ENTEGRE NEHİR HAVZASINI YÖNETME DENEYİMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ: ABD VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEKLERİ - THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INTEGRATED RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCES: USA AND TURKEY SAMPLES

Su havzalarını geliştirmek ve değerlendirmek için geliştirilen yaklaşımlardan biri, entegre nehir havzasını yönetme (IRBM) yaklaşımıdır. IRBM, kısaca nehir havzasının su ve toprak kaynaklarının entegre bir şekilde geliştirilmesi ve kullanılmasıdır. Dünyanın en eski ve en ünlü IRBM örneği, 1933 yılında ABD’de kurulan Tennessee Vadisi Yönetimi’dir (TVA). TVA, çok sayıda ülkede benzer projelere öncülük etmiştir. Bunlardan biri, Türkiye’de Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi’dir (GAP).TVA, ABD’nin Tennessee Vadisi’nin ekonomik kalkınmasını hızlandırmak için kurulmuştur. Özel teşebbüsün girişkenliğine ve esnekliğine sahip bir şekilde kurulan TVA, bölgesel kalkınma yaklaşımı temelinde IRBM yaklaşımını uygulamıştır. Bu çerçevede çok sayıda baraj ve sulama kanalları inşa etmiş; elektrik enerjisi üretmiş; bölgenin kalkınmasına katkıda bulunmuştur. GAP, Türkiye’nin çok sektörlü, entegre bölgesel kalkınma projesidir. Fırat ve Dicle nehirlerinde barajlar ve sulama kanalları yapmak için 1977 yılında geliştirilmiştir. 40 yıllık süreçte tamamlanamayan GAP’ın enerji projelerinde % 78, sulama projelerinde ise % 52 oranında gerçekleşme sağlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada TVA ve GAP, kuruluş süreci, amacı, yönetimi, finansmanı ve faaliyetleri bakımından karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiş; benzer ve farklı yönleri ortaya konmuştur. Konu, doküman analizi tekniğiyle incelenmiştir. Analizle iki projenin başlıca benzerliklerinin, uygulanan IRBM yaklaşımı; başlıca farklılıkların ise, finansman ve yönetim yapıları ile faaliyetlerinde olduğu gözlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Tennessee Vadisi Yönetimi (TVA), Entegre Nehir Havzasını Yönetme (IRBM), Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (GAP), ABD, Türkiye

THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INTEGRATED RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCES: USA AND TURKEY SAMPLES - ENTEGRE NEHİR HAVZASINI YÖNETME DENEYİMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ: ABD VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEKLERİ

One of the approaches developed to develop and evaluate watersheds is the integrated river basin management (IRBM) approach. IRBM is the development and use of water and soil resources in an integrated way. The world’s oldest and most famous IRBM example is Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) that is founded in 1933 in the USA. TVA has pioneered similar projects in many countries. One of them is the Southeast Anatolia Project in Turkey (GAP).TVA has been established to accelerate the economic development of the Tennessee Valley. Established in a way that has the initiative and flexibility of private enterprise TVA has implemented the IRBM approach on the basis of regional development approach. In this context, he built many dams and irrigation canals; produced electrical energy; contributed to the development of the region.GAP, Turkey’s multi-sectoral, integrated regional development project. It was developed in 1977 to make dams and irrigation canals in the Euphrates and Tigris rivers. 78 % of the energy projects of the GAP which could not be completed in 40 years, and 52 % of the irrigation projects were realized.In this study, TVA and GAP were examined comparatively in terms of establishment process, purpose, management, financing and activities. similar and different aspects have been revealed. Subject was examined by document analysis technique. The main similarities of the two projects were the IRBM approach; The main differences were observed in financing and management structures and activities.

Keywords:

Integrated River Basin Management (IRBM), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP), USA, Turkey,

PDF

___

Allen, M., Wilbanks, T. J., Preston, B. L., Kao, Shih-Chieh and Bradbury, J. (2017). Assessing The Cost and Benefits of Investments in Climate Resilience: Tennessee Valley Authority Case Study. Prepared for the Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis, US Department of Energy by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 28 p.
Barrow, C. J. (1998). River Basin Development Planning and Management: A Critical Review, World Development, 26 (1), pp. 171-186.
Cardno (2011). Economic Benefits of the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Natural Resource Plan. Prepared for Tennessee Valley Authority. Prepared by Cardno ENTRIX.
Clapp, G. R. (1971). The TVA; An Approach to The Development of A Region, New York, Russell & Russell, 206 p.
CRS (Congressional Research Service). (2013). Privatizing the Tennessee Valley Authority: Options and Issues. Report for Congress, 19 p.
Çelik, F. (2015). Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajanslarının Yeniliklere Katkıları: Teori, Deneyimler ve Türkiye Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilmesi. Erciyes Üniversitesi SBE (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi).
Drumright, W. W. (2005). A River for War, a Watershed to Change: The Tennessee Valley Authority During World War II, PhD Dissertation, University of Tennessee.
Ergün, T. (1993). Bölgelerarası Dengesizliklerin Giderilmesinde Bölgesel Örgütlenmelerin Önemi: Tennessee Valley Authority. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 26 (1), ss. 71-82.
Erikli, S. ve Bayat, B. (2016). Kamu İstihdam Yaratma Programı Olarak “Tennessee Vadisi Projesi” ve Toplum Yararına Çalışma Programının İncelenmesi, İş ve Hayat, 2 (3), ss. 77-88.
EURADA. (1999). Creation, Development and Management of RDAs. Does it have to be so difficult?, 169 p.
Freeman, M. (2011). The Development Program That Transformed A Region and Inspired the World, 21st Century Science & Technology, pp. 39-55.
GAO (United States General Accounting Office) (1995). Tennessee Valley Authority-Financial Problems Raise Questions About Long-term Viability. GAO/AIMD/RCED-95-134, 157 p.
Hooper, B. P. (2005). Integrated River Basin Governance: Learning from International Experiences. Published by IWA Publishing, Alliance House, London, UK, 306 p.
Huxley, J. (1943). TVA Adventure in Planning, The Architectural Press, London, 142 p.
Kitchens, C. T. (2012). Lessons From The Tennessee Valley Authority. A Dissertation of Doctor of Philosofy in the Graduate College of The University of Arizona.
Kitchens, C. T. (2013). A Dam Problem: TVA’s Fight Against Malaria 1926-1951, The Journal of Economic History, 73 (3), pp. 694-724.
Kitchens, C. T. (2014a). The Role of Publicly Provided Electricity in Economic Development: The Experience of the Tennessee Valley Authority, 1929-1955, The Journal of Economic History, 74 (2), pp. 389-419.
Kitchens, C. T. (2014b). The Use of Eminent Domain in Land Assembly: The Case of the Tennessee Valley Authority, Public Choice, 160 (3/4), pp. 455-466.
Kline, P. M. and Moretti, E. (2011). Local Economic Development, Agglomeration Economies and The Big Push: 100 Years of Evidence from The Tennessee Valley Authority. NBER Working Paper 19293, 49 p.
Knop, H. (1974). The Tennessee Valley Authority Experience. Proceeding of The First Conference on Case Studies of Large Scale Planning Projects, Ed.: H. Knop, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria.
Knop, H. (1979). The Tennessee Valley Authority: A Field Study, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria,241 p.
Kyle, J. H. (1958). The Building of TVA, An Illustrated History. Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press, 162 p.
Logue, D. E. and MacAvoy, P. W. (2003). The Tennessee Valley Authority: Competing in Markets for Capital and Electricity in Pursuit of Solvency, Journal of Strategic Management Education, 1 (1), 48 p.
Martin, R. C. (1957). The Tennessee Valley Authority: A Study of Federal Control, Law and Contemporary Problems, 22, pp. 351-377.
McCaleb, J. W. (1999). Steawardship of Public Lands and Cultural Resources in The Tennessee Valley: A Critique of The Tennessee Valley Authority’s “New Deal”, Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 1 (1), pp. 1-27.
Miller, B. A. and Reidinger, R. B. (1998). Comprehensive River Basin Development: The Tennessee Valley Authority. World Bank Technical Paper No. 416, 86 p.
Molle, F. (2006). Planning and Managing Water Resources at The River-Basin Level: Emergence and Evolution of a Concept. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute, IWMI Comprehensive Assessment Research Report 16, 32 p.
NPS (United States Department of the Interior National Park Service) (2016). Historic Resources of the Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric System, 1933-1979. Reference No: 64501263, 174 p.
Owen, M. D. (2014). For the Progress of Man: The TVA, Electric Power, and the Environment, 1939-1969. Dissertation of Doctor of Philosophy in History in Vanderbilt University, Tennessee.
Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A. and Tomaney, J. (2006). Local and Regional Development. by RoutledgeTaylor & Francis Group, 312 p.
Seeber, L. (1974). History and Accomplishments of The TVA. in The Tennessee Valley Authority Experience (Ed.: H. Knop), pp. 1-38.
ST (State of Tennessee) (2008). Tennessee Blue Book 2007-2008. The Secretary of State. Authorization No. 305315, 680 p.
ST (2018). Tennessee Blue Book 2017-2018. The Secretary of State. Authorization No. 305315, 841 p.
TVA (2008). 2008 Environmental Policy. 16 p.
TVA (2010). Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan. 91 p.
TVA (2011a). Budget Proposal and Management Agenda. 40 p.
TVA (2011b). Natural Resource Plan. 299 p.
TVA (2011c). Environmental Impact Statement for TVA’s Integrated Resource Plan (TVA’s Environmental & Energy Future). 461 p.
TVA (2012). Annual Reports 2012. 192 p.
TVA (2015). Integrated Resource Plan. 199 p.
Wood, B. G., Isbell, S. B. and Larson, C. (2012). The Tennessee Valley Authority: The Cost Of Power, IMA Educational Case Journal, 5 (4), pp. 1-7.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Seçkin Yay., Ankara, 448 s.
Yudken, J. (2015). Potential Impacts of Privatizing the Tennessee Valley Authority. Economic Policy Institute Briefing Paper No: 402, 44 p.
Zumwalt, W. (1974). The TVA Power System Today. in The Tennessee Valley Authority Experience (Ed.: H. Knop), pp. 281-305.
[1] https://www.tva.com/Environment/Managing-the-River/Navigation-on-the-Tennessee-River (Erişim: 12.3.2018).
[2] https://www.tva.com/Energy/Our-Power-System (Erişim: 3.3.2018).