DALGACIK DÖNÜŞÜMÜ-ANFIS İLE DALAMAN ÇAYI AKIMININ TAHMİNİ

Bu çalışmada, dalgacık dönüşüm tekniği ile Adaptif Ağ Temelli Bulanık Çıkarım Sistemi (ANFIS) bir arada kullanılarak akım tahmin modelleri geliştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla, otoregresif (AR) süreçler ile birleştirilmiş ANFIS modellerinin performansını geliştirmek için dalgacık analizi ile üretilen alt seriler kullanılarak Wavelet-ANFIS modeller geliştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen modeller karşılaştırıldığında, dalgacık analizi ile üretilen girdi veri setlerinin model performansını artırdığı görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, Wavelet-ANFIS hibrit modellerinin AR-ANFIS modellerinden daha iyi bir tahmin yeteneğine sahip oldukları ve Wavelet-ANFIS hibrit modelinin akım tahmininde başarı ile kullanılabileceği ortaya çıkarılmıştır.

ESTIMATION OF DALAMAN STREAM FLOW BY USING WAVELET-ANFIS

In this study, flow estimation models were formed by using a combination ofDiscrete Wavelet Transform Technique (Wavelet) and Adaptive Network BasedFuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). For this purpose, Wavelet-ANFIS models havebeen developed by using sub-series generated by wavelet analysis for improvingperformance of ANFIS models which is integrated auto regressive process (AR). It isseen that input data sets generated by wavelet analysis improved model performance. Asa result, it is found that Wavelet-ANFIS hybrid models have a better predictivepower than AR-ANFIS models and that the Wavelet-ANFIS hybrid model can be usedsuccessfully in flow estimation.

___

  • Awan, J., Bae, D-H., 2014. Improving ANFIS based model for long-term dam inflow prediction by incorporating monthly rainfall forecasts. Water Resour. Manag., 28(5), 1185–1199.
  • Badrzadeh, H., Sarukkalige, R., Jayawardena, A. W., 2013. Impact of multi-resolution analysis of artificial intelligence models inputs on multi-step ahead river flow forecasting, Journal of Hydrology, 507, 75-85.
  • Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., 1970.Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., 1994.Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.
  • Chang, L. C., Chang, F.J., 2001.Intelligent control for modelling of real-time reservoir operation. Hydrol. Processes,15, 1621–1634.
  • Chen, S.H., Lin, Y.H., Chang, L.C., Chang, F. J., 2006. The strategy of building a flood forecast model by neuro-fuzzy network. Hydrol. Processes, 20, 1525– 1540.
  • DeLurgio, S. A., 1998. Forecasting Principles and Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
  • Hundecha, Y., Bardossy, A.,Theisen, H. W., 2001. Development of a fuzzy logic based rainfall–runoff model. Hydrol. Sci. J.46(3), 363–377.
  • Jang, J. S. R., 1992. Self-learning fuzzy controllers based on temporal back propagation. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks,3(5), 714–723.
  • Keskin, M.E., Taylan, D., 2009. Artificial models for interbasin flow prediction in southern Turkey. ASCE Journal of Hydrologic Engineering., 14, 752– 758.
  • Keskin, M.E., Taylan, D., Terzi, Ö.,2006. Adaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approach for modelling hydrological time series. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51, 588–598.
  • Kisi, O., Cimen, M., 2011. A wavelet-support vector machine conjunction model for monthly streamflow forecasting, J. Hydrol., 399(1–2), 132– 140.
  • Lin, C.T., Lee, C.S.G., 1995. Neural fuzzy systems, New Jersey, USA, Prentice Hall PTR 797.
  • Nourani, V., Alami, M. T., Aminfar, M. H., 2009.A combined neural-wavelet model for prediction of Ligvanchai watershed precipitation, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 22(3), 466- 472.
  • Pektaş A.O., Cigizoglu, K.H., 2013. ANN hybrid model versus ARIMA and ARIMAX models of runoff coefficient. J. Hydrol., 500, 21–36
  • Salas, J.D., Delleur, J.W., Yevjevich, V.M., Lane, W.L. 1980.Applied modeling of hydrologic time series. Water Resources Publications, Littleton
  • See, L., Openshaw, S., 2000. Applying soft computing approaches to river level forecasting. Hydrol. Sci. J.,44(5), 763–779.
  • Shafaei, M., Kisi, O., 2015. Lake level forecasting using wavelet-SVR, Wavelet-ANFIS and wavelet-ARMA conjunction models. Water Resour. Manag,, 30(1), 79–97.
  • Shoaib, M., Shamseldin, A., Melville, B., Khan, M., 2016. Hybrid Wavelet Neural Network Approach. Artificial Neural Network Modelling, Studies in Computational Intelligence, 2016, 628 pp. 127 – 143
  • Taylan, E.D., 2008. Application of Intelligent Systems For Flow Forecasting In Region Of Mediterranean. Ph.D. Thesis. Süleyman Demirel University Graduate School of Applied and Natural Sciences, Turkey.
  • Tingsanchali, T.,Gautam, M. R,. 2000. Application of tank, NAM, ARMA and neural network models to flood forecasting. Hydrol. Processes.14, 2473– 2487.
  • Tiwari, M.K., Chatterjee, C., 2011. A new waveletbootstrap- ANN hybrid model for daily discharge forecasting.Journal of Hydroinformatics, 13(3); 500-519.
  • Tsoukalas, L. H., Uhrig, R. E., 1997. Fuzzy and Neural Approaches in Engineering. Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley &Sons.Inc., New York, USA.
  • Turan, M., Yurdusev, M., 2014. Predicting monthly river flows by genetic fuzzy systems. Water Resour.Manag., 28(13), 4685–4697.
  • Valipour, M., 2012. Parameters estimate of autoregressive moving average and autoregressive integrated moving average models and compare their ability for inflow forecasting. J. Math. Stat., 8(3), 330–338.
  • Valipour, M., Banihabib, M.E., Behbahani, S.M.R., 2013. Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir. J. Hydrol., 476, 433–441.
  • Wang W.C., Chau, K.W.,,Xu, D. M.,, Chen, X. Y., 2015. Improving forecasting accuracy of annual runoff time series using ARIMA based on EEMD decomposition. Water Resour. Manag., 29, 2655– 2675.
  • Wang, W., Ding, J., 2003.Wavelet network model and its application to the predication of hydrology. Nature and Science, 1(1), 67–71.
  • Xiong, L. H., Shamseldin, A. Y.,, O’Connor, K. M., 2001. A nonlinear combination of the forecasting of rainfall–runoff models by the first order Takagi- Sugeno fuzzy system. J. Hydrol., 245(1/4), 196– 217.
  • Xu, J., Chen, Y., Li, W., Nie, Q., Song, C., Wei, C., 2014.Integrating wavelet analysis and BPANN to simulate the annual runoff with regional climate change: a case study of Yarkand River, Northwest China. Water Resour. Manag., 28(9), 2523–2537.
  • Yarar, A., 2014. A hybrid wavelet and neuro-fuzzy model for forecasting the monthly streamflow data. Water Resour. Manag., 28(2), 553–565.
  • Zadeh, L. A., 1965 Fuzzy sets. Information Control,8(3), 338–353.