ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ COVID-19 PANDEMİSİ SÜRECİNDE UZAKTAN EĞİTİM UYGULAMALARINA İLİŞKİN GÖRÜŞLERİ

Bu makalede Covid-19 pandemisi sürecinde uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarına geçen üniversitelerdeki öğretmen adaylarının uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarına ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Betimsel tarama modelinde gerçekleştirilen araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, bir devlet üniversitesinin 2019-2020 eğitim öğretim döneminin bahar yarıyılında Sınıf Eğitimi ve Matematik Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dallarının 1-4. sınıflarında uzaktan eğitim yoluyla öğrenim gören toplam 132 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak “Uzaktan Eğitime Yönelik Öğrenci Görüşleri” ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin Cronbach Alpha iç tutarlılık katsayısı 0.86 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Veri toplama sürecinde, ölçek maddeleri web tabanlı olarak öğretmen adaylarına uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, betimsel istatistikler (frekans, aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma), bağımsız örneklem t testi ve tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. İstatistiki açıdan anlamlı olan farkın hangi gruplar arasında olduğunun tespit edilmesi amacıyla LSD testi uygulanmış ve anlamlılık p

Anahtar Kelimeler:

öğretmen, covid-19, pandemi, uzaktan eğitim, üniversite, sınıf eğitimi, matematik eğitimi

THE OPINIONS OF THE TEACHER CANDIDATES ON DISTANCE LEARNING PRACTICES IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC PROCESS

In this article, it is aimed to examine the opinions of teacher candidates' for with distance education practices in universities that have switched to distance education practices during the Covid-19 pandemic process. The study group of the research carried out in the descriptive survey model consists of a total of 132 teacher candidates. As a data collection tool in the research, "Student Views on Distance Education" scale was used. The Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was calculated as 0.86. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent sample t test and ANOVA. In order to determine which groups the statistically significant difference is between, LSD test was applied and significance was calculated based on p

Keywords:

teachers covid-19, pandemic, distance learning, university, primary school teacher, mathematics teacher, teacher candidates,

PDF

___

Almuraqab, Nasser A. Saif, (2020) Shall Universities at the UAE Continue Distance Learning after the COVID-19 Pandemic? Revealing Students’ Perspective . International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), 11(5), 2020, pp. 226-233., https://ssrn.com/abstract=3620824
Altınpınar, İ, Başar, E. (2020). Yükseköğretim Denizcilik Eğitiminde, Uzaktan Eğitim Hizmet Kalitesi ve Performansının Ölçülmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Denizcilik ve Lojistik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (1) , 48-61 .
Aristovnik, A.; Keržič, D.; Ravšelj, D.; Tomaževič, N. (2020) Umek, L. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Life of Higher Education Students: A Global Perspective. Preprints, 2020080246 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202008.0246.v2).
Berge, Zane ve Mrozowski, Susan. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education. 15. 5-19. 10.1080/08923640109527090.
Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2),85-124.
Buxton, E. (2014). Pharmacists' perception of synchronous versus asynchronous distance learning for continuing education programs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(1), 17. doi:10.5688/ajpe7818
Christensen, E. W., Anakwe, U. P. ve Kessler E. H. (2001) Receptivity to distance learning: the effect of technology, reputation, constraints, and learning preferences. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33 (3), 263 – 279
Clark, R.C. (2008). Distance learning and the science of instruction: proven guideline for consumens and designers of multimedia learning, second edition. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
George, D. ve Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson.
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., ve Gijselaers, W. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: The impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 30-50. doi: 10.1111/ jcal.12020
Hrastinski, S. (2008). A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. Educause Quarterly, 4, 51-55. Retrieved from http:// www.educause.edu/ero/article/ asynchronous-and-synchronous-e-learning
Jones, J. G., Morales, C., ve Knezek, G. A. (2005). 3-dimensional online learning environments: Examining attitudes toward information technology between students in Internet-based 3-dimensional and face-to-face classroom instruction. Educational Media International, 42(3), 219-236.
Jones, V., Jo, J., ve Martin, P. (2007). Future Schools and How Technology can be used to support Millennial and Generation-Z Students. In ICUT 2007 (Proc. B), 1st Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Information Technology (pp. 886-891).
Karasar, N. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Yirmi Birinci Baskı, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
Kırık, A. (2016). Uzaktan eğitimin tarihsel gelişimi ve Türkiye’deki durumu. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 0 (21), 73-94.
McBrien, J. L., Jones, P., ve Cheng, R. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). http://www.irrodl.org/ index.php/irrodl/article/view/605/1264
Nenko, Y., КybalnaN. ve Snisarenko, Y. (2020). The COVID-19 Distance Learning: Insight from Ukrainian students. Brazilian Journal of Rural Education, 5, e8925. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e8925
Rüzgar, N. S. (2004). Distance education in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 5(2), 22-32. Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: Educating and Engaging the Next Generation of Students. About Campus, 22(3), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21293
Somuncuoğlu, D. (2005). Türkiye’de ve dünyada uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(3), 85-100.
Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C., ve Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105-118.
Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., ve Calvin, J. (2009). How a novice adult online learner experiences transactional distance. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(3), 305-311. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ889334
UNESCO (2002) Open and distance learning – Trends, policy and strategy considerations, Paris, FR: UNESCO
Utomo, M.N.Y., Sudaryanto ve M., Saddhono, K. (2020). Tools and strategy for distance learning to respond COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 383-390. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.250314
Watts, Lynette. (2016) Quarterly Review of Distance Education; Charlotte Vol. 17, Iss. 1,: 23-32,56.