İŞ BİÇİMLENDİRMENİN GÖREV PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİNDE İŞE TUTULMA VE PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYENİN ROLÜ

Bu araştırmada, çalışanların iş biçimlendirmelerinin, görev performansına etkisinde psikolojik sermaye ve işe tutulmanın rolünü tespit etmek için oluşturulmuş hipotezlerin test edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma, hizmet sektöründe yer alan bir kuruluşun, merkez ve taşra teşkilatında görev yapan 697 katılımcıdan anket yöntemiyle elde edilen verilerin analizi ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırma sonucunda iş biçimlendirmenin görev performansını aynı yönde etkilediği ve işe tutulmanın, bu etkileşimde kısmi aracılık rolü olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Ayrıca psikolojik sermayenin işe tutulma-görev performansı ilişkisinde düzenleyici rolünün olduğu belirlenmiştir.

THE ROLE OF JOB ENGAGEMENT AND PSYCHOLOGİCAL CAPİTAL İN THE EFFECT OF JOB CRAFTİNG ON TASK PERFORMANCE

In this research, it is aimed to test the hypotheses created to determine the role of psychological capital and job engagement in the effect of job crafting of employees on task performance. The research was carried out by analyzing the data obtained by the survey method from 697 participants working in the central and provincial organization of an organization in the service sector. As a result of the research, it was revealed that job crafting affects task performance in the same direction and job engagement has a partial mediation role in this interaction. In addition, it has been determined that psychological capital has a moderator role in the relationship between job engagement and task performance.

___

  • Avey, J. B., Luthans, F. ve Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psycological capital: A positive resource for combaing employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management, 48(5), 677–693.
  • Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F. ve Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152.
  • Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S. ve Luthans, F. (2008). Can positive employees help positive organizational change? Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(1), 48–70.
  • Bakker, A.B. ve Bal, P.M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189-206.
  • Bakker, A. B. ve Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.
  • Bakker, A. B. ve Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
  • Bakker, A. B., Tims, M. ve Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378.
  • Berg, J. M., Wrzesniewski, A. ve Dutton, J. E. (2010). Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: When proactivity requires adaptivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 158–186.
  • Bipp, T. ve Demerouti, E. (2015). Which employees craft their jobs and how? Basic dimensions of personality and employees’ job crafting behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(4), 631–655.
  • Borman, W. C. ve Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. N. Schmitt ve W. C. Borman (Ed.), Personnel Selection in Organizations içinde (s. 71–98). Jossey-Bass.
  • Campbell, J. P. ve Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47–74.
  • Çelebi, M. A. (2019). Algılanan örgütsel kimliğin ve içsel-dışsal güdülenmenin rol içi ve rol dışı performansa etkileri: Konya Ovası projesi bölgesi üniversitelerinde bir araştırma (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi, Niğde
  • Çetin, F. (2019). Kaynak esaslı davranış kuramları. Ş. Yürür (Ed.), Örgütsel Davranış Kuramları içinde (s. 109–131). Ankara: Beta Yayıncılık.
  • Çetin, F. ve Basim, H. N. (2012). Örgütsel psikolojik sermaye: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 45(1), 121–137.
  • Çetin, F. ve Varoğlu, A. K. (2015). Psikolojik sermaye, performans, ayrılma niyeti ve iş tatmini etkileşimi: Cinsiyetin düzenleyici rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 2(2), 105–113.
  • Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan güçlendirmenin işgören performansı üzerine etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 1(9): 35–46.
  • Demerouti, E. Bakker, A. B. ve Gevers, J. M. P. (2015). Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of work engagement and flourishing. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 87–96.
  • Demerouti, E. ve Cropanzano, R. (2010). Form Thought to action: Emplyee work engagement and job performance. Arnold B. Bakker ve L. MP (Ed.), Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research içinde. Psychology Prss.
  • Fairchild, A. J. ve MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects. Prevention Science, 10(2), 87–99.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and- build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.
  • Gooty, J. M., Gavin, P., Johnson, M. ve Lance, F. D. (2009). In the eyes of the beholder: Transformational leadership, positive psychological capital, and performance. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15(4), 353–367.
  • Güler, M., Çetin, F. ve Basım, H. N. (2017). Duygusal emek-performans ı̇lı̇şkı̇sı̇nde ı̇şe tutulmanın aracılık rolü. 5.Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 330–338.
  • Güler, M., Çetin, F. ve Basım, H. N. (2019). İşe Tutulma Ölçeği çok kısa versiyonu (UWES-3) geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması: Alternatif bir versiyon (UWES-6) önerisi. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 6(2), 187–195.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2017). Kişi-çevre uyumu, örgütsel sosyalizasyon ve iş dizaynı uygulamaları Sığrı, Ü. ve Gürbüz, S. (Ed). Örgütsel davranış (4. Baskı) içinde (s. 193-196). Ankara: Beta Yayıncılık
  • Hackman, J. R. ve Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work Redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307–324.
  • Hu, L., ve Bentler, M., (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Ingusci, E., Callea, A., Cortese, C. G., Zito, M., Borgogni, L., Cenciotti, R., Colombo, L., Signore, F., Ciavolino, E. ve Demerouti, E. (2019). Self-efficacy and work performance: The role of job crafting in middle-age workers. International Journal of Business and Society, 20(2), 533-551.
  • Jaccard, J. ve Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. (2. baskı). California: Thousand Oaks.
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
  • Kappagoda, S., Othman, H. ve De Alwis, G. (2014). Psychological capital and job performance: The mediating role of work attitudes. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 2, 102–116.
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. 1999. Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empower-ment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58-74.
  • Knippenberg, D. V. (2000). Work motivation and performance: a social ıdentity perspective. Applied Psychology An International Review, 49(3), 357–371.
  • Kooij, D. T. A. M. Tims, M. ve Akkermans, J. (2017). The influence of future time perspective on work engagement and job performance: the role of job crafting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(1), 4–15. Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 6(1), 57–71.
  • Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M. ve Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387–393.
  • Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J. ve Peterson, S. J. (2010). The development and resulting performance impact of positive psychological capital. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1), 41–67.
  • Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B. ve Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541–572.
  • Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O. ve Li, W. (2005). The psychological capital of chinese workers: exploring the relationship with performance. Management and Organization Review, 1(2), 249–271.
  • Luthans, F., Luthans, K.W. ve Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: beyond human and social capital. Business Horizons, 47(1), 45–50.
  • Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: ınvesting in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143–160.
  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C. ve Avolio, B. J. (2006). Psychological capital: developing the human competitive edge. USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Lyons, P. (2008). The crafting of jobs and individual differences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 23(1–2), 25–36.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M. ve Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the produce and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.
  • Motowidlo, S. J. ve Scotter, J. R. V. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475–480.
  • Özdemir, Y. ve Turan, M. F. (2019). İş şekillendirme ve işe adanmışlık arasındaki ilişki: İlaç sektöründe satış pazarlama profesyonelleri üzerinde yapılan bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(3), 1346–1357.
  • Peterson, S. J., Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O. ve Zhang, Z. (2011). Psychological capital and employee performance: a latent growth modeling approach. Personnel Psychology, 64, 427–450.
  • Petrou, P., Demerouti, E. ve Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Job crafting in changing organizations: Antecedents and implications for exhaustion and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(4), 470–480.
  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A. ve Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617-35. Rotundo, M., Sackett, P. ve Smith, C. (2002). Performance to global ratings of job performance : a policy-capturing approach. Organization, 87(1), 66–80. Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N. ve Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102(314), 112–138.
  • Schaufeli, W.B. (2013). What is engagement? C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, A. Shantz, ve E. Soane (Ed.), Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice içinde (s. 1-37). London: Routledge.
  • Schaufeli, W. B. ve Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. ve Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V. ve Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.
  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. C. R. Snyder ve S. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology içinde (s. 3–9). NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Sigler, T. H. ve Pearson, C. M. (2000). Creating an empowering culture: examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. Journal of Quality Management, 5(5), 27–52.
  • Slemp, G. R. ve Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The job crafting questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2), 126–146.
  • Slemp, G. R. ve Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2014). Optimising employee mental health: the relationship between ıntrinsic need satisfaction, job crafting, and employee well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(4), 957–977.
  • Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J. ve Spychala, A. (2008). Job performance. J. Barling ve C. L. Cooper (Ed.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior, Volume 1: Micro approaches içinde (s. 427–447). Los Angeles: Sage. Tanyolaç, C. ve Şenyuva, Z. (2019). Duygusal olaylar teorisi. Ş. Yürür (Ed.), Örgütsel davranış kuramları içinde (s. 313–341). Ankra: Beta Yayıncılık.
  • Taylor, M. (2000). Communities in the lead: Power, organisational capacity and social capital. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 1019–1035.
  • Tims, M. ve Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1–9.
  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B. ve Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173–186.
  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B. ve Derks, D. (2014). Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy – Performance relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 490–507.
  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B. ve Derks, D. (2015). Job crafting and job performance: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 914–928.
  • Tims, M., Derks, D. ve Bakker, A. B. (2016). Job crafting and its relationships with person-job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 44–53.
  • Tyler, T. R. ve Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social ıdentity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361.
  • Vermooten, N., Boonzaier, B., ve Kidd, M. (2019). Job crafting, proactive personality and meaningful work: Implications for employee engagement and turnover intention. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 45, 1–14.
  • Viswesvaran, C. ve Ones, D. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216–226.
  • Walden, J., Jung, E. H. ve Westerman, C. Y. K. (2017). Employee communication, job engagement, and organizational commitment: A study of members of the Millennial Generation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29(2–3), 73–89.
  • Whetten, D., Felin, T. ve King, B. (2009). The practice of theory borrowing in organization studies: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Management, 35, 537–563.
  • Williams, K. D. ve Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 570–581.
  • Wingerden, J. Van Derks, D. ve Bakker, A. B. (2017). The impact of personel resources and job crafting interventions on work engagement and performance. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 51–67.
  • Wolf, H. (2004). Capital. G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia Of Social Theory içinde. Sage Publication.
  • Wrzesniewski, A. ve Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.
  • Wrzesniewski, A., Lobuglio, N., Dutton, J. E. ve Berg, J. M. (2013). Job crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work. Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology içinde (s. 281–302). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. ve Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 183–200.
  • Yavuz, M. ve Artan, İ. E. (2019). İş zanaatkârlığı (Job Crafting) kavramı: Türkçe iş zanaatkarlığı ölçeği’nin geliştirlmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 95–125.
  • Zhang, T. ve Li, B. (2020). Job crafting and turnover intention: The mediating role of work engagement and job satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(2), 1–9.
  • Zhang, C. ve Liu, L. (2020). The effect of job crafting to job performance. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1–10.
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-1658
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TURİZM SEKTÖRÜNDE BUMERANG YÖNETİCİLER: NEDEN GİTTİLER? NEDEN DÖNDÜLER?

Pınar ÇELİK ÇAYLAK, Nisa EKŞİLİ, Cenk TUFAN

ÜÇ BOYUTLU MERMER KESME PROBLEMİ İÇİN BİR TAM SAYILI DOĞRUSAL PROGRAMLAMA MODELİ

Gokhan YİLMAZ, Yusuf ŞAHİN

YEŞİL İŞLER ÜZERİNE YAPILAN ÇALIŞMALARIN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ İLE İNCELENMESİ

Şerife DURMAZ, Aydın ÇİVİLİDAĞ, Murşit IŞIK

KOBİ`LERDE STRATEJİK PAZARLAMA YÖNETİMİ: LÜLEBURGAZ ÖRNEĞİ

Onur ŞAYLAN, Yusuf ESMER, Pelin ÇELİK

HASTANELERDE ÇALIŞAN SAĞLIK PERSONELİNİN KAYIRMACILIK ALGILARI İLE ÖRGÜTSEL BAĞLILIKLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Hüseyin Tolga ÇAĞATAY, Zekai ÖZTÜRK

DOĞRULANMIŞ BRÜT KÜTLE UYGULAMASININ LİMANLAR VE İHRACATÇILAR ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ VE POLİTİKA ÖNERİSİNE İLİŞKİN BİR ANALİZ: “DEMOKRATİK TARTI”

Hüseyin TOPUZ, Hüseyin Ali ERSOY

TÜRK ÜNİVERSİTE WEBSİTELERİ, ULUSLARARASI ÖĞRENCİLERİN BİLGİ İHTİYAÇLARINI KARŞILAMA NOKTASINDA İŞLEVSEL Mİ?

Huseyin TUTAR

GRUPLAR ARASI TEMAS, SOSYAL BASKINLIK YÖNELİMİ VE ZENOFOBİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE ALGILANAN TEHDİDİN ROLÜ İZMİR KONAK ÖRNEĞİ

Sumeyra SARIDAĞ, Hamza Bahadır ESER

COVID-19 HANEHALKI ÇEVRE ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Huriye İrem KALAYCI KIRLIOĞLU, Sibel Büşra ÇAKIN, Mehmet KIRLIOĞLU

DİJİTALLEŞEN KAMU HİZMETLERİNDE E-DEMOKRASİ VE VATANDAŞLIK ANLAYIŞI: ENTROPİ TEMELLİ MABAC UYGULAMASI AB ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİ

Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Serkan DORU, Yaşam BALKU