GEÇMİŞTEN GÜNÜMÜZE EBELİK: TARİHİ BİR İNCELEME

Ebelik, sağlık mesleklerinin arasında geleneksel ve tarihi en eski, işlev yönünden de en önemli olan, dünyanın ilk holistik mesleğidir ve bu mesleğin hedefinde "bakım" daima kadın merkezli olmuştur. Pek çok tarihi değişim yaşamış olan ebelik toplumsal bir meslektir. Bu değişimlerin çoğu, bakımın anlamını, uygulamaya katkısını ve standart hale gelmiş becerileri kapsamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı; kronolojik bir sıra ile ebeliğin tarih boyunca geçirdiği büyük değişimleri ve bu değişimlere neden olan sosyo-kültürel faktörleri eleştirel olarak incelemektir. Çalışmanın verilerini toplamak için kütüphane ve bilgisayar araştırması yapılmıştır. Kütüphane araştırmasında Tarih öncesi devirden (Taş, Maden Devri) Tarih Devirlerine (İlk, Orta, Yakın, Yeni Çağ) kadar değişen zaman aralığında ebelikteki gelişmelerin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bilgisayar araştırmasında ise, tarih boyunca ebeliğin uygulama kapsamını şekillendiren önemli sosyal ve kültürel faktörlere odaklanan farklı akademik görüşler belirlenmiştir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Medline, PubMed, Turkish Medline, Akademik Google elektronik veri tabanlarının kapsamlı bir incelemesi yapılmıştır. Ebelik, tarih boyunca makro ve mikro sosyo-kültürel faktörlerin rol oynadığı kadın merkezli ve toplumsal bir meslektir. Sosyal örgütlerin gücü, medeniyetlerin sürekliliği ve sanayileşmenin üretkenliği, bireysel bakımdan holistik yaklaşıma kadar ebelikte "bakım" kavramını değiştiren önemli makro sosyokültürel faktörler olmuştur. Bu da mesleğin değişimini etkilemiştir. Cinsel kimlik, toplumsal sınıf, otorite ve örgün eğitimin erişilebilirliği, uygulamalarda mesleği değiştiren mikro sosyo-kültürel faktörler arasında sayılabilir

Midwifery from Past to Present: A Historical Review

Being traditional and the oldest one among health occupations and also the most important in terms of the function, midwifery is the first holistic profession in the world and the “care” is woman-centered in the aim of this profession. Midwifery, which has gone through many historical transitions, is a social profession. Most of these transitions involve the meaning of the care, its contribution to the practice and its standardized skills. The purpose of this study is to critically investigate major historical transitions of midwifery in chronological order and socio-cultural factors that have caused these transitions. Library survey and computer search were performed to collect the data of the study. During library survey, it was aimed at determining developments on midwifery within the period ranging from prehistoric age (Stone age, Metal age) to history ages (First age, Medieval Age, Modern Age, New Age). On the other hand, as a result of computer search, academic opinions focusing on important social and cultural factors shaping practice scope of midwifery throughout history were found. In line with this purpose, an extensive review was conducted on electronic databases of Medline, PubMed, Turkish Medline, and Academic Google. Midwifery is a womancentered and social profession on which macro and micro socio-cultural factors have played a role throughout history. Power of social organizations, consistency of civilizations, and productivity of industrialization are the significant macro social-cultural factors that change concept of “care” in midwifery from self-care to holistic approach. This affected change of the profession. Gender identity, social class, authority and accessibility of formal education are among micro socio-cultural factors that affect the profession in its practices

___

  • 1. Köker AH. Doğum ve Ebelik Tarihi. 1. Baskı. Erciyes Üniversitesi Matbaası; 1997.
  • 2. Beydilli ED. Ebeliğin Dünü ve Bugünü. 1. Baskı. Alter Yayıncılık; 2007.
  • 3. Lay M. The Rhetoric of Midwifery: Gender, Knowledge, & Power. 1st press. Rutgers University Press. New Brunswick, USA; 2000.
  • 4. Leap N, Hunter B. The Midwife’s Tale: An oral history from handywoman to professional midwife. 1st press. Scarlet Press, London; 1993.
  • 5. Marland H, Rafferty A. Midwives, Society, and Childbirth: Debates and Controversies in Modern Period. 2nd press. 11 New Fetter Lane, London, Routledge; 1997.
  • 6. Royal College of Midwives, [RCM]. The Midwife’s Role in Public Health. Position Paper No. 24. UK; 2001.
  • 7. International Confederation of Midwives [ICM]. (2002). Essential Competences for Basic Midwifery Practices 2002. Available from: http://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/uploads/documents/Links/Essential%20 Compsenglish_2002-JF_2007%20FINAL.pdf Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2013
  • 8. Barger MK. Midwifery practice: where have we been and where are we going? Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health. 2005;50:87-90.
  • 9. Towler L, Bramall J. Midwives in History and Society. 1st press. Croom Helm Press. London, Sydney; 1986.
  • 10. Englemann G. Labour Among Primitive Peoples. J.H Chambers. 1st press. St. Louis. USA; 1882.
  • 11. Barnawi N, Richter S, Habib F. Midwifery and Midwives: A Historical Analysis. J. Res. Nurs. Midwifery. 2013;2: 114-21.
  • 12. Phillips N. The Herbalist’s Way: The Art and Practice of Healing with Plant Medicines. 1st press. Nancy and Michael Philips. USA; 2005.
  • 13. Ehrenreich B, English D. Witches, Midwives, & Nurses: History of Women Healers. The Feminist Press, City University, NY, USA; 2010.
  • 14. Blickstein I, Gurewitsch E. Biblical Twins. Obstetric & Gynecology. 1998;91:632-4.
  • 15. Loose J. The Red Tent: A novel about Biblicalm, Midwifery and others. Informational Journal of Infant Observation and its Application. 2008;6:88-95.
  • 16. Liu Y. Position during labor and delivery: History and Perspective. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 1979;24:23-6.
  • 17. Zodak S. (2010). Midwives: Pioneers of Faith. Available from: http://www.chabad.org/theJewishWoman/article_cdo/ aid/461823/jewish/Midwives.htm Erişim Tarihi: 01.12.2013
  • 18. Allen J. The Art of Medicine in Ancient Egypt. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2nd press. New York, USA; 2005.
  • 19. Holmes B, Kilterman P. Medicine in Ancient Egypt: The Hieratic Maternal. 1st press. Lancet -Clinic Press. Cincinnati: USA; 1914.
  • 20. Nunn J. Ancient Egyptian Medicine. 1st press. University of Oklahoma Press. UK; 2002.
  • 21. O’Dwod M, Philipp E. The History of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1st press. Real River, New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group Inc; 1994.
  • 22. Arvanitidou O. Midwives and Maternity Services in Greece – Historical Context and Current challenges. In Helen Spiby and Jane Munro, Evidence Based Midwifery Applications in Context; 1st press. 2010.
  • 23. Grant T, Carter S. Women in Medicine: A celebration of Their Work. Firefly Books; 2004.
  • 24. Louros N, Kairis NM. Some of Aspects of Midwifery in Greece. British Medical Journal. 1951;14:110-1.
  • 25. Parker H. Women Doctors in Greece, Rome, & The Byzantine Empire in Women Physicians and Healers: Climbing a long Hill, ed Lilian R. Frust. 1st press. University Press of Kentucky; 1997.
  • 26. Hughes P. Witchcraft. 1st press. Longmans Green, London; 1952.
  • 27. Forbes TR. The Midwife and Witchcraft. New Haven, 1st press. Yale University Press; 1966.
  • 28. Marland H. The Art of Midwifery: Early Modern Midwives in Europe. 1st press. Routledge, London and New York; 1993.
  • 29. Evenden, D. The Midwives of Seventeenth-Century London. 1st press. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2000.
  • 30. Kontoyannis M, Katesetos C. Midwives in Early Modern Europe (1400-1800). Health Science Journal. 2011;5:31-6. 31. Nicopoullus JDM. Midwifery is not a fit Occupation for a Gentlemen. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;23:589- 93. 32. Casssidy T. Birth: The Surprising History of How We Are Born. New York, N.Y.: Atlantic Monthly Press; 2006.
  • 33. Stern CA, Facog MD. After office hours, Midwives, Male Midwives, & Nurse- Midwives. Obstetrics & Gynecology Journal. 1972;39:308-22.
  • 34. Pilkenton D, Schom M. Midwifery: A career for men in Nursing. Men in Nursing Journal, 2008;12:29-33.
  • 35. Central Midwives Board. The Midwife. 1st press. The British Journal of Nursing. UK; 1953.
  • 36. Cutter IS, Viets H. A short history of Midwifery. The American Journal of Medical Sciences. 1965;250:236.
  • 37. Hiestand W. Midwife to Nurse-Midwifery: A History. The Development of Nurse-Midwifery Education in the Continental United States to 1965. London, 1st press. England: University Microfilms International; 1977.
  • 38. MacDorman MF, Singh GK. Midwifry Care. Social and Medical Risk Factors, and Birth outcomes in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1998;52:310-17.
  • 39. Breckinridge M. Wide neighborhoods, a story of the frontier nursing service. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, in Deloughery, G. (1998). Issues and trends in nursing, 3rd Ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1952.
  • 40. McDonald K, Blogger G. Mary Breckinridge’s Grand Vision. ACNM. Available from: http://www.midwife.org/MaryBreckinridge-s-Grand-Vision. Erişim Tarihi: 11.10.2013
  • 41. Parkland School of Nurse Midwifery History of Midwifery in the US. Available from: http://www.neonatology.org/pdf/ midwifery.history.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 11.10.2013
  • 42. Benoit C, Carol D. Canadian midwifery. In C. Bates, Dodd N. Rousseau (Eds.). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press and Canadian Museum of Civilization. 2005.
  • 43. Plummer K. From Nursing Outposts to Contemporary Midwifery in 20th Century Canada. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health. 2000;45:169-75.
  • 44. Relyea J. The rebirth of Midwifery in Canada: a historical perspective. Midwifery. 1992;8: 159-69.
  • 45. National Aboriginal Health Organization. Midwifery and Aboriginal Midwifery in Canada. Available from: http://www. naho.ca/documents/naho/english/publications/DP_aboriginal_midwifery.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 11.10.2013.
  • 46. O’Brien B. Birth on the Land: Memories of Inuit Elders and Traditional Midwives. Nunavut Arctic College, Toronto, Canada; 2012.
  • 47. Bourgeault IL, Benoit C, Davis-Floyd R. Reconceiving Midwifery (paper Back). McGill: Queen’s University Press; 2004.
  • 48. Fleming SM. Midwifery in Canada. Midwives Chron. 1994;105:338-40.
  • 49. International Confederation of Midwives. Available from: http://www.internationalmidwives.org/core-documents Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2013.
  • 50. Avrupa topluluğu komisyonu. Mesleki yeterliliklerin tanınmasında Avrupa parlementosu ve konsey direktifi için bir öneri. Available from: http://www.mimarlarodasiankara.org/dosya/AB%20Direktifi-%20Mesleki%20Yeterliliklerin%20 Taninmasi.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2013.
  • 51. World Health Organization Regional Office For Europe. Nurses and Midwives for Health: WHO European Strategy for Nursing and Midwifery Education, Copenhagen; 2000.