Dijital Teknolojilerin İşbirlikli Tasarıma Olan Etkisi

Son yıllarda meydana gelen teknolojik gelişmeler sayesinde artık mimarlar sanal ortamlarda tasarım yapabilmektedirler. Dijital teknolojiler sayesinde artık farklı coğrafyalardaki profesyoneller işbirliği imkânları bulabilmekte, zaman ve mekân sınırlamaları ortadan kalkmaktadır. Tasarım alanında dijital teknolojilerin kullanılmasının yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte, tasarım betimlemelerinin niteliği de değişmiş, tasarımcının davranışını anlamaya yönelik araştırmalar yaygınlaşmaya başlamıştır. Bu makalede mimarların, iki ve üç boyutlu betimleme üretimleri ile yüz yüze ve uzaktan erişimli çalışma durumlarının kıyaslandığı ampirik bir çalışma sunulacaktır. Protokol analizi yönteminin uygulandığı bu çalışmada mimarların, dijital mecralarda verilen bir tasarım problemi üzerinde çalışırken ürettikleri betimlemeler, diyaloglar ve temsil sistemleriyle olan etkileşimleri incelenmiştir. Teknolojinin tasarım bilişi, iletişim ve etkileşim üzerindeki etkileri karşılaştırmalı olarak ele alınmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, eskiz ve 3B modelleme kullanılan teknolojiden bağımsız benzer bir tasarım sürecini desteklerken, aynı ve farklı yerde bulunarak paylaşılan bir tasarım ürünü üzerinde çalışma farklı iletişim ve etkileşim davranışlarını desteklemektedir.

The Impact of Digital Technologies On Collaborative Design

Architects can design in virtual environments as a result of the technological developments that have taken place in recent years. The parties can work together in remote locations without the restrictions of being in the same place and time zones by using digital technologies. With the proliferation of employment of digital technologies in design field, design representations have also changed, and the research in this field has become pervaded. In this paper, we present an empirical study of comparison on designing with multi-dimensional external representations and working in face-to-face and remote locations. The protocol analysis is the method of the study, the design dialogues of participants and their interaction with the given interfaces are investigated. The impact of the technology on design cognition, communication and interaction is investigated. The results show that 1) sketching and 3D modelling environments support similar design process regardless of the used technology and 2)working on the shared design representation in the same and remote locations support different communication and interaction behavior

PDF

___

Akın, Ö. (1982) “Representation And Architecture”, Ed: Akın, Ö.ve Weinel, E. (editörler) Representation And Architecture, Information Dynamics, Inc.: Maryland. 1-26.
Akın, Ö ve Lin, C (1995) “Design Protocol Data And Novel Design Decisions”. Design Studies, 16,(2), 211-236.
Aldrich, C. (2004) Simulations And The Future Of Learning: An Innovative Approach To E-Learning, Pfeiffer. ISBN: 0787969621.
Angulo, A., Fillwalk, J. ve Velasco, G. D. (2009) “Collaborating InA Virtual Architectural Environment: The Las Americas Virtual Design Studio (LAVDS) Populates Second Life”, In From Modern To Digital: The Challenges Of a Transition, Proceedings Of The 13th Congress Of The IberoAmerican Society Of Digital Graphics, s.363-365.
Azuma, R. (1997) “A Survey Of Augmented Reality”, In Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 4 (August 1997),355-385.
Bergig, O.H., Nate El-Sana, J. ve Billinghurst, M. (2009) “In-Place 3D Sketching For Authoring And Augmenting Mechanical Systems,” In Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2009. ISMAR 2009. 8th IEEE International Symposium on, s. 87-94.
Cohen, J. (1960) “A Coefficient Of Agreement For Nominal Scales”, Education And Psychological Measurement, 20,37-46.
Chase, S. (2008) “Virtual Worlds As Collaborative Environments For Design And Manufacturing: From Idea To Product”, In: Proceedings Of 5th INTUITION International Conference.
Cross, N., Christiaans, H. ve Dorst, K. (editörler) (1996) Analysing Design Activity, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. ve Beale, R. (1993) Human-Computer Interaction, Printice Hall.
Dorta, T. S. (2008) “Design Flow And Ideation” International Journal Of Architectural Computing, 6(3),299-316.
Ericsson, K.A. ve Simon, H.A. (1984) Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports As Data, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Gaver, W.W. (1991) “Technology Affordances”, Proceedings Of SIGCHI Conference On Human FactorsIn Computing Systems: Reaching Through Technology. New Orleans, Louisiana, US, ACM Press, 79-84.
Gero, J.S. ve Neill, T.M. (1998) “An Approach To The Analysis Of Design Protocols” Design Studies, 19, 21-61 Doi:10.1016/ S0142-694X(97)00015-X
Gibson, J. (1997) “The Theory Of Affordances”, Ed.: Shaw, R. And Bransford, J. (editörler) Perceiving, Acting And Knowing Toward An Ecological Psychology, Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum Assoc., 67-82.
Goel, V. (1995) Sketches Of Thought, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Gross, M.D. (1996) “The Electronic Cocktail Napkin—A Computational Environment For Working With Design Diagrams”Design Studies, 17(1), 53-69.
Gül, L.F. (2007). “Understanding Collaborative Design in Different Environments: Comparing Face-to-Face Sketching to Remote Sketching and 3D Virtual Worlds”, School of Architecture, Design Science and Planning, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, PhD Thesis, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Gül, L.F. ve Maher, M.L. (2009) “Co-Creating External Design Representations: Comparing Face-To-Face Sketching to Designing in Virtual Environments”, Co-Design. Vol. 5, Issue 2, p. 117–138.
Gül, L.F., Williams, A. ve Gu, N.(2010), “Understanding the Role of Virtual Environments in Collaborative Design”, in Carrara, G., Fioravanti, A. ve Kalay, Y.E. (editörler) Collaborative Working Environments for Architectural Design, ISBN: 978-88- 6060-261-9. Palombi Editori, Sapienza Universita di Roma, Italy, pp. 105-117.
Gül L.F. (2018). “Studying Gesture-Based Interaction On A Mobile Augmented Reality Application For Co-Design Activity”, Journal On Multimodal User Interfaces, no. November, pp.1-16.
He, F. ve Han, S. (2006) “A Method And Tool For Human-Human Interaction And Instant Collaboration”, In CSCW-Based CAD, Computers In Industry, 57, 740-751.
Henrysson, A., Billinghurst, M. ve Ollila, M. (2005) “Face To Face Collaborative AR On Mobile Phones”, Paper Presented At The Mixed And Augmented Reality, 2005. Proceedings. Fourth IEEE And ACM International Symposium On.
Kvan, T., West, R. ve Vera, A. (1997) “Tools And Channels Of Communication: Dealing With The Effects Of Computer Mediati on On Design Communication”, 1st International Conference On Creative Collaboration İn Virtual Communities. University Of Sydney.
Lawson, B. (1997) How Designers Think, London. Routledge.
Lau, K.H. ve Maher, M.L. (1999) “Architectural Design and Virtual Worlds”, ACADIA Quarterly 18:4, 4-6.
Linstone, H.A. ve Turoff, M. (1975) The Delphi Method: Techniques And Applications, Addison-Wesley Educational Pub.
Maher, M.L., Bilda, Z. ve Gül, L.F. (2006) “Impact Of Collaborative Virtual Environments On Design Behaviour” Ed: Gero J. (editör) Design Computing And Cognition’06, Pp. 305-321. Springer, Netherlands.
Maher, M.L. ve Simoff, S.J. (1999) “Variations On The Virtual Design Studio” In: Proceedings Of Fourth International Workshop On CSCW In Design, Universite De Technologie De Compiegne, Pp 159-165.
Milgram, P. ve Kishino, F. (1994) “A Taxonomy Of Mixed Reality Visual Displays” Paper Presented At The IEICE Transactions On Information Systems.
Mitchell, W.J. (2001) “Roll Over Euclid: How Frank Gehry Designs And Builds” Ed.: Frank Gehry, Architect, J Fiona Ragheb (editör) New York: The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, 2001 P. 354.
Norman, DA. (1998) The Psychology Of Everyday Things, New York, Basic Books.
Percival, S. (2008) In World Travel Guide: Second Life, Pearson.
Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think İn Action, New York, Basic Books.
Schön, D.A. ve Wiggins, G. (1992) “Kinds Of Seeing And Their Functions in Designing” Design Studies, 13,(2), 135.
Segal, L., (1995) “Designing Team Workstations: The Choreography Of Teamwork” Ed: Hancock, P., Flach, J., Caird, J. ve Vicente, K. (editörler), Local Applications Of The Ecological Approach To Human-Machine Systems, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 392-415.
Suwa, M., Purcell, T. ve Gero, J. (1998) “Macroscopic Analysis Of Design Processes Based On A Scheme For Coding Designers’ Cognitive Actions”, Design Studies, 19(4) P. 455.
Tang, H.H., Lee, Y.Y. ve Gero, J.S. (2011) “Comparing Collaborative Co-Located And Distributed Design Processes In Digital And Traditional Sketching Environments: A Protocol Study Using The Function–Behaviour–Structure Coding Scheme” Design Studies, 32(1), 1-29.
Tversky, B., Suwa, M., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Stolte, C., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., Klingner, J., Daniel, M-P., Lee, P. ve Haymaker, J. (2003) “Sketches For Design And Design Of Sketches” Ed: Lindermann, U (editör) Human Behaviour İn Design: Individuals, Teams, Tools. Germany: Springer- Verlag. 79-86.
Vyas, D., Chisalita, C.M. ve Van Der Veer, G.C. (2006) “Affordances In Interaction”, ACM Proceeding Of The 13th European Conference On Cognitive Ergonomics: Trust And Control In Complex Socio-Technical Systems, 250:92-99.
Yee, B., Ning, Y. ve Lipson, H. (2009) “Augmented Reality In-Situ 3D Sketching Of Physical Objects”, Paper Presented At The Intelligent UI Workshop On Sketch Recognition.