Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin Alternatif Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Yöntemlerine Yönelik İhtiyaç Analizi

The purpose of this study is to find out science and technology teachers’ perceptions about their knowledge about constructivist approach and alternative assessment and evaluation, technology use in education and their preferences about delivery of in-service trainings. 21 science and technology teachers were selected purposefully in this study. To understand their perceptions, semi-structured interviews as a qualitative method were used (Merriam, 1998). Study findings showed that both experienced and inexperienced teachers had troubles in preparation and application of alternative assessment methods. Moreover, study revealed that science and technology teachers are familiar with computers and internet applications. Lastly, science and technology teachers emphasized advantages of online training over face-to-face training such as accessibility, flexibility, and being up-to-date. There was no expression about disadvantages of online training. Most of the participants giving feedback about face-to-face training marked disadvantages of it as incompetent trainers, shallow content and lectures without practice. It is concluded that teachers needs trainings about alternative assessment and evaluation methods and they see the online in-service training method be more beneficial compared to face-to-face training method.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Alternatif ölçme ve değerlendirme araçları, teknoloji kullanımı, çevrim içi ve yüz yüze hizmet-içi eğitim

Needs Analysis of Science and Technology Teachers towards Alternative Assessment Methods

Keywords:

Alternative assessment and evaluation techniques, technology use, online and face to face in-service training,

PDF

___

Anderson, R. S. (1998). Why Talk About Different Ways to Grade? The Shift from Traditional Assessment to Alternative Assessment, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 5-16.
Arslan, A. S., Kaymakcı, Y. D., Arslan S. (2009). Alternatif Ölçme-Değerlendirme Etkinliklerinde Karşilaşilan Problemler: Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretmenleri Örneği, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 1-12.
Baran, B. & Cagiltay, K. (2010). The motivators and barriers in the development of online communities of practice. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 79–96.
Çepni, S. & Çoruhlu, T. S. (2010). Alternatif ölçme ve değerlendirme tekniklerine yönelik hazırlanan hizmet içi eğitim kursundan öğretime yansımalar, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültes Dergisi, 28, 117-128.
Gelbal, S. & Kelecioğlu, H. (2007). Öğretmenlerin ölçme ve değerlendirme yöntemleri hakkındaki yeterlik algıları ve karşılaştıkları sorunlar, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 135-145.
Frey, T.J. (2008) Determining the Impact of On-line Practicum Facilitation for In-service Teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 181-210.
Kilic S., Kaya B. & Kurt H. (2012). Assessment and evaluation techniques being used in classrooms by biology teachers. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 1(1).
Kurnaz, M , Pektaş, M . (2012). Fen Ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin Ölçme-Değerlendirmede Kavram Haritası Kullanım Durumları. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (1). Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/mersinefd/issue/ 17382/181563
Lawler, P. A., & King, K. P. (2000). Planning for effective faculty development: Using adult learning strategies. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing Qualitative Research, Second Edition. California, USA: Sage Publication.