THE NEW FORM OF THE PUBLIC-CIVIL SOCIETY RELATIONS AND THE WELFARE STATE
As the feld of activity becomes narrower in
local governments, it is easier and less costly
to refect the preferences of people. Since the
distance between society and administration is
closer, the local government formed qt political
and administrative levels produces more effective results in terms of democratic effciency.
In this new administrative form, which can also
be expressed as “local governance”, the local
government in an autonomous structure, assuming more responsibility to cooperate with
the central government, private sector and other actors (development agencies, NGOs, etc.)
At this point, while focusing on the needs and
disadvantages, it is necessary to understand
that NGOs hold basic responsibilities in terms
of cooperating with local governments in various forms such as local education, provision
of social services, empowerment of solidarity
and protection of freedoms. After the collapse
of welfare politics, the importance of cooperation between government and civil society
has emerged. It is then necessary to talk about
the increasing importance of civil society as a
prominent actor in the feld of social welfare, in
the sense that having the basis for providing
services without being exposed to the conditions of bulkiness, ineffciency and red-tape.
The cooperation mechanism, recently revealed in Sultanbeyli within the context of Syrian refugees, is a good example which brings
Sultanbeyli Municipality, Sultanbeyli Governorship, the Ministry of Family and Social Policy
and some important non-governmental organizations together as project partners.
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Central Government, Local Government, Local Governance, Civil Society, Welfare Policy, Sultanbeyli
THE NEW FORM OF THE PUBLIC-CIVIL SOCIETY RELATIONS AND THE WELFARE STATE
As the feld of activity becomes narrower in
local governments, it is easier and less costly
to refect the preferences of people. Since the
distance between society and administration is
closer, the local government formed qt political
and administrative levels produces more effective results in terms of democratic effciency.
In this new administrative form, which can also
be expressed as “local governance”, the local
government in an autonomous structure, assuming more responsibility to cooperate with
the central government, private sector and other actors (development agencies, NGOs, etc.)
At this point, while focusing on the needs and
disadvantages, it is necessary to understand
that NGOs hold basic responsibilities in terms
of cooperating with local governments in various forms such as local education, provision
of social services, empowerment of solidarity
and protection of freedoms. After the collapse
of welfare politics, the importance of cooperation between government and civil society
has emerged. It is then necessary to talk about
the increasing importance of civil society as a
prominent actor in the feld of social welfare, in
the sense that having the basis for providing
services without being exposed to the conditions of bulkiness, ineffciency and red-tape.
The cooperation mechanism, recently revealed in Sultanbeyli within the context of Syrian refugees, is a good example which brings
Sultanbeyli Municipality, Sultanbeyli Governorship, the Ministry of Family and Social Policy
and some important non-governmental organizations together as project partners.
___
- AKAL, C. B. (1990). Sivil Toplumun Tanrısı. Afa Yay: İstanbul
- AKBAL, İ. (2011). Doğa Hukukçularından Hegel’e Sivil Toplum Devlet İlişkileri: Sivil Toplumun Siyasal Anlamından Kurtuluşu. Muhafazakâr Düşünce. Sayı: 29-30. s. 39-63
- AYKAÇ, B. (1999). Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetimin Küçültülmesi, Yerel Yönetimler ve Yerel Demokrasinin Amaçları. Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. Cilt 1. Sayı 1. s. 1-12
- BAYRAMOĞLU, S. (2002). Küreselleşmenin Yeni Siyasal İktidar Modeli: Yönetişim. Praksis. S.7. s. 85-115
- Commission of the European Communities. (2001). European Governance: A White Paper. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf (25 March 2013)
- Communities and Local Government. (2008). Strong and Prosperous Communities. http://www. communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/153590.pdf (02.10.2008)
- ÇİTCİ, O. (1996). Temsil, Katılma ve Yerel Demokrasi. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi. Cilt 5. Sayı 6. s. 5-14
- DAVIES, S. (2003). Empiricism and History. Hampshire: Palgrave
- ERDOĞAN, M. (2005). Sivil Toplum: Bir Kavramın Anatomisi. içinde 21. Yüzyılın Eşiğinde Türkiye’de Siyasal Hayat. Cilt 2 (Ed. Selahaddin Bakan, Adnan Küçük ve Ahmet Karadağ). İstanbul: Aktüel Yayınları
- ERKEN, A. (2016). Negotiating Politics, Informal Networks and the Ford Foundation Projects in Turkey during the Cold War. International Journal of Turcologia. Vol. 11. Issue 21. pp. 5-22
- FENGER, M., BEKKERS, V. (2007). The Governance Concept in Public Administration. in Governance and the Democratic Deficit: Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Practices. Edited by Victor Bekkers. Hampshire: Ashgate
- FUKUYAMA, F. (2001). Social Capital, Civil Society and Development. Third World Quarterly. Vol 22. No 1. pp. 7–20
- GÜNEŞ, İ., TEKGÜL, Y. (2005). Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları ve Yerel Yönetimler. II. Ulusal Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. Çanakkale. s. 325-344
- HAYEK, F. (2011). The Constitution of Liberty. The University of Chicago Press
- HILL, D. M. (1974). Democratic Theory and Local Government. London: Allen & Unwin.
- HIRST, P.(2011). From Statism to Pluralism: Democracy, Civil Society and Global Politics.
- Routledge Interview with Mehmet Ali Kılıç. Vice President of the Association for Solidarity for Refugees and Asylees. 27 March 2018
- KAHRAMAN, Z. T. (2000). Yönetim Stratejilerindeki Gelişmeler. Türk İdare Dergisi. Y:72. S:426. ss. 37-54
- KAYIKÇI, S. (2007). Küreselleşmenin Kamu Yönetimi Paradigmasına Etkisi ve Türk Kamu Yönetimine Yansımaları. Mülkiye Dergisi. Cilt 31. Sayı 256. ss.165-184
- KEANE, J. (1993). Sivil Toplum ve Devlet: Avrupa’da Yeni Yaklaşımlar. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları
- KELEŞ, R. (2006). Yerinden Yönetim ve Siyaset. İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi
- KORKUT, U. (2007). Participatory Policy-Making, Participatory Civil Society: A Key for Dissolving Elite Rule in New Democracies in the Era of Globalization. The Journal of New Paradigm Research. Vol. 63. Issue: 5-6. pp. 340-352
- Local Government Association. (2008). Local Government Matters: Facts and Figures 2005- 2006. http://www.local.gov.uk/default.asp?sID=1088162663359 (13.11.2008)
- MAGNUSSON, W. (1986). Bourgeois Theories of Local Government. Political Studies. vol. 34. No. 1. pp. 1-18
- MARDİN, Ş. (1983). Sivil Toplum. Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansiklopedisi. Cilt 8. İstanbul: İletişim Yay.
- MARSHALL, T. H. (1965). Class, Citizenship and Social Development. Anchor Books: Newyork
- MUTLU, A. (2006). Yerel Yönetimler Ve Sivil Toplum Örgütleri Etkileşimi Bakımından Yeni Belediye Yasasının Değerlendirilmesi. Yerel Yönetim Ve Denetim. C. 11. S. 2. ss. 5-22
- ÖNER, Ş. (2001). Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarının Yerel Demokrasi ve Katılım Algılamaları. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler. C:10. S:2. ss. 51-68
- PUSTU, Y. (2005). Yerel Yönetimler ve Demokrasi. Sayıştay Dergisi. Sayı 57
- RICHARDS, P.G. (1983). Reformed Local Government System. London: Allen & Unwin
- ROSANVALLON, P. (2000). The New Social Question: Rethinking the Welfare State. Princeton University Press
- SARTORI, G. (1996). Demokrasi Teorisine Geri Dönüş. (Çev. Tuncer Mustafaoğlu ve Mehmet Turhan). Yetkin Yayınları: Ankara
- TEKELİ, İ. (1993). Democracy in Local Administration and Development of Municipalities in Turkey. Amme İdaresi Dergisi. TODAİE. Cilt 2. Sayı 6. ss. 22-52
- The Association for Solidarity for Refugees and Asylees Official Website. http://multeciler.org. tr/eng/ (28.03.2018)
- UÇAR, A. (2004). Belediye Hizmetlerinin Etkinliği Açısından Hizmette Yerellik (Subsidiarite) İlkesi ile Yönetişim (Governance) Kavramı Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Celal Bayar Üni. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. C.2. S.1. ss. 97-107
- WICKWAR, H. (1970). The Political Theory of Local Goverment. University of South Carolina Press
- YILDIRIM, S. (1993). Yerel Yönetim ve Demokrasi: Kavramlar, Yaklaşımlar. T.C. Başbakanlık Toplu Konut İdaresi Başkanlığı
- YILDIZ, Ö. (2004). Sivil Toplum, Demokrasi ve Çoğulculuk, Sivil Toplum. 2 (5). s. 85-92
- ISSN: 1304-8864
- Başlangıç: 2015
- Yayıncı: Orient Yayıncılık Reklamcılık Bilgisayar Araştırma
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
AŞIRI SAĞIN YÜKSELİŞİ: RESME KÜRESEL PERSPEKTİFTEN BAKMAK
EGEMENLİĞİN MANTIĞI, FAŞİZM VE ŞİDDET
THE NEW FORM OF THE PUBLIC-CIVIL SOCIETY RELATIONS AND THE WELFARE STATE
AVRUPA’DA “AŞIRI SAĞ”IN DİNÎ-İDEOLOJİK VE TARİHÎ TEMELLERİ-KÖKENLERİ
ROMA CİVİTAS’INDAN MODERN BATI SİVİLİZASYONUNA UZANAN TARİHSEL ÜÇLEME
TEOLOJİK VE SİYASİ BİR MEYDAN OKUMA OLARAK İSLAM VE YORUMU