395-412.
Hyltenstam, K. ve Obler, L. (1989), Bilingualism Across the Lifespan: Acquisition, Maturity, and Loss, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
İmer, K. (1987), “Toplumdilbilimin Kimi Kavramlarına Bir Bakıs ve Dil Türleri”, A.Ü. Dil ve Tarih-Cografya Fakültesi Dergisi 213-230.
Kaplan, D. ve Manners, R.A.(Ed). (1968). Theory in Anthropology, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago
Kesckes, I. ve Papp, T. (2000), Foreign Language and Mother Tongue, Hillsday, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
König, G. (1991) ‘Toplumdilbilim Açısından Dil ve Dil Türleri’, Dilbilim Arastırmaları, 1991, Hitit Yayınevi, s. 59-70.
Mackey, W.F. (1968), “The description of bilingualism”, (Ed. J.A. Fishman), Readings in the Sociology of Language.
Malmberg, B. (1977), Manual of Phonetics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Mougeon, R. ve Beniak, É. (1987), “Minority language schooling without home language maintenance: Impact on language proficiency”, (Ed. A. Holmen), Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism, vol. 4: Bilingualism and the individual, Multilingual Matters, pp. 253-264.
Paulston, C.B. (1977b). “Review article: Language in Kenya, Language,53, s.174- 89.
Pfaff, C. (1979), Constraints on language mixing: Intrasentential code-switching and borrowing in Spanish / English, Language, 55, 291-318.
Romaine, S. (1989), Bilingualism, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Salzman, P.C. (1978). “Ideology and Change in Tribal Society.” Man, 13: 618 - 37.
Schatzman, L. ve Strauss, A. (1955), “Social Class and Modes of Communication”, American Journal of Sociology, LX, pp. 336-337.
Skutnabb, T. ve Kangas, L. (1981), Bilingualism Or Not, England: Multilingual Matters 7.
Strauss, C.L. (1996). Yaban Düsünce, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul: Altan Matbaacılık.
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in Contact, The Hague: Mouton.
Weinrecih, U. ve Labov, W. ve Herzog, M. (1968), “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change, (Ed. Lehmann, W.P. and Malkiel, Y.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, Austin TX, University of Texas Press, 95-195.
White, L. (1949). The science of Culture, A Study of Man and Civilization: New York, Strand.