ÖNDE GELEN ÜÇ DERGİ ÖZELİNDE DİL ÖĞRETİMİNDE TEKNOLOJİ KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Bu çalışma, son 10 yılda (2010-2019) üç adet bilgisayar destekli dil öğretimi odaklı amiral gemi dergisinde (Language Learning & Technology, CALL ve ReCALL) yayınlanan teknolojiyle dil öğrenimi araştırmaları üzerinde yapılan çalışmaları incelemektedir. Bu dergiler Sosyal Bilimler Atıf İndeksinde (SSCI) indekslenmektedir ve yalnızca teknolojinin dil öğreniminde kullanımı ile ilgili makaleler yayınlamaktadır. Makale seçimi için belirlenen ölçüt, çalışmaların bir dil alanında (örneğin ana dil becerileri, dilbilgisi, kelime bilgisi, kaygı ve özerklik) belirli bir teknolojik araç kullanmanın yararları üzerine deneysel kanıtlar sunması gerektiğidir. Yayınların eğilimlerini, metodolojilerini, teorilerini, araştırma odağını, kullanılan teknolojiyi ve dil öğrenme faydalarını izlemek için toplam 286 çalışma tespit edilmiş ve içerik analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, yaygın olarak kullanılan teknolojilerin derlem (veriye dayalı öğrenme), bilgisayar aracılı iletişim, sanal dünyalar, blog oluşturma, wiki'ler, tele-iş birliği ve altyazı olduğunu göstermiştir. Teknolojiden en çok yararlanan dil alanları; yazma, kelime bilgisi, konuşma, okuma, özerklik, telaffuz, dinleme, dilbilgisi, pragmatik, kaygı, hata düzeltme ve motivasyondur. Çalışmalarda teknolojiyi, dille ilgili yardım ve teşvik sağlayarak dil öğrenimini desteklemek için kullanıldığı bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar, teknolojiyi dil öğrenimine entegre etmenin bazı sonuçları doğrultusunda tartışılmaktadır.

AN ANALYSIS OF USING TECHNOLOGY IN LANGUAGE LEARNING IN THREE FLAGSHIP JOURNALS

This study probes into the researchstudies on language learning with technologypublished in three CALL-focused flagship journals(Language Learning & Technology, CALL, andReCALL) in the last 10 years (2010-2019). Thesejournals are indexed in the Social Science CitationIndex (SSCI) and they solely publish articles on theuse of technology in language learning. Theestablished criterion for article selection is that thestudies should provide empirical evidence on thebenefits of using a specific technological tool on alanguage area (e.g. main language skills, grammar,vocabulary, anxiety, and autonomy). A total of 286studies were identified and the content analysistechnique was used to track the publications‟ trends,methodologies, theories, research focus, thetechnology used, and language learning benefits.The findings showed that the commonly usedtechnologies were corpus (data-driven learning),computer-mediated communication (CMC), virtualworlds, blogging, wikis, telecollaboration, andcaptioning. The language areas that mostlybenefited from technology were writing,vocabulary, speaking, reading, autonomy,pronunciation, listening, grammar, pragmatics,anxiety, error correction, and motivation. Thestudies utilized technology mainly to supportlanguage learning by providing language-relatedassistance and encouragement. The results arediscussed in line with some implications forintegrating technology into language learning.

PDF

___

Akayoğlu, S. (2019). Theoretical frameworks used in CALL studies: A systematic review. Teaching English with Technology, 19(4), 104-118.
Beatty, K. (2013). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. New York, USA: Routledge.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.
Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 129– 142.
Burston, J. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning: A selected annotated bibliography of implementation studies 1994–2012. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 157–224.
Cárdenas-Claros, M. S., & Gruba, P. A. (2014). Listeners‟ interactions with help options in CALL.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 228–245.
Chan, H. W. (2016). Popular culture, English out-of-class activities, and learner autonomy among highly proficient secondary students in Hong Kong. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 1918-1923.
Chapelle, C. A. (2005). Interactionist SLA theory n CALL research. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petre (Eds.), CALL Research Perspectives (pp. 53-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. Modern Language Journal, 100( Supplement 2016), 64– 80.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-331.
Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(02), 197–216.
Egbert, J. L. (2005). Conducting research on CALL. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 3–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Friðriksdóttir, K. (2018) The impact of different modalities on student retention and overall engagement patterns in open online courses, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1-2), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1381129
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014) Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126-149.
Hockly, N. (2013). Mobile learning. ELT Journal, 67, 80-84.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (2016). Theory in computer-assisted language learning research and practice. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology (pp. 24-38). Abingdon, Oxon, United Kingdom: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657899
Illes, E. (2012). Learner autonomy revisited. ELT Journal, 66(4), 505-513.
Kartal, G. (2019). What‟s up with WhatsApp? A critical analysis of mobile instant messaging research in language learning. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(2),352-365. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.599138
Kern, R. G. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 183– 210.
Kessler, G. (2010). When they talk about CALL: Discourse in a required CALL class? CALICO Journal, 27(2), 376–392.
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Liu, M. Navarrete, C. C., Maradiegue, E., & Wivagg, J. (2014). Mobile learning and English language learners: A case study of using iPod touch as a teaching and learning tool. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(3), 373-403.
Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum: A study in second language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Park, K., & Kinginger, C. (2010). Writing/thinking in real time: Digital video and corpusquery analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 31-50.
Perraton, H. (2000). Rethinking the research agenda. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v1i1.5
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning and Technology, 20(2), 143–154.
Richert, A. (1991). Case methods and teacher education: Using cases to teach teacher reflection. In B. R. Tabachnich & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Issues and practices in inquiry-oriented teacher education (pp. 130-150). London: Falmer.
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). Review of research on mobile language learning in authentic environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 284– 303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1308383
Son, J. B. (2018). Technology in English as a foreign language (EFL) teaching. In J. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–7). Malden, MA: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0448
Tellez, K., & Waxman, H. (2006). Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policies & practices. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artefact: the emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–23.
Yi, M. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Selfefficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 59, 431–449.
Zeng, S. (2015). English Learning with Web 2.0: An investigation into Chinese undergraduates’ technology (non)-use and perspectives. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), London: UCL Institute of Education.